Profile - To The Moon

elufa

Posts · 11Posts · 11
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- elufaelufa
  ·2022-09-13
  Good
  299 Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
- elufaelufa
  ·2022-09-13
  Great
  Singapore Spent S$72.3 Billion on Covid-19 in FY2020 and FY2021, Less Than Budgeted
  SINGAPORE’S government spent S$72.3 billion on Covid-19 in FY 2020 and 2021, less than the S$100 bil
  Singapore Spent S$72.3 Billion on Covid-19 in FY2020 and FY2021, Less Than Budgeted
  463 Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
- elufaelufa
  ·2022-09-12
  Good
  Nio, XPeng and Li Auto Jumped in Premarket Trading
  Nio, XPeng and Li Auto jumped in premarket trading as all of the three gained more than 2%.
  Nio, XPeng and Li Auto Jumped in Premarket Trading
  441 Comment
  4
  Share
  Report
- elufaelufa
  ·2022-09-12
  Awesome
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  229 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- elufaelufa
  ·2022-09-12
  Good
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  388 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- elufaelufa
  ·2022-09-12
  Good
  Carvana Stock Looks "Grossly Undervalued" despite Falling Used-Car Prices, Says Analyst
  Shares of Carvana Co. were up 8% in premarket trading Monday after a Piper Sandler analyst turned bu
  Carvana Stock Looks "Grossly Undervalued" despite Falling Used-Car Prices, Says Analyst
  461 Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
- elufaelufa
  ·2022-08-27
  Good
  Tesla Ramping Up Fast: Giga Berlin Shooting For 2,000 Model Y A Week
  When Tesla opened its newest factories in Germany and Texas, it was clear it would be a long time before the factories could ramp up significantly. In fact, Tesla provided its annual production and de
  Tesla Ramping Up Fast: Giga Berlin Shooting For 2,000 Model Y A Week
  556 Comment
  4
  Share
  Report
- elufaelufa
  ·2022-08-27
  $CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(CRWD)$
  231 Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
- elufaelufa
  ·2022-08-27
  Useful info
  Did the Fed Kill the Bear Market Rally?
  A big drop sent the Dow down more than a thousand points.
  Did the Fed Kill the Bear Market Rally?
  383 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- elufaelufa
  ·2022-08-27
  Good info
  Did the Fed Kill the Bear Market Rally?
  A big drop sent the Dow down more than a thousand points.
  Did the Fed Kill the Bear Market Rally?
  235 Comment
  4
  Share
  Report

抱歉，当前请求异常(-1)

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"4108812918228490","uuid":"4108812918228490","gmtCreate":1652334758635,"gmtModify":1652449732712,"name":"elufa","pinyin":"elufa","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a2de30587a781e6d638c3890045047c1","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":1,"tweetSize":11,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.02.06","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.20","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9935884348,"gmtCreate":1663068160584,"gmtModify":1676537195319,"author":{"id":"4108812918228490","authorId":"4108812918228490","name":"elufa","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a2de30587a781e6d638c3890045047c1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4108812918228490","authorIdStr":"4108812918228490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9935884348","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":299,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9935885213,"gmtCreate":1663068020132,"gmtModify":1676537195294,"author":{"id":"4108812918228490","authorId":"4108812918228490","name":"elufa","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a2de30587a781e6d638c3890045047c1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4108812918228490","authorIdStr":"4108812918228490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9935885213","repostId":"1149440294","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1149440294","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1663064553,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1149440294?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-09-13 18:22","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Singapore Spent S$72.3 Billion on Covid-19 in FY2020 and FY2021, Less Than Budgeted","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1149440294","media":"businesstimes","summary":"SINGAPORE’S government spent S$72.3 billion on Covid-19 in FY 2020 and 2021, less than the S$100 bil","content":"<div>\n<p>SINGAPORE’S government spent S$72.3 billion on Covid-19 in FY 2020 and 2021, less than the S$100 billion committed in its budgets for those years, said Second Minister for Finance Indranee Rajah in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/government-economy/singapore-spent-s723-billion-on-covid-19-in-fy2020-and-fy2021-less-than-budgeted\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Spent S$72.3 Billion on Covid-19 in FY2020 and FY2021, Less Than Budgeted</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Spent S$72.3 Billion on Covid-19 in FY2020 and FY2021, Less Than Budgeted\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-13 18:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/government-economy/singapore-spent-s723-billion-on-covid-19-in-fy2020-and-fy2021-less-than-budgeted><strong>businesstimes</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SINGAPORE’S government spent S$72.3 billion on Covid-19 in FY 2020 and 2021, less than the S$100 billion committed in its budgets for those years, said Second Minister for Finance Indranee Rajah in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/government-economy/singapore-spent-s723-billion-on-covid-19-in-fy2020-and-fy2021-less-than-budgeted\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STI.SI":"富时新加坡海峡指数"},"source_url":"https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/government-economy/singapore-spent-s723-billion-on-covid-19-in-fy2020-and-fy2021-less-than-budgeted","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1149440294","content_text":"SINGAPORE’S government spent S$72.3 billion on Covid-19 in FY 2020 and 2021, less than the S$100 billion committed in its budgets for those years, said Second Minister for Finance Indranee Rajah in Parliament on Tuesday (Sep 13).Of this, S$13.4 billion was spent on public health measures, S$50.6 billion was used to protect jobs and S$8.3 billion was for direct household and social support, she said in response to a supplementary question from People’s Action Party (PAP) Member of Parliament (MP) Foo Mee Har (West Coast GRC).For FY 2020, the government had initially set aside loan capital in anticipation of a tight credit market, but this was eventually not needed, she explained.