To The Moon

📊 **Closing Market Snapshot** As of June 3, 2026, Oracle (ORCL) closed at $244.58, declining -1.44% (-$3.57) for the day. The stock is currently trading approximately 29.3% below its 52-week high of $345.72, indicating a significant consolidation phase from previous highs. 🚀 **Core Market Drivers** The recent price action is primarily driven by the ongoing narrative around Oracle's aggressive expansion in AI and cloud infrastructure, which continues to attract investor interest despite broader market volatility. Profit-taking after a strong multi-week rally has contributed to the current pullback. 🎯 **Price Movement Probability Forecast** **Short-Term (1-2 Weeks) Upside/Downside Probability** | Direction | Probability | Price Range | Magnitude | |---|---|---|---| | **Upside** | **60%** | $

📊 **Closing Market** On June 3rd, SanDisk (SNDK) closed at $1,716.36, down -2.56% for the day. The closing price is approximately 4.9% below its 52-week high of $1,804.00. The stock is in a consolidation phase after a massive run-up, digesting gains near the $1700-$1750 range. 🚀 **Core Market Drivers** The stock's recent volatility is driven by the powerful narrative of the "AI Storage Supercycle." Analysts from firms like Citi and Barclays have recently raised price targets significantly, citing SNDK's central role in this trend. However, profit-taking and valuation concerns have led to multi-session selling pressure, as seen in the recent decline. 🎯 **Price Movement Probability Forecast** **Short-Term (1-2 Weeks) Upside/Downside Probability** | Direction | Probability | Price Range | Mag

**📊 Closing Market** Intel (INTC) closed at $107.93 on June 3, 2026, declining -1.28% for the day. The stock is currently trading approximately 18.7% below its 52-week high of $132.75, showing a consolidation phase after recent volatility. Pre-market trading indicates some potential for early session pressure. **🚀 Core Market Drivers** The stock is navigating a complex landscape. On the positive side, ongoing AI-driven demand for CPUs and the company's aggressive push into the foundry business with its 18A process node continue to be long-term narratives. However, recent price action reflects a broader semiconductor sector pullback, high valuation concerns among analysts, and profit-taking after a significant run-up earlier in the period. **🎯 Price Movement Probability** **Short-Term (1-2

📊 Closing Market On June 3, 2026 (ET), Marvell Technology closed at **$290.79**, surging a staggering **+32.52%** on the day. The closing price is just **$0.51** shy of its 52-week high of $291.30, indicating intense buying momentum. 🚀 Core Market Drivers Nvidia CEO's Endorsement: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang shared the stage with Marvell's CEO at Computex, stating Marvell has the potential to become the next trillion-dollar chip company, directly fueling the explosive rally. Product Innovation: The recent launch of the Teralynx T100, the industry's first 102.4 Tbps AI data-center switch, solidifies Marvell's position in the critical AI infrastructure market. Strong Fundamental Performance: The stock has been on a tear, up 242% year-to-date, supported by robust quarterly earnings and strategic

**📊 Closing Quote** On June 3rd, Micron Technology closed at **$1,064.10**, gaining +2.76% and hitting a new all-time high. The stock is now trading at its 52-week high of $1,076.56, just 1.2% away, signaling powerful bullish momentum. **🚀 Key Market Drivers** - **AI Demand & Supply Constraints**: Strong demand for HBM and AI memory, coupled with a structurally tight supply outlook extending into 2028, continues to be the core bullish narrative. - **Wall Street Enthusiasm**: Following its entry into the "$1,000 Club," analysts have been actively raising price targets, with some reaching as high as $1,750, reflecting confidence in its AI positioning. - **Competitive Dynamics**: News of Samsung's HBM4E samples underscores the intense competition but also validates the massive market oppo

**📊 Closing Market** On June 3rd (ET), NVIDIA closed at **$222.82**, down **-0.69%** for the day. The stock is trading approximately **5.8%** below its 52-week high of $236.54, showing consolidation after a recent strong run. **🚀 Core Market Drivers** 1. **AI Leadership & Demand:** The company remains the undisputed leader in AI and HPC accelerators. Continued strong demand for its next-generation Blackwell and Rubin platform GPUs is the primary long-term driver. 2. **Valuation & Sentiment Check:** Despite a significant pullback from its highs, high expectations are baked into the stock price. Market focus is on execution and sustaining growth to justify its premium valuation. **🎯 NVDA Short & Mid-Term Price Momentum Probabilities** **Short-Term (1-2 Weeks)** | Direction | Prob

