To The Moon
Home
News
TigerAI
Log In
Sign Up
bkloh1981
+Follow
Posts · 15
Posts · 15
Following · 0
Following · 0
Followers · 0
Followers · 0
bkloh1981
bkloh1981
·
2021-08-01
ok//
@bkloh1981
: o
When we buy funds, what are we buying?
有“锂”走遍天下，无“锂”寸步难行，最近，在碳中和政策的持续发酵下，作为新能源电池原料的锂，受到了市场的狂热追捧。“锂爷爷”“钴奶奶”发威，新能源板块大涨。不少投资者看到涨势大好的新能源板块开始蠢蠢欲
When we buy funds, what are we buying?
看
2.31K
回复
29
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
bkloh1981
bkloh1981
·
2021-07-25
o
When we buy funds, what are we buying?
有“锂”走遍天下，无“锂”寸步难行，最近，在碳中和政策的持续发酵下，作为新能源电池原料的锂，受到了市场的狂热追捧。“锂爷爷”“钴奶奶”发威，新能源板块大涨。不少投资者看到涨势大好的新能源板块开始蠢蠢欲
When we buy funds, what are we buying?
看
2.46K
回复
8
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
bkloh1981
bkloh1981
·
2021-07-19
ok
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.39K
回复
2
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
bkloh1981
bkloh1981
·
2021-07-12
ok
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.09K
回复
6
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
bkloh1981
bkloh1981
·
2021-07-12
ok
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.27K
回复
3
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
bkloh1981
bkloh1981
·
2021-07-09
ok
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
1.94K
回复
2
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
bkloh1981
bkloh1981
·
2021-07-08
ok
BEYOND IMAGINATION! More than 3.7 trillion yuan of funds rushed into the stock market in half a year. What is the signal?
美股牛市正酣，资金正疯狂涌入。 全球股市正疯狂吸纳市场资金，据高盛的最新数据显示，2021年上半年流入全球股票基金的资金规模达到5800亿美元（约合人民币37470亿元），刷新历史纪录，直接令从业1
BEYOND IMAGINATION! More than 3.7 trillion yuan of funds rushed into the stock market in half a year. What is the signal?
看
2.33K
回复
1
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
bkloh1981
bkloh1981
·
2021-07-06
ok
U.S. stocks may fall, will gold rise? The "pain index" has already explained it all
“经济痛苦指数”最早由美国经济学家欧肯提出,该指数通过将失业率和通货膨胀水平相加,以评估民众的实际经济压力，也是衡量经济滞胀程度的一个指标，并且该指数历来与美国股市、黄金价格呈高度相关性。 目前，伴随
U.S. stocks may fall, will gold rise? The "pain index" has already explained it all
看
2.23K
回复
1
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
bkloh1981
bkloh1981
·
2021-07-06
oo
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
1.55K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
bkloh1981
bkloh1981
·
2021-07-06
oo
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.08K
回复
1
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Load more
Most Discussed
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"4087300083147710","uuid":"4087300083147710","gmtCreate":1624197020031,"gmtModify":1625298243348,"name":"bkloh1981","pinyin":"bkloh1981","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb66730db127d226356e0dcabc7aa977","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":5,"headSize":185,"tweetSize":15,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[],"userBadgeCount":0,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":802589139,"gmtCreate":1627788116721,"gmtModify":1703495878022,"author":{"id":"4087300083147710","authorId":"4087300083147710","name":"bkloh1981","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb66730db127d226356e0dcabc7aa977","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4087300083147710","idStr":"4087300083147710"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok//<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/4087300083147710\">@bkloh1981</a>: o","listText":"ok//<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/U/4087300083147710\">@bkloh1981</a>: o","text":"ok//@bkloh1981: o","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":29,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/802589139","repostId":"1161895834","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161895834","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627179003,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1161895834?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-25 10:10","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"When we buy funds, what are we buying?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161895834","media":"远川投资评论","summary":"有“锂”走遍天下，无“锂”寸步难行，最近，在碳中和政策的持续发酵下，作为新能源电池原料的锂，受到了市场的狂热追捧。“锂爷爷”“钴奶奶”发威，新能源板块大涨。不少投资者看到涨势大好的新能源板块开始蠢蠢欲","content":"<p>\"Lithium\" has traveled all over the world, but it is difficult to move without \"lithium\". Recently, under the continuous fermentation of carbon neutrality policies, lithium, as a raw material for new energy batteries, has been enthusiastically sought after by the market. \"Grandpa Lithium\" and \"Grandma Cobalt\" showed their power, and the new energy sector rose sharply. Many investors saw that the new energy sector, which was rising well, was ready to move, so they went looking for a new energy-themed fund and were ready to buy it.</p><p>\"Some investors buy funds when they are optimistic about some sectors first, such as consumer military industry, and then find the fund manager who is most similar to their own ideas and positions in the market, and then buy it. This is a bit of putting the cart before the horse.\" Ye Erle of Guosheng Metalworking said, \"For the allocation of the same stock or industry, each fund manager's logic may be completely different, and the amount of money he can make in the end is also completely different.\"</p><p>Yerle believes that we often ask fund managers \"what did they buy\" without knowing \"why they bought it\", and the latter question may be more important. Recently, one of his research reports, \"What Money Does Public Offering of Fund Make-A Series Report on the Evolution History of Fund ALPHA\", has attracted widespread attention in the industry and has been well received by many institutions. In his report, he analyzed the fund's income sources in detail, and introduced a different method of dividing the ability of fund managers from the traditional one.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/457375bc4d0235878aa7dc3b323dbb68\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1220\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Guosheng Metalworking Analyst Ye Erle</p><p>Last month, our Yuanchuan Research Institute had a conversation with Ye Erle, an analyst at Guosheng Metalworking, and conducted a series of discussions on what money Public Offering of Fund actually makes. We hope that through this conversation, we can bring new inspiration to investors about \"buying funds\".</p><p>The following are some of Ye Erle's views on what you buy when buying a fund, what abilities the fund manager has, and how to build a fund portfolio.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cafe4d249052d6040ae3bf665fe6edad\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>When many people buy funds, they will ask, \"Can this fund still be bought after it has risen so much?\" Ye Erle gave an answer: Buying funds is different from buying stocks. Stocks should not be chased high.<b>But funds can \"chase high\" under certain circumstances.</b>Generally speaking, Yerle listed three differences between funds and stocks, which are reflected in pricing, valuation, and risk diversification.</p><p>The pricing of stocks is the result of people's expected exchange and expected game based on public market data.<b>The pricing of the fund is determined by the fund manager alone.</b>If stocks want to rise, more and more people are persuaded to buy by a certain narrative or logic. If funds want to rise, fund managers need to have the ability to perceive such logic in advance, buy stocks in advance, and buy them when everyone buys them. Sell when you come.</p><p>Stocks have clear valuations, and funds have no valuation issues in the sense of net value. If stocks rise too much, they will fall, and if they fall too much, they will rise. However, funds do not necessarily perform poorly in the future if they rise well, nor do they necessarily perform well in the future if they performed poorly in the past. There is a highly extrapolated indicator when buying funds, called ALPHA medium and long-term momentum, which means<b>The essence of a good past and a good future is the ability of fund managers. Only when a certain ability of the fund manager is stable can he have long-term momentum in a certain segment of income, and the long-term momentum in a certain segment of income also proves that the fund is stable in this kind of ability.</b></p><p>Stocks have characteristic risks at the company level, which can be controlled through diversified holdings. Funds are a combination of stocks, and the risks in this respect are already small, and their risks cannot be controlled only by simple diversification. For example, if you buy a bunch of funds that prefer group stocks, although a single fund may account for a small proportion, the risk of the \"group factor\" of the portfolio is very high. Once the group collapses, the entire fund portfolio will have great pullback/retracement risks. It may not be as good as choosing a fund for each of the large, mid-cap and small-cap stocks, and the risks will be more dispersed. So,<b>The risk of the fund needs to penetrate into the underlying style to diversify.</b></p><p>So what is the nature of a fund?</p><p>Yerle believes that the fund will remain unchanged<b>The essence is that fund managers include so-called circles of competence such as personality, investment system, information sources, and investment models.</b>After years of evolution, it has been difficult for fund managers to use simple investment styles such as \"large and small caps\", \"value growth\", and \"industry themes\" to divide. The stability of such divisions is weak, and it is necessary to further attribute fund returns to summarize The stock selection logic of the fund manager is divided into the true ability of the fund manager.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7147ee6f0c9e846a286b58749c009cb7\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>What money does Public Offering of Fund make?</p><p>After attributing the income of Public Offering of Fund in the report, Ye Erle concluded that the fund income includes money that the fund manager cannot earn steadily, money that will inevitably be lost, and money that can be earned steadily.</p><p>First, the money a fund makes in terms of market capitalization and valuation is volatile. I have only made two waves of money in terms of market value, one wave is money with small market value in 14 ~ 16 years, and the other wave is money with large market value from the end of last year to the beginning of this year. It is difficult to grasp the money with market value. In terms of valuation, Public Offering of Fund prefers high-valued stocks, which brought negative returns before 19 years, and then positive returns, and the money earned at the valuation level is not stable.</p><p>Furthermore, Public Offering of Fund prefers stocks with high volatility and high liquidity, which makes funds lose money for a long time. High volatility refers to the sharp ups and downs of stocks in the past, which can cause trading losses. However, Public Offering of Fund is subject to the attributes of large volume and public offering, so it must buy high liquidity tickets. High liquidity corresponds to high pricing efficiency. The duration of fast logic money on these stocks has become shorter and shorter in recent years.<b>It is difficult to do high-frequency trading in public offerings, and it is difficult to earn such fast logic money, so it is basically transferred to private high-frequency traders.</b></p><p>Therefore, whether it is market value, valuation money, or high volatility and high liquidity money, most fund managers cannot stably grasp it. Ye Erle believes that,<b>When buying funds, you should pay more attention to the fund manager's ability to make money steadily.</b></p><p>Then<b>Public offerings can only make slow money when they can't make quick money.</b>The money of slow logic is reflected in two styles of income:<b>Momentum and growth.</b>The so-called momentum refers to a logic that only when it is slowly fermented can the stock price eventually rise steadily in the past 12 months. This characteristic of steady rise is called momentum by Ye Erle. Growth means that the company has growth, and the verification of growth takes time and thus depends on slow logic.</p><p>Regarding making money from growth logic, Ye Erle summarized three advantages: (1) The logic of growth needs time to be verified, and it cannot be fully responded in the short term, leaving fund managers with enough time; (2) The logic of growth will be realized in the short term, that is, it can be verified in stages according to the quarterly report, and each verification can realize part of the excess returns, so that the stock can rise continuously; (3) The logic of growth is more verifiable than the logic of value, because the regression of valuation depends on many external macro or market factors, and the logic of growth, such as the judgment of the company's five-year growth rate, must exist in the next five years. A fact verifies whether what was said five years ago is right or not.</p><p>Ye Erle believes that,<b>The most important thing for Public Offering of Fund is to predict the company's performance and earn money from growth logic.</b>At present, public offerings are mostly based on short-term performance appraisal, and growth is more cost-effective than value: it may take 1 to 3 years for value to return to earn excess returns, and the time is highly uncertain, while growth stocks can be logically realized every quarter.</p><p>From a strategic perspective, Ye Erle introduced that in addition to performance growth, another factor for funds to make money in the long term at the company level-analyst popularity. Analyst enthusiasm means that fund managers usually pay close attention to analyst recommendations, which are translated into their own investment logic.<b>Compared with the public's information source advantage, it is also the reason why Public Offering of Fund makes money for a long time. Fund managers have faster channels to receive information.</b></p><p>Generally speaking, public funds are<b>Momentum, Growth, Analyst Heat</b>These factors are long-term profit-making, which is also the ability of fund managers, while the style income of market value and valuation, as well as the trading income of high volatility and high liquidity, are beyond the grasp of fund managers.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5cf5bac55700f0cdf8740d80785377cf\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>After understanding the source of fund income, how should we operate when it comes to the division of fund manager ability labels and the construction of fund portfolios?