“We had some under-utilisation in public health spending,” she added. “These under-utilisations were offset, however, by additional funding for the various support packages rolled out... over the Heightened Alerts and stabilisation phases from May to November 2021.”Foo had asked if the government would consider commissioning a special review of controls and checks in relation to pandemic-related procurement and expenditure. To this, Indranee replied that the Ministry of Finance had already started its review of such controls and checks earlier this year.Agencies are conducting their respective audits on Covid-19 pandemic-related procurement and expenditure to ensure that “transactions are bona fide and that there is no erroneous payment”, she said. This is on top of the earlier-released Auditor-General’s thematic audit of Covid-related procurement and expenditure.“The government has put in place a number of measures to mitigate fraud risk,” she added.Replying to a separate question, Minister for Health Ong Ye Kung said that hospitalisations have fallen in the most recent Omicron infection wave, compared to previous Covid-19 waves.But he added: “However, it is not possible to estimate a hospitalisation incidence rate which our healthcare capacity can accommodate, or can handle, because this is also a function of the infectiousness of the variant and the number of people who get infected.”Responding to other questions from PAP MP Yip Hon Weng (Yio Chu Kang SMC), Ong reiterated that the use of the Noravax vaccine for young persons aged 12 to 17 is still under independent evaluation, adding: “Novavax has not submitted the application for its vaccine to be administered to children under 12 years old.”As for the Moderna vaccine for young children under 5 years old and boosters for children aged 6 to 12, the intention remains to have a combined vaccination exercise around end-October or early November, as Covid cases are low for these age groups and the older age group is “getting into examination mode”, he added, in response to a supplementary question from Yip.Ong also addressed a question from Workers’ Party MP Jamus Lim (Sengkang GRC) about when vaccination-differentiated safe management measures (VDS) would be removed. He reiterated that the government is reviewing Singapore’s vaccination requirements, moving from an approach of counting number of doses and boosters, to one of ensuring that vaccination is ‘up to date’.The government expects to complete this review in the next few months, and will review VDS at the same time, he said.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":463,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9932702053,"gmtCreate":1662988317273,"gmtModify":1676537176699,"author":{"id":"4108812918228490","authorId":"4108812918228490","name":"elufa","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a2de30587a781e6d638c3890045047c1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4108812918228490","authorIdStr":"4108812918228490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9932702053","repostId":"1173454771","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1173454771","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1662986524,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1173454771?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-09-12 20:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nio, XPeng and Li Auto Jumped in Premarket Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1173454771","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Nio, XPeng and Li Auto jumped in premarket trading as all of the three gained more than 2%.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Nio, XPeng and Li Auto jumped in premarket trading as all of the three gained more than 2%.<img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/dd330e44fc2d364137b3c2d0da269bd2\" tg-width=\"442\" tg-height=\"183\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nio, XPeng and Li Auto Jumped in Premarket Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNio, XPeng and Li Auto Jumped in Premarket Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-12 20:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Nio, XPeng and Li Auto jumped in premarket trading as all of the three gained more than 2%.<img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/dd330e44fc2d364137b3c2d0da269bd2\" tg-width=\"442\" tg-height=\"183\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"XPEV":"小鹏汽车","LI":"理想汽车","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1173454771","content_text":"Nio, XPeng and Li Auto jumped in premarket trading as all of the three gained more than 2%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":441,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9932706184,"gmtCreate":1662988253448,"gmtModify":1676537176675,"author":{"id":"4108812918228490","authorId":"4108812918228490","name":"elufa","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a2de30587a781e6d638c3890045047c1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4108812918228490","authorIdStr":"4108812918228490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Awesome","listText":"Awesome","text":"Awesome","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9932706184","repostId":"2266804526","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":229,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9932708438,"gmtCreate":1662988212424,"gmtModify":1676537176659,"author":{"id":"4108812918228490","authorId":"4108812918228490","name":"elufa","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a2de30587a781e6d638c3890045047c1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4108812918228490","authorIdStr":"4108812918228490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9932708438","repostId":"2266804526","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":388,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9932708546,"gmtCreate":1662988185785,"gmtModify":1676537176659,"author":{"id":"4108812918228490","authorId":"4108812918228490","name":"elufa","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a2de30587a781e6d638c3890045047c1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4108812918228490","authorIdStr":"4108812918228490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9932708546","repostId":"2266857347","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2266857347","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1662984056,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2266857347?