The calm before the storm on W

Like
Comment
Favorite

定得利DT
2021-03-16

The calm before the storm on Wed. Hold your horses and don't go charging in first

AI Replaces Job, Man Demoted and Dismissed: Court Rules in Landmark Case

A man surnamed Zhou, who worked as a supervisor at a company, was demoted and had his salary reduced on the grounds that his "work could be replaced by AI (Artificial Intelligence)," and was...

AI Replaces Job, Man Demoted and Dismissed: Court Rules in Landmark Case

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

Top
Latest

No comments yet

Most Discussed

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":325907329,"tweetId":"325907329","gmtCreate":1615855280461,"gmtModify":1704787466679,"author":{"id":3569464793088167,"idStr":"3569464793088167","authorId":3569464793088167,"authorIdStr":"3569464793088167","name":"定得利DT","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ceb31ac8d94d490b1b5f9ba8e159d47f","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":4,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>The calm before the storm on Wed. Hold your horses and don't go charging in first</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>The calm before the storm on Wed. Hold your horses and don't go charging in first</p></body></html>","text":"The calm before the storm on Wed. Hold your horses and don't go charging in first","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325907329","repostId":1151746119,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1151746119","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Global Stock Market Deep Analysis","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Deep News","id":"1039043262","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8296859682db4b478146245e72de1922"},"pubTimestamp":1779341529,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1151746119?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-05-21 13:32","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"AI Replaces Job, Man Demoted and Dismissed: Court Rules in Landmark Case","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1151746119","media":"Deep News","summary":"A man surnamed Zhou, who worked as a supervisor at a company, was demoted and had his salary reduced on the grounds that his \"work could be replaced by AI (Artificial Intelligence),\" and was...","content":"<p>A man surnamed Zhou, who worked as a supervisor at a company, was demoted and had his salary reduced on the grounds that his \"work could be replaced by AI (Artificial Intelligence),\" and was subsequently dismissed. Recently, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court concluded the second trial of this case, ruling that the company's actions were illegal and ordering it to pay the worker over 260,000 yuan in compensation. Previously, a similar ruling was made by the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court regarding a graphic designer whose position was replaced by AI. Judicial practice has clarified that technological iteration does not constitute a legitimate reason for employment adjustments, providing valuable reference for safeguarding labor rights in the AI era.</p>\n<p>Discussions such as \"the first batch of jobs replaced by AI have already emerged\" and \"master these skills to stay competitive in the AI era\" are frequently seen on social media as artificial intelligence, particularly intelligent agent technology, rapidly develops and becomes widespread. Such workplace anxiety is not unfounded. A report released by the World Economic Forum predicts that by 2030, AI will replace approximately 92 million existing jobs. Additionally, some companies have sparked considerable controversy by collecting employees' work habits and \"distilling\" them into standardized skills executable by AI.</p>\n<p>Behind this social concern lies a governance issue that requires attention. While it is understandable for companies to use AI to reduce costs and improve efficiency from a business logic perspective, the pursuit of efficiency does not mean they can breach legal boundaries. Healthy development must balance efficiency and fairness. Impartial justice serves as the last line of defense in upholding social fairness and justice, and the rule of law should play its due role in this regard. The court's ruling not only restores justice for the worker but also sets a clear value orientation for society: employers cannot arbitrarily infringe on workers' rights under the pretext of technological transformation and must shoulder their corresponding social responsibilities.</p>\n<p>It is also important to recognize that addressing the potential risks of AI development requires further efforts. From a governance efficiency perspective, solving problems only at the end of the chain is inefficient. For workers, relying solely on post-incident remedies also incurs excessively high costs for rights protection. Seizing the window of opportunity as early signs emerge and establishing a comprehensive governance system is an imperative task.</p>\n<p>In the legal domain, China already has a relatively comprehensive legal system, including the Labor Law and the Labor Contract Law. It is advisable to fully leverage existing legal resources and incorporate new situations into the regulatory framework through judicial interpretations, particularly clarifying evidence submission in the context of new technologies. This will use legal red lines to urge employers to fulfill their obligations, such as negotiating job transfers and providing training for role transitions.</p>\n<p>To prevent issues before they arise, there is a need to explore and establish robust常态化监管机制. Earlier this year, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security stated that it would accelerate the establishment of a monitoring, early warning, and response system for the employment impact of artificial intelligence. During the National Two Sessions, some representatives also suggested implementing pre-assessment and process monitoring for companies deploying AI on a large scale to replace human labor, drawing on the institutional logic of environmental impact assessments. Effective监管并不缺乏可借鉴的模式; the key lies in making regulatory measures operable, \"with teeth,\" and capable of deterrence.