</p><p>Yerle tells us how to analyze a fund through examples. Taking a fund that performed well this year as an example, he made a quantitative attribution to the income of this fund, thus summarizing the ability labels possessed by the fund manager.</p><p>First of all, Ye Erle completely decomposed the fund income into four major sources of income. The fund performed averagely in terms of \"strategic income\" and contributed greatly in terms of \"dynamic income\", which means that the fund manager's overall stock selection ability is average, but the ability to do band is strong. The fund also contributes greatly to \"industry returns\", which means that its industry is well chosen. Accordingly, fund managers can be labeled: dynamic profitability, industry allocation ability.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96be149643d87dd279b716450ccb6797\" tg-width=\"717\" tg-height=\"513\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Then analyze the \"style income\" of the fund. Since the fund changed its fund manager in 2020, its style has switched to small and medium-sized market capitalization, high momentum, high volatility, high valuation, high growth, and its style is stable. It is found that the fund manager likes to buy small receipts, buy popular sectors. This labeled him: small and medium-sized market capitalization, investment in popular sectors, and stable historical style.</p><p>Observe the characteristics of industry income again: the concentration of positions is relatively high, medicine has bought nearly 50% of the positions, and machinery has bought nearly 40%. Once you are optimistic about the industry, the bet is relatively heavy; In terms of industry switching, it is highly sensitive to the cycle. In the second quarter of last year, it switched to machinery and chemical industry in large quantities, and the market as a whole paid close attention to these two industries in the fourth quarter. Accordingly, it can be labeled: industry concentration.</p><p>Finally, it was observed that the fund's low exposure to the analyst heat factor in the second quarter of last year meant that he was earlier than analysts expected, and his later operations were contrary to analysts' recommendations. The more analysts recommended, the more he sold, indicating that he: the left side/information changes are sensitive.</p><p>Based on this, Yerle concluded that the fund manager showed during the management of this fund from 2020.01 to 2021.03<b>Strong dynamic investment ability and small and medium-sized market capitalization investment style.</b>It can quickly process market information, decisively and centrally adjust positions at the critical points on the left and right sides, carry out effective meso-industry allocation and dynamic operation of individual stocks, and invest in sectors with relatively popular but small and medium market value, thus avoiding the crowded big white horse plate at that time.</p><p>After analyzing such a fund manager, Ye Erle believes that we can aim at the \"personality\" of this fund manager, find out all similar fund managers, and build a portfolio.</p><p>For example, build a portfolio of fund managers who are also strong dynamic income capabilities, or transfer out a certain type of fund managers who are also strong in stock selection capabilities and industry allocation capabilities, and continue to track and analyze this portfolio What kind of market is suitable for.<b>When you need a fund manager with any characteristics, Guosheng Metalworking can quantitatively screen it out from the portfolio of fund managers.</b></p><p>Guosheng Metalworking has built a long-term tracking fund portfolio on Wind: Guosheng Base Selection Strategy, which has performed very well in the past two years.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a439a13ff398b1ae2bd7eae1b60978ee\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>(Data source: wind)</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb201d1d3189ee8ec2a861a447ce715c\" tg-width=\"388\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>(Data source: wind)</p><p>This method of dividing the ability of fund managers is an important contribution of Ye Erle's research report. He re-divided the dimensions of fund managers into various capabilities and investment logics. Compared with the previous division of fund managers by industry and simple style, this method is more stable.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0df7a1b499d59e3ea2351cf743665be\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>For ordinary investors, they should also pay more attention to the various abilities of fund managers when buying funds. Our WeChat official account \"Yuanchuan Investment Review\" often updates some research and interviews with fund managers, which can serve as a window for everyone to understand the competence circle of fund managers.</p><p>Through continuous learning, you will know which fund managers are good at stock trading, which are good at stock selection, and which industries have strong allocation capabilities, so as to choose funds that meet our preferred types.</p><p>For capabilities that fund managers cannot grasp, such as capabilities in market value, we can build portfolios by matching funds with different market styles (such as large and small caps) to diversify fund risks.</p><p>However, when building a fund portfolio, everyone's expected returns and risk preferences are different. It is the most important thing to understand yourself and allocate funds according to your own needs.</p><p>Finally, Ye Erle gave ordinary Christians<b>Some tips:</b></p><p>1. Don't blindly follow the trend of buying funds recommended on Alipay's homepage. Be cautious when everyone is buying.</p><p>2. Don't expect funds with a scale of more than 5 billion to bring strong excess returns outside the style industry. Guosheng Metalworking has conducted a test on the size of the fund. On average, the alpha of the fund is the strongest between 500 and 2 billion. Once the scale managed by the fund manager becomes particularly large, the alpha will most likely be exhausted.</p><p>3. In the absence of obvious judgment ability, Christians recommend fixed investment to disperse costs and reduce the sensitivity of winning rate.</p>","source":"lsy1583835599575","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>When we buy funds, what are we buying?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhen we buy funds, what are we buying?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">远川投资评论</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-25 10:10</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>\"Lithium\" has traveled all over the world, but it is difficult to move without \"lithium\". Recently, under the continuous fermentation of carbon neutrality policies, lithium, as a raw material for new energy batteries, has been enthusiastically sought after by the market. \"Grandpa Lithium\" and \"Grandma Cobalt\" showed their power, and the new energy sector rose sharply. Many investors saw that the new energy sector, which was rising well, was ready to move, so they went looking for a new energy-themed fund and were ready to buy it.</p><p>\"Some investors buy funds when they are optimistic about some sectors first, such as consumer military industry, and then find the fund manager who is most similar to their own ideas and positions in the market, and then buy it. This is a bit of putting the cart before the horse.\" Ye Erle of Guosheng Metalworking said, \"For the allocation of the same stock or industry, each fund manager's logic may be completely different, and the amount of money he can make in the end is also completely different.\"</p><p>Yerle believes that we often ask fund managers \"what did they buy\" without knowing \"why they bought it\", and the latter question may be more important. Recently, one of his research reports, \"What Money Does Public Offering of Fund Make-A Series Report on the Evolution History of Fund ALPHA\", has attracted widespread attention in the industry and has been well received by many institutions. In his report, he analyzed the fund's income sources in detail, and introduced a different method of dividing the ability of fund managers from the traditional one.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/457375bc4d0235878aa7dc3b323dbb68\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1220\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Guosheng Metalworking Analyst Ye Erle</p><p>Last month, our Yuanchuan Research Institute had a conversation with Ye Erle, an analyst at Guosheng Metalworking, and conducted a series of discussions on what money Public Offering of Fund actually makes. We hope that through this conversation, we can bring new inspiration to investors about \"buying funds\".</p><p>The following are some of Ye Erle's views on what you buy when buying a fund, what abilities the fund manager has, and how to build a fund portfolio.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cafe4d249052d6040ae3bf665fe6edad\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>When many people buy funds, they will ask, \"Can this fund still be bought after it has risen so much?\" Ye Erle gave an answer: Buying funds is different from buying stocks. Stocks should not be chased high.<b>But funds can \"chase high\" under certain circumstances.</b>Generally speaking, Yerle listed three differences between funds and stocks, which are reflected in pricing, valuation, and risk diversification.</p><p>The pricing of stocks is the result of people's expected exchange and expected game based on public market data.<b>The pricing of the fund is determined by the fund manager alone.</b>If stocks want to rise, more and more people are persuaded to buy by a certain narrative or logic. If funds want to rise, fund managers need to have the ability to perceive such logic in advance, buy stocks in advance, and buy them when everyone buys them. Sell when you come.</p><p>Stocks have clear valuations, and funds have no valuation issues in the sense of net value. If stocks rise too much, they will fall, and if they fall too much, they will rise. However, funds do not necessarily perform poorly in the future if they rise well, nor do they necessarily perform well in the future if they performed poorly in the past. There is a highly extrapolated indicator when buying funds, called ALPHA medium and long-term momentum, which means<b>The essence of a good past and a good future is the ability of fund managers. Only when a certain ability of the fund manager is stable can he have long-term momentum in a certain segment of income, and the long-term momentum in a certain segment of income also proves that the fund is stable in this kind of ability.</b></p><p>Stocks have characteristic risks at the company level, which can be controlled through diversified holdings. Funds are a combination of stocks, and the risks in this respect are already small, and their risks cannot be controlled only by simple diversification. For example, if you buy a bunch of funds that prefer group stocks, although a single fund may account for a small proportion, the risk of the \"group factor\" of the portfolio is very high. Once the group collapses, the entire fund portfolio will have great pullback/retracement risks. It may not be as good as choosing a fund for each of the large, mid-cap and small-cap stocks, and the risks will be more dispersed. So,<b>The risk of the fund needs to penetrate into the underlying style to diversify.</b></p><p>So what is the nature of a fund?</p><p>Yerle believes that the fund will remain unchanged<b>The essence is that fund managers include so-called circles of competence such as personality, investment system, information sources, and investment models.</b>After years of evolution, it has been difficult for fund managers to use simple investment styles such as \"large and small caps\", \"value growth\", and \"industry themes\" to divide. The stability of such divisions is weak, and it is necessary to further attribute fund returns to summarize The stock selection logic of the fund manager is divided into the true ability of the fund manager.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7147ee6f0c9e846a286b58749c009cb7\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>What money does Public Offering of Fund make?</p><p>After attributing the income of Public Offering of Fund in the report, Ye Erle concluded that the fund income includes money that the fund manager cannot earn steadily, money that will inevitably be lost, and money that can be earned steadily.</p><p>First, the money a fund makes in terms of market capitalization and valuation is volatile. I have only made two waves of money in terms of market value, one wave is money with small market value in 14 ~ 16 years, and the other wave is money with large market value from the end of last year to the beginning of this year. It is difficult to grasp the money with market value. In terms of valuation, Public Offering of Fund prefers high-valued stocks, which brought negative returns before 19 years, and then positive returns, and the money earned at the valuation level is not stable.</p><p>Furthermore, Public Offering of Fund prefers stocks with high volatility and high liquidity, which makes funds lose money for a long time. High volatility refers to the sharp ups and downs of stocks in the past, which can cause trading losses. However, Public Offering of Fund is subject to the attributes of large volume and public offering, so it must buy high liquidity tickets. High liquidity corresponds to high pricing efficiency. The duration of fast logic money on these stocks has become shorter and shorter in recent years.<b>It is difficult to do high-frequency trading in public offerings, and it is difficult to earn such fast logic money, so it is basically transferred to private high-frequency traders.</b></p><p>Therefore, whether it is market value, valuation money, or high volatility and high liquidity money, most fund managers cannot stably grasp it. Ye Erle believes that,<b>When buying funds, you should pay more attention to the fund manager's ability to make money steadily.</b></p><p>Then<b>Public offerings can only make slow money when they can't make quick money.</b>The money of slow logic is reflected in two styles of income:<b>Momentum and growth.</b>The so-called momentum refers to a logic that only when it is slowly fermented can the stock price eventually rise steadily in the past 12 months. This characteristic of steady rise is called momentum by Ye Erle. Growth means that the company has growth, and the verification of growth takes time and thus depends on slow logic.