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-09-12 20:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Carvana Stock Looks \"Grossly Undervalued\" despite Falling Used-Car Prices, Says Analyst","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2266857347","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Shares of Carvana Co. were up 8% in premarket trading Monday after a Piper Sandler analyst turned bu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVNA\">Carvana Co.</a> were up 8% in premarket trading Monday after a Piper Sandler analyst turned bullish on the stock, writing that &#34;many realistic scenarios&#34; suggest the name is &#34;grossly undervalued&#34; despite declines in used-car prices.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78f5fe9efa24ba3f7685641146a3abe8\" tg-width=\"827\" tg-height=\"844\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>&#34;Before we get to the punchline, please note that yes, we are aware that used vehicle prices are falling,&#34; Piper Sandler&#39;s Alexander Potter wrote. &#34;We know that rising interest rates are a risk, and we know that bankruptcy is a real possibility.&#34;</p><p>That said, he also noted that Carvana shares (CVNA) are a tenth as valuable as they were a year back, and while the company faces an &#34;array of possible outcomes,&#34; many of those &#34;imply substantial upside.&#34;</p><p>Carvana shares &#34;could easily continue falling, but with so much potential upside, we think investors should consider owning at least some CVNA,&#34; he continued, as he upgraded Carvana&#39;s stock to overweight from neutral, while cutting his price target to $73 from $98.</p><p>In Potter&#39;s view, Carvana isn&#39;t necessarily as complex a business as some on Wall Street might think.</p><p>&#34;In order to stay informed, investors often feel obliged to study outside-the-box data sets (e.g. securitization filings, used vehicle pricing indices, web-scraping results, etc.),&#34; Potter wrote. But he sees Carvana as a &#34;simple business&#34; at its foundation, as the company&#39;s value can be boiled down to its share of the market used cars and its profitability.</p><p>When looking at those factors and making assumptions about tax rates, capital efficiency, and weighted average cost of capital, Potter&#39;s analysis of Carvana suggests &#34;reason for optimism.&#34;</p><p>He acknowledged that the company faces risk, including related to its acquisition of Adesa&#39;s physical auction business, which he says can broaden Carvana&#39;s capacity, though the company had to accept &#34;onerous&#34; financing terms due to the market climate.</p><p>&#34;Some investors may rightly note that long-term potential is meaningless if CVNA cannot survive the coming quarters,&#34; he wrote. &#34;Due to deteriorating market conditions and a hefty debt burden, there are definitely some scenarios that imply fair equity value of $0/share.&#34;</p><p>The company&#39;s &#34;predicament&#34; relates to the Adesa deal because Carvana financed it &#34;using a $3.275 billion junk bond carrying a 10.25% interest rate,&#34; he continued.</p><p>Shares of Carvana are up 66% over the past three months, though they&#39;re down 84% so far this year. The S&amp;P 500  has gained 4% over a three-month span but is off 15% on a year-to-date basis.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Carvana Stock Looks \"Grossly Undervalued\" despite Falling Used-Car Prices, Says Analyst</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCarvana Stock Looks \"Grossly Undervalued\" despite Falling Used-Car Prices, Says Analyst\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-09-12 20:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Shares of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CVNA\">Carvana Co.</a> were up 8% in premarket trading Monday after a Piper Sandler analyst turned bullish on the stock, writing that &#34;many realistic scenarios&#34; suggest the name is &#34;grossly undervalued&#34; despite declines in used-car prices.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78f5fe9efa24ba3f7685641146a3abe8\" tg-width=\"827\" tg-height=\"844\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>&#34;Before we get to the punchline, please note that yes, we are aware that used vehicle prices are falling,&#34; Piper Sandler&#39;s Alexander Potter wrote. &#34;We know that rising interest rates are a risk, and we know that bankruptcy is a real possibility.&#34;</p><p>That said, he also noted that Carvana shares (CVNA) are a tenth as valuable as they were a year back, and while the company faces an &#34;array of possible outcomes,&#34; many of those &#34;imply substantial upside.&#34;</p><p>Carvana shares &#34;could easily continue falling, but with so much potential upside, we think investors should consider owning at least some CVNA,&#34; he continued, as he upgraded Carvana&#39;s stock to overweight from neutral, while cutting his price target to $73 from $98.</p><p>In Potter&#39;s view, Carvana isn&#39;t necessarily as complex a business as some on Wall Street might think.</p><p>&#34;In order to stay informed, investors often feel obliged to study outside-the-box data sets (e.g. securitization filings, used vehicle pricing indices, web-scraping results, etc.),&#34; Potter wrote. But he sees Carvana as a &#34;simple business&#34; at its foundation, as the company&#39;s value can be boiled down to its share of the market used cars and its profitability.</p><p>When looking at those factors and making assumptions about tax rates, capital efficiency, and weighted average cost of capital, Potter&#39;s analysis of Carvana suggests &#34;reason for optimism.&#34;</p><p>He acknowledged that the company faces risk, including related to its acquisition of Adesa&#39;s physical auction business, which he says can broaden Carvana&#39;s capacity, though the company had to accept &#34;onerous&#34; financing terms due to the market climate.</p><p>&#34;Some investors may rightly note that long-term potential is meaningless if CVNA cannot survive the coming quarters,&#34; he wrote. &#34;Due to deteriorating market conditions and a hefty debt burden, there are definitely some scenarios that imply fair equity value of $0/share.