I won’t bank on intel’s revenge comeback. It still depends to be seen whether it can fulfil its end of the deal with these various tie-ups. I see these as intel’s partners wanting to rely less on their current partners and hence being held hostage if their current partners ditch them rather than intel being recognised for its own strengths. It is the second best alternative and not a true rival. Rivals partner with it because cooperation is better than cut throat competition.


I think any of its current rivals like ARM and Qualcomm might partner with it to reduce the pain of rivalry and to collectively capture more market share. As the saying goes, the enemy of your enemy can be your friend because both have the same enemy. They could partner to push out one company first.


I see meta’s potential investment as potentially a political signaling but I also see it as a second tier option that meta is willing to consider either from a price point or availability.
# Intel Beats Sales! Above $40, Smooth Sailing Ahead?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment5

  • Top
  • Latest
  • NinaEmmie
    ·09-26
    TOP
    Insightful perspective! Totally agree! [Wow]
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • MHh
      Thank you[Grin]
      09-27
      Reply
      Report
  • You say Intel’s not a true rival—could its new foundry tech change that down the line?
    Reply
    Report
  • Jo Betsy
    ·09-28
    If partners see Intel as backup, won’t that limit how much they commit to its tie-ups?
    Reply
    Report
  • Intel’s “second-best” label makes sense—partners pick it to avoid being held hostage.
    Reply
    Report