$AMD: Google picked EPYC. The stock is up 36.7% in four sessions. Here's my sell put.
The four sessions
• Thu Nov 5: $404.40 (−17.26%), the AI chip crash
• Fri Nov 6: $449.04 (+11.04%), a sector bounce
• Mon Nov 9: $508.58 (+13.26%). Google Cloud named EPYC as the host CPU for its TPU 8tx, and Oppenheimer upgraded to Outperform with a $600 target.
• Tue Nov 10: $515.21 (+1.30%). Anthropic's IPO filing showed AMD buying $2.5B of Anthropic shares, part of AMD's commitment of up to $5B linked to Anthropic deploying up to 2 GW of AMD chips.
• Wed Nov 11: $552.90 (+7.32%) on CoreWeave's results and a UBS note on growing CPU sales. About $574 after hours.
From $404.40 to $552.90 is +36.7%. The stock is still 14.9% below its $649.42 record close.
What Google actually said
AMD's 5th Gen EPYC chips run the host side of Google Cloud's TPU 8tx: workload orchestration, data preparation, and high-speed communication with the TPU chips. TPU 8tx is the first cloud TPU with hardware-enforced confidential computing. AMD also says EPYC is the host CPU of choice for more than 10 leading hyperscalers and frontier AI labs.
The topic's question: when does a design win become cloud revenue?
The bears have a point. Contract value, shipment cadence and margin weren't disclosed, and a one-day stock gain isn't booked revenue.
I'm watching for three things:
1. Google Cloud product pages listing TPU 8tx as generally available, with regions and pricing. Not press releases.
2. AMD's Q4 data center revenue against the company's ~$17B ±3% total revenue guidance. Data center was $8.5B in Q3, up 97%, and 64% of sales.
3. More named host-CPU wins. GPUs and custom chips both need a CPU next to them, and EPYC is the default at many of the biggest buyers.
If the first two land, the win is real money. Until then, it's a design win with no dollar figure attached.
The risks
• Hot October CPI pushed the 10-year yield to about 5% and raised the odds of rate hikes
• +36.7% in four days invites chasing. Some of it can give back.
• Nvidia's CEO investigation is pushing money toward AMD. If that resolves, some of that money may go back to Nvidia.
Checking it against my rules
✅ Trend: $552.90 against the 200-day (~$416), +33%
✅ Earnings: next report around early February 2027 (estimated), after expiry
⚠️ Volatility: IV is about 60% (my estimate after the rally). Against a 1-year range of 42–89, that's an IV rank around 38, just under my 40 bar.
Strike math (Dec 18, 36 days, 60% IV)
• 1 standard deviation down ≈ $449
• 50-day × 0.98 ≈ $535
• $450 has delta 0.11, too far out to be worth selling, so I move up to $470 (delta 0.16)
The pick
• Sell 1× AMD Dec 18 $470 put
• Model premium ≈ $9.90
• Break-even ≈ $460, 15% below Wednesday's close
• About 78% model odds of expiring worthless
• $47,000 cash per contract. Tier 2, so 2% max.
• Half size now. Add only if a pullback holds $515 (Tuesday's close).
• Take profit: GTC buy-back at ~$4.95 (50%). Stop: ~$24.75 (2.5× the credit).
Update on last week's pick
On Nov 9 I picked the Dec 18 $370 put at a model ~$9.90. With AMD at $552.90, that put is worth about $0.47 on the model. The 50% take-profit order would have filled days ago. That's model pricing, not an actual fill, but it's the method doing its job: sell into fear, buy back once the fear has passed.
The verdict: the trend is back and the news is real. Half size now at $470. Let the rest come to me.
Personal framework, education only, not advice. Premiums are Black-Scholes estimates, not live quotes. Options carry risk, including assignment.
#AMD #EPYC #GoogleCloud #SellPut #Options
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
- AuntieAaA·00:33GoodLikeReport