&#34;</p><p>The company&#39;s &#34;predicament&#34; relates to the Adesa deal because Carvana financed it &#34;using a $3.275 billion junk bond carrying a 10.25% interest rate,&#34; he continued.</p><p>Shares of Carvana are up 66% over the past three months, though they&#39;re down 84% so far this year. The S&amp;P 500  has gained 4% over a three-month span but is off 15% on a year-to-date basis.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4214":"汽车零售","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","CVNA":"Carvana Co.","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2266857347","content_text":"Shares of Carvana Co. were up 8% in premarket trading Monday after a Piper Sandler analyst turned bullish on the stock, writing that \"many realistic scenarios\" suggest the name is \"grossly undervalued\" despite declines in used-car prices.\"Before we get to the punchline, please note that yes, we are aware that used vehicle prices are falling,\" Piper Sandler's Alexander Potter wrote. \"We know that rising interest rates are a risk, and we know that bankruptcy is a real possibility.\"That said, he also noted that Carvana shares (CVNA) are a tenth as valuable as they were a year back, and while the company faces an \"array of possible outcomes,\" many of those \"imply substantial upside.\"Carvana shares \"could easily continue falling, but with so much potential upside, we think investors should consider owning at least some CVNA,\" he continued, as he upgraded Carvana's stock to overweight from neutral, while cutting his price target to $73 from $98.In Potter's view, Carvana isn't necessarily as complex a business as some on Wall Street might think.\"In order to stay informed, investors often feel obliged to study outside-the-box data sets (e.g. securitization filings, used vehicle pricing indices, web-scraping results, etc.),\" Potter wrote. But he sees Carvana as a \"simple business\" at its foundation, as the company's value can be boiled down to its share of the market used cars and its profitability.When looking at those factors and making assumptions about tax rates, capital efficiency, and weighted average cost of capital, Potter's analysis of Carvana suggests \"reason for optimism.\"He acknowledged that the company faces risk, including related to its acquisition of Adesa's physical auction business, which he says can broaden Carvana's capacity, though the company had to accept \"onerous\" financing terms due to the market climate.\"Some investors may rightly note that long-term potential is meaningless if CVNA cannot survive the coming quarters,\" he wrote. \"Due to deteriorating market conditions and a hefty debt burden, there are definitely some scenarios that imply fair equity value of $0/share.\"The company's \"predicament\" relates to the Adesa deal because Carvana financed it \"using a $3.275 billion junk bond carrying a 10.25% interest rate,\" he continued.Shares of Carvana are up 66% over the past three months, though they're down 84% so far this year. The S&P 500  has gained 4% over a three-month span but is off 15% on a year-to-date basis.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":461,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9994664711,"gmtCreate":1661640939535,"gmtModify":1676536551293,"author":{"id":"4108812918228490","authorId":"4108812918228490","name":"elufa","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a2de30587a781e6d638c3890045047c1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4108812918228490","authorIdStr":"4108812918228490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9994664711","repostId":"1180024105","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1180024105","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1661579226,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1180024105?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-08-27 13:47","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Ramping Up Fast: Giga Berlin Shooting For 2,000 Model Y A Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1180024105","media":"InsideEVs","summary":"When Tesla opened its newest factories in Germany and Texas, it was clear it would be a long time before the factories could ramp up significantly. In fact, Tesla provided its annual production and de","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>When Tesla opened its newest factories in Germany and Texas, it was clear it would be a long time before the factories could ramp up significantly. In fact, Tesla provided its annual production and delivery estimates stating that it wasn&#39;t counting on Giga Berlin or Giga Texas to make a monumental impact since Giga Shanghai and Tesla&#39;s Fremont factory are cranking out EVs at an increasing speed.</p><p>Nonetheless, Tesla already hit the milestone of 1,000 Model Y crossovers produced per week in Berlin by June 2022. The same goal was achieved at Giga Texas much more recently. At any rate, new reports are suggesting that Tesla is hoping to produce 2,000 Model Y per week in the near future. As we previously reported, the goal is for the Tesla factory in Germany to reach a run rate of 3,000 EVs per week by this October 2022.</p><p>Keep in mind that Tesla&#39;s CEO Elon Musk has been raving about the Model Y since he first unveiled it. Musk has gone so far as to say that it will eventually be the best-selling vehicle across the globe, and it&#39;s already making notable strides.</p><p>With two factories making Model Y crossovers in the US for the local market, as well as a factory in China producing the electric crossover for local and global consumption, Tesla is already proving that it can begin to chip away at the high demand by reducing Model Y delivery times. Now, focusing on the European market seems paramount.</p><p>The new 2,000-Model-Y-per-week goal was reported by Teslarati based on details from the German publication TeslaMag.de. The article cites reports suggesting that Tesla aims to achieve the goal sometime in September 2022.</p><p>If the EV maker can pull it off, it will have doubled its production capacity in just a few months. Adding another 1,000 EVs produced per week in another month or so doesn&#39;t seem impossible, but we&#39;ll have to wait and see how the ramp-up to 2,000 progresses before we speculate about when Tesla might actually hit 3,000.</p><p>It&#39;s important to note that even though Tesla just recently opened Giga Berlin, it has already carried out some upgrades to speed up production. The same has been true of Giga Shanghai and Giga Texas.