Baba on AI , competition and f-To The Moon - Tiger Brokers Online Investing Community - To The Moon

1
Comment
Favorite

Baba on AI , competition and future world

Alibaba's Joe Tsai Debates White House "AI Czar": China Makes Significant Progress in AI Applications, AI is Not Winner-Takes-All

On October 9, at the All-In 2025 Summit, Alibaba Group co-founder and Chairman Joe Tsai shared his latest insights on US-China tech competition, Alibaba's strategic transformation, and AGI among...

Alibaba's Joe Tsai Debates White House "AI Czar": China Makes Significant Progress in AI Applications, AI is Not Winner-Takes-All

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

1

Report

Comment

Top
Latest

empty

No comments yet

Most Discussed

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":487946464399456,"tweetId":"487946464399456","gmtCreate":1760150919592,"gmtModify":1760150923522,"author":{"id":3579788727995257,"idStr":"3579788727995257","authorId":3579788727995257,"authorIdStr":"3579788727995257","name":"Westango","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3a4b1fc2fb23b33fff900b71df70c49f","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"80.04%","individualDisplayEnabled":0},"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":3,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Baba on AI , competition&nbsp;and future world</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Baba on AI , competition&nbsp;and future world</p></body></html>","text":"Baba on AI , competition and future world","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/487946464399456","repostId":1199643973,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1199643973","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Global Stock Market Deep Analysis","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Deep News","id":"1039043262","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8296859682db4b478146245e72de1922"},"pubTimestamp":1760009056,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199643973?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-10-09 19:24","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Alibaba's Joe Tsai Debates White House \"AI Czar\": China Makes Significant Progress in AI Applications, AI is Not Winner-Takes-All","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199643973","media":"Deep News","summary":"On October 9, at the All-In 2025 Summit, Alibaba Group co-founder and Chairman Joe Tsai shared his latest insights on US-China tech competition, Alibaba's strategic transformation, and AGI among...","content":"<p>On October 9, at the All-In 2025 Summit, Alibaba Group co-founder and Chairman Joe Tsai shared his latest insights on US-China tech competition, Alibaba's strategic transformation, and AGI among other hot topics. Tsai stated bluntly: \"AI is not a winner-takes-all field. True victory lies not in developing the most powerful AI models, but in achieving faster technological implementation and applications.\"</p>\n<p>Tsai engaged in a debate with David Sacks, dubbed the \"White House AI Czar\" and head of White House AI and cryptocurrency affairs. Sacks emphasized that the US must maintain leadership in AI and chip technologies. However, Tsai argued: \"The US should invest more resources in technology applications and popularization, rather than focusing solely on technology R&D.\"</p>\n<p>Tsai added that China actively embraces open-source principles, and many companies have launched models with moderate parameter scales, a development model more conducive to rapid technology adoption. While he did not assert that China has taken the lead in the model technology race, he stated that \"China has indeed made significant progress in practical applications.\" He concluded that AI is becoming a ubiquitous fundamental element like air, and no country would claim exclusive ownership of air.</p>\n<p>Regarding Alibaba, Tsai mentioned joining due to Jack Ma's leadership, deeply attracted by Ma's clear vision and ability to identify talent. Throughout Alibaba's 26-year development journey, Tsai witnessed Chinese companies transition from a \"free expansion period\" to a \"new normal,\" believing that today's regulatory environment is more predictable and stable.</p>\n<p>Alibaba has undergone internal transformation in recent years. Tsai revealed that after returning as board chairman, the first thing he did was tell everyone that promoting Alibaba's involvement in six different businesses to the outside world was \"too confusing.\" Tsai focused Alibaba's strategy on two core areas: e-commerce and cloud computing, deeply integrating AI into all business segments, with this focus being key to managing the company well. Currently, approximately 30% of Alibaba's code is generated by AI.</p>\n<p>Regarding AI's future, Tsai specifically mentioned Google DeepMind founder and CEO Demis Hassabis's prediction that AGI might be achieved within 5 to 10 years, but Tsai personally believes AGI still needs about 20 years to truly arrive.</p>\n<p>Beyond Alibaba, Tsai has another identity: he owns NBA team Brooklyn Nets and WNBA team New York Liberty. In the interview, he also shared business insights from operating teams and perspectives on the sports industry.</p>\n<p>Recently, the 2025 NBA China Games will be held in Macau, marking the event's restart after a 6-year hiatus. The participating teams are the Phoenix Suns and Brooklyn Nets, with the latter being Tsai's NBA team, while Alibaba Cloud also sponsors the event. On October 9, NBA China and Alibaba Group announced a multi-year partnership between NBA China and Alibaba Cloud.</p>\n<p>The All-In 2025 Summit was held from September 8-10 in the US, initiated by the well-known Silicon Valley podcast All-In. This year's summit also featured notable tech industry leaders including Elon Musk and Demis Hassabis.</p>\n<p>The following is a transcript of Tsai's interview at the All-In Summit (with team-related Q&A moved to the end):</p>\n<p>**01. Alibaba Founded 26 Years Ago, Regulatory Environment Has Entered New Normal**</p>\n<p>Host: Let's talk about Alibaba. This has been an incredible journey, with Jack Ma's story documented in books, but can you take us back to your mindset then? How did you get involved, what were you thinking, and how much risk did you take?</p>\n<p>Tsai: I was fascinated by Jack Ma's personality. People see Ma's public side, which is very charismatic. But what I saw was his ability to instill belief in people. When I walked into his apartment, there were about 12 to 15 recent college graduates, and Ma was like a teacher 10 years older than them. He was good at communication and could paint a very clear vision. That's what I truly identified with and joined for. His leadership ability was amazing.</p>\n<p>Ma himself came from a teaching background, was educated as such, and taught English at Zhejiang University. Teachers are natural leaders to some extent. Teachers must first be good communicators, and secondly, they must be able to identify talent. I think many teachers enjoy making judgments like \"this child will be very successful in the future,\" writing recommendation letters for them, doing various things. And teachers are humble enough; they are willing, even happy to see their students more successful than themselves. In the process of starting a company, you need to be able to accommodate all kinds of people who are smarter than you. This is very important.</p>\n<p>Host: There was a phase, I think around the early 2010s, when China felt like a highly free capitalist environment, with a Cambrian explosion of excellent entrepreneurs emerging, including you, Jack Ma, Pony Ma, and others. Later, things changed somewhat. Can you outline this process of change for us? I believe these changes profoundly affected foreign direct investment entering China's ecosystem. Please tell us about this journey you personally experienced, participated in, and observed.</p>\n<p>Tsai: Alibaba has been established for 26 years. I think the first 15 years were completely free market growth, where we organically built many businesses. Then we entered a phase of extreme competition. Everyone wanted to do e-commerce because if you have online traffic, e-commerce is the best way to monetize that traffic. In today's market, we have five or six very strong competitors, including ByteDance, TikTok's parent company. They're also doing e-commerce. They're not known for e-commerce, but they're one of our fiercest competitors.</p>\n<p>We went through a period of extreme competition, then the government felt the industry was somewhat off track. Competition was too intense, and some platforms showed monopolistic behavior. So more regulatory measures were introduced, some of which were actually very good, such as privacy protection and anti-monopoly measures. Now we've entered a new normal where the regulatory environment is more predictable. We know where the red lines are, what should and shouldn't be done. Actually, due to this predictability, it has created a better business environment.</p>\n<p>**02. China is a Peaceful Country, Emphasis on Education Worth Learning from by America**</p>\n<p>Host: On the geopolitical level, the US seems to constantly indoctrinate Americans to view China as an existential threat to America, that we are competitors, that we cannot cooperate and jointly lead the world toward prosperity. What's your view?</p>\n<p>Tsai: I disagree with that worldview.</p>\n<p>Host: I don't believe it either. I don't know why our only tone of dialogue has to be that we are mortal enemies.</p>\n<p>Tsai: I think I can understand why America has such thoughts. China has risen rapidly over the past 20-25 years, manufacturing has become strong, becoming an export powerhouse. Due to economic development, China has also become a tech power. America's fear is that economic strength and technological strength will translate into military strength, making it a national security issue. I understand this.</p>\n<p>But I think China and the US are the world's two largest economies. I think you need to step back and think about the problem. On one hand, you should compete with China. Hyperscale companies compete globally with Chinese internet companies. But on the other hand, there are so many conflict zones in the world. Didn't President Trump say he himself prevented seven wars? China didn't start any of them. How many years has China not started a war? I feel it's been 30-40 years. I think China participated in the Korean War, maybe the Vietnam War, but that's ancient history.</p>\n<p>If you observe the Chinese people and China's behavior, it's a very peaceful country. China cares about its own economic development and the welfare of its citizens. I think there's a lot of friction in the US-China competition process, with China feeling that America is trying to contain China and prevent China's economic rise.</p>\n<p>Host: Speaking of citizen welfare, you mentioned ByteDance. I think there are reports that ByteDance's revenue just exceeded Meta's revenue. ByteDance's core product TikTok is fundamentally different in America and China. Due to regulation and concern for citizen welfare, China's Douyin has strict regulations on content, screening, and algorithms. In America, TikTok is full of cat videos and all kinds of meaningless content, although I now notice TikTok has added a STEM section. China has that mindset and willingness to think about its citizens. I'm just curious, how should we Americans embrace more of that principle? Because this is often overlooked in the US-China confrontational atmosphere. What should we do more of that China is doing?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Education. China has a highly educated population. Talk to any Chinese parent, and they want their children to take the gaokao and enter the best universities. If they want to send their children abroad to study, their targets are Ivy League schools or Stanford. Chinese people place great emphasis on education. I think America has some structural problems, like teacher union obstacles. But China doesn't have teacher unions.