$50 Billion in Bets! Is the World Cup “Curse” Real?
The World Cup kicks off on June 11, and every time it comes around, someone digs up that old “curse” chart: over the past eight World Cups, the Nasdaq fell during five of them, with an average return of -1.2%.
The measurement window is from the close before the opening match to the close of the first trading day after the final $NASDAQ(.IXIC)$
- 1994, United States: -1.7%
- 1998, France: +9.2%
- 2002, Korea/Japan: -13.1%
- 2006, Germany: -1.3%
- 2010, South Africa: -0.9%
- 2014, Brazil: +2.5%
- 2018, Russia: +1.4%
- 2022, Qatar: -5.4%
So it’s 5 down, 3 up. More red than green. But once you look at the backdrop, the story is obvious: 2002 was still dealing with the aftermath of the dot-com bust, 2022 was hit by the Fed’s aggressive rate hikes, and that +9.2% in 1998 was simply the tech bull market doing its thing. The matches go on, but the market trades on its own logic. The World Cup is background noise, not the engine.
So what does the World Cup actually affect? Not direction, but liquidity.
Two ECB economists, Ehrmann and Jansen, looked at data from 2010 and 2014 and found that once the matches start, trading volume drops immediately. When the home team is playing, volume can fall by nearly half. In the U.S. market, it dropped by 43%, and each goal scored shaved off another 5%. During the 2014 knockout stage, S&P trading volume was more than 18% lower than the year before.
Traders are fans too. Once the ball starts rolling, who’s still staring at the screen? So the market doesn’t necessarily fall, it just gets thinner and quieter. And this year there’s an extra twist: previous tournaments like Qatar and Korea/Japan were played at odd hours for U.S. viewers, often late at night. This time, with the tournament in North America, the biggest matches will land right in U.S. trading hours, making distraction potentially worse than it’s been in years.
2026 World Cup: one of the biggest sports betting events in history, with total global wagers to reach around $50 billion!
The 2026 tournament will be co-hosted by the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, with 48 teams and 104 matches running from June 11 to July 19. It will be the largest World Cup ever, opening in Mexico City and ending with the final in New Jersey, with an expected 6 million fans attending.
Lodging:$Airbnb, Inc.(ABNB)$ & $Booking Holdings(BKNG)$
Oxford Economics estimates host-city hotels could bring in about $900 million in additional revenue, with room rates on match days rising 7% to 25%. Sounds meaningful, but spread across total annual U.S. hotel revenue, it adds only about 0.4%, which is barely noticeable at the company earnings level. Even worse, pre-tournament surveys show that in about 80% of host cities, hotel bookings are still below expectations due to visa hassles, expensive tickets, and high travel costs. Some hotels are even saying this tournament “doesn’t feel like much.” If you want exposure, hotels are cleaner than airlines, which still have to deal with fuel prices and capacity constraints.
Sports betting: $DraftKings Inc.(DKNG)$, $Flutter Entertainment PLC(FLUT)$, $Sportradar Group AG(SRAD)$, $Genius Sports Ltd(GENI)$
This is the most leveraged theme by far. The 2026 World Cup could become the biggest sports betting event ever, with global betting volume potentially reaching $50 billion. With the U.S. hosting, and the event landing in June and July, usually a slow season for sportsbooks, it should be a rare customer-acquisition opportunity. Some analysts think the buzz could even outshine the Super Bowl.
But there’s a catch. DraftKings just cut its 2026 revenue guidance below expectations, and the stock fell about 15% after hours. The bigger threat may be prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi. In the U.S. alone, prediction-market volume on this tournament is expected to exceed $2.3 billion, and a single Polymarket winner contract has already traded around $1.6 billion.
Do you believe in the World Cup “curse”?
Is there really some kind of market superstition here, or does macro drive everything while football is just the backdrop?
Who’s your biggest winner?
Leave your comments to win tiger coins~
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
2. World Cup investment increases economic activities in infrastructure and crowds out other activities
3.my biggest winner is investment in the USA World Cup
Football is a magnificent distraction but the cost of capital is the true driver with US 10 year Treasury yield climbing back to 4.45%. When investors can lock in high guaranteed return from the US bonds, they naturally trim their exposure to stocks.
I believe the biggest winner would be $Alphabet(GOOG)$ for no matter which country wins the trophy, billions of fans globally will spend the next month continuously flooding into YouTube and Google Search to stream match highlights, watch live recaps and consume digital media.
Google captures a direct advertising fee on every single eyeball, charging premium rates to place ads in front of the world's most captive audience.
Let the World Cup begin & see how high Google can fly!
@Tiger_SG @Tiger_comments
What I do think is real is the impact on liquidity. With matches being played during U.S. trading hours this year, I wouldn’t be surprised to see lighter volumes and more short-term volatility. Traders are fans too, and attention is a limited resource.
My biggest winner is still the sports betting ecosystem. The World Cup is a massive customer-acquisition event, and companies like DraftKings, Flutter, Sportradar, and Genius Sports could see a surge in engagement. That said, I’m also watching prediction markets closely, as they may end up capturing a bigger share of the action than many investors expect.
@Tiger_SG @TigerStars @Tiger_comments @TigerClub @小虎热点雷达 @小虎福利站
A national team crashing out might cause a brief dip in local stocks, but it is usually a sentiment effect rather than a fundamental one. The impact tends to be small and temporary.
For the current market, I think macro matters far more than football: • Fed rate expectations
• AI spending cycle
• Corporate earnings
• Geopolitical risks
• Global liquidity
Biggest winner? Usually not the winning country's stock market. I'd look at sectors that directly benefit from the tournament: broadcasters, advertisers, travel, hospitality, sportswear, and betting companies.
So my view: football may move emotions, but macro moves money. ⚽📈
Hmm