Errrr

Like
Comment
Favorite

tth
2021-03-27

Errrr

Amazon wants to remove all Chinese cotton products from its shelves?

今天，有中国网民爆料称，美国知名电商平台亚马逊有可能会将许多来自中国的棉制品下架，因为根据美国政府的规定，任何出口到美国的棉制品都不能包含有来自新疆的棉花，否则就很有可能会被扣留。可新疆却是中国棉花

Amazon wants to remove all Chinese cotton products from its shelves?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

Top
Latest

No comments yet

Most Discussed

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":352039870,"tweetId":"352039870","gmtCreate":1616826683390,"gmtModify":1704799466395,"author":{"id":3579082546741430,"idStr":"3579082546741430","authorId":3579082546741430,"authorIdStr":"3579082546741430","name":"tth","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b457c26185dbcac47868bcb7791fe3ab","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":1,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>Errrr</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>Errrr</body></html>","text":"Errrr","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/352039870","repostId":1104682690,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1104682690","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616817056,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1104682690?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-27 11:50","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Amazon wants to remove all Chinese cotton products from its shelves?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1104682690","media":"环球时报","summary":"今天，有中国网民爆料称，美国知名电商平台亚马逊有可能会将许多来自中国的棉制品下架，因为根据美国政府的规定，任何出口到美国的棉制品都不能包含有来自新疆的棉花，否则就很有可能会被扣留。\n可新疆却是中国棉花","content":"Today, some Chinese netizens broke the news that a well-known e-commerce platform in the United States<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>It is possible that many cotton products from China will be removed from the shelves, because according to the regulations of the U.S. government, any cotton products exported to the United States cannot contain cotton from Xinjiang, otherwise it is likely to be detained.But Xinjiang is the most important cotton producing area in China.As shown in the figure below, a netizen named \"Woguaguai\" on Douban.com posted yesterday that a Chinese merchant who exported cotton products to the United States through the Amazon platform in the United States revealed to him that Amazon is asking Chinese exporters to provide proof that their cotton products do not contain Xinjiang cotton.In a document suspected of being sent to Chinese exporters by Amazon, Amazon said that since 85% of China's cotton comes from Xinjiang, some customers asked Chinese merchants to provide such certificates, otherwise cotton products from China are likely to be detained by U.S. customs until the merchants can prove that the cotton does not come from Xinjiang.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5656ca6a088d854ba5935643e301871a\" tg-width=\"464\" tg-height=\"541\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Another group of chat screenshots provided by \"Wogua Monster\" showed that people suspected of being Chinese merchants said that the sellers simply couldn't provide this proof that the export products did not contain Xinjiang cotton. As a result, the cotton products they sold on Amazon, such as men's bath towels, were removed by Amazon.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ef9160dead6f98dac3b92c2946c5441\" tg-width=\"531\" tg-height=\"434\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">At present, Brother honest and frank can't verify the authenticity of these materials, documents and chat screenshots given in the news post of \"Wogua Monster\", but US media reports show that the administration of former US President Trump has completely banned cotton, tomato and other products from Xinjiang, China, on January 13th this year, on the grounds of the political rumor of so-called \"forced labor\".<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ef4e7c9593bc7a2cd7e097ca52a80df2\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Among them, a report in the Washington Post on February 22nd even pointed out that this practice of the U.S. government directly led to the cancellation of orders by many Chinese cotton and cotton products exporters by American buyers, and some overseas manufacturers that used Chinese cotton for product production also suspended cooperation with domestic cotton manufacturers, because Xinjiang is the most important cotton producing area in China.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7849c8c7d00a77b748c979330034c5b9\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"530\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Some foreign companies that have long been aware of this political risk have already cut Xinjiang cotton in advance, such as the well-known clothing brand GAP and its Oly Navy and Banana Republic brands. IKEA and H&M have also stopped exporting products approved by Xinjiang cotton to the United States, and have stopped purchasing from suppliers in Xinjiang.