</p>\n<p>**03. AI Field is Not Winner-Takes-All, US-China Still Has Broad Cooperation Space**</p>\n<p>Host: David, I'm curious how you view this issue. Are we destined to forever be in conflict with China? Or under our remarkable, dynamic President Trump's leadership, is there another path forward?</p>\n<p>David Sacks: America and China are in high-tech competition, also competing in security and economic fields. The reason is that China has become wealthy and powerful, and America doesn't tolerate peer competitors. America wants to be the strongest country. Power balance is somewhat a zero-sum game. Economics isn't, but power is. America's history is that we want to be first, we don't like having pure competitors. That's the bottom line. This is for good reason. Countries are essentially in anarchy with each other, meaning there's no higher authority above nations. If you encounter trouble in the global system, you can't dial 911. Countries place survival above all considerations, and the way to survive in the international system is to become powerful. Countries measure your power by the gap between you and the next most powerful country. 20 years ago, China wasn't seen as a threat because it wasn't wealthy and powerful, but now it is.</p>\n<p>I think this has led to a more hawkish atmosphere in Washington. I agree with parts of their view because I think it's very important for America to win the AI race. We don't want China to dominate AI or the chip field. As Americans, we want America to be the strongest country. If I were Chinese, I would want China to be the strongest country. I have no personal grudge or malice about this. But I want America to be the strongest country, and in my little field, this means winning the AI race.</p>\n<p>Tsai: May I respond?</p>\n<p>Host: Of course. Please go ahead.</p>\n<p>Tsai: I understand your feelings as a patriot wanting America to win. But regarding the AI field, I don't think there's such a thing as winning the race. It's more like a long marathon. Observing the development trends of model companies, you'll find new models leading every week, but the next week they're overtaken by other models. On the other hand, the entire AI industry hasn't yet formed a clear business model. The e-commerce business we're in has network effects market models, but I'm skeptical whether the model development field also has this winner-takes-all characteristic. I think AI is not a winner-takes-all field.</p>\n<p>In my view, true victory lies not in developing the most powerful AI models, but in achieving faster technological implementation and applications. America should invest more resources in technology applications and popularization, rather than focusing solely on technology R&D. Currently, each tech giant invests about $80 billion annually in R&D, which is a huge investment.</p>\n<p>Looking at China's development path: First, China actively embraces open-source principles; second, many companies including ours have launched models with moderate parameter scales - such as 1.7 billion and 8 billion parameter models, which are more suitable for mobile devices and laptops. This development model is more conducive to rapid technology adoption.</p>\n<p>I should clarify that I'm not asserting China has taken the lead in the model technology race, but China has indeed made significant progress in practical applications. A survey last year showed only 8% of Chinese companies applied AI technology in their business; now this proportion is approaching 50%. The speed of this application adoption is remarkable.</p>\n<p>AI is becoming a ubiquitous fundamental element like air, and no country would claim exclusive ownership of air. In critical fields like healthcare and biology, AI holds enormous potential, providing broad space for cooperation between the two countries.</p>\n<p>**04. After Returning to Alibaba, the Key is Focus**</p>\n<p>Host: Whether self-developing or adopting existing models, the most critical question is: what is AI's actual impact on business operations? How will this change hiring scale? At what levels will it have impact? What changes will it bring to efficiency and work nature? What are the specific AI application scenarios within Alibaba?</p>\n<p>Tsai: AI has indeed significantly improved our operational efficiency, correspondingly reducing manpower needs. We're trying to use AI to write quarterly financial reports, even considering using AI in analyst meetings, observing whether people can tell the difference, then we'll just lay off the entire finance department (laughs). But AI's greatest value lies in empowering consumer-side applications. We deeply integrate AI into e-commerce, maps, food delivery and other businesses, expanding user scale by improving user experience, with this impact ultimately reflected in revenue growth.</p>\n<p>Host: As more and more work is done by AI, won't demand for labor naturally decline?</p>\n<p>Tsai: We haven't announced any layoffs because of AI yet, but I keep asking our engineering department heads how much code is now written by AI. I get different answers depending on which department you ask, but I think it's probably reached 30% now.</p>\n<p>Host: Already that high?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Yes, I did a weighted average across different departments, roughly that figure.</p>\n<p>Host: Alibaba is a huge enterprise with business spanning many countries globally. How does Alibaba build corporate culture, and how do you manage massive numbers of employees, diverse needs, and various issues? How do you handle this?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Focus. Before taking over as chairman, I was actually gradually stepping back from company operations, focusing on the Brooklyn Nets. About a year and a half ago, I returned as company chairman. The first thing I did was tell everyone we can't keep saying our company is involved in six different businesses - it's too confusing. We only do two businesses: e-commerce and cloud computing, both containing AI elements, these two are our core businesses. This focus allows our team to concentrate and execute company decisions.</p>\n<p>Host: Finally, can you briefly predict the team's performance this new season?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Are you referring to the entire league, or specifically the Nets?</p>\n<p>Host: Let's talk about the Nets.</p>\n<p>Tsai: We're in a rebuilding cycle. This summer we fully utilized five first-round draft picks while retaining important draft assets for 2026. This layout already indicates our strategic direction - we'll focus on developing young players, giving them ample growth space. While this means we need to go through a growth process, this is our clear development path at this stage.</p>\n<p>**05. AGI Still Needs 20 Years to Arrive, China Doesn't Fear Superintelligence Getting Out of Control**</p>\n<p>Host: I want to follow up with a question. We just talked in the previous panel discussion that China seems to have a somewhat different view of autonomous driving technology. China is both testing autonomous driving technology but also wants to ensure related technology won't cause widespread unemployment. What exactly is China's view on autonomous driving? Tens of millions of workers make a living driving - what are their views on this? I understand some drivers in Wuhan have expressed dissatisfaction. How do the Chinese government and Chinese people view this incredible transformation of autonomous driving and its impact on employment?</p>\n<p>Tsai: I think the government fully embraces it. The Chinese government introduced the \"AI+\" policy a few weeks ago - by 2030, five years from now, they want to see 90% adoption of AI agents, devices, etc. in society. This is an official public government statement - full commitment. There really isn't much discussion about AI replacing human jobs. But overall, Chinese people have employment anxiety. China has about 10 million university graduates annually. China's youth unemployment rate, that is, the unemployment rate for the 16-24 age population, including graduate students, is 18%. Actually quite high, and Chinese people have a lot of anxiety about this.</p>\n<p>Part of the reason is economic. Although China's overall economic situation is quite good in terms of infrastructure, energy access, etc., there's currently a kind of low mood because China has experienced a real estate market decline over the past four or five years, with average housing prices falling about 30%. This is a very negative wealth effect, and this impact continues.</p>\n<p>David Sacks: Does China fear AGI? I'm talking about fear of superintelligence getting out of control. Is this a widespread fear, or just an American concern?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Government insiders don't talk much about this because they believe they can control AGI better, perhaps better than America. But there are indeed some lingering concerns. I just heard Google DeepMind founder and CEO Demis Hassabis speak, his prediction for AGI is 5 to 10 years. I think AGI might take another 20 years. The key is the word \"general.\" AI must be able to generalize and apply principles to scenarios it has never seen before.</p>\n<p>**06. Teams are Both Business and Social Institutions, NBA is Essentially a Product**</p>\n<p>Host: You own the Brooklyn Nets (NBA team) and New York Liberty (WNBA team). Operating teams must not be easy either?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Yes, not easy at all. Any professional team is both a business and a social institution - we need to keep fans happy. There are some church and state elements in this, no different from running a news organization.</p>\n<p>Host: Can we start by talking about the WNBA? Recently Caitlin Clark's season ended, causing a lot of controversy and attention. What did the WNBA do right? What did it do wrong? Did the league fulfill its responsibility to protect this star player?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Caitlin Clark undoubtedly had a huge impact on the WNBA. All metrics are rising. In her first season entering the league from college, we saw viewership, ticket sales, sponsorship revenue - almost all metrics quadrupled. Her economic impact on the league is extraordinary.</p>\n<p>Host: Indeed undeniable.</p>\n<p>Tsai: But because of her characteristics, she's a different kind of player - a point guard, relatively small, and there were questions about whether she could adapt to the league's physical confrontation, but she proved she could. Of course, there's always competition, like her rivalry with Angel Reese that started in college. Some people portray it as racial confrontation, but I think we should move beyond that and focus on the players' skills and talents themselves.</p>\n<p>Now there are more and more excellent college players in the league, like Sonia Citron, who's now a hot candidate for Rookie of the Year and broke the league's three-point shooting percentage record. If you ask what the WNBA did right, I think it was really the confluence of timing, geography, and people. But what really changed was that before the season Caitlin Clark appeared, the fan base watching ESPN basically didn't watch women's basketball. Maybe some people followed college games, but definitely not the WNBA. But now, mainstream sports fans like you all are watching the WNBA.</p>\n<p>Host: I have an observation about this. You and I are both old-school basketball fans who watched games in the '80s and '90s, watched Patrick Ewing and Charles Barkley. Currently, the WNBA has more intense physical confrontation, they're tougher. Every time LeBron jumps and gets fouled, he flops around. So maybe you can comment on LeBron, or the NBA as a \"product.\"</p>\n<p>Tsai: The NBA product is great. I think comparing the physical confrontation intensity between men's and women's leagues is unfair. Both are very physical. If you sit courtside, what you see is physical confrontation and athleticism, right? But games have other dimensions. I now serve on the NBA's \"competition committee.