</p><p>Regarding making money from growth logic, Ye Erle summarized three advantages: (1) The logic of growth needs time to be verified, and it cannot be fully responded in the short term, leaving fund managers with enough time; (2) The logic of growth will be realized in the short term, that is, it can be verified in stages according to the quarterly report, and each verification can realize part of the excess returns, so that the stock can rise continuously; (3) The logic of growth is more verifiable than the logic of value, because the regression of valuation depends on many external macro or market factors, and the logic of growth, such as the judgment of the company's five-year growth rate, must exist in the next five years. A fact verifies whether what was said five years ago is right or not.</p><p>Ye Erle believes that,<b>The most important thing for Public Offering of Fund is to predict the company's performance and earn money from growth logic.</b>At present, public offerings are mostly based on short-term performance appraisal, and growth is more cost-effective than value: it may take 1 to 3 years for value to return to earn excess returns, and the time is highly uncertain, while growth stocks can be logically realized every quarter.</p><p>From a strategic perspective, Ye Erle introduced that in addition to performance growth, another factor for funds to make money in the long term at the company level-analyst popularity. Analyst enthusiasm means that fund managers usually pay close attention to analyst recommendations, which are translated into their own investment logic.<b>Compared with the public's information source advantage, it is also the reason why Public Offering of Fund makes money for a long time. Fund managers have faster channels to receive information.</b></p><p>Generally speaking, public funds are<b>Momentum, Growth, Analyst Heat</b>These factors are long-term profit-making, which is also the ability of fund managers, while the style income of market value and valuation, as well as the trading income of high volatility and high liquidity, are beyond the grasp of fund managers.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5cf5bac55700f0cdf8740d80785377cf\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>After understanding the source of fund income, how should we operate when it comes to the division of fund manager ability labels and the construction of fund portfolios?</p><p>Yerle tells us how to analyze a fund through examples. Taking a fund that performed well this year as an example, he made a quantitative attribution to the income of this fund, thus summarizing the ability labels possessed by the fund manager.</p><p>First of all, Ye Erle completely decomposed the fund income into four major sources of income. The fund performed averagely in terms of \"strategic income\" and contributed greatly in terms of \"dynamic income\", which means that the fund manager's overall stock selection ability is average, but the ability to do band is strong. The fund also contributes greatly to \"industry returns\", which means that its industry is well chosen. Accordingly, fund managers can be labeled: dynamic profitability, industry allocation ability.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96be149643d87dd279b716450ccb6797\" tg-width=\"717\" tg-height=\"513\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Then analyze the \"style income\" of the fund. Since the fund changed its fund manager in 2020, its style has switched to small and medium-sized market capitalization, high momentum, high volatility, high valuation, high growth, and its style is stable. It is found that the fund manager likes to buy small receipts, buy popular sectors. This labeled him: small and medium-sized market capitalization, investment in popular sectors, and stable historical style.</p><p>Observe the characteristics of industry income again: the concentration of positions is relatively high, medicine has bought nearly 50% of the positions, and machinery has bought nearly 40%. Once you are optimistic about the industry, the bet is relatively heavy; In terms of industry switching, it is highly sensitive to the cycle. In the second quarter of last year, it switched to machinery and chemical industry in large quantities, and the market as a whole paid close attention to these two industries in the fourth quarter. Accordingly, it can be labeled: industry concentration.</p><p>Finally, it was observed that the fund's low exposure to the analyst heat factor in the second quarter of last year meant that he was earlier than analysts expected, and his later operations were contrary to analysts' recommendations. The more analysts recommended, the more he sold, indicating that he: the left side/information changes are sensitive.</p><p>Based on this, Yerle concluded that the fund manager showed during the management of this fund from 2020.01 to 2021.03<b>Strong dynamic investment ability and small and medium-sized market capitalization investment style.</b>It can quickly process market information, decisively and centrally adjust positions at the critical points on the left and right sides, carry out effective meso-industry allocation and dynamic operation of individual stocks, and invest in sectors with relatively popular but small and medium market value, thus avoiding the crowded big white horse plate at that time.</p><p>After analyzing such a fund manager, Ye Erle believes that we can aim at the \"personality\" of this fund manager, find out all similar fund managers, and build a portfolio.</p><p>For example, build a portfolio of fund managers who are also strong dynamic income capabilities, or transfer out a certain type of fund managers who are also strong in stock selection capabilities and industry allocation capabilities, and continue to track and analyze this portfolio What kind of market is suitable for.<b>When you need a fund manager with any characteristics, Guosheng Metalworking can quantitatively screen it out from the portfolio of fund managers.</b></p><p>Guosheng Metalworking has built a long-term tracking fund portfolio on Wind: Guosheng Base Selection Strategy, which has performed very well in the past two years.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a439a13ff398b1ae2bd7eae1b60978ee\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>(Data source: wind)</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb201d1d3189ee8ec2a861a447ce715c\" tg-width=\"388\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>(Data source: wind)</p><p>This method of dividing the ability of fund managers is an important contribution of Ye Erle's research report. He re-divided the dimensions of fund managers into various capabilities and investment logics. Compared with the previous division of fund managers by industry and simple style, this method is more stable.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0df7a1b499d59e3ea2351cf743665be\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>For ordinary investors, they should also pay more attention to the various abilities of fund managers when buying funds. Our WeChat official account \"Yuanchuan Investment Review\" often updates some research and interviews with fund managers, which can serve as a window for everyone to understand the competence circle of fund managers.</p><p>Through continuous learning, you will know which fund managers are good at stock trading, which are good at stock selection, and which industries have strong allocation capabilities, so as to choose funds that meet our preferred types.</p><p>For capabilities that fund managers cannot grasp, such as capabilities in market value, we can build portfolios by matching funds with different market styles (such as large and small caps) to diversify fund risks.</p><p>However, when building a fund portfolio, everyone's expected returns and risk preferences are different. It is the most important thing to understand yourself and allocate funds according to your own needs.</p><p>Finally, Ye Erle gave ordinary Christians<b>Some tips:</b></p><p>1. Don't blindly follow the trend of buying funds recommended on Alipay's homepage. Be cautious when everyone is buying.</p><p>2. Don't expect funds with a scale of more than 5 billion to bring strong excess returns outside the style industry. Guosheng Metalworking has conducted a test on the size of the fund. On average, the alpha of the fund is the strongest between 500 and 2 billion. Once the scale managed by the fund manager becomes particularly large, the alpha will most likely be exhausted.</p><p>3. In the absence of obvious judgment ability, Christians recommend fixed investment to disperse costs and reduce the sensitivity of winning rate.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/am8U1F6q6VGz2YRds9RHEA\">远川投资评论</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/753c9aba3202037bc97463c545d5d015","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/am8U1F6q6VGz2YRds9RHEA","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161895834","content_text":"有“锂”走遍天下，无“锂”寸步难行，最近，在碳中和政策的持续发酵下，作为新能源电池原料的锂，受到了市场的狂热追捧。“锂爷爷”“钴奶奶”发威，新能源板块大涨。不少投资者看到涨势大好的新能源板块开始蠢蠢欲动，于是去寻找一只新能源主题基金，准备买入。\n“部分投资者买基金是先自己看好一些板块，比如消费军工之类的，然后再在市场中去找与自己想法持仓最像的基金经理，然后去买它，这有点本末倒置了”国盛金工的叶尔乐说，“对同一个股或行业的配置，每个基金经理的逻辑可能完全不一样，最终能赚到的钱也完全不一样”。\n叶尔乐认为，我们常常会问基金经理“买了什么”而不知道“为什么买”，而后一个问题可能更为重要。最近，他的一篇研究报告《公募基金究竟赚的什么钱—基金ALPHA进化史系列报告》引起了业内广泛关注，受到多家机构的一致好评。他在报告中详细分析了基金的收益来源，并介绍了不同于传统的划分基金经理能力的方法。\n\n国盛金工分析师 叶尔乐\n上个月，我们远川研究所对话了国盛金工分析师叶尔乐，对公募基金究竟赚的是什么钱进行了一系列的探讨，希望通过这次交谈，能够就“买基金”这件事给投资者们带来新的启发。\n以下，是叶尔乐对买基金买的是什么、基金经理具备哪些能力、怎么去构建基金组合等问题的一些看法。\n\n很多人买基金时，会问到“这个基金涨这么多还能买吗？”叶尔乐给出了回答：买基金和买股票不一样，股票不宜追高，但基金在某种情况下是可以“追高”的。总体来说，叶尔乐列举了基金与股票的三个区别，分别体现在定价、估值、风险分散方式上。\n股票的定价是由众人根据市场公开数据进行预期交换、预期博弈得到的结果，而基金的定价是由基金经理一个人决定的。股票要涨，是越来越多的人被某一叙事或逻辑说服而买入，基金要涨，是需要基金经理有提前感知到这样逻辑的能力，提前众人买入股票，并在众人买进来时卖掉。\n股票有明确的估值，基金没有净值意义上的估值问题。股票涨多了会跌，跌多了会涨，而基金并非涨得好的未来表现一定差，也不是以前表现差的未来一定就表现好。买基金有个外推性很强的指标，叫ALPHA中长期动量，意思是过去好的未来好，其本质就是基金经理的能力。只有基金经理某一块能力是稳定的，才能在某一细分收益上有长期动量，而某一细分收益上的长期动量也反证了基金在这类能力上是稳定的。\n股票具有公司层面的特质风险，能通过分散持有来控制，基金是股票的组合，这方面风险已经较小，其风险的控制不能仅靠简单的分散。比如买一堆偏抱团股的基金，虽然可能单个基金占比很小，但组合在“抱团因子”上的风险则非常高，一旦抱团瓦解，整个基金组合都有很大回撤风险，那这样可能还不如大盘中盘小盘各挑一个基金，风险更分散。所以，基金的风险需要穿透到底层风格来分散。\n那么基金的本质是什么呢？\n叶尔乐认为，基金不变的本质是基金经理包括性格、投资体系、信息来源以及投资模式等所谓的能力圈。经过多年进化，基金经理已经很难用“大小盘”、“价值成长”、“行业主题”等简单投资风格去划分，这样的划分稳定性较弱，需要进一步对基金收益进行归因，从而归纳出基金经理的选股逻辑，划分出基金经理的真正能力。\n\n公募基金究竟赚哪些钱？\n叶尔乐在报告中对公募基金的收益进行归因后得出，基金收益中有基金经理不能稳定赚到的钱、不可避免要亏掉的钱、以及能够稳定赚到的钱。\n首先，基金在市值和估值方面赚的钱是不稳定的。市值上只赚过两波钱，一波是14~16年小市值的钱，一波是去年底到今年初的大市值的钱，市值的钱很难把握。在估值上，公募基金偏好高估值股票，这在19年之前带来的是负收益，之后是正收益，估值层面赚的钱也不是稳定的。\n再者，公募基金偏好高波动性和高流动性股票，这使得基金长期亏钱。高波动性是指股票在过去大涨大跌，这会引起交易上的损失。而公募基金受制于大体量和公开募集的属性，必须买高流动性票，高流动性对应高定价效率，快逻辑的钱在这些股票上持续时间近年在越来越短，公募难以做高频交易，很难赚到这种快逻辑的钱，基本将其让渡给私募高频交易者。\n因此，无论是市值、估值的钱，或是高波动性、高流动性的钱，都不是大部分基金经理能够稳定把握的。叶尔乐认为，买基金时更应该关注的是基金经理稳定赚钱的能力。\n那么公募在不能赚快钱的情况下，只能赚慢钱。慢逻辑的钱体现在两种风格收益上：动量和成长。所谓动量，是指一个逻辑只有是慢慢发酵的，最终才可能使股价在过去12个月稳定上涨，这种稳稳上涨的特征叶尔乐称之为动量。而成长就是公司具有成长性，成长性的验证需要时间从而也靠慢逻辑。\n关于赚成长逻辑的钱，叶尔乐总结了三个优点：（1）成长的逻辑需要时间验证，无法在短期反应充分，留给基金经理足够的时间；（2）成长的逻辑短期会有兑现，即可根据季报阶段性验证，每次验证能兑现部分超额收益，使股票连续上涨；（3）成长的逻辑相比价值逻辑是强可验证的，因为估值的回归依赖很多外部的宏观或市场因素，而成长逻辑比如对公司5年增速的判断，那么在未来5年一定存在一个事实验证5年前的话对与否。\n叶尔乐认为，公募基金最主要是预测公司业绩，赚成长逻辑的钱。因为目前公募多以短期业绩考核为主，成长比价值更具有性价比：价值回归可能要等1到3年才赚到超额收益，时间高度不确定，而成长股每个季度都能有逻辑兑现。\n从策略视角，叶尔乐介绍了除业绩增长外，基金在公司层面长期赚钱的另一个因子—分析师热度。分析师热度是指基金经理通常会密切关注分析师的推荐，从而转化为自己的投资逻辑。相比于公众的信息来源优势也是公募基金长期赚钱的原因，基金经理拥有更快接收信息的渠道。\n总的来说，公募基金在动量、成长、分析师热度这些因子上是长期赚钱的，也是基金经理的能力所在，而市值和估值这种风格类收益，以及高波动性高流动性这种交易类收益则是基金经理无法把握的。\n\n在了解了基金收益来源之后，具体到基金经理能力标签的划分、基金组合的构建时又该如何操作呢？\n叶尔乐通过举例来告诉我们如何去分析一只基金。他以今年表现较好的一只基金为例，对这只基金的收益做了量化归因，从而归纳出了基金经理所具备的能力标签。\n首先叶尔乐将基金收益完全分解成四大收益来源，该基金在“策略收益”收益上表现一般，“动态收益”上贡献较大，这意味着基金经理总体选股能力一般，但做波段能力较强。该基金还在“行业收益”上贡献较大，意味着它行业选得好。据此，可以给基金经理贴上标签：动态收益能力、行业配置能力。\n\n接着分析基金的“风格收益”，该基金自2020年换基金经理后，风格切换为中小市值、高动量、高波动性、高估值、高成长，且风格稳健，发现该基金经理喜欢买小票、买热门板块。由此给他贴上标签：中小市值、热门板块投资、历史风格稳定。\n再观察行业收益的特征：持仓集中度较高，医药买了将近50%的仓位，机械买了近40%，一旦看好行业，下注比较重；行业切换上，对周期敏锐度强，在去年二季度大笔切换到机械和化工上，而市场整体高度关注这两个行业是在四季度。据此，可贴标签：行业集中。\n最后，观察到该基金去年二季度在分析师热度因子上暴露较低，意味着他比分析师预期更早，并且他的后期操作与分析师推荐是相逆的，分析师越推荐的他越卖，说明他：左侧/信息变化敏感。\n据此，叶尔乐得出结论：该基金经理在2020.01-2021.03管理这只基金期间表现出了较强的动态投资能力和中小市值投资风格。其能够快速处理市场信息，在左侧右侧临界点果决且集中的调整仓位，进行有效的中观行业配置和个股动态操作，投资较为热门但市值偏中小的板块，避免了当时拥挤的大白马板块。\n分析了这样一位基金经理后，叶尔乐认为，可以以这个基金经理的“个性”为目标，把同类的基金经理都找出来，构建一个组合。\n比如构建一个同样都是动态收益能力较强的基金经理的组合，或者把同样都是选股能力强的、同样都是行业配置能力强的某一类基金经理调出来，继续跟踪，分析这个组合适应什么样的市场。当你需要什么特征的基金经理，国盛金工可以通过量化的方式，将其从基金经理的组合中筛选出来。\n国盛金工在Wind上构建有长期跟踪的基金组合：国盛选基策略，该组合这两年收益表现十分不错。\n\n(数据来源：wind)\n\n(数据来源：wind)\n这种划分基金经理能力的方法，是叶尔乐这篇研报的重要贡献。他将基金经理的维度做了一个重新的划分，划分为各种各样的能力和投资逻辑，相比以往按行业、按简单风格来划分基金经理，这种方式更为稳定。\n\n对于普通投资者来说，在买基金时也应该更多地关注基金经理所具备的各种能力。我们的公众号“远川投资评论”经常会更新一些基金经理的研究和访谈，可以作为大家了解基金经理能力圈的一个窗口。\n通过不断学习，你就会知道哪些基金经理擅长股票交易，哪些擅长选股，还有哪些行业配置能力较强，从而去选择符合我们偏好类型的基金。\n对于基金经理把握不了的能力，比如市值上的能力，我们可以通过搭配不同市场风格（比如大盘小盘）的基金来构建组合从而分散基金风险。\n不过在构建基金组合时，每个人的预期收益和风险偏好不一样，了解自己，根据自己的需求去配置基金才是最重要的。\n最后，叶尔乐对普通基民给出了一些建议：\n1. 切勿盲目跟风购买支付宝首页推荐基金，当所有人都在买时需要谨慎。\n2. 不要期待规模超50亿的基金能带来很强的风格行业以外超额收益。国盛金工对基金规模做过一个测试，基金的阿尔法平均来看在管理规模5~20亿之间最强，一旦基金经理管理的规模变的特别大，阿尔法大概率会有所衰竭。\n3. 基民在没有明显判断能力的情况下，建议定投分散成本，降低胜率敏感性。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2312,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177379914,"gmtCreate":1627183226538,"gmtModify":1703485225901,"author":{"id":"4087300083147710","authorId":"4087300083147710","name":"bkloh1981","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb66730db127d226356e0dcabc7aa977","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4087300083147710","idStr":"4087300083147710"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"o","listText":"o","text":"o","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":8,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177379914","repostId":"1161895834","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1161895834","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627179003,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1161895834?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-25 10:10","market":"hk","language":"zh","title":"When we buy funds, what are we buying?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161895834","media":"远川投资评论","summary":"有“锂”走遍天下，无“锂”寸步难行，最近，在碳中和政策的持续发酵下，作为新能源电池原料的锂，受到了市场的狂热追捧。“锂爷爷”“钴奶奶”发威，新能源板块大涨。不少投资者看到涨势大好的新能源板块开始蠢蠢欲","content":"<p>\"Lithium\" has traveled all over the world, but it is difficult to move without \"lithium\". Recently, under the continuous fermentation of carbon neutrality policies, lithium, as a raw material for new energy batteries, has been enthusiastically sought after by the market. \"Grandpa Lithium\" and \"Grandma Cobalt\" showed their power, and the new energy sector rose sharply. Many investors saw that the new energy sector, which was rising well, was ready to move, so they went looking for a new energy-themed fund and were ready to buy it.</p><p>\"Some investors buy funds when they are optimistic about some sectors first, such as consumer military industry, and then find the fund manager who is most similar to their own ideas and positions in the market, and then buy it. This is a bit of putting the cart before the horse.