To The Moon

Yes, Intel and AMD can still hold most desktop dominance in the near term, but their moat is clearly weakening. NVIDIA’s threat is strongest in premium AI PCs, creator laptops, workstations, and developer machines, not ordinary office desktops yet. RTX Spark/Arm needs Windows software compatibility, OEM scale, pricing, battery proof, enterprise support, and gaming/app optimisation before it can truly replace x86 broadly.  For Intel, the risk is bigger: its desktop moat is already under pressure from weak execution, AMD competition, and ARM momentum. For AMD, the threat is less existential because it has stronger x86 performance credibility and can still ride AI PCs with Ryzen + Radeon/NPU. DSX is separate but important. It strengthens NVIDIA’s AI infrastructure ecosystem by helping bu

$Marvell Technology(MRVL)$  I would not chase MRVL after a 32% one-day surge, even if the long-term ASIC story remains compelling. The bullish case is clear: Hyperscalers increasingly want custom AI chips to complement, not replace, NVIDIA GPUs. Marvell is a major beneficiary through custom silicon, networking, interconnects, and optical infrastructure. Jensen Huang's public endorsement adds credibility to the ASIC/XPU growth narrative. Alongside Broadcom, MRVL is one of the purest ways to play the custom AI silicon trend. The risk is valuation and expectations. A single CEO endorsement does not create a trillion-dollar market cap overnight. After a 30%+ gap-up, the stock is pricing in years of future growth. Even great companies can deliver

A 3.8% drop alone would not be enough for me to change my view on Alphabet. The key issue is whether the market believes AI capex is creating long-term value faster than it is consuming capital. If Alphabet can maintain strong growth in Search, Cloud, YouTube and AI services, a temporary increase in spending is easier to justify. What matters more than the share issuance headline is: Whether AI revenue growth accelerates. Whether Google Cloud margins remain healthy. Whether Gemini and AI-powered Search monetise successfully. Whether capex growth eventually slows relative to revenue growth. For a long-term investor, I would become increasingly interested if the pullback expanded into the 10-15% range from recent highs, assuming fundamentals remained intact. At that point, sentiment may be p

$iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF(IGV)$ $VanEck Semiconductor ETF(SMH)$  $Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund(XLK)$  🚀💻📈 Tech Leadership Stretches Further as ETFs Hit Extreme Levels 📈💻🚀 📊 Momentum remains firmly concentrated in technology as software, semiconductors and AI-linked sectors continue to attract the bulk of investor capital. $IGV now leads all major sector ETFs, trading 25% above its 50-day moving average. Close behind are $SMH at 24% and $XLK at 23%, highlighting just how powerful the technology-led rally has become. 📈 The most extended ETFs versus their 50DMA: • $IGV (Software): +25% • $SMH (Semiconductors): +24% • $XLK (Tec

$APPLIED DIGITAL CORP(APLD)$ $TeraWulf Inc.(WULF)$  $NEBIUS(NBIS)$  🚀📉🔥 The Most Crowded Bear Bets in AI and Quantum Computing 🔥📉🚀 The short interest story remains concentrated in the market’s hottest themes, and that should make investors pay attention. While headlines continue focusing on AI infrastructure, data centres, crypto compute and quantum computing, short sellers have quietly doubled down against many of the sector’s biggest winners. I’m seeing a fascinating divergence emerge. In many cases, bearish positioning has surged dramatically even as share prices continue pushing higher. That means conviction remains strong on both sides of