\" Each season, the committee makes rule adjustments to make the NBA product better. When I got the call, I thought, you want me to sit on a committee with Jason Kidd, Chris Paul, Coach K? Can my understanding of basketball really be deeper than theirs? I told NBA Commissioner Adam Silver this committee should be called the \"product committee\" because rule adjustments essentially determine the game \"product\" audiences see. For example, changing three-point line position isn't just a game rule issue, it's more a \"product design\" issue.</p>\n<p>Host: When you see the Boston Celtics make 43 three-pointers in a game, do you think that's a good product?</p>\n<p>Tsai: I think it's a great product because there are 18 different ways to make 43 three-pointers in a game.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba's Joe Tsai Debates White House \"AI Czar\": China Makes Significant Progress in AI Applications, AI is Not Winner-Takes-All</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba's Joe Tsai Debates White House \"AI Czar\": China Makes Significant Progress in AI Applications, AI is Not Winner-Takes-All\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1039043262\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8296859682db4b478146245e72de1922);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Deep News </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-10-09 19:24</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On October 9, at the All-In 2025 Summit, Alibaba Group co-founder and Chairman Joe Tsai shared his latest insights on US-China tech competition, Alibaba's strategic transformation, and AGI among other hot topics. Tsai stated bluntly: \"AI is not a winner-takes-all field. True victory lies not in developing the most powerful AI models, but in achieving faster technological implementation and applications.\"</p>\n<p>Tsai engaged in a debate with David Sacks, dubbed the \"White House AI Czar\" and head of White House AI and cryptocurrency affairs. Sacks emphasized that the US must maintain leadership in AI and chip technologies. However, Tsai argued: \"The US should invest more resources in technology applications and popularization, rather than focusing solely on technology R&D.\"</p>\n<p>Tsai added that China actively embraces open-source principles, and many companies have launched models with moderate parameter scales, a development model more conducive to rapid technology adoption. While he did not assert that China has taken the lead in the model technology race, he stated that \"China has indeed made significant progress in practical applications.\" He concluded that AI is becoming a ubiquitous fundamental element like air, and no country would claim exclusive ownership of air.</p>\n<p>Regarding Alibaba, Tsai mentioned joining due to Jack Ma's leadership, deeply attracted by Ma's clear vision and ability to identify talent. Throughout Alibaba's 26-year development journey, Tsai witnessed Chinese companies transition from a \"free expansion period\" to a \"new normal,\" believing that today's regulatory environment is more predictable and stable.</p>\n<p>Alibaba has undergone internal transformation in recent years. Tsai revealed that after returning as board chairman, the first thing he did was tell everyone that promoting Alibaba's involvement in six different businesses to the outside world was \"too confusing.\" Tsai focused Alibaba's strategy on two core areas: e-commerce and cloud computing, deeply integrating AI into all business segments, with this focus being key to managing the company well. Currently, approximately 30% of Alibaba's code is generated by AI.</p>\n<p>Regarding AI's future, Tsai specifically mentioned Google DeepMind founder and CEO Demis Hassabis's prediction that AGI might be achieved within 5 to 10 years, but Tsai personally believes AGI still needs about 20 years to truly arrive.</p>\n<p>Beyond Alibaba, Tsai has another identity: he owns NBA team Brooklyn Nets and WNBA team New York Liberty. In the interview, he also shared business insights from operating teams and perspectives on the sports industry.</p>\n<p>Recently, the 2025 NBA China Games will be held in Macau, marking the event's restart after a 6-year hiatus. The participating teams are the Phoenix Suns and Brooklyn Nets, with the latter being Tsai's NBA team, while Alibaba Cloud also sponsors the event. On October 9, NBA China and Alibaba Group announced a multi-year partnership between NBA China and Alibaba Cloud.</p>\n<p>The All-In 2025 Summit was held from September 8-10 in the US, initiated by the well-known Silicon Valley podcast All-In. This year's summit also featured notable tech industry leaders including Elon Musk and Demis Hassabis.</p>\n<p>The following is a transcript of Tsai's interview at the All-In Summit (with team-related Q&A moved to the end):</p>\n<p>**01. Alibaba Founded 26 Years Ago, Regulatory Environment Has Entered New Normal**</p>\n<p>Host: Let's talk about Alibaba. This has been an incredible journey, with Jack Ma's story documented in books, but can you take us back to your mindset then? How did you get involved, what were you thinking, and how much risk did you take?</p>\n<p>Tsai: I was fascinated by Jack Ma's personality. People see Ma's public side, which is very charismatic. But what I saw was his ability to instill belief in people. When I walked into his apartment, there were about 12 to 15 recent college graduates, and Ma was like a teacher 10 years older than them. He was good at communication and could paint a very clear vision. That's what I truly identified with and joined for. His leadership ability was amazing.</p>\n<p>Ma himself came from a teaching background, was educated as such, and taught English at Zhejiang University. Teachers are natural leaders to some extent. Teachers must first be good communicators, and secondly, they must be able to identify talent. I think many teachers enjoy making judgments like \"this child will be very successful in the future,\" writing recommendation letters for them, doing various things. And teachers are humble enough; they are willing, even happy to see their students more successful than themselves. In the process of starting a company, you need to be able to accommodate all kinds of people who are smarter than you. This is very important.</p>\n<p>Host: There was a phase, I think around the early 2010s, when China felt like a highly free capitalist environment, with a Cambrian explosion of excellent entrepreneurs emerging, including you, Jack Ma, Pony Ma, and others. Later, things changed somewhat. Can you outline this process of change for us? I believe these changes profoundly affected foreign direct investment entering China's ecosystem. Please tell us about this journey you personally experienced, participated in, and observed.</p>\n<p>Tsai: Alibaba has been established for 26 years. I think the first 15 years were completely free market growth, where we organically built many businesses. Then we entered a phase of extreme competition. Everyone wanted to do e-commerce because if you have online traffic, e-commerce is the best way to monetize that traffic. In today's market, we have five or six very strong competitors, including ByteDance, TikTok's parent company. They're also doing e-commerce. They're not known for e-commerce, but they're one of our fiercest competitors.</p>\n<p>We went through a period of extreme competition, then the government felt the industry was somewhat off track. Competition was too intense, and some platforms showed monopolistic behavior. So more regulatory measures were introduced, some of which were actually very good, such as privacy protection and anti-monopoly measures. Now we've entered a new normal where the regulatory environment is more predictable. We know where the red lines are, what should and shouldn't be done. Actually, due to this predictability, it has created a better business environment.</p>\n<p>**02. China is a Peaceful Country, Emphasis on Education Worth Learning from by America**</p>\n<p>Host: On the geopolitical level, the US seems to constantly indoctrinate Americans to view China as an existential threat to America, that we are competitors, that we cannot cooperate and jointly lead the world toward prosperity. What's your view?</p>\n<p>Tsai: I disagree with that worldview.</p>\n<p>Host: I don't believe it either. I don't know why our only tone of dialogue has to be that we are mortal enemies.</p>\n<p>Tsai: I think I can understand why America has such thoughts. China has risen rapidly over the past 20-25 years, manufacturing has become strong, becoming an export powerhouse. Due to economic development, China has also become a tech power. America's fear is that economic strength and technological strength will translate into military strength, making it a national security issue. I understand this.</p>\n<p>But I think China and the US are the world's two largest economies. I think you need to step back and think about the problem. On one hand, you should compete with China. Hyperscale companies compete globally with Chinese internet companies. But on the other hand, there are so many conflict zones in the world. Didn't President Trump say he himself prevented seven wars? China didn't start any of them. How many years has China not started a war? I feel it's been 30-40 years. I think China participated in the Korean War, maybe the Vietnam War, but that's ancient history.</p>\n<p>If you observe the Chinese people and China's behavior, it's a very peaceful country. China cares about its own economic development and the welfare of its citizens. I think there's a lot of friction in the US-China competition process, with China feeling that America is trying to contain China and prevent China's economic rise.</p>\n<p>Host: Speaking of citizen welfare, you mentioned ByteDance. I think there are reports that ByteDance's revenue just exceeded Meta's revenue. ByteDance's core product TikTok is fundamentally different in America and China. Due to regulation and concern for citizen welfare, China's Douyin has strict regulations on content, screening, and algorithms. In America, TikTok is full of cat videos and all kinds of meaningless content, although I now notice TikTok has added a STEM section. China has that mindset and willingness to think about its citizens. I'm just curious, how should we Americans embrace more of that principle? Because this is often overlooked in the US-China confrontational atmosphere. What should we do more of that China is doing?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Education. China has a highly educated population. Talk to any Chinese parent, and they want their children to take the gaokao and enter the best universities. If they want to send their children abroad to study, their targets are Ivy League schools or Stanford. Chinese people place great emphasis on education. I think America has some structural problems, like teacher union obstacles. But China doesn't have teacher unions.</p>\n<p>**03. AI Field is Not Winner-Takes-All, US-China Still Has Broad Cooperation Space**</p>\n<p>Host: David, I'm curious how you view this issue. Are we destined to forever be in conflict with China? Or under our remarkable, dynamic President Trump's leadership, is there another path forward?</p>\n<p>David Sacks: America and China are in high-tech competition, also competing in security and economic fields. The reason is that China has become wealthy and powerful, and America doesn't tolerate peer competitors. America wants to be the strongest country. Power balance is somewhat a zero-sum game. Economics isn't, but power is. America's history is that we want to be first, we don't like having pure competitors. That's the bottom line. This is for good reason. Countries are essentially in anarchy with each other, meaning there's no higher authority above nations. If you encounter trouble in the global system, you can't dial 911. Countries place survival above all considerations, and the way to survive in the international system is to become powerful. Countries measure your power by the gap between you and the next most powerful country. 20 years ago, China wasn't seen as a threat because it wasn't wealthy and powerful, but now it is.