Profile - To The Moon

Safemuthu11

Posts · 4Posts · 4
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- Safemuthu11Safemuthu11
  ·2022-07-24
  Ok
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  1.82K Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- Safemuthu11Safemuthu11
  ·2022-07-24
  Ok
  8 Snap Analysts React To Q2 Earnings Miss: "Not Snapping Back Anytime Soon"
  Snap Inc (NYSE: SNAP) shares traded lower by 38% on Friday after the company disappointed Wall Street with its second-quarter numbers.
  8 Snap Analysts React To Q2 Earnings Miss: "Not Snapping Back Anytime Soon"
  3.01K 1
  2
  Share
  Report
- Safemuthu11Safemuthu11
  ·2022-07-20
  Ok
  Tesla: The Gold Standard For Mission-Driven Companies
  SummaryTesla’s mission is to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.There are count
  Tesla: The Gold Standard For Mission-Driven Companies
  1.58K Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- Safemuthu11Safemuthu11
  ·2022-07-18
  Ok
  3 Undervalued Stocks to Buy in the Second Half of 2022
  The rough start to the year has created great buying opportunities for investors.
  3 Undervalued Stocks to Buy in the Second Half of 2022
  1.97K Comment
  3
  Share
  Report

Most Discussed

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"4120206933854022","uuid":"4120206933854022","gmtCreate":1657103851890,"gmtModify":1657106326619,"name":"Safemuthu11","pinyin":"safemuthu11","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/68ba00ec7df657685dbb5c904bf101c3","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":3,"tweetSize":4,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.07.16","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":1,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9900141611,"gmtCreate":1658673303233,"gmtModify":1676536189832,"author":{"id":"4120206933854022","authorId":"4120206933854022","name":"Safemuthu11","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/68ba00ec7df657685dbb5c904bf101c3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4120206933854022","idStr":"4120206933854022"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9900141611","repostId":"2253060728","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1824,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9900141164,"gmtCreate":1658673260759,"gmtModify":1676536189825,"author":{"id":"4120206933854022","authorId":"4120206933854022","name":"Safemuthu11","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/68ba00ec7df657685dbb5c904bf101c3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4120206933854022","idStr":"4120206933854022"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9900141164","repostId":"2253476050","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2253476050","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1658631171,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2253476050?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-24 10:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"8 Snap Analysts React To Q2 Earnings Miss: \"Not Snapping Back Anytime Soon\"","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2253476050","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Snap Inc (NYSE: SNAP) shares traded lower by 38% on Friday after the company disappointed Wall Street with its second-quarter numbers.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNAP\">Snap Inc</a></b> (NYSE:SNAP) shares traded lower by 38% on Friday after the company disappointed Wall Street with its second-quarter numbers.</p><p>On Thursday, Snap reported a second-quarter adjusted EPS loss of 2 cents, missing analyst estimates of a 1-cent loss. Snap&#39;s $1.11 billion in revenue for the quarter also fell short of consensus expectations of $1.14 billion. Revenue was up 13% from a year ago.</p><p>Snap reported 347 million Global Daily Active Users (DAUs), beating analyst estimates of 344.2 million. Snap did not provide official guidance for the third quarter but said third-quarter revenue growth would be &#34;approximately flat.&#34;</p><p>Snap also announced a new $500 million stock repurchase program.</p><p><b>User Growth Overshadowed:</b> Morgan Stanley analyst <b>Brian Nowak said Snap needs to demonstrate spending discipline given its smaller gross profit base than social media peers.</b></p><p>&#34;The steep slope of SNAP&#39;s 2Q ad deterioration (with April growing roughly 30% Y/Y and June declining an estimated -8% Y/Y) speaks to the weakening ad spend environment and larger than expected microlevel factors impacting the business,&#34; Nowak wrote.</p><p>Bank of America analyst<b> Justin Post noted Snap&#39;s strong user trends were far overshadowed by its revenue miss.</b></p><p>&#34;While there is risk the perceived macro or competitive outlook deteriorates further in 3Q (we will learn a lot from Meta and Pinterest’s 2Q results), we believe an ad recession is largely priced in the stock with SNAP trading at 3.7x our revised 2023 revenue estimate using AH price of $12 (stock was a 3.8x P/S in 2018 when users were declining q/q),&#34; Post wrote.</p><p>JMP analyst <b>Andrew Boone said Snap&#39;s macroeconomic, privacy and competition headwinds are all intensifying.</b></p><p>&#34;While we acknowledge the lack of revenue visibility as the company is rebuilding a portion of its advertising measurement and targeting, we believe Snap still has significant assets as it reaches 75% of 13- to 34-year-olds in 20+ countries, continues to be a leader in AR, and has multiples growth levers across Spotlight, Map and Games/Minis as we believe innovation remains a core company tenet,&#34; Boone wrote.</p><p><b>From Bad To Worse:</b> Benchmark analyst <b>Mark Zgutowicz noted Snap is &#34;not snapping back anytime soon.&#34;</b></p><p>&#34;We believe fundamental (iOS measurement/ROAS) and macro factors are equally impacting SNAP ads platform demand, with the former remaining a slow work in progress, as we previously suggested,&#34; Zgutowicz wrote.</p><p>RBC Capital Markets analyst <b>Brad Erickson said Snap once again proved things can always get worse.</b></p><p>&#34;SNAP’s weak Q3 guidance confirmed our fears that ad spending is worsening, consistent with our June 23 channel checks, and unfortunately for SNAP and the digital ad sector, we believe there are signs of further ad spending cuts still to come,&#34; Erickson wrote.</p><p>Raymond James analyst <b>Aaron Kessler said privacy concerns, ad budget headwinds and higher operating expenses are weighing on Snap&#39;s growth.