$Lumentum(LITE)$ （定投項目） LITE(Lumentum) vs GLW(康寧)：產業鏈上下遊關係、競合格局（2026最新） **核心定論：二者並非直接全線競爭，多數場景是上下游供應夥伴；僅在少數被動光器件、CPO配套零組件小範圍競爭。整體：GLW在光纖/光纜/被動玻璃材料絕對領先，LITE在雷射光源(主動晶片)全球獨霸，各自壟斷自身賽道**。 ## 一、產業鏈位置完全錯位（為什麼大多是合作而非競爭） ### 1、康寧GLW：光通信「底層材料+光纖+被動器件」（產業上游基建） 產品鏈：石英原料→預製棒→單模/特種光纖→室內外光纜→高密度跳線、連接器、光配架、CPO玻璃波導基材、空芯光纖、多芯光纖。 - 核心輸出：**光的傳輸介質（玻璃光纖）**，沒有光纖，雷射光無法傳輸； - 客戶：雲廠(Meta/微軟)、電信運營商、**LITE等光模廠（LITE採購康寧特種光纖做模組）**、博通、矽光晶片廠； - 市場地位：全球光纖市佔≈35%~40%，北美本土超50%，行業絕對龍頭。 ### 2、LITE(Lumentum)：光通信「主動光源晶片+雷射器件」（發光源，光模心臟） 產品鏈：EML雷射晶片、CW連續波雷射、VCSEL、高速光收發芯片、少量中低端光模塊。 - 核心輸出：**產生光訊號的發光晶片**，是光模塊最貴零件； - 市場地位：**全球高速EML雷射市佔50%~60%**，AI 800G/1.6T光模的第一大光源供應商，AAOI、Finisar、中際旭創等全球九成光模廠都向LITE採購雷射晶元； - 自身很少自產光纖，成品光纖幾乎外採康寧/住友。 > **產業邏輯：LITE做「發光」，GLW做「傳光」，天然互補，7成業務是供應鏈合作**。 ## 二、雙方

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ （定投項目） 特斯拉創辦人完整史實：**法定初始創辦人≠馬斯克，但他是讓特斯拉活下來、成為巨頭的靈魂締造者（所以市面常有「真正創辦人是馬斯克」的說法）** ## 一、法律註冊：2003年登記創辦人是兩位工程師 **馬丁·艾伯哈德、馬克·塔彭寧，2003年7月1日在加州正式註冊Tesla Motors**，自掏資金立項、定名特斯拉、確立「高性能電動跑車」原始路線、研發初代Roadster原型車，**此時馬斯克和公司毫無關聯**。 1. 2004年才經電動車廠商引薦，馬斯克參加A輪融資，**獨自領投630萬美元，成為最大股東、董事長**，不擔任創辦人、非發起人； 2. 2007年創始CEO艾伯哈德因產能、成本爭執離職，塔彭寧隨後出走；2008年特斯拉瀕臨破產，馬斯克掏盡個人餘錢接盤、出任CEO，才救活瀕臨倒閉的特斯拉。 ## 二、為什麼「很多資料主張馬斯克才是真正創辦人」？三大關鍵原因 ### 1. 2009年官司和解：取得「聯合創辦人」法定頭銜 艾伯哈德曾控告馬斯克擅自自稱創辦人，庭外和解後，**法院認定5人並列聯合創辦人：艾伯哈德、塔彭寧、馬斯克、斯特勞貝爾、伊恩·萊特**，馬斯克從法律層面正式擁有創辦人資格，這是他對外自稱創辦人的合法依據。 ### 2. 原始創辦人只搭起骨架，馬斯克重塑整間公司靈魂 - 初代創辦人目標：只做小眾高價電動超跑（Roadster），定位奢侈品小廠； - 馬斯克改寫企業使命：**加速全球永續能源轉型，從超跑向下普及平價電車（Model S→Model3→Model Y）**，垂直整合電池、自駕、動力研發，把一間瀕臨倒閉的小車企變成萬億市值龍頭； - 2008年破產關頭：全靠馬斯克砸入數千萬美元個人資金，沒有他

The Software Shakeout: Palantir & ServiceNow Face the Brutal Iron Laws of Valuation Perfection 🌟🌟🌟A sharp volume driven AI software retreat has slammed the sector, dragging $Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$  down 5% and $ServiceNow(NOW)$  tumbling 6% recently. What happened? The sharp sudden retreats hitting Palantir and Service Now are being driven by a combination of new US regulatory actions, intensifying institutional capital rotation into physical hardware and an existential macro narrative shift regarding the survival of software models. The Regulatory Shockwave : Trump's Pre Release AI Mandate  The Executive Blueprint