</p><p>Tesla continues to prove that it can increase its production speed at factories across the globe and that the upgrades are actually making a notable impact. This helps to make it more clear that those same strategies and upgrades may have a similar impact at each of Tesla&#39;s factories.</p><p>Looking further out, Tesla executive Drew Baglino noted during the company&#39;s Q2 2022 earning conference call that Giga Berlin could reach a run rate of as many as 5,000 Model Y SUVs per week by the end of 2022.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1638513147814","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Ramping Up Fast: Giga Berlin Shooting For 2,000 Model Y A Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Ramping Up Fast: Giga Berlin Shooting For 2,000 Model Y A Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-27 13:47 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://insideevs.com/news/606719/tesla-ramping-fast-giga-berlin-report-2000-week/><strong>InsideEVs</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>When Tesla opened its newest factories in Germany and Texas, it was clear it would be a long time before the factories could ramp up significantly. In fact, Tesla provided its annual production and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://insideevs.com/news/606719/tesla-ramping-fast-giga-berlin-report-2000-week/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://insideevs.com/news/606719/tesla-ramping-fast-giga-berlin-report-2000-week/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1180024105","content_text":"When Tesla opened its newest factories in Germany and Texas, it was clear it would be a long time before the factories could ramp up significantly. In fact, Tesla provided its annual production and delivery estimates stating that it wasn't counting on Giga Berlin or Giga Texas to make a monumental impact since Giga Shanghai and Tesla's Fremont factory are cranking out EVs at an increasing speed.Nonetheless, Tesla already hit the milestone of 1,000 Model Y crossovers produced per week in Berlin by June 2022. The same goal was achieved at Giga Texas much more recently. At any rate, new reports are suggesting that Tesla is hoping to produce 2,000 Model Y per week in the near future. As we previously reported, the goal is for the Tesla factory in Germany to reach a run rate of 3,000 EVs per week by this October 2022.Keep in mind that Tesla's CEO Elon Musk has been raving about the Model Y since he first unveiled it. Musk has gone so far as to say that it will eventually be the best-selling vehicle across the globe, and it's already making notable strides.With two factories making Model Y crossovers in the US for the local market, as well as a factory in China producing the electric crossover for local and global consumption, Tesla is already proving that it can begin to chip away at the high demand by reducing Model Y delivery times. Now, focusing on the European market seems paramount.The new 2,000-Model-Y-per-week goal was reported by Teslarati based on details from the German publication TeslaMag.de. The article cites reports suggesting that Tesla aims to achieve the goal sometime in September 2022.If the EV maker can pull it off, it will have doubled its production capacity in just a few months. Adding another 1,000 EVs produced per week in another month or so doesn't seem impossible, but we'll have to wait and see how the ramp-up to 2,000 progresses before we speculate about when Tesla might actually hit 3,000.It's important to note that even though Tesla just recently opened Giga Berlin, it has already carried out some upgrades to speed up production. The same has been true of Giga Shanghai and Giga Texas.Tesla continues to prove that it can increase its production speed at factories across the globe and that the upgrades are actually making a notable impact. This helps to make it more clear that those same strategies and upgrades may have a similar impact at each of Tesla's factories.Looking further out, Tesla executive Drew Baglino noted during the company's Q2 2022 earning conference call that Giga Berlin could reach a run rate of as many as 5,000 Model Y SUVs per week by the end of 2022.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":556,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9994664896,"gmtCreate":1661640834717,"gmtModify":1676536551284,"author":{"id":"4108812918228490","authorId":"4108812918228490","name":"elufa","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a2de30587a781e6d638c3890045047c1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4108812918228490","authorIdStr":"4108812918228490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CRWD\">$CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(CRWD)$</a>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/CRWD\">$CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(CRWD)$</a>","text":"$CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(CRWD)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e700ea4912f6b9f3463c3c1ec225a216","width":"1080","height":"1736"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9994664896","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":231,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9994665532,"gmtCreate":1661640702228,"gmtModify":1676536551261,"author":{"id":"4108812918228490","authorId":"4108812918228490","name":"elufa","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a2de30587a781e6d638c3890045047c1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4108812918228490","authorIdStr":"4108812918228490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Useful info","listText":"Useful info","text":"Useful info","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9994665532","repostId":"2262901563","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2262901563","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1661571503,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2262901563?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-08-27 11:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Did the Fed Kill the Bear Market Rally?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2262901563","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A big drop sent the Dow down more than a thousand points.