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ 定投 Space X上市，特斯拉豈會斯人獨憔悴？ 外界普遍認為，Space X上市與特斯拉股價關係不大，甚至可能因馬斯克分心而拖累特斯拉。然而，這種看法過於理性、過於財務導向，完全忽略了特斯拉最核心的資產——馬斯克本人。 我一直不認同這種「兩者無關」的論調。特斯拉並非蘋果或波克夏·哈薩韋（巴郡），沒有馬斯克，它就失去靈魂。外界支持特斯拉，十之八九是對馬斯克有信心，多於對電動車產業的憧憬。人們視特斯拉為「信仰股」，願意為馬斯克付出高昂溢價。既然如此，當馬斯克旗下的Space X即將上市，特斯拉這所「馬斯克的根據地」，豈會斯人獨憔悴？ 早在一兩個月前，我便開始布局特斯拉正股及TSLL，期望搭上這趟順風車。起初市場反應冷淡，股價更一度暴跌，令我曾經動搖。但我始終認為：看戲看全套，Space X尚未正式路演，我豈能半途而廢？ 結果，隨著Space X公布上市時間表，我的套牢部位（蟹貨）終於迎來轉機。雖然比預期稍遲，但並未讓我失望（跌眼鏡）。我預計下半年景氣將持續復甦，特斯拉與TSLL股價會逐步走強。這才是馬斯克的劇本——身為執行長，他的天價薪酬與特斯拉股價高度綁定，他豈會放過這個提振股價的大好機會？ 當然，我也明白市場的反對聲音。AI分析師（老師們）指出，特斯拉持有Space X的股權極少，對其直接財務影響有限。更有人憂慮，Space X上市會耗盡馬斯克在特斯拉以外的精力，甚至導致他減持特斯拉股票套現。這些都是理性且值得正視的風險。 然而，理性往往低估了人性的力量。Space X上市並非一則孤立新聞，而是一場圍繞「馬斯克」這個品牌的盛事。只要市場仍將特斯拉視為馬斯克意志的延伸，那麼任何屬於他的高光時刻，都不會繞過特斯拉。 我也必須承認，自己的操作

Looking at that list, the one that surprises me the most is probably Nebius (NBIS). Most investors talk about the obvious AI winners—NVIDIA, AMD, or Micron Technology—but Nebius was relatively unknown to many retail investors until recently. Its rise has been fueled by the AI infrastructure boom, data-center expansion, and major partnerships, including agreements with large tech companies. The company has been growing aggressively in AI cloud infrastructure, which explains why some investors started viewing it as a potential "picks-and-shovels" AI play. From my favorites: • NVIDIA — not surprising to me; it's still the kingmaker of AI hardware. • AMD — a bit more surprising because it has to compete directly with NVIDIA, but the AI accelerator opportunity is huge. • Micron Technology — mak

The Pulse $Palo Alto Networks(PANW)$ $CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(CRWD)$ Two earnings reports. Two very different stories. One question that matters for every tech portfolio in 2026: which AI security platform wins the enterprise? This week, the cybersecurity sector is under the microscope. $PANW reports after Tuesday's close. $CRWD follows Wednesday. Both are pitching the same dream — Agentic SOC, AI-driven automation, platform consolidation — but the roads they're taking are wildly different, and the valuation math is brutal if either one stumbles. Here's what I'm watching, why it matters, and which one I'd own heading into the print. Key News 🛡️ CrowdStrike ($CRWD) — The Comeback Test The July 2024

Yes, Intel and AMD can still hold desktop dominance near term, but the moat is now clearly weaker. NVIDIA’s RTX Spark is not just a chip launch. It combines Arm CPU, Blackwell GPU, CUDA/RTX software, Windows AI agents, and OEM support from Dell, HP, Lenovo, Asus and others. That attacks the PC market through AI performance, not traditional CPU benchmarks.  But x86 still has major defences: app compatibility, enterprise fleets, gaming support, existing supply chains, and years of OEM optimisation. Most users still buy PCs for price, reliability and compatibility, not local AI agents. My view: Intel is more exposed than AMD. AMD has stronger execution and GPU/CPU credibility. Intel’s moat depends heavily on legacy x86 share, manufacturing recovery and enterprise stickiness. So, not an i