</b></p><p>&#34;We view risk/reward as fairly balanced at current levels of ~4.2/6.8x our 2022 revenue/gross profit estimates as the company plans a path to higher growth and cost improvements,&#34; Kessler wrote.</p><p><b>Disappearing Revenue Growth:</b> Rosenblatt Securities analyst <b>Barton Crockett said he is stunned by how quickly Snap&#39;s revenue growth has evaporated.</b></p><p>&#34;After rising 66%, 116% and 57% in the first three quarters of 2021, sales growth slowed to 42% in 4Q21, 38% in 1Q22, 13% in 2Q22, and, now, flat Y/Y QTD in 3Q22,&#34; Crockett wrote.</p><p>KeyBanc analyst Justin Patterson says competition from TikTok, <b>Apple Inc </b>(NASDAQ:AAPL) and others are hurting, while Snap&#39;s ad solutions are simply taking too long to drive improvements.</p><p><b>&#34;Given a ~20% revenue growth profile and persistent GAAP loses, we struggle to see SNAP&#39;s 2023E/2024E EV/S multiple expanding beyond 3.6x/3.0x,&#34; Patterson wrote.</b></p><p><b>Ratings And Price Targets:</b></p><ul><li>Morgan Stanley had an Overweight rating and a $17 target.</li><li>Bank of America had a Buy rating and a $22 target.</li><li>JMP had a Market Outperform rating and a $24 target.</li><li>Benchmark had a Buy rating and a $15 target.</li><li>RBC Capital Markets had a Sector Perform rating and a $10 target.</li><li>Raymond James had a Market Perform rating.</li><li>Rosenblatt Securities had a Neutral rating and a $14 target.</li><li>KeyBanc had a Sector Weight rating.</li></ul></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>8 Snap Analysts React To Q2 Earnings Miss: \"Not Snapping Back Anytime Soon\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n8 Snap Analysts React To Q2 Earnings Miss: \"Not Snapping Back Anytime Soon\"\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-24 10:52</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SNAP\">Snap Inc</a></b> (NYSE:SNAP) shares traded lower by 38% on Friday after the company disappointed Wall Street with its second-quarter numbers.</p><p>On Thursday, Snap reported a second-quarter adjusted EPS loss of 2 cents, missing analyst estimates of a 1-cent loss. Snap&#39;s $1.11 billion in revenue for the quarter also fell short of consensus expectations of $1.14 billion. Revenue was up 13% from a year ago.</p><p>Snap reported 347 million Global Daily Active Users (DAUs), beating analyst estimates of 344.2 million. Snap did not provide official guidance for the third quarter but said third-quarter revenue growth would be &#34;approximately flat.&#34;</p><p>Snap also announced a new $500 million stock repurchase program.</p><p><b>User Growth Overshadowed:</b> Morgan Stanley analyst <b>Brian Nowak said Snap needs to demonstrate spending discipline given its smaller gross profit base than social media peers.</b></p><p>&#34;The steep slope of SNAP&#39;s 2Q ad deterioration (with April growing roughly 30% Y/Y and June declining an estimated -8% Y/Y) speaks to the weakening ad spend environment and larger than expected microlevel factors impacting the business,&#34; Nowak wrote.</p><p>Bank of America analyst<b> Justin Post noted Snap&#39;s strong user trends were far overshadowed by its revenue miss.</b></p><p>&#34;While there is risk the perceived macro or competitive outlook deteriorates further in 3Q (we will learn a lot from Meta and Pinterest’s 2Q results), we believe an ad recession is largely priced in the stock with SNAP trading at 3.7x our revised 2023 revenue estimate using AH price of $12 (stock was a 3.8x P/S in 2018 when users were declining q/q),&#34; Post wrote.</p><p>JMP analyst <b>Andrew Boone said Snap&#39;s macroeconomic, privacy and competition headwinds are all intensifying.</b></p><p>&#34;While we acknowledge the lack of revenue visibility as the company is rebuilding a portion of its advertising measurement and targeting, we believe Snap still has significant assets as it reaches 75% of 13- to 34-year-olds in 20+ countries, continues to be a leader in AR, and has multiples growth levers across Spotlight, Map and Games/Minis as we believe innovation remains a core company tenet,&#34; Boone wrote.</p><p><b>From Bad To Worse:</b> Benchmark analyst <b>Mark Zgutowicz noted Snap is &#34;not snapping back anytime soon.&#34;</b></p><p>&#34;We believe fundamental (iOS measurement/ROAS) and macro factors are equally impacting SNAP ads platform demand, with the former remaining a slow work in progress, as we previously suggested,&#34; Zgutowicz wrote.</p><p>RBC Capital Markets analyst <b>Brad Erickson said Snap once again proved things can always get worse.</b></p><p>&#34;SNAP’s weak Q3 guidance confirmed our fears that ad spending is worsening, consistent with our June 23 channel checks, and unfortunately for SNAP and the digital ad sector, we believe there are signs of further ad spending cuts still to come,&#34; Erickson wrote.</p><p>Raymond James analyst <b>Aaron Kessler said privacy concerns, ad budget headwinds and higher operating expenses are weighing on Snap&#39;s growth.</b></p><p>&#34;We view risk/reward as fairly balanced at current levels of ~4.2/6.8x our 2022 revenue/gross profit estimates as the company plans a path to higher growth and cost improvements,&#34; Kessler wrote.</p><p><b>Disappearing Revenue Growth:</b> Rosenblatt Securities analyst <b>Barton Crockett said he is stunned by how quickly Snap&#39;s revenue growth has evaporated.</b></p><p>&#34;After rising 66%, 116% and 57% in the first three quarters of 2021, sales growth slowed to 42% in 4Q21, 38% in 1Q22, 13% in 2Q22, and, now, flat Y/Y QTD in 3Q22,&#34; Crockett wrote.</p><p>KeyBanc analyst Justin Patterson says competition from TikTok, <b>Apple Inc </b>(NASDAQ:AAPL) and others are hurting, while Snap&#39;s ad solutions are simply taking too long to drive improvements.</p><p><b>&#34;Given a ~20% revenue growth profile and persistent GAAP loses, we struggle to see SNAP&#39;s 2023E/2024E EV/S multiple expanding beyond 3.6x/3.0x,&#34; Patterson wrote.</b></p><p><b>Ratings And Price Targets:</b></p><ul><li>Morgan Stanley had an Overweight rating and a $17 target.</li><li>Bank of America had a Buy rating and a $22 target.</li><li>JMP had a Market Outperform rating and a $24 target.</li><li>Benchmark had a Buy rating and a $15 target.</li><li>RBC Capital Markets had a Sector Perform rating and a $10 target.</li><li>Raymond James had a Market Perform rating.</li><li>Rosenblatt Securities had a Neutral rating and a $14 target.