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Market participants have been concerned for weeks about what Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell might say at the central bank&#39;s annual symposium in Jackson Hole. Apparently, they were quite discouraged by what they heard, as Powell restated the Fed&#39;s determination to push interest rates as high as they needed to go in order to ensure that inflationary pressures don&#39;t become permanently entrenched in the U.S. economy. For those who had hoped for a more dovish response, that was bad news, and the <b>Dow Jones Industrial Average </b>ended the day down more than a thousand points. Percentage drops for the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> and <b>Nasdaq Composite</b> were also in the 3% to 4% range.</p><p>Among large-cap stocks, there were only a handful of gainers as most share prices followed the broader market lower. Some now fear that the rebound that the market saw from mid-June to about a week ago may well prove to have been only a bear market rally, with today&#39;s downward move reestablishing a bearish trend that could take market indexes far lower.</p><table><thead><tr></tr></thead></table><p>There&#39;s no way to predict short-term price movements in the stock market. However, efforts to fight inflation, if successful, should result in better long-term results for investors than if the Fed simply backed off and allowed higher price trends to become a permanent feature of the U.S. economy.</p><h2>Stubborn inflation</h2><p>The big question still facing investors is whether inflation has peaked. Many of those watching economic data were pleased to see the upward moves in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCE) start to moderate recently. However, just because inflation has stopped accelerating doesn&#39;t mean that it&#39;s under control.</p><p>The latest numbers from the Bureau of Economic Analysis on the PCE tell  the story well. The headline number that most people emphasized was that the price index fell 0.1% in July, with goods prices falling 0.4%.</p><p>However, looking more closely at what goes into the PCE price index gives a more complete picture. Much of the downward pressure on the index came from a 7.7% drop in the sub-index for gasoline and other energy goods. That by itself was enough to send nondurable goods prices down half a percent, even as food and beverage prices jumped 1.3% month over month.</p><p>Some other key components showed continued rises. Housing and utility costs were up 0.6% for the month, extending their gain over the past 12 months to 7%.</p><p>Perhaps most importantly, even larger declines in a single month wouldn&#39;t by themselves reverse adverse trends. Energy costs are still more than 45% higher than they were this time last year. Food and beverages are up nearly 12% year over year, and even when you exclude food and energy, core PCE prices are up 4.6% since July 2021 -- more than double the 2% target that the Fed pursues.</p><h2>Is a recession worth long-term prosperity?</h2><p>Investors worry that a prolonged set of interest-rate increases from the Fed will push the economy into recession and restrain business activity. If that view from the Fed was unexpectedly hawkish, then it could leave stock market participants facing downward revisions on earnings estimates that could send stock prices lower once again.</p><p>In the long run, though, the impact of inflation on stock prices historically has been more difficult to overcome than short-term business cycle fluctuations. When you look back at recent bouts of inflation in the 1970s and early 1980s, for instance, you&#39;ll notice significant volatility in stock markets that led to subpar returns. Only when inflationary pressures were resolved did solid bull markets result, and the long bull markets of the 1990s, mid-2000s, and 2010s all came in economic environments with little or no inflation.</p><p>It&#39;s indeed possible that a central bank with tight monetary policy might bring short-term pain to the stock market and an end to what might materialize as a bear market rally. However, I believe investors will be happier with this outcome in the long run than they would be with sustained inflation and the complications that come with it.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Did the Fed Kill the Bear Market Rally?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDid the Fed Kill the Bear Market Rally?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-27 11:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/26/did-the-fed-just-kill-the-bear-market-rally/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Market participants have been concerned for weeks about what Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell might say at the central bank's annual symposium in Jackson Hole. Apparently, they were quite ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/26/did-the-fed-just-kill-the-bear-market-rally/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/26/did-the-fed-just-kill-the-bear-market-rally/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2262901563","content_text":"Market participants have been concerned for weeks about what Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell might say at the central bank's annual symposium in Jackson Hole. Apparently, they were quite discouraged by what they heard, as Powell restated the Fed's determination to push interest rates as high as they needed to go in order to ensure that inflationary pressures don't become permanently entrenched in the U.S. economy. For those who had hoped for a more dovish response, that was bad news, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average ended the day down more than a thousand points. Percentage drops for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite were also in the 3% to 4% range.Among large-cap stocks, there were only a handful of gainers as most share prices followed the broader market lower. Some now fear that the rebound that the market saw from mid-June to about a week ago may well prove to have been only a bear market rally, with today's downward move reestablishing a bearish trend that could take market indexes far lower.There's no way to predict short-term price movements in the stock market. However, efforts to fight inflation, if successful, should result in better long-term results for investors than if the Fed simply backed off and allowed higher price trends to become a permanent feature of the U.S. economy.Stubborn inflationThe big question still facing investors is whether inflation has peaked. Many of those watching economic data