To The Moon

We saw some interesting developments in 2025 with respect to $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ - some negative and few positive too: (1) Loss of Global Lead: In 2025, Tesla officially lost its title, in a rather convincing way, as the world's top seller of battery-electric vehicles - and that surprisingly to China's BYD, which delivered 2.26 million BEVs compared to Tesla's 1.64 million. Will the tide turn in 2026? In theory it can but Tesla has some smart thinking ti do. (2) Growth Outlook: Analysts are split on 2026. While some expect a recovery driven by FSD and a potential "Robotaxi" scale-up, others remain bearish due to aging vehicle models and the expiration of U.S. federal EV tax credits. So, unless trump feels uncharacteristically

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ Buckle up, folks! Tesla's shares just blasted off with a sizzling 3% leap, fueled by blockbuster December 2025 numbers from the China Passenger Car Association. We're talking a jaw-dropping 97,171 vehicles wholesaled – that's the second-highest monthly haul ever for Tesla China! 😎 This beast of a performance cranked up 11% from November and flexed a 13% year-over-year sales spike to around 94,000 units. Even with a full-year dip of about 5-7% to 625,000-851,732 vehicles amid fierce EV rivalries, this late-year surge screams resilience and dominance in the world's biggest electric playground. 🌏💥 But wait, there's more rocket fuel in the tank! Full Self-Driving (FSD) is gearing up to transform Tesla's fate in China. Partial appr

Personally I feel the target of $250k is just too optimistic. It hinges on institutional adoption and other factors that could disrupt the traditional four-year market cycle. Whether this will happen is debatable. The broader macro-economic landscape, including U.S. Fed  interest rate policy and global liquidity will heavily influence Bitcoin. So, I feel while there is a strong long-term bullish case for Bitcoin driven by structural factors it could be about $150k+ if it stabilises & consolidates. Else it could also correct address bit.

Gold $5,000 & Silver $300? Why BofA’s "Absurd" Target Might Actually Be Conservative 🚀 Current Price: Gold Futures (GCmain) @ $4,479 | Silver Target: $135–$309 We are witnessing history. With Gold sitting at $4,479, just inches from the psychological $4,500 barrier, Bank of America has dropped a bombshell forecast: Gold to $5,000 and a potential "blow-off top" for Silver at $309. For years, skeptics called precious metals a "pet rock." Now, they are the only asset class offering shelter while fiat currencies debase globally. If you think you missed the boat, look closer: we might just be leaving the harbor. Here is the deep-dive analysis on why this rally is structural, not just hype. 1️⃣ The "Fiscal Dominance" Thesis (Why $5,000 Makes Sense) The driver for Gold isn't just war or fear

Bitcoin is Waking Up Quietly — Which Proxy Play Offers the Best Risk/Reward? Bitcoin is creeping back up, yet the retail crowd seems unusually quiet. While the timeline is flooded with other noise, BTC has been silently reclaiming key levels. For active traders, this "quiet accumulation" phase is often the most profitable entry point before the masses return. But here is the dilemma: do you buy the coin directly, or do you play the equities for potentially higher beta? If you don't have a crypto wallet or want to leverage the volatility through the stock market, the ecosystem has evolved significantly. It’s no longer just "buy MSTR and pray." We now have distinct sectors: The HODLers, The Builders, The Exchanges, and the Hybrid AI plays. Here is how I am categorizing the opportunities righ

For me, CES 2026 boils down to Rubin, Physical AI, and Power. Rubin confirms that AI is now about system-level efficiency, where NVIDIA $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ still leads. Physical AI—autonomous driving and robotics—is the next growth layer, and energy, especially nuclear, is becoming long-term infrastructure rather than a short-term trade. In positioning, NVIDIA remains my core holding, but I’m not ignoring the second-order plays. Robotics is where expectations are still forming, and Qualcomm’s $Qualcomm(QCOM)$ full-stack push stands out as a possible re-rating catalyst as embodied AI scales. On Tesla

$Micron Technology(MU)$  $SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$  $NVIDIA(NVDA)$  06Jan26 🇺🇸 | 07Jan26 🇳🇿 I’m treating memory as the defining AI bottleneck of 2026, with Micron, Sandisk, and SK Hynix confirming in price, volatility, and flow that capital is reallocating from compute-first narratives into bandwidth, HBM, and DRAM scarcity across the AI stack 🔥 This is not rotation noise, it is structural repricing 🧱 ⚙️ The inflection is happening now because AI economics are shifting from FLOPs toward memory density, latency, and persistence as agentic models scale and think longer