</li><li>KeyBanc had a Sector Weight rating.</li></ul></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNAP":"Snap Inc"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2253476050","content_text":"Snap Inc (NYSE:SNAP) shares traded lower by 38% on Friday after the company disappointed Wall Street with its second-quarter numbers.On Thursday, Snap reported a second-quarter adjusted EPS loss of 2 cents, missing analyst estimates of a 1-cent loss. Snap's $1.11 billion in revenue for the quarter also fell short of consensus expectations of $1.14 billion. Revenue was up 13% from a year ago.Snap reported 347 million Global Daily Active Users (DAUs), beating analyst estimates of 344.2 million. Snap did not provide official guidance for the third quarter but said third-quarter revenue growth would be \"approximately flat.\"Snap also announced a new $500 million stock repurchase program.User Growth Overshadowed: Morgan Stanley analyst Brian Nowak said Snap needs to demonstrate spending discipline given its smaller gross profit base than social media peers.\"The steep slope of SNAP's 2Q ad deterioration (with April growing roughly 30% Y/Y and June declining an estimated -8% Y/Y) speaks to the weakening ad spend environment and larger than expected microlevel factors impacting the business,\" Nowak wrote.Bank of America analyst Justin Post noted Snap's strong user trends were far overshadowed by its revenue miss.\"While there is risk the perceived macro or competitive outlook deteriorates further in 3Q (we will learn a lot from Meta and Pinterest’s 2Q results), we believe an ad recession is largely priced in the stock with SNAP trading at 3.7x our revised 2023 revenue estimate using AH price of $12 (stock was a 3.8x P/S in 2018 when users were declining q/q),\" Post wrote.JMP analyst Andrew Boone said Snap's macroeconomic, privacy and competition headwinds are all intensifying.\"While we acknowledge the lack of revenue visibility as the company is rebuilding a portion of its advertising measurement and targeting, we believe Snap still has significant assets as it reaches 75% of 13- to 34-year-olds in 20+ countries, continues to be a leader in AR, and has multiples growth levers across Spotlight, Map and Games/Minis as we believe innovation remains a core company tenet,\" Boone wrote.From Bad To Worse: Benchmark analyst Mark Zgutowicz noted Snap is \"not snapping back anytime soon.\"\"We believe fundamental (iOS measurement/ROAS) and macro factors are equally impacting SNAP ads platform demand, with the former remaining a slow work in progress, as we previously suggested,\" Zgutowicz wrote.RBC Capital Markets analyst Brad Erickson said Snap once again proved things can always get worse.\"SNAP’s weak Q3 guidance confirmed our fears that ad spending is worsening, consistent with our June 23 channel checks, and unfortunately for SNAP and the digital ad sector, we believe there are signs of further ad spending cuts still to come,\" Erickson wrote.Raymond James analyst Aaron Kessler said privacy concerns, ad budget headwinds and higher operating expenses are weighing on Snap's growth.\"We view risk/reward as fairly balanced at current levels of ~4.2/6.8x our 2022 revenue/gross profit estimates as the company plans a path to higher growth and cost improvements,\" Kessler wrote.Disappearing Revenue Growth: Rosenblatt Securities analyst Barton Crockett said he is stunned by how quickly Snap's revenue growth has evaporated.\"After rising 66%, 116% and 57% in the first three quarters of 2021, sales growth slowed to 42% in 4Q21, 38% in 1Q22, 13% in 2Q22, and, now, flat Y/Y QTD in 3Q22,\" Crockett wrote.KeyBanc analyst Justin Patterson says competition from TikTok, Apple Inc (NASDAQ:AAPL) and others are hurting, while Snap's ad solutions are simply taking too long to drive improvements.\"Given a ~20% revenue growth profile and persistent GAAP loses, we struggle to see SNAP's 2023E/2024E EV/S multiple expanding beyond 3.6x/3.0x,\" Patterson wrote.Ratings And Price Targets:Morgan Stanley had an Overweight rating and a $17 target.Bank of America had a Buy rating and a $22 target.JMP had a Market Outperform rating and a $24 target.Benchmark had a Buy rating and a $15 target.RBC Capital Markets had a Sector Perform rating and a $10 target.Raymond James had a Market Perform rating.Rosenblatt Securities had a Neutral rating and a $14 target.KeyBanc had a Sector Weight rating.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SNAP":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3007,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9074327791,"gmtCreate":1658301231814,"gmtModify":1676536137746,"author":{"id":"4120206933854022","authorId":"4120206933854022","name":"Safemuthu11","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/68ba00ec7df657685dbb5c904bf101c3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4120206933854022","idStr":"4120206933854022"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9074327791","repostId":"1180458878","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1180458878","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1658296438,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1180458878?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-20 13:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla: The Gold Standard For Mission-Driven Companies","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1180458878","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryTesla’s mission is to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.There are count","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Tesla’s mission is to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.</li><li>There are countless examples of decisions Tesla has taken to achieve this inspirational mission.</li><li>Perhaps most impressively, these decisions have also enhanced Tesla’s business performance at the same time.</li><li>If Tesla continues to be mission-driven, and I believe it will, then I think shareholders will reap the rewards over the upcoming decade.</li></ul><p><b>Overview</b></p><p>Most companies in the world today will have mission statements, which are supposed to be the north star of any company. Any employee should be able to look at whatever they&#39;re working on, and think &#39;yeah, this is helping us to achieve our mission&#39;. Often, mission-driven companies end up being more successful than their counterparts, as they attract and retain high-quality employees, customers, and long-term investors who can all get behind the mission.