were pleased to see the upward moves in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCE) start to moderate recently. However, just because inflation has stopped accelerating doesn't mean that it's under control.The latest numbers from the Bureau of Economic Analysis on the PCE tell  the story well. The headline number that most people emphasized was that the price index fell 0.1% in July, with goods prices falling 0.4%.However, looking more closely at what goes into the PCE price index gives a more complete picture. Much of the downward pressure on the index came from a 7.7% drop in the sub-index for gasoline and other energy goods. That by itself was enough to send nondurable goods prices down half a percent, even as food and beverage prices jumped 1.3% month over month.Some other key components showed continued rises. Housing and utility costs were up 0.6% for the month, extending their gain over the past 12 months to 7%.Perhaps most importantly, even larger declines in a single month wouldn't by themselves reverse adverse trends. Energy costs are still more than 45% higher than they were this time last year. Food and beverages are up nearly 12% year over year, and even when you exclude food and energy, core PCE prices are up 4.6% since July 2021 -- more than double the 2% target that the Fed pursues.Is a recession worth long-term prosperity?Investors worry that a prolonged set of interest-rate increases from the Fed will push the economy into recession and restrain business activity. If that view from the Fed was unexpectedly hawkish, then it could leave stock market participants facing downward revisions on earnings estimates that could send stock prices lower once again.In the long run, though, the impact of inflation on stock prices historically has been more difficult to overcome than short-term business cycle fluctuations. When you look back at recent bouts of inflation in the 1970s and early 1980s, for instance, you'll notice significant volatility in stock markets that led to subpar returns. Only when inflationary pressures were resolved did solid bull markets result, and the long bull markets of the 1990s, mid-2000s, and 2010s all came in economic environments with little or no inflation.It's indeed possible that a central bank with tight monetary policy might bring short-term pain to the stock market and an end to what might materialize as a bear market rally. However, I believe investors will be happier with this outcome in the long run than they would be with sustained inflation and the complications that come with it.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":383,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9994665052,"gmtCreate":1661640618380,"gmtModify":1676536551246,"author":{"id":"4108812918228490","authorId":"4108812918228490","name":"elufa","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a2de30587a781e6d638c3890045047c1","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4108812918228490","authorIdStr":"4108812918228490"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good info","listText":"Good info","text":"Good info","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9994665052","repostId":"2262901563","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2262901563","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1661571503,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2262901563?lang=&edition=full_marsco","pubTime":"2022-08-27 11:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Did the Fed Kill the Bear Market Rally?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2262901563","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"A big drop sent the Dow down more than a thousand points.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Market participants have been concerned for weeks about what Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell might say at the central bank&#39;s annual symposium in Jackson Hole. Apparently, they were quite discouraged by what they heard, as Powell restated the Fed&#39;s determination to push interest rates as high as they needed to go in order to ensure that inflationary pressures don&#39;t become permanently entrenched in the U.S. economy. For those who had hoped for a more dovish response, that was bad news, and the <b>Dow Jones Industrial Average </b>ended the day down more than a thousand points. Percentage drops for the <b>S&amp;P 500</b> and <b>Nasdaq Composite</b> were also in the 3% to 4% range.</p><p>Among large-cap stocks, there were only a handful of gainers as most share prices followed the broader market lower. Some now fear that the rebound that the market saw from mid-June to about a week ago may well prove to have been only a bear market rally, with today&#39;s downward move reestablishing a bearish trend that could take market indexes far lower.</p><table><thead><tr></tr></thead></table><p>There&#39;s no way to predict short-term price movements in the stock market. However, efforts to fight inflation, if successful, should result in better long-term results for investors than if the Fed simply backed off and allowed higher price trends to become a permanent feature of the U.S. economy.</p><h2>Stubborn inflation</h2><p>The big question still facing investors is whether inflation has peaked. Many of those watching economic data were pleased to see the upward moves in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCE) start to moderate recently. However, just because inflation has stopped accelerating doesn&#39;t mean that it&#39;s under control.</p><p>The latest numbers from the Bureau of Economic Analysis on the PCE tell  the story well. The headline number that most people emphasized was that the price index fell 0.1% in July, with goods prices falling 0.4%.</p><p>However, looking more closely at what goes into the PCE price index gives a more complete picture. Much of the downward pressure on the index came from a 7.7% drop in the sub-index for gasoline and other energy goods. That by itself was enough to send nondurable goods prices down half a percent, even as food and beverage prices jumped 1.3% month over month.</p><p>Some other key components showed continued rises. Housing and utility costs were up 0.6% for the month, extending their gain over the past 12 months to 7%.</p><p>Perhaps most importantly, even larger declines in a single month wouldn&#39;t by themselves reverse adverse trends. Energy costs are still more than 45% higher than they were this time last year. Food and beverages are up nearly 12% year over year, and even when you exclude food and energy, core PCE prices are up 4.6% since July 2021 -- more than double the 2% target that the Fed pursues.