Profile - To The Moon

YinFai

Posts · 3Posts · 3
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- YinFaiYinFai
  ·2021-05-28
  Omg
  The United States' massive infrastructure spending plan has been significantly scaled back again!
  5月27日周四，美国参议院共和党人向白宫提出了一项9280亿美元的基建提案，作为对白宫最新1.7万亿美元基建计划的回应。尽管金额差距缩小，双方在“基建”定义与如何支付方面仍有鸿沟。分析称，这一最新提
  The United States' massive infrastructure spending plan has been significantly scaled back again!
  3.02K Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
No following yet

Most Discussed

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3582514962740876","uuid":"3582514962740876","gmtCreate":1619425710301,"gmtModify":1622168525121,"name":"YinFai","pinyin":"yinfai","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b3236777157d8b61a9865bda227804e","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":20,"tweetSize":3,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.06.06","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":3,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":135121637,"gmtCreate":1622151286029,"gmtModify":1704180277026,"author":{"id":"3582514962740876","authorId":"3582514962740876","name":"YinFai","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b3236777157d8b61a9865bda227804e","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3582514962740876","authorIdStr":"3582514962740876"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Omg","listText":"Omg","text":"Omg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/135121637","repostId":"2138085173","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2138085173","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1622130063,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2138085173?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-27 23:41","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"The United States' massive infrastructure spending plan has been significantly scaled back again!","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2138085173","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"5月27日周四，美国参议院共和党人向白宫提出了一项9280亿美元的基建提案，作为对白宫最新1.7万亿美元基建计划的回应。尽管金额差距缩小，双方在“基建”定义与如何支付方面仍有鸿沟。\n分析称，这一最新提","content":"<p>On Thursday, May 27, U.S. Senate Republicans submitted a $928 billion infrastructure proposal to the White House in response to the White House's latest $1.7 trillion infrastructure plan. Despite the narrowing gap in amounts, the two sides still have gaps over the definition of \"infrastructure\" and how to pay for it.</p><p>Analysts say this latest proposal could help break the deadlock in negotiations between Republicans and the Biden administration over infrastructure plans, after the White House set Memorial Day next Monday (May 31) as the deadline for negotiations to make progress.</p><p>Meanwhile, the $928 billion plan is an increase from the $568 billion spending over five years previously proposed by the Republicans. The new plan will provide funding for transportation systems such as roads, bridges, railways, airports, ports, freight and passenger transport, broadband internet, and water supply over eight years.</p><p><b>The latest proposal suggests $506 billion for roads, bridges, and major infrastructure projects, including $4 billion for electric vehicles, but does not include the Biden administration's priorities.</b>For example, $400 billion for home healthcare, $100 billion for electric vehicle consumer incentives, or spending on upgrading housing and schools.</p><p>Wall Street Insights previously reported that last Friday, in an effort to gain support from Republican members of Congress, the Biden administration made concessions, reducing the original $2.3 trillion infrastructure and jobs program to $1.7 trillion, reducing investment in rural broadband and roads and bridges, and shifting some funding from the jobs program to other bills. At the time, Republicans said the new proposal went far beyond the scope of bipartisan support.</p><p><b>Republican senators who led the drafting of the proposal reiterated today their opposition to the Biden administration's proposed plan to raise corporate taxes to pay for infrastructure investment.</b>Biden had previously stated that the corporate tax rate should be raised from 21% to at least 25%. Republicans want to reallocate unused pandemic relief funds from state and local governments to infrastructure or charge user fees for transportation, such as electric vehicles, to pay bills.</p><p>However, congressional Democrats are bound to oppose such a proposal, which also contradicts Biden's promise that \"individuals earning less than $400,000 a year will not raise taxes,\" because electric vehicle usage fees or raising gasoline taxes would place an additional burden on people.