</p>\n<p>I think this has led to a more hawkish atmosphere in Washington. I agree with parts of their view because I think it's very important for America to win the AI race. We don't want China to dominate AI or the chip field. As Americans, we want America to be the strongest country. If I were Chinese, I would want China to be the strongest country. I have no personal grudge or malice about this. But I want America to be the strongest country, and in my little field, this means winning the AI race.</p>\n<p>Tsai: May I respond?</p>\n<p>Host: Of course. Please go ahead.</p>\n<p>Tsai: I understand your feelings as a patriot wanting America to win. But regarding the AI field, I don't think there's such a thing as winning the race. It's more like a long marathon. Observing the development trends of model companies, you'll find new models leading every week, but the next week they're overtaken by other models. On the other hand, the entire AI industry hasn't yet formed a clear business model. The e-commerce business we're in has network effects market models, but I'm skeptical whether the model development field also has this winner-takes-all characteristic. I think AI is not a winner-takes-all field.</p>\n<p>In my view, true victory lies not in developing the most powerful AI models, but in achieving faster technological implementation and applications. America should invest more resources in technology applications and popularization, rather than focusing solely on technology R&D. Currently, each tech giant invests about $80 billion annually in R&D, which is a huge investment.</p>\n<p>Looking at China's development path: First, China actively embraces open-source principles; second, many companies including ours have launched models with moderate parameter scales - such as 1.7 billion and 8 billion parameter models, which are more suitable for mobile devices and laptops. This development model is more conducive to rapid technology adoption.</p>\n<p>I should clarify that I'm not asserting China has taken the lead in the model technology race, but China has indeed made significant progress in practical applications. A survey last year showed only 8% of Chinese companies applied AI technology in their business; now this proportion is approaching 50%. The speed of this application adoption is remarkable.</p>\n<p>AI is becoming a ubiquitous fundamental element like air, and no country would claim exclusive ownership of air. In critical fields like healthcare and biology, AI holds enormous potential, providing broad space for cooperation between the two countries.</p>\n<p>**04. After Returning to Alibaba, the Key is Focus**</p>\n<p>Host: Whether self-developing or adopting existing models, the most critical question is: what is AI's actual impact on business operations? How will this change hiring scale? At what levels will it have impact? What changes will it bring to efficiency and work nature? What are the specific AI application scenarios within Alibaba?</p>\n<p>Tsai: AI has indeed significantly improved our operational efficiency, correspondingly reducing manpower needs. We're trying to use AI to write quarterly financial reports, even considering using AI in analyst meetings, observing whether people can tell the difference, then we'll just lay off the entire finance department (laughs). But AI's greatest value lies in empowering consumer-side applications. We deeply integrate AI into e-commerce, maps, food delivery and other businesses, expanding user scale by improving user experience, with this impact ultimately reflected in revenue growth.</p>\n<p>Host: As more and more work is done by AI, won't demand for labor naturally decline?</p>\n<p>Tsai: We haven't announced any layoffs because of AI yet, but I keep asking our engineering department heads how much code is now written by AI. I get different answers depending on which department you ask, but I think it's probably reached 30% now.</p>\n<p>Host: Already that high?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Yes, I did a weighted average across different departments, roughly that figure.</p>\n<p>Host: Alibaba is a huge enterprise with business spanning many countries globally. How does Alibaba build corporate culture, and how do you manage massive numbers of employees, diverse needs, and various issues? How do you handle this?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Focus. Before taking over as chairman, I was actually gradually stepping back from company operations, focusing on the Brooklyn Nets. About a year and a half ago, I returned as company chairman. The first thing I did was tell everyone we can't keep saying our company is involved in six different businesses - it's too confusing. We only do two businesses: e-commerce and cloud computing, both containing AI elements, these two are our core businesses. This focus allows our team to concentrate and execute company decisions.</p>\n<p>Host: Finally, can you briefly predict the team's performance this new season?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Are you referring to the entire league, or specifically the Nets?</p>\n<p>Host: Let's talk about the Nets.</p>\n<p>Tsai: We're in a rebuilding cycle. This summer we fully utilized five first-round draft picks while retaining important draft assets for 2026. This layout already indicates our strategic direction - we'll focus on developing young players, giving them ample growth space. While this means we need to go through a growth process, this is our clear development path at this stage.</p>\n<p>**05. AGI Still Needs 20 Years to Arrive, China Doesn't Fear Superintelligence Getting Out of Control**</p>\n<p>Host: I want to follow up with a question. We just talked in the previous panel discussion that China seems to have a somewhat different view of autonomous driving technology. China is both testing autonomous driving technology but also wants to ensure related technology won't cause widespread unemployment. What exactly is China's view on autonomous driving? Tens of millions of workers make a living driving - what are their views on this? I understand some drivers in Wuhan have expressed dissatisfaction. How do the Chinese government and Chinese people view this incredible transformation of autonomous driving and its impact on employment?</p>\n<p>Tsai: I think the government fully embraces it. The Chinese government introduced the \"AI+\" policy a few weeks ago - by 2030, five years from now, they want to see 90% adoption of AI agents, devices, etc. in society. This is an official public government statement - full commitment. There really isn't much discussion about AI replacing human jobs. But overall, Chinese people have employment anxiety. China has about 10 million university graduates annually. China's youth unemployment rate, that is, the unemployment rate for the 16-24 age population, including graduate students, is 18%. Actually quite high, and Chinese people have a lot of anxiety about this.</p>\n<p>Part of the reason is economic. Although China's overall economic situation is quite good in terms of infrastructure, energy access, etc., there's currently a kind of low mood because China has experienced a real estate market decline over the past four or five years, with average housing prices falling about 30%. This is a very negative wealth effect, and this impact continues.</p>\n<p>David Sacks: Does China fear AGI? I'm talking about fear of superintelligence getting out of control. Is this a widespread fear, or just an American concern?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Government insiders don't talk much about this because they believe they can control AGI better, perhaps better than America. But there are indeed some lingering concerns. I just heard Google DeepMind founder and CEO Demis Hassabis speak, his prediction for AGI is 5 to 10 years. I think AGI might take another 20 years. The key is the word \"general.\" AI must be able to generalize and apply principles to scenarios it has never seen before.</p>\n<p>**06. Teams are Both Business and Social Institutions, NBA is Essentially a Product**</p>\n<p>Host: You own the Brooklyn Nets (NBA team) and New York Liberty (WNBA team). Operating teams must not be easy either?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Yes, not easy at all. Any professional team is both a business and a social institution - we need to keep fans happy. There are some church and state elements in this, no different from running a news organization.</p>\n<p>Host: Can we start by talking about the WNBA? Recently Caitlin Clark's season ended, causing a lot of controversy and attention. What did the WNBA do right? What did it do wrong? Did the league fulfill its responsibility to protect this star player?</p>\n<p>Tsai: Caitlin Clark undoubtedly had a huge impact on the WNBA. All metrics are rising. In her first season entering the league from college, we saw viewership, ticket sales, sponsorship revenue - almost all metrics quadrupled. Her economic impact on the league is extraordinary.</p>\n<p>Host: Indeed undeniable.</p>\n<p>Tsai: But because of her characteristics, she's a different kind of player - a point guard, relatively small, and there were questions about whether she could adapt to the league's physical confrontation, but she proved she could. Of course, there's always competition, like her rivalry with Angel Reese that started in college. Some people portray it as racial confrontation, but I think we should move beyond that and focus on the players' skills and talents themselves.</p>\n<p>Now there are more and more excellent college players in the league, like Sonia Citron, who's now a hot candidate for Rookie of the Year and broke the league's three-point shooting percentage record. If you ask what the WNBA did right, I think it was really the confluence of timing, geography, and people. But what really changed was that before the season Caitlin Clark appeared, the fan base watching ESPN basically didn't watch women's basketball. Maybe some people followed college games, but definitely not the WNBA. But now, mainstream sports fans like you all are watching the WNBA.</p>\n<p>Host: I have an observation about this. You and I are both old-school basketball fans who watched games in the '80s and '90s, watched Patrick Ewing and Charles Barkley. Currently, the WNBA has more intense physical confrontation, they're tougher. Every time LeBron jumps and gets fouled, he flops around. So maybe you can comment on LeBron, or the NBA as a \"product.\"</p>\n<p>Tsai: The NBA product is great. I think comparing the physical confrontation intensity between men's and women's leagues is unfair. Both are very physical. If you sit courtside, what you see is physical confrontation and athleticism, right? But games have other dimensions. I now serve on the NBA's \"competition committee.\" Each season, the committee makes rule adjustments to make the NBA product better. When I got the call, I thought, you want me to sit on a committee with Jason Kidd, Chris Paul, Coach K? Can my understanding of basketball really be deeper than theirs? I told NBA Commissioner Adam Silver this committee should be called the \"product committee\" because rule adjustments essentially determine the game \"product\" audiences see. For example, changing three-point line position isn't just a game rule issue, it's more a \"product design\" issue.</p>\n<p>Host: When you see the Boston Celtics make 43 three-pointers in a game, do you think that's a good product?</p>\n<p>Tsai: I think it's a great product because there are 18 different ways to make 43 three-pointers in a game.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"89988":"阿里巴巴-WR","IE00BFMHRM44.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN GLOBAL EQUITY MEGATRENDS \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0359201885.HKD":"BGF CHINA \"A2\" (HKD) ACC","LU1880398554.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS GLOBAL EQUITY \"A2\" (USD) INC","LU0117841782.USD":"JPM GREATER CHINA \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1439103000.SGD":"Fidelity Greater China Multi Asset Growth & Income A-MINCOME(G)-SGD","LU1196710864.SGD":"Schroder ISF Emerging Markets Multi-Asset A Dis SGD-H","IE00B0169N27.USD":"STEWARD INVESTORS GLOBAL EMERGING MARKETS LEADERS \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0261950983.USD":"FIDELITY ASIAN SPECIAL SITUATIONS \"A\" ACC","LU1868838027.