</p>\n<p>For ordinary employees, how to embrace the AI era is also a pressing question. On one hand, it is essential to recognize that expanding knowledge reserves and enhancing capabilities are not temporary needs but lifelong requirements. Avoiding the mindset of \"carving a mark on a moving boat\" is crucial to keeping pace with the times. On the other hand, it is also important to remain vigilant about one's rights, particularly regarding the collection of personal information and intellectual property.</p>\n<p>On a deeper level, in every wave of technological revolution and industrial transformation, how to ensure that the dividends of development benefit more people is a question society must confront, and the AI era is no exception. History has repeatedly shown us that enabling the majority to share in the benefits is not a natural outcome of technological development but is closely tied to科学的制度设计. With高效能治理 as a crucial保障，promoting technology for good and benefiting the people, we can undoubtedly ensure that human value is respected and human potential is fully unleashed.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AI Replaces Job, Man Demoted and Dismissed: Court Rules in Landmark Case</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAI Replaces Job, Man Demoted and Dismissed: Court Rules in Landmark Case\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1039043262\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8296859682db4b478146245e72de1922);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Deep News </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-05-21 13:32</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>A man surnamed Zhou, who worked as a supervisor at a company, was demoted and had his salary reduced on the grounds that his \"work could be replaced by AI (Artificial Intelligence),\" and was subsequently dismissed. Recently, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court concluded the second trial of this case, ruling that the company's actions were illegal and ordering it to pay the worker over 260,000 yuan in compensation. Previously, a similar ruling was made by the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court regarding a graphic designer whose position was replaced by AI. Judicial practice has clarified that technological iteration does not constitute a legitimate reason for employment adjustments, providing valuable reference for safeguarding labor rights in the AI era.</p>\n<p>Discussions such as \"the first batch of jobs replaced by AI have already emerged\" and \"master these skills to stay competitive in the AI era\" are frequently seen on social media as artificial intelligence, particularly intelligent agent technology, rapidly develops and becomes widespread. Such workplace anxiety is not unfounded. A report released by the World Economic Forum predicts that by 2030, AI will replace approximately 92 million existing jobs. Additionally, some companies have sparked considerable controversy by collecting employees' work habits and \"distilling\" them into standardized skills executable by AI.</p>\n<p>Behind this social concern lies a governance issue that requires attention. While it is understandable for companies to use AI to reduce costs and improve efficiency from a business logic perspective, the pursuit of efficiency does not mean they can breach legal boundaries. Healthy development must balance efficiency and fairness. Impartial justice serves as the last line of defense in upholding social fairness and justice, and the rule of law should play its due role in this regard. The court's ruling not only restores justice for the worker but also sets a clear value orientation for society: employers cannot arbitrarily infringe on workers' rights under the pretext of technological transformation and must shoulder their corresponding social responsibilities.</p>\n<p>It is also important to recognize that addressing the potential risks of AI development requires further efforts. From a governance efficiency perspective, solving problems only at the end of the chain is inefficient. For workers, relying solely on post-incident remedies also incurs excessively high costs for rights protection. Seizing the window of opportunity as early signs emerge and establishing a comprehensive governance system is an imperative task.</p>\n<p>In the legal domain, China already has a relatively comprehensive legal system, including the Labor Law and the Labor Contract Law. It is advisable to fully leverage existing legal resources and incorporate new situations into the regulatory framework through judicial interpretations, particularly clarifying evidence submission in the context of new technologies. This will use legal red lines to urge employers to fulfill their obligations, such as negotiating job transfers and providing training for role transitions.</p>\n<p>To prevent issues before they arise, there is a need to explore and establish robust常态化监管机制. Earlier this year, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security stated that it would accelerate the establishment of a monitoring, early warning, and response system for the employment impact of artificial intelligence. During the National Two Sessions, some representatives also suggested implementing pre-assessment and process monitoring for companies deploying AI on a large scale to replace human labor, drawing on the institutional logic of environmental impact assessments. Effective监管并不缺乏可借鉴的模式; the key lies in making regulatory measures operable, \"with teeth,\" and capable of deterrence.</p>\n<p>For ordinary employees, how to embrace the AI era is also a pressing question. On one hand, it is essential to recognize that expanding knowledge reserves and enhancing capabilities are not temporary needs but lifelong requirements. Avoiding the mindset of \"carving a mark on a moving boat\" is crucial to keeping pace with the times. On the other hand, it is also important to remain vigilant about one's rights, particularly regarding the collection of personal information and intellectual property.