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NKE\">Nike</a>It means that they don't use cotton from Xinjiang, and the company has told suppliers not to use Xinjiang cotton.However, this report in the Washington Post is not criticizing the U.S. government's ban on Xinjiang cotton as wrong, but believes that the insufficient transparency of the downstream supply chain of the garment industry, coupled with the influence of COVID-19 pandemic, will make it difficult for the U.S. government to quickly and comprehensively implement the ban on Xinjiang cotton.Some people in \"labor organizations\" interviewed by the newspaper said that suppliers are good at \"cheating\" their customers. A clothing brand produced in the United States also said that western brands generally don't directly deal with raw material suppliers in China, so they can't ensure that the raw materials are fine. It's better to use their American clothing directly.A person in charge of the American Apparel and Footwear Association said that American brands are vigorously removing Xinjiang cotton from their industrial chains, but the process will be slower due to the epidemic.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e89bd6288afda39e86d335634a1ddf06\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"368\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6359598ba14aa9f346926a58a6deef8\" tg-width=\"1071\" tg-height=\"234\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In addition, the Washington Post also mentioned that some American chemical companies are cooperating with some clothing brands to trace the source of cotton chemically to further exclude cotton from Xinjiang.In short, the above-mentioned US media reports show that as early as January this year, the US government had directly banned cotton and other products in Xinjiang by establishing regulations, which also forced a large number of merchants who exported cotton products to the United States to cut Xinjiang cotton from their supply chain. However, since Xinjiang is the most important producing area of Chinese cotton, the U.S. government's ban will inevitably lead to \"one-size-fits-all\" harm to Chinese cotton manufacturers and exporters of related products. Some American political forces and local enterprises are also taking the opportunity to incite this kind of rejection of Chinese cotton.Therefore, the situation that the Douban netizen \"nest melon monster\" broke the news does not seem to be \"groundless\".Finally, the Washington Post mentioned in its February report that the ban by the United States will not actually affect the overall international export of Chinese clothing, because the demand in the international market is huge. But what the United States did do led to an increase in international demand for American cotton.However, with the pressure of the United States, more and more western countries are also planning to follow the example of the United States in banning Xinjiang cotton. For example, in January this year, the British government said that British brands would be punished if they used cotton picked through so-called \"forced labor\" from Xinjiang.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/97d013ecb4478d85e56425b1c80245a2\" tg-width=\"935\" tg-height=\"424\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8daead751857186a92b3be32a6807280\" tg-width=\"665\" tg-height=\"161\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This shows once again that compared with those foreign brands that are forced to cut Xinjiang cotton, what we really have to face and fight back is the western government headed by the United States.How to disintegrate their right to speak in cotton trade, prevent their political rumors from further harming the cotton industry in Xinjiang and even China, and how to build our international standard system and legal system by formulating industry standards, trade rules, policies and regulations, and strengthen our right to speak internationally, so as to safeguard the development space, trade order and interests of China's cotton, especially Xinjiang's cotton, is what we need to consider, and our government, legislators and associations and chambers of commerce in China's cotton and clothing industries.","source":"lsy1568628563230","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Amazon wants to remove all Chinese cotton products from its shelves?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAmazon wants to remove all Chinese cotton products from its shelves?