$Singtel(Z74.SI)$    SingTel - I think price has more or less hitting the bottom price, likely to see a rebound happening anytime. At, 4.34, yield is ab8ut 4.26 percent of which I think is quite decent. Hopefully, a nice rebound and bringher back to above 4.60. Pls dyodd. Oversold rebound! She may rise up to 4.50 to cover the Gapped and then rise higher towards 4.63 and above. Pls dyodd. SingTel - I think boat is back. Gd price to accumulate at 4.36, yield is about 4.24 percent better than CPF OA. Pls dyodd. The company show hands! Bought back 6m share . She is being sold down to 4.59, looks rather interesting! She may go down to test the recent low of 4.46. A rebound may likely happen. Pls dyodd. XD 31st July for 10.3 cents dividend.

  Everyone talks about NVIDIA GPUs. Very few are talking about the MASSIVE power revolution happening behind them. ⚡ Why are AI data centers moving to 800V High-Voltage DC (HVDC)? Because we've hit the limits of physics. In the old server world, 12V and 48V power systems were good enough. But AI racks packed with GPUs now consume enormous amounts of power. Higher power at low voltage = massive current. And massive current creates 2 huge problems: 🔥 1. Heat Explosion Power losses increase by I²R. Double the current and heat losses can increase 4x. Data centers end up wasting huge amounts of electricity just generating heat. 🧱 2. Thick Copper Everywhere More current requires larger cables. More copper means: • Higher costs • More weight • Less rack space • More installation complexity T

$Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares(TSLL)$ 特斯拉六大核心競爭壁壘（2026現況，從製造成本→軟體數據→生態全鏈獨佔） 特斯拉競爭力本質：**全產業鏈垂直整合+數據自增長閉環+製造工業革新+獨立補能生態**，傳統車廠、新勢力很難單點複製，分成六大模塊。 ## 一、垂直全鏈自研：從礦→電芯→晶片→軟體一體化（成本底層優勢） 多數車廠零件外採、電池向寧德時代/LG採購，特斯拉自上至下關鍵環節自產自研： 1. **上游礦料精煉**：自建鋰精煉廠，繞開中游冶煉廠溢價，平抑鋰鈷原料週期波動； 2. **電池自研自產**：4680無極耳大圓柱電芯+乾式電極工藝、CTC電池底盤一體化，電池直接做車身結構件，省殼體與模組空間，同體積提升續航、壓低整車自重； 3. **三電全自研**：永磁同步油冷電機（效率＞97%）、全自研BMS電池管理系統，動力能耗行業頂尖； 4. **自駕晶片自製**：HW3/HW4車載FSD晶片、Dojo超算全自主設計，不依賴英偉達、英飛凌外購方案； 5. **整車軟體全原生開發**：車機OS、動力控制、自駕、熱管理代碼自研，OTA不受第三方軟件商牽制。 **效果**：同級別車型，物料成本較豪華電動車低15%～25%，定價靈活、毛利穩居行業第一。 ## 二、製造工藝顛覆：一體壓鑄+超級工廠，重塑造車成本曲線 ### 1. 巨型一體壓鑄（Giga Press） 6000～9000噸壓鑄機把原本數十塊後地板鈑金，一次性壓成單個鑄件：零件從70+縮至1件、焊點幾乎清零、生產時長由數小時壓縮至3分鐘，整車製造成本、人工、廠房佔用同步下降。搭配4680的CTC結構，車身輕量化+剛度雙提升。 ### 2. 超級工廠精益產線 上海、德州、柏林等超

Hello everyone! Today i want to share some option strategies with you! 1 $Alphabet(GOOGL)$ filled that gap at 355 in pre-market today. That said, there's another gap down at 305. - Gonna write cash-secured puts at the 340 volume bar, June 18 expiry. - If Google drops below 340, then will write cash-secured puts at the 305 gap. The goal is to add to long position by DCAing in via CSPs if assigned. 2 Adding $Everspin Technologies Inc(MRAM)$ to this list now that its come back down and seems to finding a new base. Will write a bunch of cash-secured puts against it for entry at lower strikes. 😍 Been eyeing Tiger merch but short on Tiger Coins? Now's your chance. 🎁 We’ve select