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL EMERGING MARKET EQUITIES \"8\" (USD) ACC","LU1366334651.USD":"ALLSPRING EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY INCOME \"I\" (USD) INC","LU1956131251.USD":"BNP PARIBAS SUSTAINABLE ASIA EX-JAPAN EQUITY \"C\"MD (USD) INC","LU0819121731.USD":"HSBC GIF MANAGED SOLUTIONS ASIA FOCUSED GROWTH \"AC\" (USD) ACC","IE00BMPRXN33.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN 5G CONNECTIVITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2257852520.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Asia Growth A (acc) SGD","BK1517":"云办公","BK4524":"宅经济概念","09988":"阿里巴巴-W","LU1810669033.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Emerging Markets Dynamic Income A (Mdis) SGD-H1","LU0320764599.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton China A Acc SGD","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4526":"热门中概股","LU1316542783.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD","LU0821914370.USD":"贝莱德亚洲成长领袖A2","LU1044875133.USD":"天利亚洲反向股票 AU Acc","LU0287142896.SGD":"Fidelity China Focus A-SGD","LU1993786604.SGD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV ALL CHINA \"P\" (SGD) ACC","LU0651947912.USD":"BGF EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY INCOME \"A5G\" (USD) INC","LU0823413660.USD":"BNP PARIBAS EMERGING EQUITY \"C\" (USD) INC","LU0828237940.HKD":"SCHRODER ISF EMERGING ASIA \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0029875118.USD":"TEMPLETON ASIAN GROWTH \"A\" INC","LU0541502299.USD":"ALLSPRING  EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU1328277881.USD":"MANULIFE GF DRAGON GROWTH FUND \"AA\" (USD) INC","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","LU0048388663.USD":"SCHRODER ISF ASIAN OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) INC AV","LU1023057109.AUD":"BGF CHINA \"A2\" (AUDHDG) ACC","IE0008368304.USD":"STEWART INVESTORS WORLDWIDE LEADERS SUSTAINABILITY FUND \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0700851271.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF EMERGING MARKETS MULTI-ASSET \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0594300179.USD":"FIDELITY CHINA CONSUMER \"A\" (USD) ACC","SG9999001903.USD":"Aberdeen Standard Pacific Equity USD","LU0130103400.USD":"Natixis Harris Associates Global Equity RA USD","LU2476274308.USD":"ALLIANZ CHINA FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU1201861165.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates Global Equity PA SGD","LU0918141887.USD":"安联亚洲实际收益股票基金","BK4531":"中概回港概念","SG9999006514.SGD":"United Asia Consumer Fund SGD","LU1048484197.HKD":"ALLIANZ CHINA MULTI INCOME PLUS \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU0143863784.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL EMERGING MARKET EQUITIES\"DU\" (USD) ACC","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","LU0327786744.USD":"Janus Henderson Horizon China Opportunities A2 USD","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","LU0228367735.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - Asian Equity Fund AS SGD","LU1046421795.USD":"富达环球科技A-ACC","LU1880398471.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS GLOBAL EQUITY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU0106252389.USD":"SCHRODER ISF EMERGING MARKETS \"A\" ACC","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","LU0348827113.USD":"ALLIANZ RCM CHINA \"AT\" ACC","BK4538":"云计算","SG9999000459.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard Pacific Equity SGD","LU1880383366.USD":"东方汇理中国股票基金 A2 (C)","LU0143863198.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL EMERGING MARKET EQUITIES\"AU\" (USD) ACC","LU0588545904.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - Asian Equity Income ASDM SGD","LU0359202008.SGD":"Blackrock China Fund A2 SGD-H","LU0196878994.USD":"MANULIFE GF CHINA VALUE \"AA\" (USD) INC","LU0979878070.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0588545730.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS ASIAN EQUITY INCOME \"ADM\" (USD) INC","LU0320764243.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Emerging Markets A Acc SGD","LU0456846285.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Greater China A (acc) SGD","SG9999006597.SGD":"United China-India Dynamic Growth SGD","LU0052750758.USD":"富兰克林中国基金A Acc","LU0545039389.USD":"BGF GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A2\" ACC","LU0611395673.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0561508036.HKD":"ALLIANZ CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU1152091168.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY FUND - CHINA OPPORTUNITY (USD) \"PM\" INC","LU0315178854.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS ASIAN EQUITY INCOME \"A\" ACC","LU0345776255.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF ASIAN EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1046422090.SGD":"Fidelity Pacific A-SGD","LU0417516571.SGD":"Allianz Oriental Income Cl AT Acc SGD","BK1521":"挪威政府全球养老基金持仓","LU0293314216.USD":"ALLIANZ GEM EQUITY HIGH DIVIDEND \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1188198961.HKD":"SCHRODER ISF CHINA OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (HKD) INC QV","LU0348788117.USD":"ALLIANZ EMERGING ASIA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0862451753.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Emerging Markets Dividend A (mth) SGD","BK4565":"NFT概念","LU0261947096.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS  SUSTAINABLE ASIA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0456827905.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - China A (acc) SGD","LU0214875030.USD":"HSBC GIF BRIC EQUITY \"M2C\" (USD) ACC","LU0181495838.USD":"施罗德新兴亚洲A Acc","IE00B0JY6N72.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL EMERGING MARKETS FOCUS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1769817096.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - GLOBAL EMERG MARKETS OPPO \"P\" (USD) INC","LU2039709279.SGD":"MANULIFE GF DRAGON GROWTH \"AA\" (SGDHDG) INC","LU0640798160.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL EMERGING MARKET DYNAMIC \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0348816934.USD":"ALLIANZ TOTAL RETURN ASIAN EQUITY \"AT\" (USD)","LU1769817179.HKD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - GLOBAL EMERG MARKETS OPPO \"P\" (HKD) INC","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","LU0211977185.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GREATER CHINA EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU0831103253.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Asia Pacific Income A (mth) SGD","LU0607220059.USD":"SCHRODER ISF HONG KONG EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4502":"阿里概念","LU0163747925.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS ASIAN EQUITY A ACC","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","LU0593848301.USD":"未来资产亚洲卓越消费股票基金A","IE00BPRC5H50.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4504":"桥水持仓","LU0868486357.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Emerging Markets Opportunities A (acc) SGD-H","LU1152091754.HKD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY FUND - CHINA OPPORTUNITY (USD) \"PM\" (HKD) INC","LU2226246903.HKD":"ALLIANZ TOTAL RETURN ASIAN EQUITY \"AT4\" (HKD) ACC","LU1251922891.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF ALL CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0898667661.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Asia Pacific Income A (mth) SGD-H","LU1303224171.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF ALL CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1831875114.USD":"SCHRODER ISF ALL CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0890818403.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - Emerging Markets Dividend A (mth) SGD-H","LU0320764755.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Asian Growth A Acc SGD","LU1105468828.SGD":"Allianz Total Return Asian Equity AM DIS H2-SGD","LU0648948544.HKD":"ALLIANZ ASIAN MULTI INCOME PLUS \"AM\" (HKD) INC","LU0431992006.USD":"摩根大通新兴市场机会A（acc）","LU0865486749.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - Asian Equity Income AS SGD-H","LU1282649067.USD":"ALLIANZ ASIAN MULTI INCOME PLUS \"AMG\" (USD) INC A","LU0918141705.HKD":"ALLIANZ TOTAL RETURN ASIAN EQUITY \"AM\" (HKD) INC","LU0499858438.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF ASIA PACIFIC EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) INC","SG9999001689.USD":"施罗德亚洲成长股票","SG9999001226.SGD":"UNITED SUSTAINABLE ASIA TOP 50 \"A\" (SGD) ACC","SG9999000327.SGD":"Schroder Asian Growth A Dis SGD","LU0823426308.USD":"法巴中国股票基金","LU0828237510.HKD":"SCHRODER ISF BIC (BRAZ IN CH)\"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0328353924.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - GLOBAL EMERGING MARKETS OPPORTUNITY (USD) \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU1981816686.USD":"EASTSPRING INV ASIAN MULTI FACTOR EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0051755006.USD":"摩根大通中国A (dist)","LU0516422366.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Focus Equities A Acc SGD","LU1115378108.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - Global Emerging Markets Dynamic AS SGD","LU1720051017.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence AT Acc H2-SGD","LU1481107354.HKD":"HSBC GIF HONG KONG EQUITY \"AD\" (HKD) INC","LU0880133367.SGD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY FUND CHINA OPPORTUNITY USD \"P\" (SGD) ACC","LU0417516902.SGD":"Allianz China Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","LU0553294199.USD":"BGF GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A5G\" (USD) INC","LU0516423091.SGD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA FOCUS EQUITIES \"I\" (SGD) ACC","BK4543":"AI","LU0708995583.HKD":"TEMPLETON CHINA \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1813983027.USD":"MANULIFE GF DRAGON GROWTH \"AA\" (USD) INC","HK0000306685.HKD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU0106259558.USD":"SCHRODER ISF ASIAN OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" ACC","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0577902371.SGD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA GROWTH & INCOME EQUITIE \"I\" (SGD) ACC","LU0049853897.USD":"SCHRODER ISF EMERGING MARKETS \"A\" (USD) INC AV","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","LU1008478684.HKD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY FUND -  CHINA OPPORTUNITY \"P\" (HKD) ACC","HK0000306701.USD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0588545490.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - Asian Equity Income AS SGD","LU2097828557.USD":"AZ EQUITY CHINA \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","LU2097828631.EUR":"AZ EQUITY CHINA \"A\" (EUR) ACC","LU1568876335.HKD":"ALLIANZ CHINA MULTI INCOME PLUS \"AMG\" (HKD) INC","LU2097828714.EUR":"AZ EQUITY CHINA \"BAZ\" (EUR) ACC","LU1568876251.USD":"ALLIANZ CHINA MULTI INCOME PLUS \"AMG\" (USD) INC","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU0229945570.USD":"TEMPLETON BRIC \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2097828805.USD":"AZ EQUITY CHINA \"A-AZ\" (USD) ACC","LU1267930227.SGD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL BALANCED \"AS\" (SGD) ACC A","LU0396098781.USD":"ALLIANZ CHINA MULTI INCOME PLUS \"AT\" (USD) ACC","BK4587":"ChatGPT概念","BK4558":"双十一","LU1235294995.USD":"FIDELITY GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USDHDG) ACC","LU0307460666.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS CHINA EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU2097828474.EUR":"AZ EQUITY CHINA \"A\" (EUR) ACC A","LU0873338254.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA GROWTH & INCOME EQUITIE \"I\" (USD) INC","LU0588546209.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - China Equity Fund AS SGD","LU0449515922.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY \"PC\" (USD)ACC","BK4588":"碎股","IE0034224299.USD":"PINEBRIDGE ASIA EX JAPAN EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1224709979.USD":"FIDELITY CHINA FOCUS \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0605514214.HKD":"FIDELITY CHINA CONSUMER \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0231483743.USD":"abrdn SICAV I - ALL CHINA SUSTAINABLE EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK1610":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU0823041008.