</p><p>But not all mission statements are created equal, and not all companies live up to this. I&#39;ll give a couple of examples.</p><p>&#39;To responsibly lead the transition of adult smokers to a smoke-free future&#39; is the mission statement of cigarette manufacturer Altria (MO), formerly Philip Morris. Can an employee coming up with the latest marketing strategy to sell their Marlboro cigarettes look at that mission statement and think they&#39;re achieving that? Absolutely not. It sounds like a great mission statement, but it is quite frankly ridiculous.</p><p>How does &#39;To provide the highest level of service, the broadest selection of products and the most competitive prices&#39; sound? I mean… this could be applied to literally <i>any</i> retailer; it&#39;s an awful mission statement, and certainly isn&#39;t going to inspire any employees. 10 points for whoever can guess the company behind this terrible mission statement in the comments.</p><p>Done correctly, a mission statement should be simple and inspirational whilst also being a north star that a company can look at to ensure it&#39;s on the road to accomplishing all that it wishes to achieve. Here&#39;s an example of a brilliant mission statement:</p><blockquote>To accelerate the world&#39;s transition to sustainable energy</blockquote><p>This, of course, is the mission statement of Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA). It is simple (any employee would be able to recite it), inspirational (doing good for the planet), and can also be used as a north star, even as Tesla has diversified across industries (cars, energy, AI). As we saw with Altria, some companies have mission statements that sound great, but are not a &#39;north star&#39; - yet with Tesla, we have a company that does everything with its mission statement in mind, and I think that investors will reap the rewards over the years ahead.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b8fd7ca96fa95b86d3d2eb7f59ee23ee\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"284\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Tesla 2021 Impact Report</p><p><b>Unmistakably Mission-Driven</b></p><p>There are numerous examples of Tesla taking actions that are not only mission-driven but have also been beneficial to the business. Some investors think that taking a mission-driven approach and trying to do some good in the world is just a company being &#39;woke&#39;, but Tesla proves that taking actions to accelerate the world&#39;s transition to sustainable energy can also drive business performance to new heights.</p><p>Back in June 2014, CEO Elon Musk wrote a blog post entitled All Our Patent Are Belong To You, and I&#39;m sure the phrasing is a pop-culture reference that I&#39;m missing.</p><p>In doing so, he announced that Tesla would apply an open source philosophy to its patents for the advancement of electric vehicle technology. Tesla vowed not to initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wanted to use its technology for their own development of electric vehicles. This is primarily because Tesla saw its main competition as the number of ICE vehicles on the road - not electric car programs from major car manufacturers.</p><p>This decision made 8 years ago clearly has not harmed Tesla, but it successfully contributed to their mission. In fact, the company also calls out that it isn&#39;t patents that will continue to give them a competitive advantage:</p><blockquote>Technology leadership is not defined by patents, which history has repeatedly shown to be small protection indeed against a determined competitor, but rather by the ability of a company to attract and motivate the world&#39;s most talented engineers. We believe that applying the open source philosophy to our patents will strengthen rather than diminish Tesla&#39;s position in this regard.</blockquote><p>Turns out, they were absolutely right - but this is only the start.</p><p>In 2017, Tesla Motors changed its name to Tesla, reflecting the company&#39;s expansion beyond cars into batteries and solar energy. Clearly a jump into different industries, but once again with the aim of achieving its mission - particularly thanks to the 2016 acquisition of SolarCity.</p><p>Nowadays, Tesla offers a range of additional products for solar energy generation and storage. These include Powerwall, a lithium-ion battery storage product designed for a home; Megapack, an energy storage solution for much larger facilities; and Solar Roof, which is well... a solar powered roof. By making this change to the company, Tesla opened up a whole new avenue in which it can generate value for shareholders, all whilst taking another step closer to achieving its mission. In fact, Tesla solar panels have generated more electricity than has been consumed by its vehicles and factories from 2012 through to 2021.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c2c54c669e95988bd15f525540cb1ea\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"339\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Tesla 2021 Impact Report</p><p>These are just a few examples of Tesla expanding the business to both achieve its mission and also deliver shareholder value. Others include:</p><ul><li><b>Open Supercharger Network</b>: More cars using these superchargers provide additional revenue for Tesla, plus it also enables greater efficiency and broader expansion opportunities.</li><li><b>Autonomous Driving</b>: Gives an additional incentive to use Tesla cars, and the opportunity for robotaxis will clearly result in more Tesla EVs on the road.</li><li><b>Battery Recycling</b>: Creates less waste in the supply chain but also enables Tesla to repurpose components of old batteries when creating new ones, particularly when it comes to harder-to-obtain minerals such as lithium.</li><li><b>Production &amp; Supply Chain Localisation</b>: Reduces emissions whilst also reducing the cost of transporting finished goods across the globe.</li></ul><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/77d85854f1b29142e8c3048597793a9e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"207\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Tesla 2020 Impact Report</p><p><b>Why Does It Matter?</b></p><p>We can see past instances where Tesla&#39;s mission-driven approach has led to changes in the company, but what are the implications for shareholders?