Big Bank Earnings Recap: Trump Policy Risk! Is Financial Still a Buy?

The January 2026 earnings season has started on a rough note for U.S. banks.

All major US banks have now reported their results. Although each bank has a different business focus, increasing short-term spending on future technologies, particularly AI, has become an industry-wide consensus.

However, the market’s reaction has been notably pragmatic: tolerance for rising expenses is fading, and the test of ROI (return on investment) has officially begun.

Management teams repeatedly emphasized AI, data centers, and automation as long-term necessities. But the market is no longer rewarding spending on trust alone.

Big bank earnings brief

  1. $Bank of America(BAC)$ delivered both EPS and revenue beats, supported by strong equity trading and a ~10% YoY increase in net interest income.
    Still, the stock recorded its worst earnings-day reaction since 2020.

  2. $JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ missed expectations, with softer debt underwriting activity weighing on results.

  3. $Wells Fargo(WFC)$ missed across EPS, revenue, and NII, burdened by $612 million in severance costs.

  4. $Citigroup(C)$ reported lower earnings due to Russia exit losses, though investment banking fees surged 35%.

Despite very different business mixes, all four stocks sold off.

The split screen: MS and GS offer a different playbook

$Morgan Stanley(MS)$ delivered a clean “wealth management + investment banking recovery” story:

Q4 net revenue $17.89B (above expectations), full-year revenue a record $70.6B; EPS $2.68 (well above $2.44 expected)

Wealth management revenue $8.43B (+13%) with strong net new assets; Investment banking revenue +47%

$Goldman Sachs(GS)$ showed core strength but with a noisy headline:

Q4 net profit $4.62B (+12%), EPS $14.01 (+17%)

Equities trading $4.31B, a Wall Street record; Investment banking revenue +25%

But revenue optics were hit by one-off accounting impacts tied to the Apple card transition to JPM, dragging the platform solutions segment

Trump policy risk: JPMorgan says "Everything' on Table to fight 10% card cap

Trump’s proposal to cap credit card interest rates at 10% starting in 2026 immediately raised alarm.

Combined with lingering uncertainty around Federal Reserve leadership, policy risk has become a second headwind on top of earnings scrutiny.

Bank stocks have become a macro + policy + execution trade, not a simple earnings trade.

How are you trading this earnings season?

Which of the six major U.S. banks do you favor?

With Citigroup and Wells Fargo both announcing layoffs alongside increased AI investment, do you believe these moves can translate into long-term profitability?

Broadly, large banks now fall into two narratives:

  • Buying higher-certainty names such as Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and Bank of America, or

  • Positioning for transformation stories, including JPMorgan’s Apple Card exposure, and the restructuring paths at Citigroup and Wells Fargo.

Which camp are you in — certainty or transformation?

Leave your comments to win tiger coins~

# Q4 Earnings Season: Valuations Stretch, What to Focus?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment38

  • Top
  • Latest
  • Shyon
    ·01-15
    TOP
    This earnings season confirms my view that bank stocks are now judged on execution and near-term ROI, not AI spending narratives. Automation and data investment are necessary, but the market is done rewarding long-term promises amid policy and rate uncertainty.

    From a trading standpoint, I favor higher-certainty names. Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs stand out with clearer earnings drivers, while Bank of America remains structurally sound despite a harsh market reaction.

    For transformation stories like JPMorgan, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo, I see potential but higher execution risk. Layoffs and AI investment may lift efficiency over time, but for now I stay in the “certainty” camp, watching for clearer inflection points.

    @koolgal @rL @icycrystal @nomadic_m @1PC @SPACE ROCKET @Michane @GoodLife99

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • ShyonReplying toicycrystal
      [Great] [Great] [Great]
      01-16
      Reply
      Report
    • icycrystal
      thanks for sharing
      01-16
      Reply
      Report
  • koolgal
    ·01-16
    TOP
    🌟🌟Certainty or Transformation?  The banks are split into 2 narratives. 

    Transformation: Citi & Wells Fargo announcing layoffs while increasing their AI investments, signal a familiar pattern in banking: streamline cost base, modernise infrastructure & hope the transformation is successful. 

    These moves can translate into long term profitability but the payoff depends on execution & whether legacy systems can be merged well.

    High potential, high complexity.

    Certainty: Certainty names like Goldman Sachs & Bank of America operate like wellrun machines.  Predictable earnings &diversified revenue streams.They are steady, reliable & less dramatic.