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n环球时报2021-03-27 11:50\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\nToday, some Chinese netizens broke the news that a well-known e-commerce platform in the United States<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon</a>It is possible that many cotton products from China will be removed from the shelves, because according to the regulations of the U.S. government, any cotton products exported to the United States cannot contain cotton from Xinjiang, otherwise it is likely to be detained.But Xinjiang is the most important cotton producing area in China.As shown in the figure below, a netizen named \"Woguaguai\" on Douban.com posted yesterday that a Chinese merchant who exported cotton products to the United States through the Amazon platform in the United States revealed to him that Amazon is asking Chinese exporters to provide proof that their cotton products do not contain Xinjiang cotton.In a document suspected of being sent to Chinese exporters by Amazon, Amazon said that since 85% of China's cotton comes from Xinjiang, some customers asked Chinese merchants to provide such certificates, otherwise cotton products from China are likely to be detained by U.S. customs until the merchants can prove that the cotton does not come from Xinjiang.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5656ca6a088d854ba5935643e301871a\" tg-width=\"464\" tg-height=\"541\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Another group of chat screenshots provided by \"Wogua Monster\" showed that people suspected of being Chinese merchants said that the sellers simply couldn't provide this proof that the export products did not contain Xinjiang cotton. As a result, the cotton products they sold on Amazon, such as men's bath towels, were removed by Amazon.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ef9160dead6f98dac3b92c2946c5441\" tg-width=\"531\" tg-height=\"434\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">At present, Brother honest and frank can't verify the authenticity of these materials, documents and chat screenshots given in the news post of \"Wogua Monster\", but US media reports show that the administration of former US President Trump has completely banned cotton, tomato and other products from Xinjiang, China, on January 13th this year, on the grounds of the political rumor of so-called \"forced labor\".<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ef4e7c9593bc7a2cd7e097ca52a80df2\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"325\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Among them, a report in the Washington Post on February 22nd even pointed out that this practice of the U.S. government directly led to the cancellation of orders by many Chinese cotton and cotton products exporters by American buyers, and some overseas manufacturers that used Chinese cotton for product production also suspended cooperation with domestic cotton manufacturers, because Xinjiang is the most important cotton producing area in China.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7849c8c7d00a77b748c979330034c5b9\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"530\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Some foreign companies that have long been aware of this political risk have already cut Xinjiang cotton in advance, such as the well-known clothing brand GAP and its Oly Navy and Banana Republic brands. IKEA and H&M have also stopped exporting products approved by Xinjiang cotton to the United States, and have stopped purchasing from suppliers in Xinjiang.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NKE\">Nike</a>It means that they don't use cotton from Xinjiang, and the company has told suppliers not to use Xinjiang cotton.However, this report in the Washington Post is not criticizing the U.S. government's ban on Xinjiang cotton as wrong, but believes that the insufficient transparency of the downstream supply chain of the garment industry, coupled with the influence of COVID-19 pandemic, will make it difficult for the U.S. government to quickly and comprehensively implement the ban on Xinjiang cotton.Some people in \"labor organizations\" interviewed by the newspaper said that suppliers are good at \"cheating\" their customers. A clothing brand produced in the United States also said that western brands generally don't directly deal with raw material suppliers in China, so they can't ensure that the raw materials are fine. It's better to use their American clothing directly.A person in charge of the American Apparel and Footwear Association said that American brands are vigorously removing Xinjiang cotton from their industrial chains, but the process will be slower due to the epidemic.