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS EMERGING WORLD EQUITY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU2087589342.USD":"BGF ASIAN MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A6\" (USD) INC","LU0823038988.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS ASIA EQUITY FOCUS  \"A2\" (USD) ACC","SGXZ90724238.SGD":"UNITED ASIA \"A\" (SGD) INC","LU0132412106.USD":"abrdn SICAV I - EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0823039010.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS ASIA EQUITY FOCUS  \"A2\" (USD) INC","LU1282649810.SGD":"Allianz Asian Multi Income Plus Cl AMg DIS H2-SGD","LU0047713382.USD":"BGF EMERGING MARKETS \"A2\" ACC","LU0499858602.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF ASIA PACIFIC EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0417516738.SGD":"Allianz Hong Kong Equity AT Acc SGD","LU1051769294.HKD":"BGF EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY INCOME \"A6\"(HKDHDG) INC","LU0244354667.USD":"SCHRODER ISF CHINA OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" ACC","LU0577902454.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA GROWTH & INCOME EQUITIE \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU1048588211.SGD":"Blackrock Asian Dragon A2 SGD-H","LU0072462343.USD":"贝莱德亚洲巨龙基金","LU0594300419.USD":"富达中国消费基金A","LU1770036033.HKD":"NINETY ONE GSF ASIAN EQUITY \"A\" (HKD) ACC","SG9999002828.SGD":"Eastspring Investments Unit Trusts - Dragon Peacock A SGD","BK4607":"DeepSeek概念股","LU2488822045.USD":"ALLIANZ CHINA HEALTHY LIVING \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU1548497426.USD":"安联环球人工智能AT Acc","BK4220":"综合零售","LU0871576103.HKD":"HSBC GIF CHINESE EQUITY \"AC\" (HKD) ACC","HK0000320223.HKD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0516422440.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA FOCUS EQUITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0348783662.USD":"ALLIANZ ORIENTAL INCOME \"A\" (USDHDG) INC","LU1242518857.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU2476274720.SGD":"ALLIANZ CHINA FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES \"AT\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU1807302812.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV ALL CHINA \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0502904849.HKD":"FIDELITY FUNDS  CHINA INNOVATION \"A\" (HKD) ACC","BK4575":"芯片概念","LU0823397103.USD":"BNP PARIBAS SUSTAINABLE ASIA EX-JAPAN EQUITY \"C\" (USD) ACC","HK0000320264.USD":"TAIKANG KAITAI CHINA NEW OPPORTUNITIES FUND \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0259732245.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS DRAGON PEACOCK A","LU0608807433.USD":"TEMPLETON EMERGING MARKETS DYNAMIC INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0043850808.USD":"HSBC GIF ASIA EX JAPAN EQUITY \"AD\" INC","LU0819123356.HKD":"HSBC GIF MANAGED SOLUTIONS ASIA FOCUSED GROWTH \"AC\" (HKD) ACC","LU2449936058.SGD":"SUSTAINABLE ASIA EQUITY \"AA\" (SGD) ACC","LU0823397285.USD":"BNP PARIBAS SUSTAINABLE ASIA EX-JAPAN EQUITY \"C\" (USD) INC","LU0672654166.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Asian Growth A (acc) SGD-H1","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4614":"Manus概念股","LU0314109678.HKD":"MANULIFE GF DRAGON GROWTH \"AA\" (HKD) INC","LU1282649141.HKD":"ALLIANZ ASIAN MULTI INCOME PLUS \"AMG\" (HKD) INC","LU1328615791.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ALL CHINA EQUITIES \"I\" (USD) ACC","BK1618":"Manus概念股","BK1142":"互联网与直销零售","LU0543330483.HKD":"TEMPLETON ASIAN GROWTH \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU1044876610.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) ASIAN CONTRARIAN EQUITY \"ZU\" (USD) ACC","LU0949170772.SGD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A6 SGD-H","LU0254981946.USD":"HSBC GIF BRIC MARKETS EQUITY \"AC\" (USD) ACC","LU1642822792.SGD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) ASIAN CONTRARIAN EQUITY \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU1003077747.HKD":"BGF GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"A6\" (HKDHDG) INC","BK1588":"回港中概股","LU0348783233.USD":"安联东方收入型 CI A Dis美元","BK1615":"港股-互联网","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU0164865239.USD":"HSBC GIF CHINESE EQUITY \"AC\" (USD) ACC","LU0084288322.USD":"Natixis Asia Equity RD USD","LU0738911758.USD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A6 USD","LU0011963245.USD":"abrdn SICAV I ASIA PACIFIC SUSTAINAB  LE EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0165289439.USD":"HSBC GIF ASIA EX JAPAN EQUITY \"AC\" ACC","LU0648000940.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates Global Equity RA SGD","LU0541501648.USD":"ALLSPRING  EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0345775950.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF ASIAN EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0164872284.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1323998911.USD":"BGF ASIAN MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0531970944.HKD":"HSBC GIF BRIC EQUITY \"AC\" (HKD) ACC","BK1586":"云计算","LU0164880469.USD":"HSBC GIF HONG KONG EQUITY \"AC\" ACC","LU0310800965.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global Balanced A Acc SGD","BABA":"阿里巴巴","BK1249":"综合零售","IE0003895053.USD":"PINEBRIDGE ASIA DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"AD\" USD  ACC","LU0048597586.USD":"富达亚洲焦点A","LU1808992512.USD":"AB ALL CHINA EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00B3M56506.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2357305700.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence ET H2-SGD","LU0661504455.SGD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A5 SGD-H","LU0531971595.HKD":"HSBC GIF CHINESE EQUITY \"AD\" (HKD) INC","LU0791591158.USD":"ALLSPRING  EMERGING MARKTES EQUITY INCOME \"I\" (USD) ACC","BK1584":"蚂蚁金服概念","HBBD.SI":"Alibaba HK SDR 5to1","LU2778985437.USD":"ALLIANZ CHINA FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1048596156.SGD":"Blackrock Asian Growth Leaders A2 SGD-H","IE00B5MMRT66.SGD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2152927971.USD":"NORDEA 1 ASIAN STARS EQUITY \"BP\" (USD) ACC","BK1591":"就地过年概念","LU0708995153.HKD":"TEMPLETON EMERGING MARKETS \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0039217434.USD":"HSBC GIF CHINESE EQUITY \"AD\" INC","LU0516423174.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA FOCUS EQUITIES \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0516422952.EUR":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA FOCUS EQUITIES \"I\" (EUR) ACC","LU0128525689.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL BALANCED \"A\"(USD) ACC","LU1960683339.HKD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV ALL CHINA \"P\" (HKD) ACC","LU0501845795.SGD":"瑞银大中华区股票基金P Acc SGD","LU0067412154.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY FUND -  CHINA OPPORTUNITY \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0329678170.USD":"FIDELITY EMERGING ASIA \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0359201612.USD":"贝莱德中国基金A2","LU1688375341.USD":"贝莱德中国灵活股票基金","LU1282651048.USD":"ALLIANZ GEM EQUITY HIGH DIVIDEND \"AMG\" (USD) INC","LU0329678337.USD":"FIDELITY EMERGING ASIA \"A\" (USD)","LU1823568750.SGD":"Fidelity Global Technology A-ACC SGD","LU1719994722.HKD":"NINETY ONE GSF ALL CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0348784397.USD":"ALLIANZ ORIENTAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","SG9999001093.SGD":"United Greater China Fund A Acc SGD","LU0128522744.USD":"TEMPLETON EMERGING MARKETS \"A\" ACC","LU1282648689.USD":"ALLIANZ TOTAL RETURN ASIAN EQUITY \"AMG\" (USD) INC","LU0463099449.HKD":"SCHRODER ISF CHINA OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0543330566.HKD":"TEMPLETON BRIC \"A\" (HKD) ACC","IE00BZ08YR35.GBP":"GUINNESS BEST OF CHINA \"C\" (GBP) ACC","LU0251144936.SGD":"Fidelity Sustainable Asia Equity A-SGD","IE00BZ08YS42.EUR":"GUINNESS BEST OF CHINA \"C\" (EUR) ACC","LU2293587155.HKD":"ALLIANZ ORIENTAL INCOME \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU0348735423.USD":"ALLIANZ HONG KONG EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","IE00BZ08YT58.USD":"GUINNESS BEST OF CHINA \"C\" (USD) ACC","LU0173614495.USD":"富达中国焦点A","IE0032431581.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GREATER CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0455707207.USD":"FIDELITY FUNDS  CHINA INNOVATION \"A\" (USD) INC","SG9999002562.SGD":"LionGlobal Asia Pacific SGD","LU0608807946.USD":"TEMPLETON EMERGING MARKETS DYNAMIC INCOME \"A\" Q (USD) INC","LU0650527681.SGD":"Fidelity China Consumer A-SGD","LU1720051108.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","IE00BMPRXR70.SGD":"Neuberger Berman 5G Connectivity A Acc SGD-H","LU0072913022.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY FUND -  GREATER CHINA \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0823413587.USD":"BNP PARIBAS EMERGING EQUITY \"C\" (USD) ACC","LU0737861772.HKD":"FIDELITY EMERGING ASIA \"A \" (HKD) ACC","LU1961090484.USD":"ALLIANZ ALL CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","SG9999001051.SGD":"United Asia Fund SGD","LU0589944569.HKD":"ALLIANZ EMERGING ASIA EQUITY \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU0348825331.USD":"ALLIANZ CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0128522157.USD":"TEMPLETON ASIAN GROWTH \"A\" ACC","LU1211504680.USD":"ALLIANZ HIGH DIVIDEND ASIA PACIFIC EQUITY \"AM\" (USD) INC","LU2045819591.USD":"Natixis WCM Global Emerging Markets Equity R/A USD","LU2125910849.SGD":"Natixis WCM Global Emerging Markets Equity R/A SGD","LU1794554557.SGD":"Allianz All China Equity AT Acc H2-SGD","LU0106959298.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY FUND - EMERGING MARKETS SUSTAINABLE LEADERS (USD) \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU2125910500.SGD":"Natixis WCM Global Emerging Markets Equity H-R/A SGD","LU0469268626.HKD":"AB FCP I-ASIA EX JAPAN EQUITY PTF(AD","LU0149534421.HKD":"SCHRODER ISF HONG KONG EQ \"A\" ACC","LU0169518387.USD":"JPM ASIA EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU0675040207.SGD":"JPM ASIA PACIFIC EQUITY \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU0572940350.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Asian Dividend Income A3 SGD","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","LU0441854154.USD":"JPM ASIA PACIFIC EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1655091459.SGD":"JPM ASIA PACIFIC INCOME \"A\" (SGD) INC A","LU0029874905.USD":"TEMPLETON EMERGING MARKETS \"A\" INC","BK1502":"双十一","LU0264606111.USD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Asian Dividend Income A2 USD","LU0210527791.USD":"JPM ASIA PACIFIC INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK1501":"阿里概念股","LU0117844026.USD":"JPM ASIA PACIFIC INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0228659784.USD":"施罗德金砖四国基金","LU0784639295.USD":"JPM ASIA PACIFIC INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC (M)","LU0370786039.SGD":"Fidelity Greater China A-SGD","LU1366334578.USD":"ALLSPRING EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0054237671.USD":"FIDELITY ASIAN SPECIAL SITUATIONS \"A\" INC","IE00B543WZ88.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0449509016.USD":"HSBC GIF BRIC EQUITY \"AC\" (USD) ACC","LU0210526637.USD":"JPM CHINA \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0572944931.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon China Opportunities A2 SGD","LU0326950275.SGD":"Schroder ISF China Opportunities A Acc SGD-H","LU0572939691.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Asian Dividend Income A2 SGD","LU1868837565.