I think any of its current rivals like ARM and Qualcomm might partner with it to reduce the pain of rivalry and to collectively capture more market share. As the saying goes, the enemy of your enemy can be your friend because both have the same enemy. They could partner to push out one company first.
I see meta’s potential investment as potentially a political signaling but I also see it as a second tier option that meta is willing to consider either from a price point or availability.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
11
Report
Login to post
- NinaEmmie·09-26TOPInsightful perspective! Totally agree! [Wow]1Report
- Phyllis Strachey·09-28You say Intel’s not a true rival—could its new foundry tech change that down the line?LikeReport
- Jo Betsy·09-28If partners see Intel as backup, won’t that limit how much they commit to its tie-ups?LikeReport
- Megan Barnard·09-28Intel’s “second-best” label makes sense—partners pick it to avoid being held hostage.LikeReport