\" Ye Erle of Guosheng Metalworking said, \"For the allocation of the same stock or industry, each fund manager's logic may be completely different, and the amount of money he can make in the end is also completely different.\"</p><p>Yerle believes that we often ask fund managers \"what did they buy\" without knowing \"why they bought it\", and the latter question may be more important. Recently, one of his research reports, \"What Money Does Public Offering of Fund Make-A Series Report on the Evolution History of Fund ALPHA\", has attracted widespread attention in the industry and has been well received by many institutions. In his report, he analyzed the fund's income sources in detail, and introduced a different method of dividing the ability of fund managers from the traditional one.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/457375bc4d0235878aa7dc3b323dbb68\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1220\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Guosheng Metalworking Analyst Ye Erle</p><p>Last month, our Yuanchuan Research Institute had a conversation with Ye Erle, an analyst at Guosheng Metalworking, and conducted a series of discussions on what money Public Offering of Fund actually makes. We hope that through this conversation, we can bring new inspiration to investors about \"buying funds\".</p><p>The following are some of Ye Erle's views on what you buy when buying a fund, what abilities the fund manager has, and how to build a fund portfolio.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cafe4d249052d6040ae3bf665fe6edad\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>When many people buy funds, they will ask, \"Can this fund still be bought after it has risen so much?\" Ye Erle gave an answer: Buying funds is different from buying stocks. Stocks should not be chased high.<b>But funds can \"chase high\" under certain circumstances.</b>Generally speaking, Yerle listed three differences between funds and stocks, which are reflected in pricing, valuation, and risk diversification.</p><p>The pricing of stocks is the result of people's expected exchange and expected game based on public market data.<b>The pricing of the fund is determined by the fund manager alone.</b>If stocks want to rise, more and more people are persuaded to buy by a certain narrative or logic. If funds want to rise, fund managers need to have the ability to perceive such logic in advance, buy stocks in advance, and buy them when everyone buys them. Sell when you come.</p><p>Stocks have clear valuations, and funds have no valuation issues in the sense of net value. If stocks rise too much, they will fall, and if they fall too much, they will rise. However, funds do not necessarily perform poorly in the future if they rise well, nor do they necessarily perform well in the future if they performed poorly in the past. There is a highly extrapolated indicator when buying funds, called ALPHA medium and long-term momentum, which means<b>The essence of a good past and a good future is the ability of fund managers. Only when a certain ability of the fund manager is stable can he have long-term momentum in a certain segment of income, and the long-term momentum in a certain segment of income also proves that the fund is stable in this kind of ability.</b></p><p>Stocks have characteristic risks at the company level, which can be controlled through diversified holdings. Funds are a combination of stocks, and the risks in this respect are already small, and their risks cannot be controlled only by simple diversification. For example, if you buy a bunch of funds that prefer group stocks, although a single fund may account for a small proportion, the risk of the \"group factor\" of the portfolio is very high. Once the group collapses, the entire fund portfolio will have great pullback/retracement risks. It may not be as good as choosing a fund for each of the large, mid-cap and small-cap stocks, and the risks will be more dispersed. So,<b>The risk of the fund needs to penetrate into the underlying style to diversify.</b></p><p>So what is the nature of a fund?</p><p>Yerle believes that the fund will remain unchanged<b>The essence is that fund managers include so-called circles of competence such as personality, investment system, information sources, and investment models.</b>After years of evolution, it has been difficult for fund managers to use simple investment styles such as \"large and small caps\", \"value growth\", and \"industry themes\" to divide. The stability of such divisions is weak, and it is necessary to further attribute fund returns to summarize The stock selection logic of the fund manager is divided into the true ability of the fund manager.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7147ee6f0c9e846a286b58749c009cb7\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>What money does Public Offering of Fund make?</p><p>After attributing the income of Public Offering of Fund in the report, Ye Erle concluded that the fund income includes money that the fund manager cannot earn steadily, money that will inevitably be lost, and money that can be earned steadily.</p><p>First, the money a fund makes in terms of market capitalization and valuation is volatile. I have only made two waves of money in terms of market value, one wave is money with small market value in 14 ~ 16 years, and the other wave is money with large market value from the end of last year to the beginning of this year. It is difficult to grasp the money with market value. In terms of valuation, Public Offering of Fund prefers high-valued stocks, which brought negative returns before 19 years, and then positive returns, and the money earned at the valuation level is not stable.</p><p>Furthermore, Public Offering of Fund prefers stocks with high volatility and high liquidity, which makes funds lose money for a long time. High volatility refers to the sharp ups and downs of stocks in the past, which can cause trading losses. However, Public Offering of Fund is subject to the attributes of large volume and public offering, so it must buy high liquidity tickets. High liquidity corresponds to high pricing efficiency. The duration of fast logic money on these stocks has become shorter and shorter in recent years.<b>It is difficult to do high-frequency trading in public offerings, and it is difficult to earn such fast logic money, so it is basically transferred to private high-frequency traders.</b></p><p>Therefore, whether it is market value, valuation money, or high volatility and high liquidity money, most fund managers cannot stably grasp it. Ye Erle believes that,<b>When buying funds, you should pay more attention to the fund manager's ability to make money steadily.</b></p><p>Then<b>Public offerings can only make slow money when they can't make quick money.</b>The money of slow logic is reflected in two styles of income:<b>Momentum and growth.</b>The so-called momentum refers to a logic that only when it is slowly fermented can the stock price eventually rise steadily in the past 12 months. This characteristic of steady rise is called momentum by Ye Erle. Growth means that the company has growth, and the verification of growth takes time and thus depends on slow logic.</p><p>Regarding making money from growth logic, Ye Erle summarized three advantages: (1) The logic of growth needs time to be verified, and it cannot be fully responded in the short term, leaving fund managers with enough time; (2) The logic of growth will be realized in the short term, that is, it can be verified in stages according to the quarterly report, and each verification can realize part of the excess returns, so that the stock can rise continuously; (3) The logic of growth is more verifiable than the logic of value, because the regression of valuation depends on many external macro or market factors, and the logic of growth, such as the judgment of the company's five-year growth rate, must exist in the next five years. A fact verifies whether what was said five years ago is right or not.</p><p>Ye Erle believes that,<b>The most important thing for Public Offering of Fund is to predict the company's performance and earn money from growth logic.</b>At present, public offerings are mostly based on short-term performance appraisal, and growth is more cost-effective than value: it may take 1 to 3 years for value to return to earn excess returns, and the time is highly uncertain, while growth stocks can be logically realized every quarter.</p><p>From a strategic perspective, Ye Erle introduced that in addition to performance growth, another factor for funds to make money in the long term at the company level-analyst popularity. Analyst enthusiasm means that fund managers usually pay close attention to analyst recommendations, which are translated into their own investment logic.<b>Compared with the public's information source advantage, it is also the reason why Public Offering of Fund makes money for a long time. Fund managers have faster channels to receive information.</b></p><p>Generally speaking, public funds are<b>Momentum, Growth, Analyst Heat</b>These factors are long-term profit-making, which is also the ability of fund managers, while the style income of market value and valuation, as well as the trading income of high volatility and high liquidity, are beyond the grasp of fund managers.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5cf5bac55700f0cdf8740d80785377cf\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>After understanding the source of fund income, how should we operate when it comes to the division of fund manager ability labels and the construction of fund portfolios?</p><p>Yerle tells us how to analyze a fund through examples. Taking a fund that performed well this year as an example, he made a quantitative attribution to the income of this fund, thus summarizing the ability labels possessed by the fund manager.</p><p>First of all, Ye Erle completely decomposed the fund income into four major sources of income. The fund performed averagely in terms of \"strategic income\" and contributed greatly in terms of \"dynamic income\", which means that the fund manager's overall stock selection ability is average, but the ability to do band is strong. The fund also contributes greatly to \"industry returns\", which means that its industry is well chosen. Accordingly, fund managers can be labeled: dynamic profitability, industry allocation ability.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96be149643d87dd279b716450ccb6797\" tg-width=\"717\" tg-height=\"513\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Then analyze the \"style income\" of the fund. Since the fund changed its fund manager in 2020, its style has switched to small and medium-sized market capitalization, high momentum, high volatility, high valuation, high growth, and its style is stable. It is found that the fund manager likes to buy small receipts, buy popular sectors. This labeled him: small and medium-sized market capitalization, investment in popular sectors, and stable historical style.</p><p>Observe the characteristics of industry income again: the concentration of positions is relatively high, medicine has bought nearly 50% of the positions, and machinery has bought nearly 40%. Once you are optimistic about the industry, the bet is relatively heavy; In terms of industry switching, it is highly sensitive to the cycle. In the second quarter of last year, it switched to machinery and chemical industry in large quantities, and the market as a whole paid close attention to these two industries in the fourth quarter. Accordingly, it can be labeled: industry concentration.</p><p>Finally, it was observed that the fund's low exposure to the analyst heat factor in the second quarter of last year meant that he was earlier than analysts expected, and his later operations were contrary to analysts' recommendations. The more analysts recommended, the more he sold, indicating that he: the left side/information changes are sensitive.</p><p>Based on this, Yerle concluded that the fund manager showed during the management of this fund from 2020.01 to 2021.03<b>Strong dynamic investment ability and small and medium-sized market capitalization investment style.</b>It can quickly process market information, decisively and centrally adjust positions at the critical points on the left and right sides, carry out effective meso-industry allocation and dynamic operation of individual stocks, and invest in sectors with relatively popular but small and medium market value, thus avoiding the crowded big white horse plate at that time.</p><p>After analyzing such a fund manager, Ye Erle believes that we can aim at the \"personality\" of this fund manager, find out all similar fund managers, and build a portfolio.</p><p>For example, build a portfolio of fund managers who are also strong dynamic income capabilities, or transfer out a certain type of fund managers who are also strong in stock selection capabilities and industry allocation capabilities, and continue to track and analyze this portfolio What kind of market is suitable for.<b>When you need a fund manager with any characteristics, Guosheng Metalworking can quantitatively screen it out from the portfolio of fund managers.</b></p><p>Guosheng Metalworking has built a long-term tracking fund portfolio on Wind: Guosheng Base Selection Strategy, which has performed very well in the past two years.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a439a13ff398b1ae2bd7eae1b60978ee\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>(Data source: wind)</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb201d1d3189ee8ec2a861a447ce715c\" tg-width=\"388\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>(Data source: wind)</p><p>This method of dividing the ability of fund managers is an important contribution of Ye Erle's research report. He re-divided the dimensions of fund managers into various capabilities and investment logics. Compared with the previous division of fund managers by industry and simple style, this method is more stable.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0df7a1b499d59e3ea2351cf743665be\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>For ordinary investors, they should also pay more attention to the various abilities of fund managers when buying funds. Our WeChat official account \"Yuanchuan Investment Review\" often updates some research and interviews with fund managers, which can serve as a window for everyone to understand the competence circle of fund managers.</p><p>Through continuous learning, you will know which fund managers are good at stock trading, which are good at stock selection, and which industries have strong allocation capabilities, so as to choose funds that meet our preferred types.