</p><p><b>In addition to fundamental and serious differences between the two parties in Congress on how to pay for infrastructure, they also have different definitions of \"infrastructure\".</b>Republicans demanded that only physical infrastructure be included in the plan, while Democrats demanded the inclusion of \"human infrastructure,\" which refers to the Biden administration's plan to invest funds in caring for the elderly and people with disabilities.</p><p>Elizabeth Warren, a senior Democratic senator who ran for U.S. president, said today that the Republicans' latest proposal \"is not a serious bargaining chip,\" and that \"they have illusions about taking money that has already been promised to be used elsewhere and for spending programs.\"</p><p>Republican Senator Shelley Moore Capito said that Republicans and the White House are close to reaching an agreement on an infrastructure plan, but fundamental issues regarding the scope and payment methods of the package still need to be resolved. \"I am optimistic, but there is still a big gap between the two sides' visions.\"</p><p>She additionally noted that a bipartisan agreement on transportation spending may be reached in Congress. A week ago, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee introduced a $300 billion ground transportation bill, which she believes could guide broader infrastructure agreements.</p><p><b>Analysts generally believe that if negotiations fail, Democrats will attempt to advance the White House version of the infrastructure bill through a \"budget reconciliation process\" without Republican support.</b></p><p>This only requires a simple majority vote, but it also means that Senate Democrats must secure all 50 votes in their party. Sources familiar with the matter told the media that Democratic senatorial aides have begun early discussions on how to advance the infrastructure package through a \"budget reconciliation process.\"</p><p>Under the current rules, since the Democrats in Congress forcibly passed the Biden administration's $1.9 trillion pandemic relief spending plan through relevant coordination procedures in February this year, exhausting the 2021 fiscal year quota that ends at the end of September this year, it is expected that the infrastructure plan will most likely be implemented again through the \"budget coordination\" mechanism after the next fiscal year of the US government begins on October 1 this year.</p>","source":"wallstreetcn_api","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The United States' massive infrastructure spending plan has been significantly scaled back again!</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe United States' massive infrastructure spending plan has been significantly scaled back again!\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">华尔街见闻</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-05-27 23:41</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On Thursday, May 27, U.S. Senate Republicans submitted a $928 billion infrastructure proposal to the White House in response to the White House's latest $1.7 trillion infrastructure plan. Despite the narrowing gap in amounts, the two sides still have gaps over the definition of \"infrastructure\" and how to pay for it.</p><p>Analysts say this latest proposal could help break the deadlock in negotiations between Republicans and the Biden administration over infrastructure plans, after the White House set Memorial Day next Monday (May 31) as the deadline for negotiations to make progress.</p><p>Meanwhile, the $928 billion plan is an increase from the $568 billion spending over five years previously proposed by the Republicans. The new plan will provide funding for transportation systems such as roads, bridges, railways, airports, ports, freight and passenger transport, broadband internet, and water supply over eight years.</p><p><b>The latest proposal suggests $506 billion for roads, bridges, and major infrastructure projects, including $4 billion for electric vehicles, but does not include the Biden administration's priorities.</b>For example, $400 billion for home healthcare, $100 billion for electric vehicle consumer incentives, or spending on upgrading housing and schools.</p><p>Wall Street Insights previously reported that last Friday, in an effort to gain support from Republican members of Congress, the Biden administration made concessions, reducing the original $2.3 trillion infrastructure and jobs program to $1.7 trillion, reducing investment in rural broadband and roads and bridges, and shifting some funding from the jobs program to other bills. At the time, Republicans said the new proposal went far beyond the scope of bipartisan support.</p><p><b>Republican senators who led the drafting of the proposal reiterated today their opposition to the Biden administration's proposed plan to raise corporate taxes to pay for infrastructure investment.