    Which camp am I in?

    Neither. I am in the disciplined camp. 

    I don't chase narratives. I don't pick favourites. I let $Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund(XLF)$ do the heavy lifting.

    Certainty is comfortable.  Transformation is exciting.  Disciplined allocation is where the long term returns are built.

    @Tiger_comments @TigerStars

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    View more 3 comments
  • Michane
    ·01-16
    TOP
    u might be surprised I don't trade banks nowadays [LOL]
    Rather I have holdings like $Sheng Siong(OV8.SI)$ when it was still $1+
    it is currently the winner 🏆 of my SG stocks!
    Reply
    Report
  • icycrystal
    ·01-16
    TOP
    If I trade for Certainty, I am likely looking at the sideways consolidation in the S&P 500.

    If I trade for Transformation, I am looking at the aggressive growth in specialized tech and the breakout of hard assets.

    can I be both [Sly] [Sly] [Sly]

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • icycrystalReplying tokoolgal
      yup [USD] [USD] [USD] [USD] [USD]
      01-17
      Reply
      Report
    • koolgal
      Whether it is certainty or transformation, the important thing is we make money.🌈🌈🌈💰💰💰
      01-17
      Reply
      Report
    • koolgal
      Great insights😍😍😍
      01-17
      Reply
      Report
  • 花旗集团(C)

    花旗集团正在实施一项重大重组计划,其中包括到2026年裁员20,000人,作为成本削减计划的一部分,预计每年可节省2至25亿美元。该银行已经裁减了10,000多名员工。

    花旗集团正在积极部署人工智能工具来支持这些效率工作,旨在简化流程、提高数据质量并推动整个运营的自动化。其内部Al工具每周释放约100,000名开发人员小时,近180,000名员工可以使用这些Al功能。该银行还拥有120亿美元的年度技术预算,这表明为Al集成提供了大量资金。

    Reply
    Report
  • L.Lim
    ·01-16
    I am certain... that they will cause the next global recession 😂
    US banks doing the same old tired play, finance a bubble carelessly, refuse to follow rules and believing that they are too large to fail. Then beg for handouts when things go south.
    I would not like to be holding the bag when the bubble pops because it will be as ugly as the dot-com bubble and the real estate bubble.
    Greed, it's always greed blinding these people. Play by the rules and things might just turn out ok, but no... they will resort to any means to have the regulations removed.
    Hopefully investors have indeed learned the lesson and figuratively whacked the banks' knuckles for being careless.
    Reply
    Report
  • Tiger_comments
    ·02-02 20:17
    Thanks for participating in my discussion. Your coins have been sent through the tiger coin center!
    Check them in the history - “community distribution“
    @T20211222001
    @Chrishust
    @L.Lim
    @這是甚麼東西
    @Michane
    @北极篂
    @Mkoh
    @koolgal
    @breAkdaWn
    @AliceSam
    @koolgal
    @北极篂
    @Emotional Investor
    @icycrystal
    @LucasOng
    @Xian789
    @AN88
    @北极篂
    @Couchman
    @highhand
    @BTS
    @TLim
    @Shyon
    @ECLC
    @北极篂
    @北极篂
    Reply
    Report
  • BTS
    ·01-19
    As earnings season for major US banks kicks off in January 2026, investors are weighing risks and opportunities amid AI investments, restructuring strategies, and shifting market dynamics

    The six major US banks present a distinct split between certainty, with Morgan Stanley (MS), Goldman Sachs (GS), and Bank of America (BAC) offering steady earnings, and transformation, with JPMorgan (JPM) and Citigroup (C) embracing restructuring efforts and the Apple Card, while Wells Fargo (WFC) scales AI for growth

    Trump-era regulatory shifts, including tax reforms and the proposed 10% credit card interest rate cap, shape bank strategies, creating risks and opportunities based on consumer exposure。。。

    As earnings season unfolds, the US banking sector presents a clear choice between the "certainty" of investment banking leaders and the "transformation" potential of retail giants, compelling investors to weigh predictable returns against the risk of radical policy shifts

