$Leslie's, Inc.(LESL)$ $Cemtrex(CETX)$ $Erayak Power Solution Group Inc.(RAYA)$ 🔥📉🔄 Reverse Splits Take Centre Stage This Week 🔄📉🔥

💡 The landscape between 29Sep25 and 03Oct25 is dominated by reverse splits, a move most companies reserve as a last line of defence. Let’s unpack the lineup and what it really signals beneath the surface.

📊 This Week’s Confirmed Splits

• Leslie’s $LESL: 1-for-20 reverse split effective 29Sep25

• Cemtrex $CETX: 1-for-15 reverse split effective 29Sep25

• Lunai Bioworks $LUNAI: 10-for-1 reverse split effective 30Sep25

• Erayak Power $RAYA: 220-for-1 reverse split effective 30Sep25

• Predictive Oncology $POAI: 1-for-15 reverse split effective 30Sep25

• American Rebel $AREB: 1-for-20 reverse split effective 03Oct25

⚖️ Why It Matters

Reverse splits are often about optics and compliance rather than fundamentals. Nasdaq’s listing standards require stocks to trade above $1; these companies are effectively “consolidating their shares” to avoid delisting. While this can temporarily create the appearance of strength, liquidity often contracts, and without operational improvement the price can slide back under thresholds.

📉 Historical Context

On average, reverse split stocks underperform the broader market over the next 12 months unless paired with a genuine turnaround. Leslie’s $LESL is a good case study: once a household brand in pool supplies, it’s now fighting to maintain listing relevance. RAYA’s 220-for-1 is extreme by any measure, a reminder of how distressed small-caps can get before they reset the tape.

🔍 What to Watch

Liquidity and order books: Spreads tend to widen after a reverse split. Traders who thrive on volatility will be watching.

• Short interest: Sometimes shorts cover into the split event, but often they reload once the new float stabilises.

Options pricing: IV can spike around reverse split events as market makers adjust contracts.

• Sentiment drift: Social media chatter tends to flare up around splits but quickly fades unless news catalysts follow.

⚔️ The Bigger Picture

This flurry of splits is a defensive manoeuvre across micro and small-cap land. With higher interest rates, tightening capital markets, and Nasdaq’s stricter enforcement, we’re likely to see more companies resort to this tactic. The question is whether any can use the reset to rebuild credibility, or whether these names join the long list of reverse-split casualties.

👉❓Which of these reverse split tickers do you think can translate this compliance move into a genuine turnaround, and which are simply buying time before fading into irrelevance?

📢 Don’t miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends, and insights that move markets 🚀📈 I’m obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Let’s outsmart the market and stack those gains together! 🍀

Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC 📈🚀🍀🍀🍀

@Tiger_comments @TigerObserver @TigerStars @TigerPM 

# 💰Stocks to watch today?(19 Dec)

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment21

  • Top
  • Latest
  • Kiwi Tigress
    ·09-29
    TOP
    The way you broke this down makes it clear these splits aren’t magic bullets, they’re just survival plays. Seeing $RAYA at 220 for 1 actually blew my mind because that’s desperation, not confidence. I’m locked into how compliance resets reshape momentum and test retail conviction
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Barcode
      KT your read on $RAYA nails it, compliance driven resets rarely equal confidence, and the test is always whether fundamentals catch up to the optics.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode
      Appreciate your engagement KT, stronger trends emerge from broader dialogue.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
  • Tui Jude
    ·09-29
    TOP
    📊The liquidity angle you raised is spot on. Once $POAI goes 1 for 15 it’ll be interesting to watch how spreads move. I’ve seen the same in $AMC post split where volume thinned and the book felt heavier to push through on either side. That’s where traders get tested.
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Barcode
      TJ your $POAI link is sharp, spreads widening post split often trap traders on fills, just like $AMC’s reset phase when liquidity drained.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode
      I value your attention TJ, depth grows with shared insight.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
  • 📘I’ve always seen reverse splits as a short term fix rather than a path to real value. Your point on Leslie’s $LESL hits hard since it shows how even household names can struggle. It makes me think of $GME after its compliance battle and how different the outcomes can be.
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Barcode
      CCW you’re right on $LESL, the compliance move buys time but without earnings traction it risks fading like $GME before the turnaround narrative built momentum.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode
      Your read matters CCW, each perspective sharpens the cycle lens.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
  • Mortimer Arthur
    ·09-29
    TOP
    Gentlemen, we need to move this Leslie stock up to at least $1, so by time when they do 20 for 1 reverse split, we will end up with $20 BUCKS per share OK ! and then a very massive shorts squeeze scenario might follow too.

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Barcode
      MA your comparison is astute. A 220 for 1 restructuring is less a corporate strategy than a forensic signal of balance sheet fragility. The parallel with $NVAX highlights how reverse splits function as mere temporal reprieves; without operational resurgence, regulatory compliance quickly erodes.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode
      I value your attention MA, depth grows with shared insight.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
  • Hen Solo
    ·09-29
    TOP
    🔬That 220 for 1 on $RAYA is staggering and really underlines distress more than strength. I appreciate the reminder that Nasdaq’s tighter rules mean one slip and you’re out. Makes me compare it with $NVAX after its reverse split scramble to hold ground.
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Barcode
      HS I agree, $RAYA’s scale signals weakness not strength, and with Nasdaq’s one shot rule it resembles $NVAX’s struggle to hold relevance.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode
      Thanks HS, thoughtful time spent here strengthens conviction.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
  • This CEO deserves to buy his CETX,in the worst way possible,by covering his short position,trades flat because his offering partner dumps on green candles,20% short and low float

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Barcode
      VA you’re framing it well. In microcaps like $CETX, a CEO covering into structural short pressure while capital partners distribute is less about conviction and more about survival mechanics. With 20% short and a thin float, price action becomes dictated by balance sheet stress, not fundamentals.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode
      Your time adds clarity VA, refining how we see shifts in markets.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
  • Queengirlypops
    ·09-29
    TOP
    This post really got me thinking because a 1 for 20 like $AREB feels like pure optics while $LESL trying to climb back above the threshold shows how fragile brands can be. I’m vibing with your liquidity callouts too, because tighter books always flip the game right after the split
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Barcode
      Q you’ve framed $AREB and $LESL perfectly, optics versus fragility, and I agree liquidity shifts post split are the real battlefield for short term flows.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report
    • Barcode
      Your time matters Q, volatility makes more sense with engaged readers sharpening the lens.
      09-29
      Reply
      Report