</p><h2>Is a recession worth long-term prosperity?</h2><p>Investors worry that a prolonged set of interest-rate increases from the Fed will push the economy into recession and restrain business activity. If that view from the Fed was unexpectedly hawkish, then it could leave stock market participants facing downward revisions on earnings estimates that could send stock prices lower once again.</p><p>In the long run, though, the impact of inflation on stock prices historically has been more difficult to overcome than short-term business cycle fluctuations. When you look back at recent bouts of inflation in the 1970s and early 1980s, for instance, you&#39;ll notice significant volatility in stock markets that led to subpar returns. Only when inflationary pressures were resolved did solid bull markets result, and the long bull markets of the 1990s, mid-2000s, and 2010s all came in economic environments with little or no inflation.</p><p>It&#39;s indeed possible that a central bank with tight monetary policy might bring short-term pain to the stock market and an end to what might materialize as a bear market rally. However, I believe investors will be happier with this outcome in the long run than they would be with sustained inflation and the complications that come with it.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Did the Fed Kill the Bear Market Rally?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nDid the Fed Kill the Bear Market Rally?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-27 11:38 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/26/did-the-fed-just-kill-the-bear-market-rally/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Market participants have been concerned for weeks about what Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell might say at the central bank's annual symposium in Jackson Hole. Apparently, they were quite ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/26/did-the-fed-just-kill-the-bear-market-rally/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/26/did-the-fed-just-kill-the-bear-market-rally/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2262901563","content_text":"Market participants have been concerned for weeks about what Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell might say at the central bank's annual symposium in Jackson Hole. Apparently, they were quite discouraged by what they heard, as Powell restated the Fed's determination to push interest rates as high as they needed to go in order to ensure that inflationary pressures don't become permanently entrenched in the U.S. economy. For those who had hoped for a more dovish response, that was bad news, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average ended the day down more than a thousand points. Percentage drops for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite were also in the 3% to 4% range.Among large-cap stocks, there were only a handful of gainers as most share prices followed the broader market lower. Some now fear that the rebound that the market saw from mid-June to about a week ago may well prove to have been only a bear market rally, with today's downward move reestablishing a bearish trend that could take market indexes far lower.There's no way to predict short-term price movements in the stock market. However, efforts to fight inflation, if successful, should result in better long-term results for investors than if the Fed simply backed off and allowed higher price trends to become a permanent feature of the U.S. economy.Stubborn inflationThe big question still facing investors is whether inflation has peaked. Many of those watching economic data were pleased to see the upward moves in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCE) start to moderate recently. However, just because inflation has stopped accelerating doesn't mean that it's under control.The latest numbers from the Bureau of Economic Analysis on the PCE tell  the story well. The headline number that most people emphasized was that the price index fell 0.1% in July, with goods prices falling 0.4%.However, looking more closely at what goes into the PCE price index gives a more complete picture. Much of the downward pressure on the index came from a 7.7% drop in the sub-index for gasoline and other energy goods. That by itself was enough to send nondurable goods prices down half a percent, even as food and beverage prices jumped 1.3% month over month.Some other key components showed continued rises. Housing and utility costs were up 0.6% for the month, extending their gain over the past 12 months to 7%.Perhaps most importantly, even larger declines in a single month wouldn't by themselves reverse adverse trends. Energy costs are still more than 45% higher than they were this time last year. Food and beverages are up nearly 12% year over year, and even when you exclude food and energy, core PCE prices are up 4.6% since July 2021 -- more than double the 2% target that the Fed pursues.Is a recession worth long-term prosperity?Investors worry that a prolonged set of interest-rate increases from the Fed will push the economy into recession and restrain business activity. If that view from the Fed was unexpectedly hawkish, then it could leave stock market participants facing downward revisions on earnings estimates that could send stock prices lower once again.In the long run, though, the impact of inflation on stock prices historically has been more difficult to overcome than short-term business cycle fluctuations. When you look back at recent bouts of inflation in the 1970s and early 1980s, for instance, you'll notice significant volatility in stock markets that led to subpar returns. Only when inflationary pressures were resolved did solid bull markets result, and the long bull markets of the 1990s, mid-2000s, and 2010s all came in economic environments with little or no inflation.It's indeed possible that a central bank with tight monetary policy might bring short-term pain to the stock market and an end to what might materialize as a bear market rally. However, I believe investors will be happier with this outcome in the long run than they would be with sustained inflation and the complications that come with it.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":235,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"followers","isTTM":true}