    Reply
    Report
  • 我拥有很多银行和投资银行股票以及Amex、visa和sofi。所有公司的年化回报率都超过50%,三分之一超过100%。我说的所有,是指除了一个以外的所有人。Visa很烂,哦,等等,如果我把PayPal放在那里,那就太烂了。我的visa年化回报率为-1%左右。PayPal大概是-20%。但与总体收益相比微不足道。
    但当我翻阅我的投资笔记时,很明显。$花旗(C)$是显而易见的。和老式的价值股。大卫·多德会感到骄傲的。当我带来它时,它的交易价格约为其拆分价值的一半。如今你再也找不到这样的股票了。但我找到了。
    大约两年前的“银行业危机”期间,我带来了很多不同的银行股。除了两个,所有人都表现出色。
    但这篇文章促使我重新评估我在这些股票中的头寸。
    它们仍然是长期持有的。但我认为他们的竞选现在已经结束了。所以我想我会修剪。
    Reply
    Report
  • Mkoh
    ·01-16
    Short take: Probably not a great trade for 2026 — at least not yet.The proposed 10% cap on credit card rates would seriously hurt the biggest earners in the space (think Capital One, Amex, Discover, even some of the big banks’ card divisions). That’s a massive hit to their highest-margin business, and the market already priced in a pretty ugly reaction when Trump floated it.If the cap actually gets passed and sticks for the full year, I’d expect more pain and lower multiples for those names. On the flip side, if it gets watered down, delayed, or quietly killed in Congress/bureaucracy (which is very possible), then the stocks could bounce hard from these depressed levels.Right now it feels more like a high-risk “fade the fear” play than a clean bullish setup. I’d wait for more clarity before getting aggressive long in the big card issuers for ’26.What do you think — are you leaning buy-the-dip or stay away?

    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-16
    至于裁员+AI投资能否带来长期盈利,我的判断是:能,但只会集中在执行力最强、商业模式最清晰的银行身上。因此,我更偏向“确定性阵营”,优先选择MS、GS这类已经证明模式有效的名字,而不是去赌转型能否顺利落地。在这个阶段,不确定性,本身就是最大的成本。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-16
    真正让我更谨慎的,是政策风险的重新定价。信用卡利率上限、监管取向、美联储人事不确定性,让银行股不再是单纯的“财报交易”,而更像一场宏观+政策+执行力的综合博弈。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-16
    相比之下,摩根士丹利和高盛给出了完全不同的剧本。MS的财富管理飞轮清晰可见,新增资产和投行业务同步回暖,这是我认为当前环境下最“可预测”的增长路径。高盛依然展现了交易和投行的硬实力,只是一次性因素让财报“噪音”变大,但核心竞争力并未动摇。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-16
    从结果看,传统大行的处境最为尴尬。美国银行盈利和收入都超预期,却交出了数年来最差的财报日表现,说明“稳健但没惊喜”已经不够。摩根大通和富国银行的问题更直接:投行业务和成本控制同时承压,任何一端失速,市场都会毫不留情地惩罚。花旗则再次提醒投资人,它的风险并不只来自业务周期,还有地缘政治与历史包袱。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·01-16
    如果說這個財報季給了我什麼最直觀的感受,那就是:市場對美國大銀行的耐心,正在快速消耗。幾乎所有管理層都在談人工智能、自動化、數據中心,但股價反應卻異常冷淡,甚至“越好越跌”。這不是否定AI的重要性,而是投資人開始真正追問:錢花下去,什麼時候能看到回報?
    Reply
    Report
  • Couchman
    ·01-16
    Despite some good results, we are at a point in the cycle where all the banks are historically expensive so i am out of banks for now until the valuations come back down
    Reply
    Report
  • Chrishust
    ·01-16
    $Goldman Sachs(GS)$ $JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ $Bank of America(BAC)$ there is a lot to like about the banks performance at this time in the economic cycle. With high growth in the economy in the United States, there is a strong positive investor sentiment for banking stocks with strong momentum. This results in a high likelihood of price growth for each of the banks. Within this list of banks. The banks with greater commercial exposure are likely to outperform $Goldman Sachs(GS)$ benefiting from deal making in the economy. In terms of lower prospects. The real estate exposed banks $Bank of America(BAC)$ may lag the more higher performing stocks
    Reply
    Report
  • I'm betting on certainty, like Morgan Stanley. Transformation is too dicey with Trump's policies looming. [看涨]
    Reply
    Report
  • AliceSam
    ·01-15
    $美国银行(BAC)$在强劲的股票交易和净利息收入同比增长约10%的支持下,每股收益和收入均超出预期。
    Reply
    Report
  • BAC for certainty camp! Transformation too dicey with policy risks. [得意]
    Reply
    Report