</p><p>For capabilities that fund managers cannot grasp, such as capabilities in market value, we can build portfolios by matching funds with different market styles (such as large and small caps) to diversify fund risks.</p><p>However, when building a fund portfolio, everyone's expected returns and risk preferences are different. It is the most important thing to understand yourself and allocate funds according to your own needs.</p><p>Finally, Ye Erle gave ordinary Christians<b>Some tips:</b></p><p>1. Don't blindly follow the trend of buying funds recommended on Alipay's homepage. Be cautious when everyone is buying.</p><p>2. Don't expect funds with a scale of more than 5 billion to bring strong excess returns outside the style industry. Guosheng Metalworking has conducted a test on the size of the fund. On average, the alpha of the fund is the strongest between 500 and 2 billion. Once the scale managed by the fund manager becomes particularly large, the alpha will most likely be exhausted.</p><p>3. In the absence of obvious judgment ability, Christians recommend fixed investment to disperse costs and reduce the sensitivity of winning rate.</p>","source":"lsy1583835599575","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>When we buy funds, what are we buying?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhen we buy funds, what are we buying?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">远川投资评论</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-25 10:10</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>\"Lithium\" has traveled all over the world, but it is difficult to move without \"lithium\". Recently, under the continuous fermentation of carbon neutrality policies, lithium, as a raw material for new energy batteries, has been enthusiastically sought after by the market. \"Grandpa Lithium\" and \"Grandma Cobalt\" showed their power, and the new energy sector rose sharply. Many investors saw that the new energy sector, which was rising well, was ready to move, so they went looking for a new energy-themed fund and were ready to buy it.</p><p>\"Some investors buy funds when they are optimistic about some sectors first, such as consumer military industry, and then find the fund manager who is most similar to their own ideas and positions in the market, and then buy it. This is a bit of putting the cart before the horse.\" Ye Erle of Guosheng Metalworking said, \"For the allocation of the same stock or industry, each fund manager's logic may be completely different, and the amount of money he can make in the end is also completely different.\"</p><p>Yerle believes that we often ask fund managers \"what did they buy\" without knowing \"why they bought it\", and the latter question may be more important. Recently, one of his research reports, \"What Money Does Public Offering of Fund Make-A Series Report on the Evolution History of Fund ALPHA\", has attracted widespread attention in the industry and has been well received by many institutions. In his report, he analyzed the fund's income sources in detail, and introduced a different method of dividing the ability of fund managers from the traditional one.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/457375bc4d0235878aa7dc3b323dbb68\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"1220\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Guosheng Metalworking Analyst Ye Erle</p><p>Last month, our Yuanchuan Research Institute had a conversation with Ye Erle, an analyst at Guosheng Metalworking, and conducted a series of discussions on what money Public Offering of Fund actually makes. We hope that through this conversation, we can bring new inspiration to investors about \"buying funds\".</p><p>The following are some of Ye Erle's views on what you buy when buying a fund, what abilities the fund manager has, and how to build a fund portfolio.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cafe4d249052d6040ae3bf665fe6edad\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>When many people buy funds, they will ask, \"Can this fund still be bought after it has risen so much?\" Ye Erle gave an answer: Buying funds is different from buying stocks. Stocks should not be chased high.<b>But funds can \"chase high\" under certain circumstances.</b>Generally speaking, Yerle listed three differences between funds and stocks, which are reflected in pricing, valuation, and risk diversification.</p><p>The pricing of stocks is the result of people's expected exchange and expected game based on public market data.<b>The pricing of the fund is determined by the fund manager alone.</b>If stocks want to rise, more and more people are persuaded to buy by a certain narrative or logic. If funds want to rise, fund managers need to have the ability to perceive such logic in advance, buy stocks in advance, and buy them when everyone buys them. Sell when you come.</p><p>Stocks have clear valuations, and funds have no valuation issues in the sense of net value. If stocks rise too much, they will fall, and if they fall too much, they will rise. However, funds do not necessarily perform poorly in the future if they rise well, nor do they necessarily perform well in the future if they performed poorly in the past. There is a highly extrapolated indicator when buying funds, called ALPHA medium and long-term momentum, which means<b>The essence of a good past and a good future is the ability of fund managers. Only when a certain ability of the fund manager is stable can he have long-term momentum in a certain segment of income, and the long-term momentum in a certain segment of income also proves that the fund is stable in this kind of ability.</b></p><p>Stocks have characteristic risks at the company level, which can be controlled through diversified holdings. Funds are a combination of stocks, and the risks in this respect are already small, and their risks cannot be controlled only by simple diversification. For example, if you buy a bunch of funds that prefer group stocks, although a single fund may account for a small proportion, the risk of the \"group factor\" of the portfolio is very high. Once the group collapses, the entire fund portfolio will have great pullback/retracement risks. It may not be as good as choosing a fund for each of the large, mid-cap and small-cap stocks, and the risks will be more dispersed. So,<b>The risk of the fund needs to penetrate into the underlying style to diversify.</b></p><p>So what is the nature of a fund?</p><p>Yerle believes that the fund will remain unchanged<b>The essence is that fund managers include so-called circles of competence such as personality, investment system, information sources, and investment models.</b>After years of evolution, it has been difficult for fund managers to use simple investment styles such as \"large and small caps\", \"value growth\", and \"industry themes\" to divide. The stability of such divisions is weak, and it is necessary to further attribute fund returns to summarize The stock selection logic of the fund manager is divided into the true ability of the fund manager.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7147ee6f0c9e846a286b58749c009cb7\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>What money does Public Offering of Fund make?</p><p>After attributing the income of Public Offering of Fund in the report, Ye Erle concluded that the fund income includes money that the fund manager cannot earn steadily, money that will inevitably be lost, and money that can be earned steadily.</p><p>First, the money a fund makes in terms of market capitalization and valuation is volatile. I have only made two waves of money in terms of market value, one wave is money with small market value in 14 ~ 16 years, and the other wave is money with large market value from the end of last year to the beginning of this year. It is difficult to grasp the money with market value. In terms of valuation, Public Offering of Fund prefers high-valued stocks, which brought negative returns before 19 years, and then positive returns, and the money earned at the valuation level is not stable.</p><p>Furthermore, Public Offering of Fund prefers stocks with high volatility and high liquidity, which makes funds lose money for a long time. High volatility refers to the sharp ups and downs of stocks in the past, which can cause trading losses. However, Public Offering of Fund is subject to the attributes of large volume and public offering, so it must buy high liquidity tickets. High liquidity corresponds to high pricing efficiency. The duration of fast logic money on these stocks has become shorter and shorter in recent years.<b>It is difficult to do high-frequency trading in public offerings, and it is difficult to earn such fast logic money, so it is basically transferred to private high-frequency traders.</b></p><p>Therefore, whether it is market value, valuation money, or high volatility and high liquidity money, most fund managers cannot stably grasp it. Ye Erle believes that,<b>When buying funds, you should pay more attention to the fund manager's ability to make money steadily.</b></p><p>Then<b>Public offerings can only make slow money when they can't make quick money.</b>The money of slow logic is reflected in two styles of income:<b>Momentum and growth.</b>The so-called momentum refers to a logic that only when it is slowly fermented can the stock price eventually rise steadily in the past 12 months. This characteristic of steady rise is called momentum by Ye Erle. Growth means that the company has growth, and the verification of growth takes time and thus depends on slow logic.</p><p>Regarding making money from growth logic, Ye Erle summarized three advantages: (1) The logic of growth needs time to be verified, and it cannot be fully responded in the short term, leaving fund managers with enough time; (2) The logic of growth will be realized in the short term, that is, it can be verified in stages according to the quarterly report, and each verification can realize part of the excess returns, so that the stock can rise continuously; (3) The logic of growth is more verifiable than the logic of value, because the regression of valuation depends on many external macro or market factors, and the logic of growth, such as the judgment of the company's five-year growth rate, must exist in the next five years. A fact verifies whether what was said five years ago is right or not.</p><p>Ye Erle believes that,<b>The most important thing for Public Offering of Fund is to predict the company's performance and earn money from growth logic.</b>At present, public offerings are mostly based on short-term performance appraisal, and growth is more cost-effective than value: it may take 1 to 3 years for value to return to earn excess returns, and the time is highly uncertain, while growth stocks can be logically realized every quarter.</p><p>From a strategic perspective, Ye Erle introduced that in addition to performance growth, another factor for funds to make money in the long term at the company level-analyst popularity. Analyst enthusiasm means that fund managers usually pay close attention to analyst recommendations, which are translated into their own investment logic.<b>Compared with the public's information source advantage, it is also the reason why Public Offering of Fund makes money for a long time. Fund managers have faster channels to receive information.</b></p><p>Generally speaking, public funds are<b>Momentum, Growth, Analyst Heat</b>These factors are long-term profit-making, which is also the ability of fund managers, while the style income of market value and valuation, as well as the trading income of high volatility and high liquidity, are beyond the grasp of fund managers.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5cf5bac55700f0cdf8740d80785377cf\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>After understanding the source of fund income, how should we operate when it comes to the division of fund manager ability labels and the construction of fund portfolios?</p><p>Yerle tells us how to analyze a fund through examples. Taking a fund that performed well this year as an example, he made a quantitative attribution to the income of this fund, thus summarizing the ability labels possessed by the fund manager.</p><p>First of all, Ye Erle completely decomposed the fund income into four major sources of income. The fund performed averagely in terms of \"strategic income\" and contributed greatly in terms of \"dynamic income\", which means that the fund manager's overall stock selection ability is average, but the ability to do band is strong. The fund also contributes greatly to \"industry returns\", which means that its industry is well chosen. Accordingly, fund managers can be labeled: dynamic profitability, industry allocation ability.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96be149643d87dd279b716450ccb6797\" tg-width=\"717\" tg-height=\"513\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Then analyze the \"style income\" of the fund. Since the fund changed its fund manager in 2020, its style has switched to small and medium-sized market capitalization, high momentum, high volatility, high valuation, high growth, and its style is stable. It is found that the fund manager likes to buy small receipts, buy popular sectors. This labeled him: small and medium-sized market capitalization, investment in popular sectors, and stable historical style.</p><p>Observe the characteristics of industry income again: the concentration of positions is relatively high, medicine has bought nearly 50% of the positions, and machinery has bought nearly 40%. Once you are optimistic about the industry, the bet is relatively heavy; In terms of industry switching, it is highly sensitive to the cycle. In the second quarter of last year, it switched to machinery and chemical industry in large quantities, and the market as a whole paid close attention to these two industries in the fourth quarter. Accordingly, it can be labeled: industry concentration.</p><p>Finally, it was observed that the fund's low exposure to the analyst heat factor in the second quarter of last year meant that he was earlier than analysts expected, and his later operations were contrary to analysts' recommendations. The more analysts recommended, the more he sold, indicating that he: the left side/information changes are sensitive.</p><p>Based on this, Yerle concluded that the fund manager showed during the management of this fund from 2020.01 to 2021.03<b>Strong dynamic investment ability and small and medium-sized market capitalization investment style.</b>It can quickly process market information, decisively and centrally adjust positions at the critical points on the left and right sides, carry out effective meso-industry allocation and dynamic operation of individual stocks, and invest in sectors with relatively popular but small and medium market value, thus avoiding the crowded big white horse plate at that time.