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL EMERGING MARKET EQUITIES \"1\" (USD) ACC","LU1044874839.SGD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) ASIAN CONTRARIAN EQUITY \"AGH\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU0348814723.USD":"ALLIANZ TOTAL RETURN ASIAN EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC  NC","LU0251143458.SGD":"Fidelity Emerging Markets A-SGD","LU1282651121.HKD":"ALLIANZ GEM EQUITY HIGH DIVIDEND \"AMG\" (HKD) INC","LU0140636845.USD":"施罗德大中华区股票A Acc","LU2399975544.HKD":"ALLIANZ ALL CHINA EQUITY \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU0823426480.USD":"法巴中国股票经典Dis","LU0651946864.USD":"贝莱德新兴市场股票收益A2","LU0737861699.HKD":"FIDELITY CHINA FOCUS \"A \" (HKD) ACC","LU1242518931.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","LU0577902611.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA GROWTH & INCOME EQUITIE \"A\" (USD) ACC","SG9999014674.SGD":"Nikko AM All China Equity A SGD","LU1051768304.USD":"贝莱德新兴市场股票收益A6","LU0054450605.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EMERGING MARKTS EQ \"AD\" INC","LU0540923850.HKD":"ALLIANZ HONG KONG EQUITY \"A\" (HKD) INC","LU1880383440.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS CHINA EQUITY \"A2\" (USD) INC","SG9999002463.SGD":"LionGlobal China Growth SGD","LU0634319403.HKD":"ALLIANZ HONG KONG EQUITY \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU1515016050.SGD":"Blackrock Emerging Markets Equity Income A6 SGD-H","BK1608":"元宇宙概念","LU0488056044.USD":"Allianz Asian Multi Income Plus Cl AM DIS USD","LU0384037296.USD":"ALLIANZ ASIAN MULTI INCOME PLUS \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU0823040885.USD":"东方汇理新兴市场焦点股票基金","LU0577902298.EUR":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS - ASIA GROWTH & INCOME EQUITIE \"I\" (EUR) ACC","LU1224444064.USD":"ALLIANZ GEM EQUITY HIGH DIVIDEND \"AM\" (USDHDG) INC","LU0048580855.USD":"富达大中华区A","LU0052756011.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL BALANCED \"A\" (USD) INC","LU2242644610.SGD":"Fidelity China Innovation A-ACC-SGD","LU0577902538.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Asia Growth and Income Equities A Acc SGD","LU0856984785.SGD":"HSBC GIF MANAGED SOLUTIONS ASIA FOCUSED GROWTH \"ACH\" (SGDHDG) ACC","SG9999004220.SGD":"Nikko AM Shenton Asia Dividend Equity Fund  SGD","LU1720050803.USD":"安联全方位中国股票基金","LU0348805143.USD":"ALLIANZ ENHANCED ALL CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0797268264.HKD":"ALLIANZ TOTAL RETURN ASIAN EQUITY \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","LU0149721374.USD":"HSBC GIF HONG KONG EQUITY \"AD\" INC","LU0791590937.USD":"ALLSPRING  EMERGING MARKTES EQUITY INCOME \"A\" (USD)","BK1575":"同股不同权","LU1770034418.SGD":"ALL CHINA EQUITY \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199643973","content_text":"On October 9, at the All-In 2025 Summit, Alibaba Group co-founder and Chairman Joe Tsai shared his latest insights on US-China tech competition, Alibaba's strategic transformation, and AGI among other hot topics. Tsai stated bluntly: \"AI is not a winner-takes-all field. True victory lies not in developing the most powerful AI models, but in achieving faster technological implementation and applications.\"\nTsai engaged in a debate with David Sacks, dubbed the \"White House AI Czar\" and head of White House AI and cryptocurrency affairs. Sacks emphasized that the US must maintain leadership in AI and chip technologies. However, Tsai argued: \"The US should invest more resources in technology applications and popularization, rather than focusing solely on technology R&D.\"\nTsai added that China actively embraces open-source principles, and many companies have launched models with moderate parameter scales, a development model more conducive to rapid technology adoption. While he did not assert that China has taken the lead in the model technology race, he stated that \"China has indeed made significant progress in practical applications.\" He concluded that AI is becoming a ubiquitous fundamental element like air, and no country would claim exclusive ownership of air.\nRegarding Alibaba, Tsai mentioned joining due to Jack Ma's leadership, deeply attracted by Ma's clear vision and ability to identify talent. Throughout Alibaba's 26-year development journey, Tsai witnessed Chinese companies transition from a \"free expansion period\" to a \"new normal,\" believing that today's regulatory environment is more predictable and stable.\nAlibaba has undergone internal transformation in recent years. Tsai revealed that after returning as board chairman, the first thing he did was tell everyone that promoting Alibaba's involvement in six different businesses to the outside world was \"too confusing.\" Tsai focused Alibaba's strategy on two core areas: e-commerce and cloud computing, deeply integrating AI into all business segments, with this focus being key to managing the company well. Currently, approximately 30% of Alibaba's code is generated by AI.\nRegarding AI's future, Tsai specifically mentioned Google DeepMind founder and CEO Demis Hassabis's prediction that AGI might be achieved within 5 to 10 years, but Tsai personally believes AGI still needs about 20 years to truly arrive.\nBeyond Alibaba, Tsai has another identity: he owns NBA team Brooklyn Nets and WNBA team New York Liberty. In the interview, he also shared business insights from operating teams and perspectives on the sports industry.\nRecently, the 2025 NBA China Games will be held in Macau, marking the event's restart after a 6-year hiatus. The participating teams are the Phoenix Suns and Brooklyn Nets, with the latter being Tsai's NBA team, while Alibaba Cloud also sponsors the event. On October 9, NBA China and Alibaba Group announced a multi-year partnership between NBA China and Alibaba Cloud.\nThe All-In 2025 Summit was held from September 8-10 in the US, initiated by the well-known Silicon Valley podcast All-In. This year's summit also featured notable tech industry leaders including Elon Musk and Demis Hassabis.\nThe following is a transcript of Tsai's interview at the All-In Summit (with team-related Q&A moved to the end):\n**01. Alibaba Founded 26 Years Ago, Regulatory Environment Has Entered New Normal**\nHost: Let's talk about Alibaba. This has been an incredible journey, with Jack Ma's story documented in books, but can you take us back to your mindset then? How did you get involved, what were you thinking, and how much risk did you take?\nTsai: I was fascinated by Jack Ma's personality. People see Ma's public side, which is very charismatic. But what I saw was his ability to instill belief in people. When I walked into his apartment, there were about 12 to 15 recent college graduates, and Ma was like a teacher 10 years older than them. He was good at communication and could paint a very clear vision. That's what I truly identified with and joined for. His leadership ability was amazing.\nMa himself came from a teaching background, was educated as such, and taught English at Zhejiang University. Teachers are natural leaders to some extent. Teachers must first be good communicators, and secondly, they must be able to identify talent. I think many teachers enjoy making judgments like \"this child will be very successful in the future,\" writing recommendation letters for them, doing various things. And teachers are humble enough; they are willing, even happy to see their students more successful than themselves. In the process of starting a company, you need to be able to accommodate all kinds of people who are smarter than you. This is very important.\nHost: There was a phase, I think around the early 2010s, when China felt like a highly free capitalist environment, with a Cambrian explosion of excellent entrepreneurs emerging, including you, Jack Ma, Pony Ma, and others. Later, things changed somewhat. Can you outline this process of change for us? I believe these changes profoundly affected foreign direct investment entering China's ecosystem. Please tell us about this journey you personally experienced, participated in, and observed.\nTsai: Alibaba has been established for 26 years. I think the first 15 years were completely free market growth, where we organically built many businesses. Then we entered a phase of extreme competition. Everyone wanted to do e-commerce because if you have online traffic, e-commerce is the best way to monetize that traffic. In today's market, we have five or six very strong competitors, including ByteDance, TikTok's parent company. They're also doing e-commerce. They're not known for e-commerce, but they're one of our fiercest competitors.\nWe went through a period of extreme competition, then the government felt the industry was somewhat off track. Competition was too intense, and some platforms showed monopolistic behavior. So more regulatory measures were introduced, some of which were actually very good, such as privacy protection and anti-monopoly measures. Now we've entered a new normal where the regulatory environment is more predictable. We know where the red lines are, what should and shouldn't be done. Actually, due to this predictability, it has created a better business environment.\n**02. China is a Peaceful Country, Emphasis on Education Worth Learning from by America**\nHost: On the geopolitical level, the US seems to constantly indoctrinate Americans to view China as an existential threat to America, that we are competitors, that we cannot cooperate and jointly lead the world toward prosperity. What's your view?\nTsai: I disagree with that worldview.\nHost: I don't believe it either. I don't know why our only tone of dialogue has to be that we are mortal enemies.\nTsai: I think I can understand why America has such thoughts. China has risen rapidly over the past 20-25 years, manufacturing has become strong, becoming an export powerhouse. Due to economic development, China has also become a tech power. America's fear is that economic strength and technological strength will translate into military strength, making it a national security issue. I understand this.\nBut I think China and the US are the world's two largest economies. I think you need to step back and think about the problem. On one hand, you should compete with China. Hyperscale companies compete globally with Chinese internet companies. But on the other hand, there are so many conflict zones in the world. Didn't President Trump say he himself prevented seven wars? China didn't start any of them. How many years has China not started a war? I feel it's been 30-40 years. I think China participated in the Korean War, maybe the Vietnam War, but that's ancient history.\nIf you observe the Chinese people and China's behavior, it's a very peaceful country. China cares about its own economic development and the welfare of its citizens. I think there's a lot of friction in the US-China competition process, with China feeling that America is trying to contain China and prevent China's economic rise.\nHost: Speaking of citizen welfare, you mentioned ByteDance. I think there are reports that ByteDance's revenue just exceeded Meta's revenue. ByteDance's core product TikTok is fundamentally different in America and China. Due to regulation and concern for citizen welfare, China's Douyin has strict regulations on content, screening, and algorithms. In America, TikTok is full of cat videos and all kinds of meaningless content, although I now notice TikTok has added a STEM section. China has that mindset and willingness to think about its citizens. I'm just curious, how should we Americans embrace more of that principle? Because this is often overlooked in the US-China confrontational atmosphere. What should we do more of that China is doing?\nTsai: Education. China has a highly educated population. Talk to any Chinese parent, and they want their children to take the gaokao and enter the best universities. If they want to send their children abroad to study, their targets are Ivy League schools or Stanford. Chinese people place great emphasis on education. I think America has some structural problems, like teacher union obstacles. But China doesn't have teacher unions.\n**03. AI Field is Not Winner-Takes-All, US-China Still Has Broad Cooperation Space**\nHost: David, I'm curious how you view this issue. Are we destined to forever be in conflict with China? Or under our remarkable, dynamic President Trump's leadership, is there another path forward?