To The Moon

📊 Market Recap As of September 29, 2026 (US Eastern Time), Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd closed at $192.67, down -8.67% (-$18.30). The stock now sits approximately 37.6% below its 52-week high of $308.67 and is nearing the key $190 floor after a sharp pullback from the $240 resistance zone. 🚀 Key Drivers AI Networking Sentiment Shift: Broader semiconductor and AI infrastructure stocks faced profit-taking, with high-valuation names like Credo bearing the brunt of risk-off sentiment. Capital Outflow Pressure: Five-day capital flow data shows consecutive net outflows, including a massive -$24.89 million outflow on September 25, signaling institutional de-risking ahead of quarter-end. Valuation Reset: With a forward P/E of 33.48 versus a historical average of 124.48, the market is recalib

📊 Market Recap As of September 29, 2026 (ET), 'GRAB' closed at $3.095, down -1.12%. The stock is now trading approximately 13.1% above its 52-week low of $2.74 but remains -53.1% below its 52-week high of $6.60. Following a powerful insider-buying rally that pushed shares up nearly 10% last week, GRAB is consolidating near its immediate pivot, with market focus returning to Southeast Asia's digital economy monetization and profitability trajectory. 🚀 Key Drivers Insider Confidence: CEO and co-founder Anthony Tan purchased roughly 10.35 million Class A shares at an average price of $2.8866, valued at approximately $29.9 million. President and COO Alex Hungate also bought about $867,000 worth of shares, reinforcing strong management conviction. Rally Momentum Fading: The insider-buying catal

📊 Market Recap As of the latest U.S. Eastern session close, 'IONQ' finished at $44.58, down -1.98% from the prior close of $45.48. The session high reached $47.91 before sellers stepped in, leaving the stock about 47.3% below its 52-week high of $84.64 but still well above its 52-week low of $25.89. 🚀 Key Drivers Quantum Momentum Fade: After a sharp multi-day advance, IONQ pulled back from the $47.91 intraday high as short-term profit-taking accelerated into the close. Elevated Short Interest: Short volume ratio has remained elevated near 17%-23% in recent sessions, keeping volatility high and amplifying directional swings. Speculative Growth Repricing: With a price-to-sales ratio near 68.91 and negative forward earnings, the stock remains highly sensitive to shifts in risk appetite for hi

📊 Market Recap As of September 29, 2026, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. closed at $72.19, down -2.38%. The stock remains well below its 52-week high of $151.00, trading roughly 52% off that peak, while holding above the 52-week low of $37.57. The recent price action suggests a volatile consolidation phase, with resistance near $91.10 and support around $66.68 from late September. 🚀 Key Drivers Space Infrastructure Sentiment: Investor focus remains on Rocket Lab’s expanding launch cadence and space systems backlog, though no major company-specific catalyst emerged in the latest session. Profit-Taking Pressure: After prior strength, capital flow data shows net outflows in four of the last five sessions, signaling cautious positioning among short-term traders. High Short Interest: The short volume rati

📊 Market Recap As of the close on September 29, 2026 (Eastern Time), 'MRVL' finished at $251.90, down -3.83% on the day. The stock now sits approximately 23.6% below its 52-week high of $329.88, with intraday trading confined to a range of $248.14 to $261.78. Today's decline pushed shares back toward the lower end of a multi-week consolidation zone, signaling increased caution among AI and data-center semiconductor investors. 🚀 Key Drivers Profit-taking after high-level divergence: Recent RSI readings peaked above 77 on the 6-day frame, leaving the stock vulnerable to a sharp pullback once momentum stalled. AI peer valuation reset: Broader semiconductor sentiment cooled as investors rotated out of high-multiple AI names, pressuring 'MRVL' despite stable fundamentals. Short interest decline

📊 Market Recap As of September 29, 2026 (Eastern Time), Meta Platforms, Inc. closed at $715.62, down -4.79% on the day. The stock remains about 8.2% below its 52-week high of $779.82, after an intraday swing from $713.19 to $750.58. The sharp pullback reflects mounting legal and product-safety concerns, even as the AI-driven momentum from the previous week cools. 🚀 Key Drivers New Mexico legal blow: Meta lost a case tied to the Cambridge Analytica data scandal, with the state attorney general seeking civil penalties of up to $219 billion, creating a major overhang on sentiment. Muse security concerns: Meta's AI assistant Muse was reportedly exposed to a security vulnerability that could allow access to users' cloud files and emails, raising doubts about the safety of its next-generation AI

$Meta Platforms, Inc.(META)$   $META Ran 30%+ in September. I'm Selling the $680 Put, Not Chasing the Stock Meta was the loudest name in my feed all month, and for good reason. Muse, its personal AI assistant, launched on Sept 8 and climbed to the top of the US App Store's free charts. Connect 2026 then showed Muse running hands-free on the new Ray-Ban and Oakley glasses. The stock went from the mid-$550s in late August to a 52-week high of $779.82 last Thursday. Piper Sandler, TD Cowen and Canaccord all raised targets this week, into the $865-$950 range. Then Friday reminded everyone that nothing goes up in a straight line. META closed at $751.66, down 3.3% on the day, and slipped another few dollars after hours. I don't want to buy a stock