</b>Biden had previously stated that the corporate tax rate should be raised from 21% to at least 25%. Republicans want to reallocate unused pandemic relief funds from state and local governments to infrastructure or charge user fees for transportation, such as electric vehicles, to pay bills.</p><p>However, congressional Democrats are bound to oppose such a proposal, which also contradicts Biden's promise that \"individuals earning less than $400,000 a year will not raise taxes,\" because electric vehicle usage fees or raising gasoline taxes would place an additional burden on people.</p><p><b>In addition to fundamental and serious differences between the two parties in Congress on how to pay for infrastructure, they also have different definitions of \"infrastructure\".</b>Republicans demanded that only physical infrastructure be included in the plan, while Democrats demanded the inclusion of \"human infrastructure,\" which refers to the Biden administration's plan to invest funds in caring for the elderly and people with disabilities.</p><p>Elizabeth Warren, a senior Democratic senator who ran for U.S. president, said today that the Republicans' latest proposal \"is not a serious bargaining chip,\" and that \"they have illusions about taking money that has already been promised to be used elsewhere and for spending programs.\"</p><p>Republican Senator Shelley Moore Capito said that Republicans and the White House are close to reaching an agreement on an infrastructure plan, but fundamental issues regarding the scope and payment methods of the package still need to be resolved. \"I am optimistic, but there is still a big gap between the two sides' visions.\"</p><p>She additionally noted that a bipartisan agreement on transportation spending may be reached in Congress. A week ago, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee introduced a $300 billion ground transportation bill, which she believes could guide broader infrastructure agreements.</p><p><b>Analysts generally believe that if negotiations fail, Democrats will attempt to advance the White House version of the infrastructure bill through a \"budget reconciliation process\" without Republican support.</b></p><p>This only requires a simple majority vote, but it also means that Senate Democrats must secure all 50 votes in their party. Sources familiar with the matter told the media that Democratic senatorial aides have begun early discussions on how to advance the infrastructure package through a \"budget reconciliation process.\"</p><p>Under the current rules, since the Democrats in Congress forcibly passed the Biden administration's $1.9 trillion pandemic relief spending plan through relevant coordination procedures in February this year, exhausting the 2021 fiscal year quota that ends at the end of September this year, it is expected that the infrastructure plan will most likely be implemented again through the \"budget coordination\" mechanism after the next fiscal year of the US government begins on October 1 this year.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3631483\">华尔街见闻</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/017a2d51f9605f643f552ed0e3997176","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3631483","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2138085173","content_text":"5月27日周四，美国参议院共和党人向白宫提出了一项9280亿美元的基建提案，作为对白宫最新1.7万亿美元基建计划的回应。尽管金额差距缩小，双方在“基建”定义与如何支付方面仍有鸿沟。\n分析称，这一最新提案有助于打破共和党人与拜登政府就基建计划的谈判僵局，此前白宫将下周一（5月31日）阵亡将士纪念日设定为谈判必须取得进展的截止日期。\n同时，9280亿美元规模也比共和党此前提议的五年内支出5680亿美元有所增加，新版计划将在八年内为道路、桥梁、铁路、机场、港口、货运和客运等运输系统、网络宽带、供水等提供资金。\n最新提案建议将5060亿美元用于道路、桥梁和重大基础设施项目，其中有40亿美元用于电动汽车，但不包括拜登政府的优先事项，例如4000亿美元用于家庭医疗保健、1000亿美元用于电动汽车消费者优惠，或用于升级住房和学校的支出等。\n华尔街见闻曾提到，上周五，为博取国会共和党议员的支持，拜登政府作出让步，将原本2.3万亿美元的“天量”基建和就业计划规模压缩至1.7万亿美元，减少乡村宽带和路桥相关投入，将就业计划中的部分拨款转移到其他议案。当时共和党人称，新提议远高于两党支持通过的范畴。\n牵头起草提案的共和党参议员今日重申，他们反对拜登政府拟议用提高公司税来支付基建投资的计划，拜登曾称公司税率应从21%至少提高至25%。共和党人希望将州和地方政府未使用的抗疫救助资金重新分配给基础设施，或者对电动汽车等运输收取使用费来支付账单。\n但国会民主党人势必会反对这样的提议，而且也与拜登对“年收入低于40万美元的个人不会提高税收”承诺相悖，因为电动车使用费或抬高汽油税会给人们带来额外负担。\n国会两党除了在如何支付基建费用方面存在根本性的严重分歧，他们对“基建”的定义也不一样。共和党人要求只有实体的基础设施可被囊括进方案中，民主党则要求纳入“人力基础设施”，即拜登政府计划将资金投入到照顾老年人和残障人士等。\n曾参与竞选美国总统的民主党参议员大佬伊丽莎白·沃伦今日称，共和党人的最新提案“并非一次严肃认真的还价”，“他们对拿走已经承诺用于其他地方和支出项目的钱抱有幻想”。\n共和党参议员Shelley Moore Capito称，共和党人同白宫已经接近就基础设施计划达成协议，但仍需解决有关一揽子计划涵盖范围和支付方式的根本问题，“我很乐观，不过双方设想还有很大差距”。\n她额外指出，国会两党在运输支出方面可能达成协议。一周前参议院环境与公共工程委员会提出了约3000亿美元的地面运输法案，她认为这可以指导更广泛的基础设施协议。\n分析普遍认为，如果谈判失败，民主党人将尝试在没有共和党支持的情况下，通过“预算协调程序”推进白宫版基础设施法案。\n这只需要简单多数投票支持即可，但也代表参议院民主党必须稳住党内所有50张选票。知情人士对媒体称，民主党参议员助手们已经开始就如何通过“预算协调程序”推进一揽子基建计划进行早期讨论。\n在现行规则下，由于今年2月国会民主党已经通过相关协调程序强行通过了拜登政府1.9万亿美元的抗疫纾困支出计划，用完了到今年9月末结束的2021财年配额，因此，预计在今年10月1日进入美国政府下一财年后，基建计划有极大可能再次通过“预算协调”机制落地。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3017,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"following","isTTM":true}