To The Moon

$NVDA 20260612 207.5 CALL$ Covered call Setting a goal for June 2026: to collect more than $1,000 in premium (including premiums paid to close the options). Adjusted my goal as Adbe [Facepalm]  [Cry]   Collected to date: -$2,735

$AAPL VERTICAL 260717 PUT 280.0/PUT 275.0$ Vertical spread for income. AAPL price near 50sma, chosing short side at $280 which has 72% probability of winning.

$Space Exploration Technologies Corp(SPCX)$ $Space Exploration Technologies Corp(SPCX)$ @Trade Feed Decoder.... 1st position... if a year from now down 40% 60% or 80%..... i buy again... long term hold 

$IREN DIAGONAL 260626/260717 PUT 45.0/PUT 46.0$ Booking 76% profit and rolling to 3 more weeks to collect premium.

$Intel(INTC)$ $Intel(INTC)$ Finally can clear off some shares. Glad I stuck to my original plan of selling INTL only past 130+... held through the rough downswing till 100+ and back up again T_T 127 is a bit preemptive.. but needed to lock back profits and clear some funds for SpaceX ¯_(ツ)_/¯ Plus, during the week I went and bought more (in hindsight probably too much) Intel shares during the dip, so I have way excess now 💀 

$Space Exploration Technologies Corp(SPCX)$ Yesss, i got in time for the intraday dip! Though it is still much higher than IPO. They say the valuation is very high, but they priced it low at 135/share [LOL]  of course people can't resist.

$iQiyi Inc.(IQ)$ 算啦呢d咁既垃圾。蝕5成真係要走喇。無希望亦唔可以祈望。呢個世界無咁多奇蹟[喷血]  [喷血]  

$ProShares UltraPro QQQ(TQQQ)$ 先賺些少 TQQQ招股書是一本發達祕笈 常言道：「性格決定命運。」意指人的命運與自己的性格息息相關。在股票市場中，公司的前途會是怎樣，亦很在乎管理層會有什麼新搞作，可以使股票得到提振。但TQQQ卻是例外——牠的命運，彷彿早在2011年招股那刻已註定了。 在2011年才建立的TQQQ，屬性與1999年成立的QQQ極度相似，同是追蹤納斯達克100指數。分別是TQQQ屬於3倍槓桿做多納指100。主理人很有先見之明，他認為一隻ETF要成功，便必需要普及，而要普及便需保持每日買賣的數量，所以其招股書寫著：主理人可因應市場局勢去進行分割或反分割行動，以保持ETF流通量。誰知這樣寫，卻意外令TQQQ變成差不多每兩年翻倍一次的隱性股皇。 在過去十六年間，TQQQ確實與其追蹤對象納指100及其仿如孖生兄弟QQQ忽上忽落。由於TQQQ具三倍槓桿，其波幅更見誇張，但每次都能平安渡過。而那些專家預言「股價會被陰乾」、「手續費會蠶食股價剩番排骨」、「TQQQ不宜長期持有，否則災難便會發生」，不僅沒有發生，反而一一被現實擊破。 在這16年間，TQQQ股價因為升得太高，進行了八次分割行動。每次分割股份分薄卻沒有嚇破投資者，TQQQ依然是納指20大成交額常客。更奇怪的是，股票數量加倍卻沒有令股價一蹶不振，反而過了不久便回復原來水平，造就平均兩年翻倍一次的美滿成績。 TQQQ之所以成功，全憑天時、地利、人和相配合。 天時，是零利率與科技主導的大時代。TQQQ誕生於2011年，正值美國金融海嘯後長期寬鬆貨幣政策的起點。低利率環境迫使資金追逐增長，科技股成為唯一能提供雙位數回報的板塊。更重要的是，科技股的商業模式已非2000年般憑「吹勢」（吹牛）營利，而是

$BABA-W(09988)$  $BABA-W(09988)$  I'm no longer bearish with Alibaba as the price hit as low as 106 last week. I manage to buy at 106.7 as I think it is oversold. Now Alibaba is consider cheap again. I was considering to buy into tencent but I think Alibaba will bring more value over the longer term. I expect Alibaba price to recover and will hit 200 by year end.

$Applied Materials(AMAT)$ stay calm in market 

$Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF(NEBX)$ drop to 3x from 5x

$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$ hopefully it will go up again when the market opens

Tonight, history prints. SPCX begins trading on the Nasdaq at a fixed price of $135 per share, raising $75 billion at a $1.77 trillion valuation. That makes it the largest IPO ever, more than double Saudi Aramco's 2019 record. SpaceX debuts as roughly the seventh-largest US company, bigger than Tesla on day one. The demand numbers are absurd. Over $250 billion in subscriptions locked up. Retail alone contributed $70 billion. Allocation rates expected at just 20 to 30%. Over 1,000 institutions fought for shares. Polymarket estimates the IPO creates roughly 4,000 new millionaires inside the company. Oppenheimer says $190. Morningstar says $63. The gap between those two numbers is the entire story. Let's break it down properly. What You Are Actually Buying This is no longer a rocket company.

The market is dealing with three different risks at once: 1. Geopolitical risk from the Strait of Hormuz, which could push energy prices higher. 2. Sticky inflation, reducing the probability of near-term rate cuts. 3. Valuation risk in AI-related stocks after an extraordinary run. For long-term investors, a 2-5% pullback is not unusual after such a strong rally. However, the key question is whether earnings growth can continue to justify current valuations. If AI spending remains robust, many of today's leaders could eventually grow into their multiples. If spending slows, further compression is possible. My approach would be selective accumulation rather than aggressive dip-buying. High-quality companies with strong cash flow and competitive advantages are more attractive than leveraged E