To The Moon

$UMS(558.SI)$ Riding on the waves of A.I. More to come hopefully. Long position!

$SOXL 20260522 55.0 PUT$ 再加注2張 55sp.。其實點計我都覺得唔會跌到70之下。更何況55。遲點賣。期權金亦連高[贱笑]  [贱笑]  

$BMNR 20260522 20.0 CALL$ BMMR: selling calls for those assigned at $20 last week. Price continue to weaken so I'll hold on to them for a while and ride this out. 

$JD.com(JD)$ 用夜盤係港股時段買的。諗住京東表現比其他科技股好。原來跌起上來都係無普。唔買都買左。無計。或者回升賣call31.5或32

$Figure Technology Solutions(FIGR)$ Opening up more position as I believe RWA is the trend to go in future 

$Rigetti Computing(RGTI)$ $Rigetti Computing(RGTI)$    美國政府突然資助九間量子計算公司,其主要原因和動機是什麼?誰是最大受益者? 美國政府突然重金投入量子運算，本質上是一場**以國家安全為名的戰略競賽加速跑**。其核心邏輯是：量子運算被視為下一個科技時代的制高點，直接影響國防、金融與經濟安全，美國此舉旨在確保在這場關乎未來的競爭中不被中國等國家超越。 ### 🎯 主要動機與戰略考量 這20億美元的投資背後，是美國政府精密的戰略佈局： - **應對大國競爭，確保技術霸權**：美國政府明確將此舉視為「拉大與中國差距」的關鍵一步。量子運算被公認為能顛覆密碼學、軍事和材料科學等領域的「王牌技術」，誰能率先實現實用化，誰就掌握了未來的主導權。投資公告中也直白地指出，其首要目的是鞏固美國在量子領域的領導地位。 - **打通製造瓶頸，構建本土供應鏈**：目前的量子電腦仍停留在實驗室階段，主要瓶頸之一就是缺乏專用的製造工廠。這筆資金的重點用途，正是支持**IBM**和**格芯（GlobalFoundries）** 在美國本土建立全球首批「專用量子晶圓代工廠」，以解決從實驗室樣品到工業化生產的「最後一公里」難題。 - **創新投資模式，分散技術風險**：此次投資採用了「**股權換資助**」的新模式，即政府以入股方式提供資金。這麼做至少有兩層考量：一是如果技術成功，納稅人的錢能透過股權增值獲得回報；二是透過同時押注**9家**技術路線各異的公司（如超導、離子阱、中性原子等），分散押注風險，確保無論哪條路線成功，美國都不會落後。 ### 🏆

$USAR 20260522 22.0 PUT$ Closed the trade one day before expiry date to manage margin and secure the profits 

🌟🌟🌟 NVIDIA $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ latest Q1 FY 27 report has shattered every single Wall Street metric, with an 85% revenue jump to USD 81.62 billion.  It also increased its dividends by 2400% and authorised a huge USD 80 billion share buyback. Yet Nvidia's share price fell to around USD 220 level post earnings. Why? NVIDIA's share price is priced to perfection.  When NVIDIA is priced to perfection with an amazing Blackwell supercycle, a standard beat is no longer enough to fuel upward momentum.  It is "sell the news" to lock in profits. With the US 30 year Treasury yield rising to 5.13%, and core inflation at 3.8%, the safe investment floor is just too high for tech stocks. What should investors do ? Investors should take this as a great

You are reading the situation correctly. The market is no longer reacting purely to NVIDIA as a single name. It is reacting to what NVDA represents, which is the monetisation phase of AI. A few points to ground this. First, the numbers themselves are not the issue. 85% YoY growth with 75% gross margin is still structurally rare. That tells you demand has not broken. It tells you pricing power is intact. The muted reaction is about expectations, not fundamentals. Second, the spillover matters more than NVDA’s own move. When Advanced Micro Devices, Arm Holdings and Micron Technology rally harder than NVDA itself, the market is effectively saying the trade is broadening. Early leaders stop being the highest beta once the narrative is accepted. Third, valuation. NVDA is not “cheap”, but it is

What you are describing is a classic compression phase, not necessarily the end of the trend. When long-end yields spike to multi-decade highs, the immediate effect is mechanical. Discount rates rise, so long-duration assets, especially high-growth tech, get repriced down. That is why the Nasdaq Composite weakens even when fundamentals have not yet deteriorated. But the more important layer is positioning. If hedge funds are already deleveraging and short interest is rising, a fair amount of risk has already been taken out before the event. That changes the payoff structure around NVIDIA earnings. So where does the AI rally “breathe” if both yields stay high and NVDA disappoints? There are three realistic pressure valves: 1. Rotation within the AI stack If NVDA guidance underwhelms, capita