$Alumis Inc.(ALMS)$  $Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMY)$  $Arcutis Biotherapeutics Inc.(ARQT)$  🚀🧬📊 $ALMS Repriced, Not Rallied: Phase 3 Dominance Ignites Volatility Expansion and Price Discovery 📊🧬🚀 I’m treating today’s move in Alumis Inc ($ALMS) as a live, in-session repricing event, not a completed story. With the market still open, price, volume, and flow continue to confirm a regime shift rather than a one-day headline reaction. $ALMS is up +106.5% to ~$17.16 after its lead oral TYK2 inhibitor delivered a decisive Phase 3 outcome in the ONWARD1 and ONWARD2 plaque psoriasis trials. Around 65% PASI 90 and more than 40%

$NVIDIA(NVDA)$ $Johnson Controls(JCI)$  $Carrier Global Corporation(CARR)$  I’m calling this exactly what it is. A regime break inside AI infrastructure, not a headline misread. AI’s efficiency curve just invalidated a crowded trade. After Jensen Huang confirmed that NVIDIA’s Vera Rubin racks can be cooled with hot water, the market immediately repriced what that means downstream. Cooling was never just about capacity growth, it was about how that capacity is deployed. That’s why Johnson Controls ($JCI), Carrier Global ($CARR) and Trane Technologies ($TT) sold off hard. Not because AI spend is slowing, but because the architecture changed. I’m

🚀 SanDisk +20%, Micron Breaks $340: Is the 'Memory Supercycle' Finally Here? Ticker Watch: $MU $WDC $STX $07747 The market didn't just rotate yesterday; it violently repriced an entire sector. When a massive name like SanDisk surges +20% in a single session, and Micron ($MU) pushes past $344, it’s not just retail speculation. This is institutional panic-buying. Funds that were underweight storage are scrambling to get exposure to the "Memory Shortage" narrative before Q1 earnings season confirms it. The question for traders: Is this the start of a legendary 2026 run, or a dangerous blow-off top? 1️⃣ The "Shortage" Narrative Has Changed For the last two years, the story was all about HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) for Nvidia chips. That was the "elite" trade. What changed yesterday? The rally

XRP’s latest surge has reignited the usual crypto shouting match, which tells me one thing straight away: something practical is happening beneath the noise. When an asset that half the market loves to hate starts rallying without a catchy narrative or a celebrity mascot, it is rarely an accident. XRP’s move feels less like a speculative sugar rush and more like a response to pressure building in the real financial system, particularly where that system is weakest. XRP moves quietly where traditional finance struggles to keep pace At around $2.34, XRP is up sharply on the day, carrying a market capitalisation close to $142 billion and daily trading volume pushing $8 billion. This is not a thin, excitable market. It is deep, liquid and being actively repositioned. The interesting question i

The January Effect is Back with a Vengeance — Are You Long Semis & Hardware Yet? Is this the start of the 2026 bull run, or just a post-holiday sugar rush? The markets have wasted no time shaking off the holiday cobwebs. The "January Effect" seems to be in full swing right out of the gate, with the Nasdaq popping nearly 1% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) ripping over 3% higher. The mood has shifted from cautious optimism to a decisive "Risk-On." But unlike typical seasonal rallies that rely purely on sentiment, this move has structural legs. Here is why this breakout matters and what active traders should be watching. 1️⃣ The "January Effect" Explained: Why Now? For those new to the term, the "January Effect" isn't just superstition; it’s driven by flows.  * Tax-Los

From my perspective, the recent rally in memory and storage stocks already reflects most of the good news the market has been talking about. The surge in names like SanDisk $SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$  , Micron $Micron Technology(MU)$  , Western Digital $Western Digital(WDC)$  , and Seagate $Seagate Technology PLC(STX)$   clearly shows that investors are buying into the AI-driven data demand and the improving pricing narrative. However, when stocks move this fast in such a short period, expectations also rise very

From my point of view, the recent rebound in gold and silver is not just a short-term reaction, but a reflection of deeper structural forces at work. Persistent fiscal deficits, rising geopolitical uncertainty, and the gradual erosion of trust in fiat currencies continue to strengthen the long-term case for precious metals as a store of value. In that context, Bank of America's $5,000 gold call no longer sounds as extreme as it once did. That said, I think it's important to separate long-term potential from short-term price behavior. Gold and silver rarely move in straight lines. Even within a powerful secular bull market, sharp pullbacks and long consolidation phases are normal, especially when positioning becomes crowded or real yields temporarily move against them. Silver, in particular

A piece of new information that makes me stand up and take notice. It validates what Warren Buffett had stated all along about the competition within automobiles 🚘 industry.  For me, the article is a timely reminder to what makes up Tesla. It also reinforced my take about excessive premium given for valuation of Tesla. Rather than given a premium to a future that could be replaced by other powerful competitors such as Alphabet and now Nvidia, Tesla should be valued as it is now as a primarily EV firm. We can definitely add some side-values to its power storage business (also facing strong competitors from China). However, conglomerate or holding company discount must also be applied accordingly to be fair. Elon Musk premium is too far, too much. In fact, it is nothing but to