</p><p>Firstly, there&#39;s no denying that one of Tesla&#39;s strongest economic moats is its brand. Whilst this is in part driven by its technical expertise, Tesla has also managed to appeal to the ever-more conscientious consumer who cares about this transition to sustainable energy.</p><p>The company&#39;s eco-friendly mission has accelerated the value of Tesla&#39;s brand substantially, with Tesla now being the world&#39;s 29th most valuable brand according to Kantar BrandZ- notably, the highest rating for a car brand, with its closest competitor being Toyota, ranked 66th.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e415859215c77612da6b58c6605441d4\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Kantar BrandZ Most Valuable Global Brands 2022</p><p>Strong brands have a history of delivering impressive shareholder returns, and Tesla has been no different. Its ability to deliver on its inspirational mission should only further help to supercharge growth for the company.</p><p>But it&#39;s not just about enhancing the brand; Tesla&#39;s mission-driven approach will continue to drive the company forward in ways that cannot yet be foreseen - although perhaps there is one aspect that we can dive into further.</p><p>Tesla recently announced that it was piloting an open Supercharger network throughout some European countries. On the face of it, this decision will take Tesla one step closer to achieving its mission but will be detrimental to the company. I believe that another smaller economic moat possessed by Tesla relates to its switching costs for the Supercharger network - without a Tesla, you cannot access it - and it feels like Tesla might be forgoing this moat in the name of its mission, thereby weakening the business.</p><p>But dig a little deeper, and the potential switch away from a closed Supercharger network makes a lot of sense. As it stands, Tesla is somewhat limited in the amount of Supercharger stations that it can build - is there any point building out some if there are just 100 Teslas in a town? Yet... what if there are 100 Teslas, but 1,000 electric or hybrid vehicles? Tesla&#39;s Superchargers are the best in the business according to JD Power, and so the demand would be there from non-Tesla owners to utilise these rapid charging stations.</p><p>Then take it one step further and consider the direction the world is heading in. We will all be driving electric vehicles eventually, whether that&#39;s in 10, 20, or 50 years, and these EV charging stations will be the norm, just as gas stations are today. But could you imagine General Motors (GM) owning a bunch of gas stations at which you could only refuel GM cars? It would seem silly and inefficient, and I believe this is what the Tesla Supercharger network would turn into if it failed to open up.</p><p>This is just one example of something that is only being piloted right now, but it shows how Tesla&#39;s mission statement combined with the tailwinds driving the transition to sustainable energy can result in this company being ahead of the game - as it always has been, and I hope it will continue to do so.</p><p><b>Tailwinds Pushing This Mission Forward</b></p><p>Let&#39;s reiterate once again: Tesla&#39;s mission statement is to accelerate the world&#39;s transition to sustainable energy.</p><p>Another aspect shareholders should love about this mission statement is the number of tailwinds behind it. Governments across the globe are incentivised to transition from fossil fuels to sustainable energy sources, and there is more and more pressure being put on these governments to take action. This should only help Tesla&#39;s growth to accelerate - but don&#39;t just take my word for it.</p><p>According toFacts and Factors, the global EV market is expected to grow from a size of $185B in 2021 to $980B in 2028, implying a 24.5% CAGR.</p><p>According to Precedence Research, the global solar power market is poised to grow at a 7.2% CAGR from 2021 through to 2030, reaching a size of $368B.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b024f31dfd3427917a0089dcb41f086b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"379\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Precedence Research</p><p>Finally, according to Fortune Business Insights, the EV charging station market is expected to grow at a 30.26% CAGR from 2021 through to 2028, achieving an overall market size of $111.9B.</p><p>What&#39;s the takeaway? Not only is Tesla able to improve its business performance by achieving its mission, but the mission-driven avenues that this company is exploring are growing market opportunities.</p><p>This is a perfect mission to inspire employees and create customer loyalty, but it is also a brilliant mission when it comes to expanding the business into new, emerging trends and potentially huge market opportunities. Talk about a win-win!</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ce7e089ac5fe9ffb0abace40d439c26a\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"352\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Tesla 2021 Impact Report</p><p><b>Valuation</b></p><p>I know, I know… I had to ruin it by talking about valuation. Yet Tesla&#39;s valuation may not be as unreasonable as some in the financial media like to make out. I explained the full rationale behind my valuation model in my previous article, and nothing has changed since (apart from the current market capitalisation).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/837632439f7d611f8cf8f9ff348af656\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"657\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Tesla SEC Filings/Excel</p><p>Basically, I think shares are reasonably priced, particularly if you believe that Tesla can achieve a revenue CAGR of over 28% through to 2026 (spoiler alert - I do).