The Pulse $Hewlett Packard Enterprise(HPE)$ Forget the AI hype for a second. $HPE just did something that almost nobody does — beat revenue by nearly $1 BILLION and beat EPS by 49%. Not 5%. Not 10%. Forty-nine percent. CNBC's headline called it the largest single earnings beat since 2018 and they were right to. Revenue: $10.68B vs. $9.77B consensus. EPS: $0.79 vs. $0.53 estimate. Networking revenue: +148% YoY — that's not a typo. And then HPE did something that really caught my attention: they pulled their original 2028 long-term targets forward to FY26/FY27. When a company accelerates its own roadmap by two full years, the underlying demand is real. This is the company that everyone dismissed as "old hardware." It just handed you a 40% revenue gro

If forced to choose between the two today, I would favour the NVIDIA-ARM alliance over Intel. The reason is not simply AI hype. ARM benefits from a relatively attractive business model. Every successful ARM-based PC, server, smartphone or edge AI device potentially expands royalty revenue without ARM having to manufacture chips itself. NVIDIA's commitment gives ARM another avenue for growth beyond mobile and data centres. Intel, meanwhile, faces multiple challenges simultaneously: Pressure from ARM-based PCs. Competition from AMD in x86. Massive capital expenditure requirements for foundry ambitions. The need to prove its AI strategy can generate meaningful growth. That said, Intel is now becoming a classic turnaround story. If management executes well, manufacturing improves, and enterpri

The Pulse $CoreWeave, Inc.(CRWV)$ When NVIDIA builds its most powerful GPU cluster ever — the Vera Rubin NVL72 — and CoreWeave is the FIRST company on the planet to fully deploy and commission it, that's not a press release. That's a statement of dominance. $CRWV surged +13.96% on the news. But here's what most people missed: $NBIS (Nebius) ran +14.46% on the same day. The AI compute rental market just had a broad repricing event — and it's not over. This is the picks-and-shovels AI play in its purest form. CoreWeave doesn't need to win the AI arms race. It just needs to be the company renting the most powerful weapons to everyone else fighting it. Vera Rubin changes the density of what's possible — and CoreWeave just claimed first-mover advanta

If I already owned Micron, I would hold, but trim gradually rather than exit outright. The bullish case remains intact: HBM demand is still supply-constrained. AI servers require far more memory than traditional servers. Memory has evolved from a commodity into a strategic AI bottleneck. Micron is one of the few companies capable of supplying leading-edge HBM at scale. However, several warning signs are emerging: A trillion-dollar valuation leaves less room for execution mistakes. Expectations are becoming extremely optimistic. Capacity expansions from competitors could eventually reduce scarcity premiums. "AI stock outperforming NVIDIA" narratives often appear late in a cycle. History shows that semiconductor leaders rarely move in straight lines. Even during strong secular upcycles, 20-3

The Pulse Stop. Look at what just happened in the space sector and tell me this is normal. $Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$ — down 14.70% in a single session. One of the most operationally credible space companies on the market, with a real rocket that actually launches, a real customer base, and a real path to profitability. Down almost 15% in one day. $Virgin Galactic(SPCE)$ — up 21.68% in the SAME session. A company that has been functionally dormant, burned through capital, and hasn't run a commercial flight program in years. Up over 21%. This is not fundamentals. This is capital rotation in its most brutal, institutional form — and the catalyst is one that every space investor needs to understand before

I’m leaning toward $ARM Holdings(ARM)$ in this CPU war. Its business model is the most attractive because it benefits no matter who wins. Whether it’s $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ , $Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$ , or hyperscalers building Arm-based CPUs, ARM collects royalties without having to fight for market share directly. That certainty helps explain the stock’s strong reaction. NVIDIA is still the biggest wildcard. Vera may not replace x86 overnight, but within NVIDIA’s AI ecosystem it doesn’t need to. If customers are already buying NVL racks, adopting Vera becomes a natural extension. The market may also be underestimating how much CPU revenue is embedded inside those