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e89bd6288afda39e86d335634a1ddf06\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"368\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a6359598ba14aa9f346926a58a6deef8\" tg-width=\"1071\" tg-height=\"234\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In addition, the Washington Post also mentioned that some American chemical companies are cooperating with some clothing brands to trace the source of cotton chemically to further exclude cotton from Xinjiang.In short, the above-mentioned US media reports show that as early as January this year, the US government had directly banned cotton and other products in Xinjiang by establishing regulations, which also forced a large number of merchants who exported cotton products to the United States to cut Xinjiang cotton from their supply chain. However, since Xinjiang is the most important producing area of Chinese cotton, the U.S. government's ban will inevitably lead to \"one-size-fits-all\" harm to Chinese cotton manufacturers and exporters of related products. Some American political forces and local enterprises are also taking the opportunity to incite this kind of rejection of Chinese cotton.Therefore, the situation that the Douban netizen \"nest melon monster\" broke the news does not seem to be \"groundless\".Finally, the Washington Post mentioned in its February report that the ban by the United States will not actually affect the overall international export of Chinese clothing, because the demand in the international market is huge. But what the United States did do led to an increase in international demand for American cotton.However, with the pressure of the United States, more and more western countries are also planning to follow the example of the United States in banning Xinjiang cotton. For example, in January this year, the British government said that British brands would be punished if they used cotton picked through so-called \"forced labor\" from Xinjiang.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/97d013ecb4478d85e56425b1c80245a2\" tg-width=\"935\" tg-height=\"424\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8daead751857186a92b3be32a6807280\" tg-width=\"665\" tg-height=\"161\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This shows once again that compared with those foreign brands that are forced to cut Xinjiang cotton, what we really have to face and fight back is the western government headed by the United States.How to disintegrate their right to speak in cotton trade, prevent their political rumors from further harming the cotton industry in Xinjiang and even China, and how to build our international standard system and legal system by formulating industry standards, trade rules, policies and regulations, and strengthen our right to speak internationally, so as to safeguard the development space, trade order and interests of China's cotton, especially Xinjiang's cotton, is what we need to consider, and our government, legislators and associations and chambers of commerce in China's cotton and clothing industries.\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?src=11&timestamp=1616813146&ver=2971&signature=iq3tjlCbBtohGw*vbyD5kPZk1WmpZtRRGhInZo12fxgBtKS7w9UJOfuU7OBUU7sqe5KU0nUCz3t9y3tzQr3Rsv0OfCghk7g4SuC6iqTq2dXcq0prxcgVNdVEe4*vs8XG&new=1\">环球时报</a>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3473f757d00eee50292777a0505620c4","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?src=11&timestamp=1616813146&ver=2971&signature=iq3tjlCbBtohGw*vbyD5kPZk1WmpZtRRGhInZo12fxgBtKS7w9UJOfuU7OBUU7sqe5KU0nUCz3t9y3tzQr3Rsv0OfCghk7g4SuC6iqTq2dXcq0prxcgVNdVEe4*vs8XG&new=1","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1104682690","content_text":"今天，有中国网民爆料称，美国知名电商平台亚马逊有可能会将许多来自中国的棉制品下架，因为根据美国政府的规定，任何出口到美国的棉制品都不能包含有来自新疆的棉花，否则就很有可能会被扣留。\n可新疆却是中国棉花最主要的产地。\n如下图所示，昨天豆瓣网一位名叫“窝瓜怪”的网民发帖称，有通过美国亚马逊平台向美国出口棉制品的中国商家向其透露，亚马逊正在要求中国的出口商提供可以证明他们的棉制品不包含新疆棉花的证明。\n在一份疑似为亚马逊发给中国出口商的文件中，亚马逊表示由于中国有85%的棉花都来自新疆地区，所以有客人要求中国商家必须提供这类证明，否则来自中国的棉制品很可能被美国海关扣下，直到商家能证明棉花并非来自新疆。\n\n另一组“窝瓜怪”提供的聊天截图则显示，有疑为中国商家的人表示卖家根本无法提供这种保证出口产品不包含新疆棉花的证明，结果就是他们在亚马逊上出售的棉制品，比如男用浴巾，被亚马逊下架了。\n\n目前，耿直哥无法核实“窝瓜怪”这则爆料贴中给出的这些材料文件和聊天截图的真实性，但美国媒体的报道显示美国前总统特朗普的政府在今年1月13日就已经以所谓“强迫劳动”这个政治谣言为由，全面封杀了来自中国新疆的棉花以及番茄等产品。\n\n其中，《华盛顿邮报》2月22日的一篇报道更指出，美国政府的这一做法直接导致许多中国的棉花和棉制品出口商被美国买家取消了订单，一些使用中国棉花进行产品生产的境外厂商也中止了与境内棉花厂家的合作，因为新疆是中国最主要的棉花产地。\n\n一些早就察觉到这一政治风险的外国企业则提前就已经与新疆棉花做了切割，比如知名服装品牌GAP及其旗下的Oly Navy和Banana Republic品牌，宜家和H&M也已经不再往美国出口认可新疆棉花的制品，并已经停止再从新疆的供应商处进货。耐克则表示他们不使用来自新疆的棉花，且公司也已经告知供应商们不要使用新疆棉花。\n不过，《华盛顿邮报》的这篇报道并不是在批评美国政府对新疆棉花的封杀是错误的，而是认为由于服装产业的下游供应链透明度不够，再加上新冠疫情的影响，会令美国政府对新疆棉花的封杀难以得到迅速全面的落实。\n该报采访的一些“劳工组织”的人就称供应商很擅长“欺骗”他们的客户。一家在美国本土生产的服装品牌还称西方品牌一般在中国也不是直接与原材料供应商打交道，所以无法确保原材料没问题，不如直接用他们这个美国本土的服装。\n而美国服装鞋类协会的一位负责人则表示，美国的品牌正在大力将新疆棉花移除出它们的产业链，但受疫情影响这个过程会较为缓慢。\n\n另外，《华盛顿邮报》还提到有美国的化学公司正在与一些服装品牌合作，通过化学的方式对棉花进行溯源，以进一步排除新疆的棉花。\n总之，上述这些美国媒体报道的情况说明，美国政府早在今年1月就已经通过创立法规的方式，直接封杀了新疆的棉花等制品，而这也迫使大量向美国出口棉制品的商家不得不从他们的供应链中切割掉新疆的棉花。但由于新疆是中国棉花最主要的产地，美国政府的禁令势必会导致中国棉花厂家和相关制品的出口商被“一刀切”式地伤害，一些美国的政治势力和本土企业也在趁机煽动这种对中国棉花的排斥。\n因此，那位豆瓣网民“窝瓜怪”爆料的情况，看起来就绝非“空穴来风”了。\n最后，《华盛顿邮报》在其2月那篇报道中曾提到，美国一家的封杀其实并不会影响到中国服装整体上的国际出口，因为国际市场的需求量很大。但美国的做法确实导致国际上对于美国棉花的需求量增加了。\n可是，随着美国的施压，越来越多的西方国家也在盘算着效仿美国对新疆棉花进行封杀。比如英国政府今年1月就表示如果英国品牌使用来自新疆地区通过所谓的“强制劳动”采摘的棉花，就会遭到处罚。\n\n这再次说明，比起那些被迫切割新疆棉花的外国品牌，我们真正要面对和反击的，是以美国为首的西方政府。\n如何瓦解他们在棉花贸易上的话语权，不让他们的政治谣言进一步伤害新疆乃至中国的棉花产业，如何通过制定行业标准、贸易规则和政策法规构建起我们的国际标准体系、法律体系并壮大我们的国际话语权，以维护好我国棉花——尤其是新疆棉花的发展空间和贸易秩序与利益，才是我们需要考虑的，才是在普通人表达朴素的爱国情感之上，需要我们的政府、立法者以及我国那些棉花和服装行业的协会和商会拿出方案和对策的。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1434,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":5,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}