</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla: The Gold Standard For Mission-Driven Companies</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla: The Gold Standard For Mission-Driven Companies\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-20 13:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4524281-tesla-tsla-gold-standard-for-mission-driven-companies?source=content_type%3Aall%7Cfirst_level_url%3Aportfolio%7Csection%3Aportfolio_content_unit%7Csection_asset%3Alatest%7Cline%3A13><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryTesla’s mission is to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.There are countless examples of decisions Tesla has taken to achieve this inspirational mission.Perhaps most ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4524281-tesla-tsla-gold-standard-for-mission-driven-companies?source=content_type%3Aall%7Cfirst_level_url%3Aportfolio%7Csection%3Aportfolio_content_unit%7Csection_asset%3Alatest%7Cline%3A13\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4524281-tesla-tsla-gold-standard-for-mission-driven-companies?source=content_type%3Aall%7Cfirst_level_url%3Aportfolio%7Csection%3Aportfolio_content_unit%7Csection_asset%3Alatest%7Cline%3A13","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1180458878","content_text":"SummaryTesla’s mission is to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.There are countless examples of decisions Tesla has taken to achieve this inspirational mission.Perhaps most impressively, these decisions have also enhanced Tesla’s business performance at the same time.If Tesla continues to be mission-driven, and I believe it will, then I think shareholders will reap the rewards over the upcoming decade.OverviewMost companies in the world today will have mission statements, which are supposed to be the north star of any company. Any employee should be able to look at whatever they're working on, and think 'yeah, this is helping us to achieve our mission'. Often, mission-driven companies end up being more successful than their counterparts, as they attract and retain high-quality employees, customers, and long-term investors who can all get behind the mission.But not all mission statements are created equal, and not all companies live up to this. I'll give a couple of examples.'To responsibly lead the transition of adult smokers to a smoke-free future' is the mission statement of cigarette manufacturer Altria (MO), formerly Philip Morris. Can an employee coming up with the latest marketing strategy to sell their Marlboro cigarettes look at that mission statement and think they're achieving that? Absolutely not. It sounds like a great mission statement, but it is quite frankly ridiculous.How does 'To provide the highest level of service, the broadest selection of products and the most competitive prices' sound? I mean… this could be applied to literally any retailer; it's an awful mission statement, and certainly isn't going to inspire any employees. 10 points for whoever can guess the company behind this terrible mission statement in the comments.Done correctly, a mission statement should be simple and inspirational whilst also being a north star that a company can look at to ensure it's on the road to accomplishing all that it wishes to achieve. Here's an example of a brilliant mission statement:To accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energyThis, of course, is the mission statement of Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA). It is simple (any employee would be able to recite it), inspirational (doing good for the planet), and can also be used as a north star, even as Tesla has diversified across industries (cars, energy, AI). As we saw with Altria, some companies have mission statements that sound great, but are not a 'north star' - yet with Tesla, we have a company that does everything with its mission statement in mind, and I think that investors will reap the rewards over the years ahead.Tesla 2021 Impact ReportUnmistakably Mission-DrivenThere are numerous examples of Tesla taking actions that are not only mission-driven but have also been beneficial to the business. Some investors think that taking a mission-driven approach and trying to do some good in the world is just a company being 'woke', but Tesla proves that taking actions to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy can also drive business performance to new heights.Back in June 2014, CEO Elon Musk wrote a blog post entitled All Our Patent Are Belong To You, and I'm sure the phrasing is a pop-culture reference that I'm missing.In doing so, he announced that Tesla would apply an open source philosophy to its patents for the advancement of electric vehicle technology. Tesla vowed not to initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wanted to use its technology for their own development of electric vehicles. This is primarily because Tesla saw its main competition as the number of ICE vehicles on the road - not electric car programs from major car manufacturers.This decision made 8 years ago clearly has not harmed Tesla, but it successfully contributed to their mission. In fact, the company also calls out that it isn't patents that will continue to give them a competitive advantage:Technology leadership is not defined by patents, which history has repeatedly shown to be small protection indeed against a determined competitor, but rather by the ability of a company to attract and motivate the world's most talented engineers. We believe that applying the open source philosophy to our patents will strengthen rather than diminish Tesla's position in this regard.Turns out, they were absolutely right - but this is only the start.In 2017, Tesla Motors changed its name to Tesla, reflecting the company's expansion beyond cars into batteries and solar energy. Clearly a jump into different industries, but once again with the aim of achieving its mission - particularly thanks to the 2016 acquisition of SolarCity.Nowadays, Tesla offers a range of additional products for solar energy generation and storage. These include Powerwall, a lithium-ion battery storage product designed for a home; Megapack, an energy storage solution for much larger facilities; and Solar Roof, which is well... a solar powered roof. By making this change to the company, Tesla opened up a whole new avenue in which it can generate value for shareholders, all whilst taking another step closer to achieving its mission. In fact, Tesla solar panels have generated more electricity than has been consumed by its vehicles and factories from 2012 through to 2021.Tesla 2021 Impact ReportThese are just a few examples of Tesla expanding the business to both achieve its mission and also deliver shareholder value. Others include:Open Supercharger Network: More cars using these superchargers provide additional revenue for Tesla, plus it also enables greater efficiency and broader expansion opportunities.Autonomous Driving: Gives an additional incentive to use Tesla cars, and the opportunity for robotaxis will clearly result in more Tesla EVs on the road.Battery Recycling: Creates