\nDavid Sacks: America and China are in high-tech competition, also competing in security and economic fields. The reason is that China has become wealthy and powerful, and America doesn't tolerate peer competitors. America wants to be the strongest country. Power balance is somewhat a zero-sum game. Economics isn't, but power is. America's history is that we want to be first, we don't like having pure competitors. That's the bottom line. This is for good reason. Countries are essentially in anarchy with each other, meaning there's no higher authority above nations. If you encounter trouble in the global system, you can't dial 911. Countries place survival above all considerations, and the way to survive in the international system is to become powerful. Countries measure your power by the gap between you and the next most powerful country. 20 years ago, China wasn't seen as a threat because it wasn't wealthy and powerful, but now it is.\nI think this has led to a more hawkish atmosphere in Washington. I agree with parts of their view because I think it's very important for America to win the AI race. We don't want China to dominate AI or the chip field. As Americans, we want America to be the strongest country. If I were Chinese, I would want China to be the strongest country. I have no personal grudge or malice about this. But I want America to be the strongest country, and in my little field, this means winning the AI race.\nTsai: May I respond?\nHost: Of course. Please go ahead.\nTsai: I understand your feelings as a patriot wanting America to win. But regarding the AI field, I don't think there's such a thing as winning the race. It's more like a long marathon. Observing the development trends of model companies, you'll find new models leading every week, but the next week they're overtaken by other models. On the other hand, the entire AI industry hasn't yet formed a clear business model. The e-commerce business we're in has network effects market models, but I'm skeptical whether the model development field also has this winner-takes-all characteristic. I think AI is not a winner-takes-all field.\nIn my view, true victory lies not in developing the most powerful AI models, but in achieving faster technological implementation and applications. America should invest more resources in technology applications and popularization, rather than focusing solely on technology R&D. Currently, each tech giant invests about $80 billion annually in R&D, which is a huge investment.\nLooking at China's development path: First, China actively embraces open-source principles; second, many companies including ours have launched models with moderate parameter scales - such as 1.7 billion and 8 billion parameter models, which are more suitable for mobile devices and laptops. This development model is more conducive to rapid technology adoption.\nI should clarify that I'm not asserting China has taken the lead in the model technology race, but China has indeed made significant progress in practical applications. A survey last year showed only 8% of Chinese companies applied AI technology in their business; now this proportion is approaching 50%. The speed of this application adoption is remarkable.\nAI is becoming a ubiquitous fundamental element like air, and no country would claim exclusive ownership of air. In critical fields like healthcare and biology, AI holds enormous potential, providing broad space for cooperation between the two countries.\n**04. After Returning to Alibaba, the Key is Focus**\nHost: Whether self-developing or adopting existing models, the most critical question is: what is AI's actual impact on business operations? How will this change hiring scale? At what levels will it have impact? What changes will it bring to efficiency and work nature? What are the specific AI application scenarios within Alibaba?\nTsai: AI has indeed significantly improved our operational efficiency, correspondingly reducing manpower needs. We're trying to use AI to write quarterly financial reports, even considering using AI in analyst meetings, observing whether people can tell the difference, then we'll just lay off the entire finance department (laughs). But AI's greatest value lies in empowering consumer-side applications. We deeply integrate AI into e-commerce, maps, food delivery and other businesses, expanding user scale by improving user experience, with this impact ultimately reflected in revenue growth.\nHost: As more and more work is done by AI, won't demand for labor naturally decline?\nTsai: We haven't announced any layoffs because of AI yet, but I keep asking our engineering department heads how much code is now written by AI. I get different answers depending on which department you ask, but I think it's probably reached 30% now.\nHost: Already that high?\nTsai: Yes, I did a weighted average across different departments, roughly that figure.\nHost: Alibaba is a huge enterprise with business spanning many countries globally. How does Alibaba build corporate culture, and how do you manage massive numbers of employees, diverse needs, and various issues? How do you handle this?\nTsai: Focus. Before taking over as chairman, I was actually gradually stepping back from company operations, focusing on the Brooklyn Nets. About a year and a half ago, I returned as company chairman. The first thing I did was tell everyone we can't keep saying our company is involved in six different businesses - it's too confusing. We only do two businesses: e-commerce and cloud computing, both containing AI elements, these two are our core businesses. This focus allows our team to concentrate and execute company decisions.\nHost: Finally, can you briefly predict the team's performance this new season?\nTsai: Are you referring to the entire league, or specifically the Nets?\nHost: Let's talk about the Nets.\nTsai: We're in a rebuilding cycle. This summer we fully utilized five first-round draft picks while retaining important draft assets for 2026. This layout already indicates our strategic direction - we'll focus on developing young players, giving them ample growth space. While this means we need to go through a growth process, this is our clear development path at this stage.\n**05. AGI Still Needs 20 Years to Arrive, China Doesn't Fear Superintelligence Getting Out of Control**\nHost: I want to follow up with a question. We just talked in the previous panel discussion that China seems to have a somewhat different view of autonomous driving technology. China is both testing autonomous driving technology but also wants to ensure related technology won't cause widespread unemployment. What exactly is China's view on autonomous driving? Tens of millions of workers make a living driving - what are their views on this? I understand some drivers in Wuhan have expressed dissatisfaction. How do the Chinese government and Chinese people view this incredible transformation of autonomous driving and its impact on employment?\nTsai: I think the government fully embraces it. The Chinese government introduced the \"AI+\" policy a few weeks ago - by 2030, five years from now, they want to see 90% adoption of AI agents, devices, etc. in society. This is an official public government statement - full commitment. There really isn't much discussion about AI replacing human jobs. But overall, Chinese people have employment anxiety. China has about 10 million university graduates annually. China's youth unemployment rate, that is, the unemployment rate for the 16-24 age population, including graduate students, is 18%. Actually quite high, and Chinese people have a lot of anxiety about this.\nPart of the reason is economic. Although China's overall economic situation is quite good in terms of infrastructure, energy access, etc., there's currently a kind of low mood because China has experienced a real estate market decline over the past four or five years, with average housing prices falling about 30%. This is a very negative wealth effect, and this impact continues.\nDavid Sacks: Does China fear AGI? I'm talking about fear of superintelligence getting out of control. Is this a widespread fear, or just an American concern?\nTsai: Government insiders don't talk much about this because they believe they can control AGI better, perhaps better than America. But there are indeed some lingering concerns. I just heard Google DeepMind founder and CEO Demis Hassabis speak, his prediction for AGI is 5 to 10 years. I think AGI might take another 20 years. The key is the word \"general.\" AI must be able to generalize and apply principles to scenarios it has never seen before.\n**06. Teams are Both Business and Social Institutions, NBA is Essentially a Product**\nHost: You own the Brooklyn Nets (NBA team) and New York Liberty (WNBA team). Operating teams must not be easy either?\nTsai: Yes, not easy at all. Any professional team is both a business and a social institution - we need to keep fans happy. There are some church and state elements in this, no different from running a news organization.\nHost: Can we start by talking about the WNBA? Recently Caitlin Clark's season ended, causing a lot of controversy and attention. What did the WNBA do right? What did it do wrong? Did the league fulfill its responsibility to protect this star player?\nTsai: Caitlin Clark undoubtedly had a huge impact on the WNBA. All metrics are rising. In her first season entering the league from college, we saw viewership, ticket sales, sponsorship revenue - almost all metrics quadrupled. Her economic impact on the league is extraordinary.\nHost: Indeed undeniable.\nTsai: But because of her characteristics, she's a different kind of player - a point guard, relatively small, and there were questions about whether she could adapt to the league's physical confrontation, but she proved she could. Of course, there's always competition, like her rivalry with Angel Reese that started in college. Some people portray it as racial confrontation, but I think we should move beyond that and focus on the players' skills and talents themselves.\nNow there are more and more excellent college players in the league, like Sonia Citron, who's now a hot candidate for Rookie of the Year and broke the league's three-point shooting percentage record. If you ask what the WNBA did right, I think it was really the confluence of timing, geography, and people. But what really changed was that before the season Caitlin Clark appeared, the fan base watching ESPN basically didn't watch women's basketball. Maybe some people followed college games, but definitely not the WNBA. But now, mainstream sports fans like you all are watching the WNBA.\nHost: I have an observation about this. You and I are both old-school basketball fans who watched games in the '80s and '90s, watched Patrick Ewing and Charles Barkley. Currently, the WNBA has more intense physical confrontation, they're tougher. Every time LeBron jumps and gets fouled, he flops around. So maybe you can comment on LeBron, or the NBA as a \"product.\"\nTsai: The NBA product is great. I think comparing the physical confrontation intensity between men's and women's leagues is unfair. Both are very physical. If you sit courtside, what you see is physical confrontation and athleticism, right? But games have other dimensions. I now serve on the NBA's \"competition committee.\" Each season, the committee makes rule adjustments to make the NBA product better. When I got the call, I thought, you want me to sit on a committee with Jason Kidd, Chris Paul, Coach K? Can my understanding of basketball really be deeper than theirs? I told NBA Commissioner Adam Silver this committee should be called the \"product committee\" because rule adjustments essentially determine the game \"product\" audiences see. For example, changing three-point line position isn't just a game rule issue, it's more a \"product design\" issue.\nHost: When you see the Boston Celtics make 43 three-pointers in a game, do you think that's a good product?\nTsai: I think it's a great product because there are 18 different ways to make 43 three-pointers in a game.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"89988":1,"09988":1,"HBBD.SI":1,"BABA":1,"ALBmain":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":224,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":34,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}