</p><p>After analyzing such a fund manager, Ye Erle believes that we can aim at the \"personality\" of this fund manager, find out all similar fund managers, and build a portfolio.</p><p>For example, build a portfolio of fund managers who are also strong dynamic income capabilities, or transfer out a certain type of fund managers who are also strong in stock selection capabilities and industry allocation capabilities, and continue to track and analyze this portfolio What kind of market is suitable for.<b>When you need a fund manager with any characteristics, Guosheng Metalworking can quantitatively screen it out from the portfolio of fund managers.</b></p><p>Guosheng Metalworking has built a long-term tracking fund portfolio on Wind: Guosheng Base Selection Strategy, which has performed very well in the past two years.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a439a13ff398b1ae2bd7eae1b60978ee\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"426\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>(Data source: wind)</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb201d1d3189ee8ec2a861a447ce715c\" tg-width=\"388\" tg-height=\"169\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>(Data source: wind)</p><p>This method of dividing the ability of fund managers is an important contribution of Ye Erle's research report. He re-divided the dimensions of fund managers into various capabilities and investment logics. Compared with the previous division of fund managers by industry and simple style, this method is more stable.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a0df7a1b499d59e3ea2351cf743665be\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>For ordinary investors, they should also pay more attention to the various abilities of fund managers when buying funds. Our WeChat official account \"Yuanchuan Investment Review\" often updates some research and interviews with fund managers, which can serve as a window for everyone to understand the competence circle of fund managers.</p><p>Through continuous learning, you will know which fund managers are good at stock trading, which are good at stock selection, and which industries have strong allocation capabilities, so as to choose funds that meet our preferred types.</p><p>For capabilities that fund managers cannot grasp, such as capabilities in market value, we can build portfolios by matching funds with different market styles (such as large and small caps) to diversify fund risks.</p><p>However, when building a fund portfolio, everyone's expected returns and risk preferences are different. It is the most important thing to understand yourself and allocate funds according to your own needs.</p><p>Finally, Ye Erle gave ordinary Christians<b>Some tips:</b></p><p>1. Don't blindly follow the trend of buying funds recommended on Alipay's homepage. Be cautious when everyone is buying.</p><p>2. Don't expect funds with a scale of more than 5 billion to bring strong excess returns outside the style industry. Guosheng Metalworking has conducted a test on the size of the fund. On average, the alpha of the fund is the strongest between 500 and 2 billion. Once the scale managed by the fund manager becomes particularly large, the alpha will most likely be exhausted.</p><p>3. In the absence of obvious judgment ability, Christians recommend fixed investment to disperse costs and reduce the sensitivity of winning rate.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/am8U1F6q6VGz2YRds9RHEA\">远川投资评论</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/753c9aba3202037bc97463c545d5d015","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/am8U1F6q6VGz2YRds9RHEA","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161895834","content_text":"有“锂”走遍天下，无“锂”寸步难行，最近，在碳中和政策的持续发酵下，作为新能源电池原料的锂，受到了市场的狂热追捧。“锂爷爷”“钴奶奶”发威，新能源板块大涨。不少投资者看到涨势大好的新能源板块开始蠢蠢欲动，于是去寻找一只新能源主题基金，准备买入。\n“部分投资者买基金是先自己看好一些板块，比如消费军工之类的，然后再在市场中去找与自己想法持仓最像的基金经理，然后去买它，这有点本末倒置了”国盛金工的叶尔乐说，“对同一个股或行业的配置，每个基金经理的逻辑可能完全不一样，最终能赚到的钱也完全不一样”。\n叶尔乐认为，我们常常会问基金经理“买了什么”而不知道“为什么买”，而后一个问题可能更为重要。最近，他的一篇研究报告《公募基金究竟赚的什么钱—基金ALPHA进化史系列报告》引起了业内广泛关注，受到多家机构的一致好评。他在报告中详细分析了基金的收益来源，并介绍了不同于传统的划分基金经理能力的方法。\n\n国盛金工分析师 叶尔乐\n上个月，我们远川研究所对话了国盛金工分析师叶尔乐，对公募基金究竟赚的是什么钱进行了一系列的探讨，希望通过这次交谈，能够就“买基金”这件事给投资者们带来新的启发。\n以下，是叶尔乐对买基金买的是什么、基金经理具备哪些能力、怎么去构建基金组合等问题的一些看法。\n\n很多人买基金时，会问到“这个基金涨这么多还能买吗？”叶尔乐给出了回答：买基金和买股票不一样，股票不宜追高，但基金在某种情况下是可以“追高”的。总体来说，叶尔乐列举了基金与股票的三个区别，分别体现在定价、估值、风险分散方式上。\n股票的定价是由众人根据市场公开数据进行预期交换、预期博弈得到的结果，而基金的定价是由基金经理一个人决定的。股票要涨，是越来越多的人被某一叙事或逻辑说服而买入，基金要涨，是需要基金经理有提前感知到这样逻辑的能力，提前众人买入股票，并在众人买进来时卖掉。\n股票有明确的估值，基金没有净值意义上的估值问题。股票涨多了会跌，跌多了会涨，而基金并非涨得好的未来表现一定差，也不是以前表现差的未来一定就表现好。买基金有个外推性很强的指标，叫ALPHA中长期动量，意思是过去好的未来好，其本质就是基金经理的能力。只有基金经理某一块能力是稳定的，才能在某一细分收益上有长期动量，而某一细分收益上的长期动量也反证了基金在这类能力上是稳定的。\n股票具有公司层面的特质风险，能通过分散持有来控制，基金是股票的组合，这方面风险已经较小，其风险的控制不能仅靠简单的分散。比如买一堆偏抱团股的基金，虽然可能单个基金占比很小，但组合在“抱团因子”上的风险则非常高，一旦抱团瓦解，整个基金组合都有很大回撤风险，那这样可能还不如大盘中盘小盘各挑一个基金，风险更分散。所以，基金的风险需要穿透到底层风格来分散。\n那么基金的本质是什么呢？\n叶尔乐认为，基金不变的本质是基金经理包括性格、投资体系、信息来源以及投资模式等所谓的能力圈。经过多年进化，基金经理已经很难用“大小盘”、“价值成长”、“行业主题”等简单投资风格去划分，这样的划分稳定性较弱，需要进一步对基金收益进行归因，从而归纳出基金经理的选股逻辑，划分出基金经理的真正能力。\n\n公募基金究竟赚哪些钱？\n叶尔乐在报告中对公募基金的收益进行归因后得出，基金收益中有基金经理不能稳定赚到的钱、不可避免要亏掉的钱、以及能够稳定赚到的钱。\n首先，基金在市值和估值方面赚的钱是不稳定的。市值上只赚过两波钱，一波是14~16年小市值的钱，一波是去年底到今年初的大市值的钱，市值的钱很难把握。在估值上，公募基金偏好高估值股票，这在19年之前带来的是负收益，之后是正收益，估值层面赚的钱也不是稳定的。\n再者，公募基金偏好高波动性和高流动性股票，这使得基金长期亏钱。高波动性是指股票在过去大涨大跌，这会引起交易上的损失。而公募基金受制于大体量和公开募集的属性，必须买高流动性票，高流动性对应高定价效率，快逻辑的钱在这些股票上持续时间近年在越来越短，公募难以做高频交易，很难赚到这种快逻辑的钱，基本将其让渡给私募高频交易者。\n因此，无论是市值、估值的钱，或是高波动性、高流动性的钱，都不是大部分基金经理能够稳定把握的。叶尔乐认为，买基金时更应该关注的是基金经理稳定赚钱的能力。\n那么公募在不能赚快钱的情况下，只能赚慢钱。慢逻辑的钱体现在两种风格收益上：动量和成长。所谓动量，是指一个逻辑只有是慢慢发酵的，最终才可能使股价在过去12个月稳定上涨，这种稳稳上涨的特征叶尔乐称之为动量。而成长就是公司具有成长性，成长性的验证需要时间从而也靠慢逻辑。\n关于赚成长逻辑的钱，叶尔乐总结了三个优点：（1）成长的逻辑需要时间验证，无法在短期反应充分，留给基金经理足够的时间；（2）成长的逻辑短期会有兑现，即可根据季报阶段性验证，每次验证能兑现部分超额收益，使股票连续上涨；（3）成长的逻辑相比价值逻辑是强可验证的，因为估值的回归依赖很多外部的宏观或市场因素，而成长逻辑比如对公司5年增速的判断，那么在未来5年一定存在一个事实验证5年前的话对与否。\n叶尔乐认为，公募基金最主要是预测公司业绩，赚成长逻辑的钱。因为目前公募多以短期业绩考核为主，成长比价值更具有性价比：价值回归可能要等1到3年才赚到超额收益，时间高度不确定，而成长股每个季度都能有逻辑兑现。\n从策略视角，叶尔乐介绍了除业绩增长外，基金在公司层面长期赚钱的另一个因子—分析师热度。分析师热度是指基金经理通常会密切关注分析师的推荐，从而转化为自己的投资逻辑。相比于公众的信息来源优势也是公募基金长期赚钱的原因，基金经理拥有更快接收信息的渠道。\n总的来说，公募基金在动量、成长、分析师热度这些因子上是长期赚钱的，也是基金经理的能力所在，而市值和估值这种风格类收益，以及高波动性高流动性这种交易类收益则是基金经理无法把握的。\n\n在了解了基金收益来源之后，具体到基金经理能力标签的划分、基金组合的构建时又该如何操作呢？\n叶尔乐通过举例来告诉我们如何去分析一只基金。他以今年表现较好的一只基金为例，对这只基金的收益做了量化归因，从而归纳出了基金经理所具备的能力标签。\n首先叶尔乐将基金收益完全分解成四大收益来源，该基金在“策略收益”收益上表现一般，“动态收益”上贡献较大，这意味着基金经理总体选股能力一般，但做波段能力较强。该基金还在“行业收益”上贡献较大，意味着它行业选得好。据此，可以给基金经理贴上标签：动态收益能力、行业配置能力。\n\n接着分析基金的“风格收益”，该基金自2020年换基金经理后，风格切换为中小市值、高动量、高波动性、高估值、高成长，且风格稳健，发现该基金经理喜欢买小票、买热门板块。由此给他贴上标签：中小市值、热门板块投资、历史风格稳定。\n再观察行业收益的特征：持仓集中度较高，医药买了将近50%的仓位，机械买了近40%，一旦看好行业，下注比较重；行业切换上，对周期敏锐度强，在去年二季度大笔切换到机械和化工上，而市场整体高度关注这两个行业是在四季度。据此，可贴标签：行业集中。\n最后，观察到该基金去年二季度在分析师热度因子上暴露较低，意味着他比分析师预期更早，并且他的后期操作与分析师推荐是相逆的，分析师越推荐的他越卖，说明他：左侧/信息变化敏感。\n据此，叶尔乐得出结论：该基金经理在2020.01-2021.03管理这只基金期间表现出了较强的动态投资能力和中小市值投资风格。其能够快速处理市场信息，在左侧右侧临界点果决且集中的调整仓位，进行有效的中观行业配置和个股动态操作，投资较为热门但市值偏中小的板块，避免了当时拥挤的大白马板块。\n分析了这样一位基金经理后，叶尔乐认为，可以以这个基金经理的“个性”为目标，把同类的基金经理都找出来，构建一个组合。\n比如构建一个同样都是动态收益能力较强的基金经理的组合，或者把同样都是选股能力强的、同样都是行业配置能力强的某一类基金经理调出来，继续跟踪，分析这个组合适应什么样的市场。当你需要什么特征的基金经理，国盛金工可以通过量化的方式，将其从基金经理的组合中筛选出来。\n国盛金工在Wind上构建有长期跟踪的基金组合：国盛选基策略，该组合这两年收益表现十分不错。\n\n(数据来源：wind)\n\n(数据来源：wind)\n这种划分基金经理能力的方法，是叶尔乐这篇研报的重要贡献。他将基金经理的维度做了一个重新的划分，划分为各种各样的能力和投资逻辑，相比以往按行业、按简单风格来划分基金经理，这种方式更为稳定。\n\n对于普通投资者来说，在买基金时也应该更多地关注基金经理所具备的各种能力。我们的公众号“远川投资评论”经常会更新一些基金经理的研究和访谈，可以作为大家了解基金经理能力圈的一个窗口。\n通过不断学习，你就会知道哪些基金经理擅长股票交易，哪些擅长选股，还有哪些行业配置能力较强，从而去选择符合我们偏好类型的基金。\n对于基金经理把握不了的能力，比如市值上的能力，我们可以通过搭配不同市场风格（比如大盘小盘）的基金来构建组合从而分散基金风险。\n不过在构建基金组合时，每个人的预期收益和风险偏好不一样，了解自己，根据自己的需求去配置基金才是最重要的。\n最后，叶尔乐对普通基民给出了一些建议：\n1. 切勿盲目跟风购买支付宝首页推荐基金，当所有人都在买时需要谨慎。\n2. 不要期待规模超50亿的基金能带来很强的风格行业以外超额收益。国盛金工对基金规模做过一个测试，基金的阿尔法平均来看在管理规模5~20亿之间最强，一旦基金经理管理的规模变的特别大，阿尔法大概率会有所衰竭。\n3. 基民在没有明显判断能力的情况下，建议定投分散成本，降低胜率敏感性。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2459,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":173588113,"gmtCreate":1626670109632,"gmtModify":1703763065145,"author":{"id":"4087300083147710","authorId":"4087300083147710","name":"bkloh1981","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb66730db127d226356e0dcabc7aa977","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4087300083147710","idStr":"4087300083147710"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/173588113","repostId":"1162382593","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2385,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148721072,"gmtCreate":1626019639096,"gmtModify":1703752010796,"author":{"id":"4087300083147710","authorId":"4087300083147710","name":"bkloh1981","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb66730db127d226356e0dcabc7aa977","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4087300083147710","idStr":"4087300083147710"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":6,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/148721072","repostId":"1114379787","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2086,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148723694,"gmtCreate":1626019575918,"gmtModify":1703752009988,"author":{"id":"4087300083147710","authorId":"4087300083147710","name":"bkloh1981","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb66730db127d226356e0dcabc7aa977","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4087300083147710","idStr":"4087300083147710"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/148723694","repostId":"1155854665","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2268,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":143792598,"gmtCreate":1625815880114,"gmtModify":1703749116710,"author":{"id":"4087300083147710","authorId":"4087300083147710","name":"bkloh1981","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb66730db127d226356e0dcabc7aa977","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4087300083147710","idStr":"4087300083147710"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/143792598","repostId":"1193107255","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1943,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":149169575,"gmtCreate":1625709624697,"gmtModify":1703746842774,"author":{"id":"4087300083147710","authorId":"4087300083147710","name":"bkloh1981","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb66730db127d226356e0dcabc7aa977","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4087300083147710","idStr":"4087300083147710"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/149169575","repostId":"1124799487","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1124799487","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"致力于提供最及时的财经资讯，最专业的解读分析，覆盖宏观经济、金融机构、A股市场、上市公司、投资理财等财经领域。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"券商中国","id":"9","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d482d56459984e8c86a6a137295b3c4f"},"pubTimestamp":1625704041,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1124799487?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-08 08:27","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"BEYOND IMAGINATION! More than 3.7 trillion yuan of funds rushed into the stock market in half a year. What is the signal?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1124799487","media":"券商中国","summary":"美股牛市正酣，资金正疯狂涌入。\n\n全球股市正疯狂吸纳市场资金，据高盛的最新数据显示，2021年上半年流入全球股票基金的资金规模达到5800亿美元（约合人民币37470亿元），刷新历史纪录，直接令从业1","content":"<p>The bull market in U.S. stocks is in full swing, and funds are pouring in like crazy. Global stock markets are frantically absorbing market funds, according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>The latest data shows that in the first half of 2021, the scale of funds flowing into global stock funds reached US $580 billion (approximately RMB 3,747 billion), setting a new historical record and directly shocking Goldman Sachs traders who have been in the business for 18 years: they could never imagine such a huge number.</p><p>In the face of this epic bull market in U.S. stocks, U.S. retail investors are also crazy. According to data from Wall Street institutions, from January to June this year, more than 10 million new securities accounts have been opened in the U.S. stock market, which has exceeded the level of the whole of 2020. The net purchase of stocks and funds by U.S. retail investors in June reached US $28 billion (approximately RMB 180.8 billion), setting a new monthly high since 2014.</p><p><b>The surge of funds is closely related to the crazy release of water by the Federal Reserve. In the past 15 months, the Federal Reserve has added another $3.75 trillion in assets to its existing assets. At the same time, the U.S. government has also launched six rounds of fiscal plans of about $3.4 trillion on a large scale, making the funds in the hands of the American people very abundant.</b></p><p><b>RECORD! More than 3.7 trillion funds are pouring into the stock market</b></p><p>Money is pouring into stock markets worldwide at an unprecedented rate.</p><p>According to the latest data from Goldman Sachs, the scale of funds flowing into global equity funds in the first half of 2021 reached US $580 billion (approximately RMB 3,747 billion), the highest in history and 2.6 times that of the same period in 2017.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aaff21b95273cd661d08c30397203583\" tg-width=\"641\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Among them, the scale of funds flowing into global equity funds in the first quarter of 2021 was US $348 billion, and the scale in the second quarter was still as high as US $169 billion.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a>According to the analysis, if the rate of capital inflows remains unchanged for the rest of this year, the scale of global equity fund inflows in 2021 will exceed US $1.035 billion, which will exceed the sum of the past 20 years.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb7f9a5dbbe27fce90700025ca864b9f\" tg-width=\"661\" tg-height=\"389\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Faced with such a huge inflow, Scott Rubner, a Goldman Sachs trader who has been working on Wall Street for 18 years, was very shocked. He said that in the 18 years of tracking market capital flows, he could never imagine such a huge number. The past weekend was the busiest ever, and it was also the one with the most questions from customers.</p><p>The continuous inflow of funds is driving the global stock indexes to continue to rise. The world's major stock indexes have climbed one after another in the past week, and some stock indexes have set new record highs. On July 7, local time, the S&P 500 index once again set a new record high in intraday trading, setting a new historical record for nine consecutive trading days. This situation has only happened four times since 1928, and the cumulative increase this year has exceeded 16%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c6a3309b81629f15c10f492f8ac6472\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In addition, the Nasdaq index is constantly setting new record highs. On July 7, it once again hit a record high of 14,755.33 points. The cumulative increase this year has reached 13.79%. Compared with the low point in March 2020, the increase is even higher. As high as 121%.