less waste in the supply chain but also enables Tesla to repurpose components of old batteries when creating new ones, particularly when it comes to harder-to-obtain minerals such as lithium.Production & Supply Chain Localisation: Reduces emissions whilst also reducing the cost of transporting finished goods across the globe.Tesla 2020 Impact ReportWhy Does It Matter?We can see past instances where Tesla's mission-driven approach has led to changes in the company, but what are the implications for shareholders?Firstly, there's no denying that one of Tesla's strongest economic moats is its brand. Whilst this is in part driven by its technical expertise, Tesla has also managed to appeal to the ever-more conscientious consumer who cares about this transition to sustainable energy.The company's eco-friendly mission has accelerated the value of Tesla's brand substantially, with Tesla now being the world's 29th most valuable brand according to Kantar BrandZ- notably, the highest rating for a car brand, with its closest competitor being Toyota, ranked 66th.Kantar BrandZ Most Valuable Global Brands 2022Strong brands have a history of delivering impressive shareholder returns, and Tesla has been no different. Its ability to deliver on its inspirational mission should only further help to supercharge growth for the company.But it's not just about enhancing the brand; Tesla's mission-driven approach will continue to drive the company forward in ways that cannot yet be foreseen - although perhaps there is one aspect that we can dive into further.Tesla recently announced that it was piloting an open Supercharger network throughout some European countries. On the face of it, this decision will take Tesla one step closer to achieving its mission but will be detrimental to the company. I believe that another smaller economic moat possessed by Tesla relates to its switching costs for the Supercharger network - without a Tesla, you cannot access it - and it feels like Tesla might be forgoing this moat in the name of its mission, thereby weakening the business.But dig a little deeper, and the potential switch away from a closed Supercharger network makes a lot of sense. As it stands, Tesla is somewhat limited in the amount of Supercharger stations that it can build - is there any point building out some if there are just 100 Teslas in a town? Yet... what if there are 100 Teslas, but 1,000 electric or hybrid vehicles? Tesla's Superchargers are the best in the business according to JD Power, and so the demand would be there from non-Tesla owners to utilise these rapid charging stations.Then take it one step further and consider the direction the world is heading in. We will all be driving electric vehicles eventually, whether that's in 10, 20, or 50 years, and these EV charging stations will be the norm, just as gas stations are today. But could you imagine General Motors (GM) owning a bunch of gas stations at which you could only refuel GM cars? It would seem silly and inefficient, and I believe this is what the Tesla Supercharger network would turn into if it failed to open up.This is just one example of something that is only being piloted right now, but it shows how Tesla's mission statement combined with the tailwinds driving the transition to sustainable energy can result in this company being ahead of the game - as it always has been, and I hope it will continue to do so.Tailwinds Pushing This Mission ForwardLet's reiterate once again: Tesla's mission statement is to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy.Another aspect shareholders should love about this mission statement is the number of tailwinds behind it. Governments across the globe are incentivised to transition from fossil fuels to sustainable energy sources, and there is more and more pressure being put on these governments to take action. This should only help Tesla's growth to accelerate - but don't just take my word for it.According toFacts and Factors, the global EV market is expected to grow from a size of $185B in 2021 to $980B in 2028, implying a 24.5% CAGR.According to Precedence Research, the global solar power market is poised to grow at a 7.2% CAGR from 2021 through to 2030, reaching a size of $368B.Precedence ResearchFinally, according to Fortune Business Insights, the EV charging station market is expected to grow at a 30.26% CAGR from 2021 through to 2028, achieving an overall market size of $111.9B.What's the takeaway? Not only is Tesla able to improve its business performance by achieving its mission, but the mission-driven avenues that this company is exploring are growing market opportunities.This is a perfect mission to inspire employees and create customer loyalty, but it is also a brilliant mission when it comes to expanding the business into new, emerging trends and potentially huge market opportunities. Talk about a win-win!Tesla 2021 Impact ReportValuationI know, I know… I had to ruin it by talking about valuation. Yet Tesla's valuation may not be as unreasonable as some in the financial media like to make out. I explained the full rationale behind my valuation model in my previous article, and nothing has changed since (apart from the current market capitalisation).Tesla SEC Filings/ExcelBasically, I think shares are reasonably priced, particularly if you believe that Tesla can achieve a revenue CAGR of over 28% through to 2026 (spoiler alert - I do).","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1582,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9075135038,"gmtCreate":1658159342924,"gmtModify":1676536114451,"author":{"id":"4120206933854022","authorId":"4120206933854022","name":"Safemuthu11","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/68ba00ec7df657685dbb5c904bf101c3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4120206933854022","idStr":"4120206933854022"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9075135038","repostId":"2252420073","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2252420073","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1658130724,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2252420073?