π₯πβοΈ Rare Earths Reckoning: Why Trumpβs βBoomβ Rhetoric Masks a Multi-Year Marathon to Break Chinaβs Stranglehold βοΈππ₯
$Energy Fuels(UUUU)$ $LYNAS RARE EARTHS LTD(LYC.AU)$ $NuScale Power(SMR)$ Iβve spent years dissecting commodity cycles, from uranium squeezes to lithium booms, and nothing rivals the rare earths saga for its fusion of geopolitics and industrial necessity. Iβm watching Trumpβs latest claim: an $8.5 billion βpipeline ready to goβ with Australia, and Iβm not buying the hype of overnight mineral independence. Miningβs the easy part; refiningβs the fortress, and China built it. Iβm tracking this not for the politics, but for the asymmetric setups it creates in the volatility.
πΊπΈ Geopolitics: Alliances Over Ambition
The Trump-Albanese pact announced in October was pitched as an industrial revolution for critical minerals. The deal includes joint stockpiles, production-sharing, and U.S. investment in Australiaβs $1.2 billion critical-minerals reserve by 2026. It sounds bold, but Iβve crunched the numbers; itβs progress dressed as transformation. Australia mines 18 percent of the worldβs rare earths yet exports roughly 80 percent of them to China for processing. Lynas Rare Earths, the nationβs largest player, still relies on Malaysian facilities that depend on Chinese intermediates.
Beijing controls about 70 percent of known reserves and 90 percent of global refining, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Its new export-licence rules, covering any product with more than 0.1 percent rare-earth content effective 1 December 2025, tighten that grip even further. Foreign military-linked companies will receive automatic denials. This follows the 2023 bans on gallium and germanium exports. History rhymes: when tariffs last escalated in 2010, China flooded supply and crashed prices 80 percent. Iβm factoring that playbook in.
π§ͺ Refiningβs the Moat, Not the Mine
Commodities trade on bottlenecks, and rare earthsβ bottleneck is refining; capital-intensive, toxic, and decades ahead in China. Even if new mines open tomorrow, weβre still queuing for Chinese plants. Dysprosium oxide, vital for EV magnets, costs about US $800 per kg in the U.S. versus $230 in China, a 248 percent premium. Energy Fuels ($UUUU) recently achieved 99.9 percent pure dysprosium output at its White Mesa Mill but is producing just 2 kg per week. Scaling to commercial levels takes years.
Global demand is sprinting while capacity crawls. The IEAβs 2025 Critical Minerals Outlook projects a 50β60 percent demand surge by 2040, with rare-earth shortfalls exceeding 20 percent under current policy paths. Iβm blending exposure through uranium as well; nuclearβs revival reinforces the theme. The World Nuclear Association expects global uranium demand to reach 180,000 tonnes by 2030 while supply lags 20 percent. Energy Fuelsβ dual rare-earth and uranium model is an under-appreciated hedge against both macro shocks and policy bluster.
βοΈ Trade-War Theatre Meets Market Reality
Trumpβs rhetoric sells independence, yet Australia still imports refined rare-earth materials from China for its own defence and technology sectors. If Canberra canβt secure domestic supply, thereβs no surplus for Washington. The IMFβs World Economic Outlook (Oct 2025) warns that new trade barriers could shave 1β2 percent from global GDP; energy-transition inflation is already sticky. For traders, this means volatility, not victory. Iβm watching for U.S. DoD funding rounds; $400 million has already been channelled to MP Materials ($MP) and $540 million sector-wide for mid-stream development.
π Market Setups: $UUUU | $MP | $REMX
Markets move long before politicians do. The VanEck Rare Earth & Strategic Metals ETF ($REMX) hit a 52-week high of $80.25 on 13 October before retracing to $73.68 on profit-taking. Iβm eyeing that dip: top holdings MP (25 percent weight) and Lynas (10 percent) capture the macro theme without single-name volatility.
Energy Fuels ($UUUU) trades near $21.91, coiling in a falling-wedge pattern; a textbook reversal setup. Resistance sits at $23.50; a breakout targets $27.40 to $28.00 based on Fibonacci extensions from the $11.82 lows. RSI 45 and rising, MACD turning positive, and Bollinger compression hint at a volatility pop. Options flow on 15 October showed $14 million in calls, institutions positioning ahead of headlines.
$MP Materials remains the institutional proxy for U.S.-based supply. Price near $80 tests its 50-day SMA around $78; short interest 7 percent creates squeeze potential if policy momentum builds. 13F filings reveal BlackRock up 5 percent to a $1.2 billion stake and Vanguard adding two million UUUU shares in Q2.
π§ My Positioning & Outlook
Iβm long UUUU November $22 calls with tight risk below $21.50. Scaling in on weakness, I allocate 40 percent UUUU, 30 percent MP, 20 percent REMX, and 10 percent cash. Targets: UUUU $28 (Q1 2026), MP $95, REMX $85. Near-term catalysts: UUUU earnings 31 Oct (EPS -$0.08 exp.), MP 6 Nov (EPS -$0.13 exp.), Chinaβs export curbs effective 1 Dec. Iβm not buying political promises; Iβm buying confirmation breakouts.
Iβve traded enough cycles to know this isnβt a sprint to βboomβ but a marathon where execution beats headlines. The Trump-Albanese pact buys time, not independence. My eyes are on the companies building, not boasting.
πβDo you believe the U.S. can truly break Chinaβs rare-earth dominance this decade, or is this another βenergy-independence illusionβ designed to comfort the crowd while traders quietly position for the marathon?
π’ Donβt miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends, and insights that move markets ππ Iβm obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Letβs outsmart the market and stack those gains together! π
Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC πππππ
@Tiger_comments @TigerPM @TigerObserver @TigerStars @Daily_Discussion
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Great article, would you like to share it?
Great article, would you like to share it?
Great article, would you like to share it?
Great article, would you like to share it?
Great article, would you like to share it?