$Bloom Energy Corp(BE)$ just jumped 8.27% — but the bigger story may be what happens AFTER the GPUs arrive. Everyone has been focused on chips, servers and data centres. But there is another bottleneck becoming increasingly difficult to ignore: ⚡ Power. Bloom Energy is positioning its fuel-cell technology as an onsite power solution for AI data centres, helping operators avoid some of the delays involved in connecting massive new facilities to the traditional grid. And the timing is interesting. Bloom recently unveiled an 800V DC-native power architecture designed around next-generation AI infrastructure. The company says its system can reduce non-compute capital costs for a 1GW AI data centre by $3.6 billion, although those figures are Bloom’s own

For me, a cash-secured put is not simply a strategy to collect premium—it is a commitment to buy a stock at a price I have already decided is attractive. I prefer OTM strikes with enough downside buffer, typically giving myself time for theta to work without taking unnecessary assignment risk. But the biggest lesson is that a high premium often comes with a reason: elevated IV usually means the market expects bigger moves. I also prefer limit orders, especially when spreads are wide. A few cents of execution difference may look insignificant, but repeated across multiple contracts, it adds up. Most importantly, I treat assignment as part of the original plan, not a failure. Before entering, I ask one question: If this stock falls another 30%, would I still be comfortable owning 100 shares

I think Wednesday was a good reminder that rates can temporarily override fundamentals. Strong PMI pushed yields higher, and with the 10-year above 5%, growth and semiconductor stocks faced renewed valuation pressure. I would not treat one red day as a change in the long-term AI thesis. For $Meta Platforms, Inc.(META)$ , I find the Muse monetization angle more interesting than downloads alone. A transaction fee could turn engagement into revenue, but I want to see the actual fee structure and user retention before changing my view. For me, patience matters. I am still comfortable accumulating quality AI and semiconductor names during meaningful pullbacks, but I prefer scaling in gradually rather than chasing strength. Earnings, cash flow and AI m

I find the memory strength interesting because $SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$ , $Micron Technology(MU)$ and $SK hynix(SKHY)$ all moved higher while the broader chip chain also remained positive. To me, this looks more like money staying within the AI semiconductor theme rather than a simple rotation away from chips. For Micron, the September 30 earnings will be important. I want to see whether margins and guidance can support the current memory-cycle optimism. A strong report could reinforce the thesis, while weaker guidance would make me more cautious. I am still bullish on semiconductors over the longer term, but I prefer to accumulate gradually during pullbacks rather t

🌟🌟🌟 $SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$ pullback isn't a structural breakdown.  It is a healthy breathing moment for a red hot sector. Beneath yesterday's drop lies an economic reality.  SanDisk latest revenue soared 175% year over year to USD 20.3 billion, with adjusted EPS erupting to USD 70.88. SanDisk has literally signed away two thirds  of next year's manufacturing output to long term enterprise agreements. Yet Wall Street is pricing SanDisk at a conservative forward Price to Earnings (P/E ratio) at just 8 times future profits. For long term investors, a 24% discount from recent all time highs is a gift. Another alternative strategy is to buy $Roundhill Memory ETF(DRAM)$ which includes

The AI Fortress Cracks — 30Y Yields at 5.44% Drag the Mag 7 into the Same Fire That Torched Everything Else One thing has held this market up for months and the legs are getting wobbly. Mega-cap Tech and AI absorbed the capital while everything rate-sensitive got crushed. NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, GOOGL, AMZN, META, AVGO — the Mag 7 and the AI complex (SMCI, ARM, TSM) vacuumed up every free dollar. The rest of the tape? Rate-sensitive cyclicals, regional banks, REITs, homebuilders, small caps — all left for dead. That worked as long as AI stayed insulated from the macro. The 30Y just hit 5.44%, its highest since 2004. Nasdaq futures are down close to a point. That is not a minor tick. When the long end of the curve is screaming like this, duration gets repriced and the high-multiple growth names f

For years, one of the simplest stablecoin theses has been: Money moves onchain → traditional payment rails become less important → Visa and Mastercard get disrupted. Makes sense. But something happened this week that made me question whether we’ve got the second half of that equation wrong. On September 22, SoFi announced it was moving its entire debit and credit card program onto stablecoin settlement using SoFiUSD. Expected annualised volume? More than US$25 billion. But here’s the interesting part. It isn’t bypassing Mastercard. It’s settling through Mastercard’s global payments network. That sent me down a rabbit hole. And I think there might be a much bigger story developing underneath the stablecoin boom. 💳 THE DISRUPTORS ARE MEETING THE TOLL ROADS Stablecoins solve some genuine prob