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-18 15:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Undervalued Stocks to Buy in the Second Half of 2022","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2252420073","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The rough start to the year has created great buying opportunities for investors.","content":"<div>\n<p>It was a rough first half of 2022 for the stock market. At the market close on June 30, the S&P 500 was down 21% and the Nasdaq was off 30%, leaving many investors' portfolios drowning in red. The ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/17/3-undervalued-stocks-to-buy-in-the-second-half-of/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Undervalued Stocks to Buy in the Second Half of 2022</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Undervalued Stocks to Buy in the Second Half of 2022\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-18 15:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/17/3-undervalued-stocks-to-buy-in-the-second-half-of/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It was a rough first half of 2022 for the stock market. At the market close on June 30, the S&P 500 was down 21% and the Nasdaq was off 30%, leaving many investors' portfolios drowning in red. The ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/17/3-undervalued-stocks-to-buy-in-the-second-half-of/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"DIS":"迪士尼","AMZN":"亚马逊","SBUX":"星巴克"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/17/3-undervalued-stocks-to-buy-in-the-second-half-of/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2252420073","content_text":"It was a rough first half of 2022 for the stock market. At the market close on June 30, the S&P 500 was down 21% and the Nasdaq was off 30%, leaving many investors' portfolios drowning in red. The upside of this brutal start to the year is that it has brought many high-quality businesses down to bargain valuations, creating compelling opportunities for investors.However, just because a stock is trading for a cheaper valuation doesn't mean it's necessarily a good buy. Investors should look beyond the share price and dig into the fundamentals of the business to determine what's a value play and what's a value trap. Here are three undervalued companies I think make great buys for the second half of 2022 and beyond.AmazonMostly known for its dominant position in the e-commerce space, Amazon.com is in a position to have a stronger second half of 2022. When the company reported first-quarter earnings, the market reacted negatively to some of the headline numbers, further punishing the stock price. However, upon closer inspection, there is reason to believe the short-term headwinds facing the e-commerce side of the business are just a bump in the road.The North America segment of Amazon's business had year-over-year growth of 8% in Q1, and the International segment posted a decline of 6%. Revenue from these two segments is comprised mostly of e-commerce sales, which were impacted by macroeconomic factors such as inflation and supply chain constraints.However, Amazon Web Services (AWS) grew 37% and now represents 16% of Amazon's total revenue, up from 13% in the year-ago quarter. Cloud infrastructure is a market that's expected to grow at 16% per year until 2030, providing a massive growth opportunity for Amazon.With a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 2.4, Amazon currently trades for the same valuation as it did in 2016, when AWS accounted for approximately 9% of overall revenue. At this price, Amazon is hard to ignore.DisneyIt's easy to understand the negative impact that the pandemic had on Disney's business. With its parks and experiences segment decimated by worldwide lockdowns, it's been a rough past few years for the House of Mouse.One saving grace for Disney was the fortuitous timing of the launch of its Disney+ streaming service in November of 2019. The unexpectedly fast subscriber growth gave the business a much-needed lifeline as it was weathering the pandemic storm.However, Disney is now emerging from this dark period, and has some bright skies ahead. In Q2 of 2022 (ended April 2), Disney posted year-over-year revenue growth of 23%. Most importantly, the segment that includes the theme parks, cruise lines, and other experiences saw revenue growth of over 100% in the quarter.Not only are people returning to Disney properties, they're spending a lot more while they're there. The second quarter saw per-capita spending grow more than 40% over 2019. As we enter the summer travel season, there's reason to expect strong growth for the coming quarters.With the exception of the pandemic-induced crash in early 2020, you'd have to go all the way back to 2013 to find a time that Disney traded for a P/S multiple as low as today's 2.2. Even with the hardships the company has faced over the past few years, it's difficult to argue Disney isn't in a better place as a business than it was then.StarbucksWhen Starbucks reported its earnings for Q2 2022 (ended April 3), the results were good. Revenue was up 15%, comparable store sales increased 7% globally (and 12% in the U.S.), and Starbucks Rewards memberships grew 17% year-over-year. The results look even more impressive, considering its second-largest market, China, saw comparable store sales decrease 23% due to COVID-related lockdowns.The company suspended guidance for the remainder of the year due to uncertainty around the COVID lockdowns in China, but management does expect there to be pressure on results for the next two quarters. On the bright side, despite a year-over-year decrease in comparable store sales, the international segment did see revenue grow 4% in Q2.CEO Howard Schultz also suspended the company's stock buyback plan shortly after returning to the company as Interim CEO, his fourth stint in the corner office. Johnson made this move to reinvest in the business in order to provide long-term value for shareholders. This may be what is needed considering the challenges facing the company, and it's good for the business to have a seasoned CEO at the helm to navigate this tough time.There are absolutely some near-term challenges for Starbucks, but it is still a dominant brand with global reach. Starbucks currently has a P/S multiple of 2.9, a valuation only seen three times over the past decade, and below its 10-year average of 3.9. Starbucks also pays a dividend, with a market beating yield of 2.5%. For investors with a long-term investing horizon, now is a great time to pick up shares.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SBUX":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"DIS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1970,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}