</p><p>In fact, this wave of funds entering the market crazily is closely related to the epic release of water by global central banks. Among them, the \"faucet\" of the Federal Reserve is particularly fierce. Since the outbreak of the epidemic, the Federal Reserve has acted quickly. In addition to reactivating the zero interest rate and asset purchase program during the financial crisis, it has also created new policy tools, such as the Primary Dealer Credit Facility (PDCF) and the Commercial Paper Financing Facility (CPFF), etc., injecting a large amount of liquidity into the market.</p><p>According to data, in the past 15 months, the Federal Reserve has added another $3.75 trillion in assets to its existing assets. Since the repo market broke out in September 2019 and triggered a large-scale bail-out, its asset growth rate has more than doubled.</p><p>In addition, in response to the COVID-19 epidemic and the economic recession, the U.S. government has launched six rounds of fiscal plans of approximately US $3.4 trillion on a large scale. In fiscal year 2020, the U.S. federal deficit expanded by US $3.1 trillion, with a deficit ratio of 15.2%. At the end of 2020, the U.S. Treasury Bond The balance hit a record high of US $26.9 trillion.</p><p>Currently, the Federal Reserve's continued quantitative easing is still injecting liquidity into the market. Some Wall Street institutions predict that in the next two months, $250 billion of funds will flood into the market through QE.</p><p>Some Wall Street analysts believe that as long as U.S. stocks continue to maintain an upward trajectory, it will still be a high probability event that a large amount of funds will continue to pour into index stock funds. The reason is that some large asset management institutions are recently withdrawing funds from the commodity market and switching to index stock funds.</p><p><b>The net purchase in a single month was 180 billion! American retail investors are crazy, too</b></p><p><b>The profit-making effect of the epic bull market in U.S. stocks is stimulating individual U.S. investors to enter the market frantically, and U.S. retail investors have also contributed to the global capital inflow into the stock market.</b></p><p>According to data from JPM Securities, a Wall Street financial services company, from January to June this year, more than 10 million new securities accounts have been opened in the U.S. stock market, which has exceeded the level of the whole of 2020.</p><p>In addition, according to data from Vanda Research, an independent research organization, in June this year, U.S. retail investors bought a net purchase of approximately US $28 billion (approximately RMB 180.8 billion) in stocks and equity funds, setting a new monthly inflow high since 2014, even exceeding the epic short squeeze of \"retail investors VS Wall Street institutions\" in January this year.</p><p>U.S. retail investors have net poured nearly $140 billion into the stock market this year, more than six times that of the same period in 2019, according to data from VandaTrack through mid-June.</p><p>At the same time, most U.S. retail investors are very optimistic about every market correction, and are keen to \"buy on dips\" and \"buy bottoms with full positions.\" According to data from Vanda Research, when the U.S. stock market collectively plummeted on June 18, U.S. retail investors bought more than US $2 billion in stocks that day. Then the three major U.S. stock indexes collectively counterattacked and continued to set new record highs, further increasing the confidence of retail investors.</p><p>Jason Goepfert, president of Sundial Capital Research, which studies the public psychology of financial markets, said that the current sentiment in the U.S. stock market is still very optimistic. More than 70% of retail investors expect U.S. stocks to continue to rise in the next three months, but professional traders with the same view only about 44%.</p><p>Because of the ubiquity of social media, retail investors tend to gather together to trade, whether it is individual stocks or the broader market, and buy quickly after reaching an agreement, pushing up the stock price within hours or days. Previous market conditions showed that U.S. retail investors withdrew from buying and selling almost as quickly, and then turned to the next trading target.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>, GME, Dogecoin, and AMC are all targets of retail investors in different periods.</p><p>Another characteristic of American retail investors is that they prefer to chase high volatility stocks, even some little-known small-cap stocks. In the past two weeks, small-cap stocks such as Alfi, Marin Software, and IKONICS in the US stock market have soared by more than 100%.</p><p>Compared with the enthusiasm of retail investors, professional fund managers have more doubts about the prospects of the US stock market. So far this year, the Dow and Nasdaq have both risen by more than 13%. Due to concerns about inflation and high valuations, quite a few fund managers believe that the future returns of the stock market are unclear, and the market heat is approaching its peak. Reflecting the market, the current total leverage level of the U.S. stock market is continuing to decline and is already at the lowest level since October last year.</p><p><b>Made a lot of money! \"U.S. Retail Investor Base Camp\" officially impacts IPO</b></p><p>American retail investors are frantically entering the market, and Internet brokerages are making a lot of money. Among them, Robinhood, an Internet brokerage firm known as the \"retail investor base camp\" in the United States, has submitted a prospectus to the US Securities and Exchange Commission relying on this trend and plans to list on Nasdaq.</p><p>In the prospectus, Robinhood disclosed its operating performance and user data for two natural years (2019-2020). Its revenue has increased from US $278 million in 2019 to US $959 million in 2020 (approximately RMB 6.19 billion), a year-on-year increase of more than 245%. In 2020, it recorded a net profit of US $7 million, while it was still in 2019. In a state of loss, the loss amount exceeded US $100 million.</p><p>With the crazy entry of American retail investors into the market, the number of active users of Robinhood is also growing rapidly. According to the prospectus, the number of monthly active users on the platform increased from 4.3 million at the end of 2019 to 12.5 million at the end of 2020, an increase of nearly 200%.</p><p>In addition, according to Robinhood, from January 1, 2015 to March 31, 2021, more than half of the customer capital accounts on the Robinhood platform said that they had opened their first trading account on the platform. Nearly half of the newly opened individual investor accounts in the United States came from the Robinhood platform.</p><p>As the \"base camp\" of retail investors in the United States, Robin Hood is not only involved in stocks, but also cryptocurrencies. According to the prospectus, as of the end of the first quarter of 2021, Robinhood supports transactions in 7 different cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin SV, Dogecoin, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic and Litecoin, with more than 9.5 million customers traded approximately US $88 billion in cryptocurrencies at Robinhood. As of March 31, 2021, Robinhood held approximately US $12 billion in custodial cryptocurrency assets, an increase of 23 times over the same period in 2020.</p><p>It is obvious from the prospectus that Robinhood mainly engages in retail business, and most of its income comes from the trading income of individual investors, accounting for more than 75%.</p><p>In fact, Robin Hood's money-making model has been questioned, because under the banner of \"0 commission\", Robin Hood cannot earn handling fees, making its main revenue come from user transactions. Robinhood described in the prospectus that most of the revenue is generated based on transactions, because the platform sends users' stock, options, and cryptocurrency trading orders to market makers for execution, thereby obtaining consideration, and the platform will receive the publicly quoted price when the transaction is executed. A fixed percentage difference between the bid price and the ask price.</p><p>For this profit model, \"stock gods\" Buffett and Charlie Munger have always called it a \"dirty way to make money.\" Munger once bluntly said that \"zero commission\" is a \"big lie\", which makes customers mistakenly think that they are trading for free, but actually charges more fees. This is a very shameful and low-level way.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>BEYOND IMAGINATION! More than 3.7 trillion yuan of funds rushed into the stock market in half a year. What is the signal?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBEYOND IMAGINATION! More than 3.7 trillion yuan of funds rushed into the stock market in half a year. What is the signal?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/9\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d482d56459984e8c86a6a137295b3c4f);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">券商中国 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-08 08:27</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The bull market in U.S. stocks is in full swing, and funds are pouring in like crazy. Global stock markets are frantically absorbing market funds, according to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>The latest data shows that in the first half of 2021, the scale of funds flowing into global stock funds reached US $580 billion (approximately RMB 3,747 billion), setting a new historical record and directly shocking Goldman Sachs traders who have been in the business for 18 years: they could never imagine such a huge number.</p><p>In the face of this epic bull market in U.S. stocks, U.S. retail investors are also crazy. According to data from Wall Street institutions, from January to June this year, more than 10 million new securities accounts have been opened in the U.S. stock market, which has exceeded the level of the whole of 2020. The net purchase of stocks and funds by U.S. retail investors in June reached US $28 billion (approximately RMB 180.8 billion), setting a new monthly high since 2014.</p><p><b>The surge of funds is closely related to the crazy release of water by the Federal Reserve. In the past 15 months, the Federal Reserve has added another $3.75 trillion in assets to its existing assets. At the same time, the U.S. government has also launched six rounds of fiscal plans of about $3.4 trillion on a large scale, making the funds in the hands of the American people very abundant.</b></p><p><b>RECORD! More than 3.7 trillion funds are pouring into the stock market</b></p><p>Money is pouring into stock markets worldwide at an unprecedented rate.</p><p>According to the latest data from Goldman Sachs, the scale of funds flowing into global equity funds in the first half of 2021 reached US $580 billion (approximately RMB 3,747 billion), the highest in history and 2.6 times that of the same period in 2017.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/aaff21b95273cd661d08c30397203583\" tg-width=\"641\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Among them, the scale of funds flowing into global equity funds in the first quarter of 2021 was US $348 billion, and the scale in the second quarter was still as high as US $169 billion.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a>According to the analysis, if the rate of capital inflows remains unchanged for the rest of this year, the scale of global equity fund inflows in 2021 will exceed US $1.035 billion, which will exceed the sum of the past 20 years.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb7f9a5dbbe27fce90700025ca864b9f\" tg-width=\"661\" tg-height=\"389\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Faced with such a huge inflow, Scott Rubner, a Goldman Sachs trader who has been working on Wall Street for 18 years, was very shocked. He said that in the 18 years of tracking market capital flows, he could never imagine such a huge number. The past weekend was the busiest ever, and it was also the one with the most questions from customers.</p><p>The continuous inflow of funds is driving the global stock indexes to continue to rise. The world's major stock indexes have climbed one after another in the past week, and some stock indexes have set new record highs. On July 7, local time, the S&P 500 index once again set a new record high in intraday trading, setting a new historical record for nine consecutive trading days. This situation has only happened four times since 1928, and the cumulative increase this year has exceeded 16%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c6a3309b81629f15c10f492f8ac6472\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In addition, the Nasdaq index is constantly setting new record highs. On July 7, it once again hit a record high of 14,755.33 points. The cumulative increase this year has reached 13.79%. Compared with the low point in March 2020, the increase is even higher. As high as 121%.</p><p>In fact, this wave of funds entering the market crazily is closely related to the epic release of water by global central banks. Among them, the \"faucet\" of the Federal Reserve is particularly fierce. Since the outbreak of the epidemic, the Federal Reserve has acted quickly. In addition to reactivating the zero interest rate and asset purchase program during the financial crisis, it has also created new policy tools, such as the Primary Dealer Credit Facility (PDCF) and the Commercial Paper Financing Facility (CPFF), etc., injecting a large amount of liquidity into the market.</p><p>According to data, in the past 15 months, the Federal Reserve has added another $3.75 trillion in assets to its existing assets. Since the repo market broke out in September 2019 and triggered a large-scale bail-out, its asset growth rate has more than doubled.</p><p>In addition, in response to the COVID-19 epidemic and the economic recession, the U.S. government has launched six rounds of fiscal plans of approximately US $3.4 trillion on a large scale. In fiscal year 2020, the U.S. federal deficit expanded by US $3.1 trillion, with a deficit ratio of 15.2%. At the end of 2020, the U.S. Treasury Bond The balance hit a record high of US $26.9 trillion.