To The Moon

As an investor and a fan of $Lululemon Athletica(LULU)$  , I was stunned to see their stock crash 18.4% in a single day, wiping out much of its recent gains. 

Having tracked this company, I know its stock once soared past $500, a massive leap from its low of $2.17—a 200x increase! Now trading at just $168, a level last seen in the 2020 bear market, I’m left wondering: what fueled Lululemon’s incredible rise, and why did it plummet this week? Can its business model pull through, and what makes premium athletic brands like this so special? 

Here’s my perspective: Lululemon’s drop stems from a mix of disappointing earnings, intense competition, and macroeconomic pressures. Their Q2 2025 earnings, released after market close on September 4, showed $3.1 per share, beating expectations, and $2.5 billion in revenue, up 7% but slightly missing forecasts. The real shock was their guidance: Q3 earnings projected at $2.18–$2.23 per share, well below the $2.9 analysts expected, and full-year guidance cut from $14.58–$14.78 to $12.77–$12.97. 

This crushed investor confidence, as Lululemon’s high-growth, premium brand image makes any slowdown a red flag.Competition is heating up too. 

Brands like Alo, with its savvy social media marketing and slightly cheaper $80–$120 yoga pants (compared to Lululemon’s $100–$150), are stealing market share. Alo’s 30% revenue growth in 2024 outpaces Lululemon’s 10%, and their trendy vibe, backed by influencers like Kendall Jenner, is resonating with younger buyers. Alo has also officially landed in Singapore, opening its first store at Marina Bay Sands,spanning over 3,000 square feet.

I like their products — pricing is cheaper and the quality is just as good as Lululemon. What’s even better is that Alo offers a one-stop experience where you can shop skincare, haircare, apparel, and sportswear all in one place. The pieces are super comfortable and provide great support.

Then there’s On Running, a Swiss brand growing 37.3% in 2024, challenging Lululemon in running shoes and apparel with $140–$180 price points. 

Add to that, macro issues like potential tariffs on Lululemon’s Asia-heavy supply chain (80% of production, with Vietnam and China as key players) and a weak U.S. economy—August’s nonfarm payrolls added just 22,000 jobs, signaling a cooling market. High-end brands like Lululemon, reliant on affluent consumers, feel the pinch when spending tightens. That said, I’ve personally loved wearing Lululemon’s products—their yoga pants and tops are incredibly comfortable, with top-notch fabric that feels great during workouts and holds up over time, which is why I’m still rooting for their comeback.What sets Lululemon apart? Its business model hinges on premium positioning, high-quality fabrics, and innovative designs, targeting health-conscious, high-income consumers. In 2024, they posted $10.59 billion in revenue (up 10.7%) and $1.815 billion in net income (up 17.06%). Their direct-to-consumer model, through owned stores and e-commerce, ensures brand control but comes with high fixed costs. Community marketing, partnering with fitness coaches and influencers, builds loyalty, while global expansion—especially in China, with 151 stores and 24.8% revenue growth—shows strong potential.Still, risks are real. High costs, heavy reliance on North America (70% of revenue), and competition from Alo and On Running threaten growth. The athletic apparel sector is volatile, tied to consumer confidence, trends, and economic shifts. 

Lululemon’s premium pricing and brand loyalty give it an edge, but it’s not immune to challenges, much like peers Nike, Canada Goose, or Arc’teryx, which share similar high-end, direct-sales models. Could Lululemon follow their struggles?As an investor, I’m cautious. The stock’s cyclical nature, driven by economic and fashion trends, plus tariff risks and competition, makes it a risky bet right now. But as a fan of their products, I’m hopeful they can rebound. What do you think—would you invest in Lululemon after this drop, or is the risk too high?

@TigerPM  @TigerObserver  @Tiger_comments  @Daily_Discussion  @TigerStars