</p>\n<p>On a deeper level, in every wave of technological revolution and industrial transformation, how to ensure that the dividends of development benefit more people is a question society must confront, and the AI era is no exception. History has repeatedly shown us that enabling the majority to share in the benefits is not a natural outcome of technological development but is closely tied to科学的制度设计. With高效能治理 as a crucial保障，promoting technology for good and benefiting the people, we can undoubtedly ensure that human value is respected and human potential is fully unleashed.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AIPO":"Defiance AI and Power Infrastructure ETF","ARTY":"ISHARES FUTURE AI & TECH ETF","AGIX":"通用人工智能 ETF-AGIX","CHAT":"ROUNDHILL GENERATIVE AI & TECHNOLOGY ETF"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1151746119","content_text":"A man surnamed Zhou, who worked as a supervisor at a company, was demoted and had his salary reduced on the grounds that his \"work could be replaced by AI (Artificial Intelligence),\" and was subsequently dismissed. Recently, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court concluded the second trial of this case, ruling that the company's actions were illegal and ordering it to pay the worker over 260,000 yuan in compensation. Previously, a similar ruling was made by the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court regarding a graphic designer whose position was replaced by AI. Judicial practice has clarified that technological iteration does not constitute a legitimate reason for employment adjustments, providing valuable reference for safeguarding labor rights in the AI era.\nDiscussions such as \"the first batch of jobs replaced by AI have already emerged\" and \"master these skills to stay competitive in the AI era\" are frequently seen on social media as artificial intelligence, particularly intelligent agent technology, rapidly develops and becomes widespread. Such workplace anxiety is not unfounded. A report released by the World Economic Forum predicts that by 2030, AI will replace approximately 92 million existing jobs. Additionally, some companies have sparked considerable controversy by collecting employees' work habits and \"distilling\" them into standardized skills executable by AI.\nBehind this social concern lies a governance issue that requires attention. While it is understandable for companies to use AI to reduce costs and improve efficiency from a business logic perspective, the pursuit of efficiency does not mean they can breach legal boundaries. Healthy development must balance efficiency and fairness. Impartial justice serves as the last line of defense in upholding social fairness and justice, and the rule of law should play its due role in this regard. The court's ruling not only restores justice for the worker but also sets a clear value orientation for society: employers cannot arbitrarily infringe on workers' rights under the pretext of technological transformation and must shoulder their corresponding social responsibilities.\nIt is also important to recognize that addressing the potential risks of AI development requires further efforts. From a governance efficiency perspective, solving problems only at the end of the chain is inefficient. For workers, relying solely on post-incident remedies also incurs excessively high costs for rights protection. Seizing the window of opportunity as early signs emerge and establishing a comprehensive governance system is an imperative task.\nIn the legal domain, China already has a relatively comprehensive legal system, including the Labor Law and the Labor Contract Law. It is advisable to fully leverage existing legal resources and incorporate new situations into the regulatory framework through judicial interpretations, particularly clarifying evidence submission in the context of new technologies. This will use legal red lines to urge employers to fulfill their obligations, such as negotiating job transfers and providing training for role transitions.\nTo prevent issues before they arise, there is a need to explore and establish robust常态化监管机制. Earlier this year, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security stated that it would accelerate the establishment of a monitoring, early warning, and response system for the employment impact of artificial intelligence. During the National Two Sessions, some representatives also suggested implementing pre-assessment and process monitoring for companies deploying AI on a large scale to replace human labor, drawing on the institutional logic of environmental impact assessments. Effective监管并不缺乏可借鉴的模式; the key lies in making regulatory measures operable, \"with teeth,\" and capable of deterrence.\nFor ordinary employees, how to embrace the AI era is also a pressing question. On one hand, it is essential to recognize that expanding knowledge reserves and enhancing capabilities are not temporary needs but lifelong requirements. Avoiding the mindset of \"carving a mark on a moving boat\" is crucial to keeping pace with the times. On the other hand, it is also important to remain vigilant about one's rights, particularly regarding the collection of personal information and intellectual property.\nOn a deeper level, in every wave of technological revolution and industrial transformation, how to ensure that the dividends of development benefit more people is a question society must confront, and the AI era is no exception. History has repeatedly shown us that enabling the majority to share in the benefits is not a natural outcome of technological development but is closely tied to科学的制度设计. With高效能治理 as a crucial保障，promoting technology for good and benefiting the people, we can undoubtedly ensure that human value is respected and human potential is fully unleashed.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AGIX":1,"AIPO":1,"ARTY":1,"CHAT":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2768,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":66,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}