</p><p>Currently, the Federal Reserve's continued quantitative easing is still injecting liquidity into the market. Some Wall Street institutions predict that in the next two months, $250 billion of funds will flood into the market through QE.</p><p>Some Wall Street analysts believe that as long as U.S. stocks continue to maintain an upward trajectory, it will still be a high probability event that a large amount of funds will continue to pour into index stock funds. The reason is that some large asset management institutions are recently withdrawing funds from the commodity market and switching to index stock funds.</p><p><b>The net purchase in a single month was 180 billion! American retail investors are crazy, too</b></p><p><b>The profit-making effect of the epic bull market in U.S. stocks is stimulating individual U.S. investors to enter the market frantically, and U.S. retail investors have also contributed to the global capital inflow into the stock market.</b></p><p>According to data from JPM Securities, a Wall Street financial services company, from January to June this year, more than 10 million new securities accounts have been opened in the U.S. stock market, which has exceeded the level of the whole of 2020.</p><p>In addition, according to data from Vanda Research, an independent research organization, in June this year, U.S. retail investors bought a net purchase of approximately US $28 billion (approximately RMB 180.8 billion) in stocks and equity funds, setting a new monthly inflow high since 2014, even exceeding the epic short squeeze of \"retail investors VS Wall Street institutions\" in January this year.</p><p>U.S. retail investors have net poured nearly $140 billion into the stock market this year, more than six times that of the same period in 2019, according to data from VandaTrack through mid-June.</p><p>At the same time, most U.S. retail investors are very optimistic about every market correction, and are keen to \"buy on dips\" and \"buy bottoms with full positions.\" According to data from Vanda Research, when the U.S. stock market collectively plummeted on June 18, U.S. retail investors bought more than US $2 billion in stocks that day. Then the three major U.S. stock indexes collectively counterattacked and continued to set new record highs, further increasing the confidence of retail investors.</p><p>Jason Goepfert, president of Sundial Capital Research, which studies the public psychology of financial markets, said that the current sentiment in the U.S. stock market is still very optimistic. More than 70% of retail investors expect U.S. stocks to continue to rise in the next three months, but professional traders with the same view only about 44%.</p><p>Because of the ubiquity of social media, retail investors tend to gather together to trade, whether it is individual stocks or the broader market, and buy quickly after reaching an agreement, pushing up the stock price within hours or days. Previous market conditions showed that U.S. retail investors withdrew from buying and selling almost as quickly, and then turned to the next trading target.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>, GME, Dogecoin, and AMC are all targets of retail investors in different periods.</p><p>Another characteristic of American retail investors is that they prefer to chase high volatility stocks, even some little-known small-cap stocks. In the past two weeks, small-cap stocks such as Alfi, Marin Software, and IKONICS in the US stock market have soared by more than 100%.</p><p>Compared with the enthusiasm of retail investors, professional fund managers have more doubts about the prospects of the US stock market. So far this year, the Dow and Nasdaq have both risen by more than 13%. Due to concerns about inflation and high valuations, quite a few fund managers believe that the future returns of the stock market are unclear, and the market heat is approaching its peak. Reflecting the market, the current total leverage level of the U.S. stock market is continuing to decline and is already at the lowest level since October last year.</p><p><b>Made a lot of money! \"U.S. Retail Investor Base Camp\" officially impacts IPO</b></p><p>American retail investors are frantically entering the market, and Internet brokerages are making a lot of money. Among them, Robinhood, an Internet brokerage firm known as the \"retail investor base camp\" in the United States, has submitted a prospectus to the US Securities and Exchange Commission relying on this trend and plans to list on Nasdaq.</p><p>In the prospectus, Robinhood disclosed its operating performance and user data for two natural years (2019-2020). Its revenue has increased from US $278 million in 2019 to US $959 million in 2020 (approximately RMB 6.19 billion), a year-on-year increase of more than 245%. In 2020, it recorded a net profit of US $7 million, while it was still in 2019. In a state of loss, the loss amount exceeded US $100 million.</p><p>With the crazy entry of American retail investors into the market, the number of active users of Robinhood is also growing rapidly. According to the prospectus, the number of monthly active users on the platform increased from 4.3 million at the end of 2019 to 12.5 million at the end of 2020, an increase of nearly 200%.</p><p>In addition, according to Robinhood, from January 1, 2015 to March 31, 2021, more than half of the customer capital accounts on the Robinhood platform said that they had opened their first trading account on the platform. Nearly half of the newly opened individual investor accounts in the United States came from the Robinhood platform.</p><p>As the \"base camp\" of retail investors in the United States, Robin Hood is not only involved in stocks, but also cryptocurrencies. According to the prospectus, as of the end of the first quarter of 2021, Robinhood supports transactions in 7 different cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin SV, Dogecoin, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic and Litecoin, with more than 9.5 million customers traded approximately US $88 billion in cryptocurrencies at Robinhood. As of March 31, 2021, Robinhood held approximately US $12 billion in custodial cryptocurrency assets, an increase of 23 times over the same period in 2020.</p><p>It is obvious from the prospectus that Robinhood mainly engages in retail business, and most of its income comes from the trading income of individual investors, accounting for more than 75%.</p><p>In fact, Robin Hood's money-making model has been questioned, because under the banner of \"0 commission\", Robin Hood cannot earn handling fees, making its main revenue come from user transactions. Robinhood described in the prospectus that most of the revenue is generated based on transactions, because the platform sends users' stock, options, and cryptocurrency trading orders to market makers for execution, thereby obtaining consideration, and the platform will receive the publicly quoted price when the transaction is executed. A fixed percentage difference between the bid price and the ask price.</p><p>For this profit model, \"stock gods\" Buffett and Charlie Munger have always called it a \"dirty way to make money.\" Munger once bluntly said that \"zero commission\" is a \"big lie\", which makes customers mistakenly think that they are trading for free, but actually charges more fees. This is a very shameful and low-level way.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9397c1d762c75a661436dbf516b20b24","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1124799487","content_text":"美股牛市正酣，资金正疯狂涌入。\n\n全球股市正疯狂吸纳市场资金，据高盛的最新数据显示，2021年上半年流入全球股票基金的资金规模达到5800亿美元（约合人民币37470亿元），刷新历史纪录，直接令从业18年的高盛交易员感到震惊：从来都无法想象如此庞大的数字。\n面对这轮史诗级的美股大牛市，美国散户也疯狂。据华尔街机构的数据显示，今年1-6月，美股市场已经新开设了超过1000万的证券账户，已经超过2020年全年的水平。美国散户6月的净买入股票和基金的规模达到280亿美元（约合人民币1808亿元），创下自2014以来的单月新高。\n资金狂涌，与美联储的疯狂放水密切相关，在过去的15个月内，美联储在现有资产基础上又增加了3.75万亿美元的资产。与此同时，美国政府也大规模推出了六轮约3.4万亿美元的财政计划，使得美国民众手中的资金非常充裕。\n创纪录！超37000亿资金疯狂涌入股市\n资金正在以前所未有的速度涌入全球股票市场。\n据高盛的最新数据显示，2021年上半年流入全球股票基金的资金规模达到5800亿美元（约合人民币37470亿元），为历史最高，是2017年同期的2.6倍。\n\n其中，2021年第一季度流入全球股票基金的资金规模为3480亿美元，第二季度的规模仍高达1690亿美元。\n美国银行分析表示，如果今年剩余时间里资金流入速度保持不变，2021年全年全球股票基金流入规模将超过10350亿美元，将超过过去20年的总和。\n\n面对如此庞大的流入规模，在华尔街从业18年之久的高盛交易员Scott Rubner都感到非常震惊，他表示，在跟踪市场资金流动的18年里，从来都无法想象如此庞大的数字，刚刚过去的周末是有史以来最忙碌的，也是收到客户问题最多的一个周末。\n持续流入的资金正在推动着全球股指持续上涨，全球主要股指在过去一周内接连攀升，部分股指都刷新了历史纪录高位。当地时间7月7日，标普500指数盘中再次刷新了历史新高，连续9个交易日刷新历史纪录，这种情况自1928年以来仅发生过4次，今年以来的累计涨幅超过16%。\n\n另外，纳斯达克指数也正在不断刷新历史新高，7月7日盘中，再度创出历史新高14755.33点，今年以来累计涨幅已达到13.79%，相比2020年3月的低点，涨幅更是高达121%。\n其实，这一波资金疯狂入市，与全球央行的史诗级放水密切相关。其中，美联储的“水龙头”开得尤为凶猛。自疫情爆发以来，美联储便迅速行动，除了重新启用金融危机时期的零利率和资产购买计划外，还创设了新的政策工具，如一级交易商信贷工具（PDCF）、商业票据融资工具（CPFF）等，向市场注入了大量的流动性。\n据数据显示，在过去的15个月内，美联储在现有资产基础上又增加了3.75万亿美元的资产，自2019年9月回购市场爆发并引发大规模纾困以来，其资产增长幅度已经超过一倍。\n另外，为应对新冠疫情和经济衰退，美国政府大规模推出了六轮约3.4万亿美元的财政计划，2020财年美国联邦赤字扩张了3.1万亿美元，赤字率15.2%，2020年末美国国债余额创下26.9万亿美元的历史新高。\n当前，美联储持续的量化宽松仍在向市场注入流动性。有华尔街机构预计，未来2个月内，将有2500亿美元资金通过QE涌入市场。\n有华尔街分析机构认为，只要美股持续保持上涨轨迹，大量资金继续涌入指数型股票基金仍将是大概率事件，原因是近期一些大型资管机构正将资金从大宗商品市场撤出，转投指数型股票基金。\n单月净买入1800亿！美国散户也疯狂\n美股史诗级大牛市的赚钱效应正在刺激着美国个人投资者疯狂入市，美国散户们也为全球资金流入股市贡献了一部分力量。\n据华尔街金融服务公司JPM Securities的数据显示，今年1-6月期间，美股市场已经新开设了超过1000万的证券账户，已经超过2020年全年的水平。\n另外，据独立研究机构Vanda Research数据，今年6月，美国散户净买入约280亿美元（约合人民币1808亿元）的股票和股票类基金，创下自2014以来的月度流入新高，甚至超过了今年1月的“散户VS华尔街机构”的史诗级逼空大战。\n万达研究公司(VandaTrack)截至6月中旬的数据显示，美国散户投资者今年向股市净投入资金接近1400亿美元，是2019年同期的六倍多。\n与此同时，大部分美国散户对每一次的市场回调都感到非常乐观，并且热衷于“逢低买入”、“满仓抄底”。Vanda Research的数据显示，6月18日美股集体大跌之时，美国的散户投资者当日净买入超过20亿美元的股票，随后美股三大指数集体反扑，继续刷新历史新高，进一步增添了散户们的信心。\n研究金融市场大众心理的Sundial Capital Research总裁Jason Goepfert表示，当前美股市场的情绪依然十分乐观，超过70%的散户投资者预期美股将在未来3月内继续上涨，但同样观点的专业交易员则只有约44%。\n由于社交媒体的无所不在，散户投资者往往会聚集在一起进行交易，无论是个股还是大盘，达成一致后便迅速买进，在数小时或数天内推高股价。此前的行情显示，美国散户投资者几乎同样迅速地撤出买入、卖出，再转向下一个交易目标，特斯拉、GME、狗狗币、AMC都是不同时期散户爆炒的目标。\n美国散户的另一个特点是，更爱追逐高波动性股票，即使是一些名不经传的小盘股。近两周以来，美股的Alfi 、Marin Software、IKONICS等小市值个股都迅速飙升超过100%。\n相比于散户投资者们的狂热，专业基金经理们对美股市场前景则抱有更多怀疑。今年迄今，道指和纳指涨幅均超过13%，出于对通胀和高估值的担忧，相当多的基金经理认为，未来的股市的回报不明朗，市场热度正在逼近峰值。反应到市场上，目前美股市场的总杠杆水平正在持续下降，已经处于去年10月以来的最低水平。\n赚翻了！“美国散户大本营”正式冲击IPO\n美国散户疯狂入市，互联网券商赚得盆满钵满。其中，号称为美国“散户大本营”的互联网券商Robinhood（罗宾汉）靠着这波风口，已经向美国证监会提交了招股书，计划在纳斯达克挂牌上市。\n在招股书中，罗宾汉披露了两个自然年（2019-2020年）的经营业绩和用户数据。其营收从2019年的2.78亿美元，增长至2020年的9.59亿美元（约合人民币达61.9亿元），同比增幅超245%，2020年录得700万美元净利润，而2019年还处于亏损状态，亏损金额超1亿美元。\n借着美国散户疯狂入市的潮流，罗宾汉的活跃用户数也在高速增长。据招股书显示，平台上的月活跃用户数从2019年末的430万户，增至2020年末的1250万户，增幅接近200%。\n另外，据罗宾汉透露，从2015年1月1日到2021年3月31日，罗宾汉平台上超过一半的客户资金账户称其在该平台上开设了第一个交易账户，仅看过去五年间全美国新开立的个人投资者账户，其中近半数账户来自罗宾汉平台。\n罗宾汉作为美国散户“大本营”，并非仅涉及股票，加密货币也是重点。据招股书显示，截至2021年一季度末，罗宾汉支持7种不同加密货币的交易，包括比特币、比特币现金、比特币SV、狗狗币、以太坊、以太坊经典和莱特币，超过950万客户在罗宾汉交易了约880亿美元的加密货币，截至2021年3月31日，罗宾汉持有约120亿美元规模的托管加密货币资产，比2020年同期增加23倍。\n从招股书很明显可以看出，罗宾汉主要是做散户的生意，其收入的绝大部分来自于个人投资者的交易性收入，占比超过75%。\n其实，罗宾汉的赚钱模式一直饱受质疑，因为打着“0佣金”的旗号，罗宾汉便不能赚取手续费，使得其主要的营收来自于用户的交易。罗宾汉在招股书描述，大部分收入都是基于交易产生，因为平台将用户的股票、期权、加密货币交易订单发送给做市商执行，从而获得对价，平台会收到交易执行时公开报价的买入价和卖出价之间的固定百分比差额。\n对于这种盈利模式，“股神”巴菲特和查理·芒格一直称之为“肮脏的赚钱方式”。芒格曾直言，“零佣金”就是一个“天大的谎言”，让客户误以为是在免费交易，实则却收取了更多费用，这是一种非常可耻的、低级的方式。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2326,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":154450720,"gmtCreate":1625540589060,"gmtModify":1703743337391,"author":{"id":"4087300083147710","authorId":"4087300083147710","name":"bkloh1981","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb66730db127d226356e0dcabc7aa977","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4087300083147710","idStr":"4087300083147710"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"ok","listText":"ok","text":"ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/154450720","repostId":"1187560969","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1187560969","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625540177,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1187560969?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-06 10:56","market":"fut","language":"zh","title":"U.S. stocks may fall, will gold rise? The \"pain index\" has already explained it all","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187560969","media":"智通财经 ","summary":"“经济痛苦指数”最早由美国经济学家欧肯提出,该指数通过将失业率和通货膨胀水平相加,以评估民众的实际经济压力，也是衡量经济滞胀程度的一个指标，并且该指数历来与美国股市、黄金价格呈高度相关性。\n目前，伴随","content":"<p>The \"Economic Pain Index\" was first proposed by American economist Okun. The index adds the unemployment rate and inflation level to assess the actual economic pressure of the people. It is also an indicator to measure the degree of economic stagflation, and the index has always been highly correlated with the U.S. stock market and gold price.</p><p>At present, with the inflation rate and unemployment rate soaring, the S&P 500 index is still at a multi-year high relative to gold, which is more beneficial to gold. The table below shows the correlation between the Pain Index and the S&P 500/Gold ratio, dating back to the 1950s.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3ff22e419bd5b69016be3e16762e43f9\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"412\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>At present, the ratio is quite high, far higher than the reasonable level of the pain index. The previous times when such a huge difference occurred were 1971, 1975 and 2000. In the following years, the S&P performed very poorly and gold strengthened.</p><p>The chart below shows the overestimation or underestimation of the S&P 500/Gold ratio relative to the Pain Index, and the subsequent 10-year return.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40ddfffc958e0830c0084d07c49253c1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"442\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>It is clear that the relationship between stocks and gold ratios is an interesting phenomenon and not sufficient as an investment decision, but more evidence suggests that U.S. stocks face prolonged weakness relative to precious metals, particularly as the pain index continues to rise.</p><p>One assumption underpinning current monetary policy decisions is that there is an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. That is, if the unemployment rate is high, it reflects the weakness of the economy, and loose monetary policy can reduce this weakness, but at the cost of enduring the rising inflation rate.</p><p>Indeed, loose monetary policy at the moment is a key factor in rising inflation and unemployment-politicians have done little to stop increasing spending because of the Fed's willingness to continue funding large fiscal deficits, which is why we are seeing welfare spending skyrocket, hindering labor market recovery while pushing inflation higher.</p><p>With government spending increasingly being funded by printing money rather than taxes, many voters now see any political party's reluctance to increase social spending as immoral. Therefore, as long as both parties in the United States are unwilling to cut spending, the loose fiscal policy is likely to continue, and it is foreseeable that the price of gold will significantly outperform the US stock market.</p><p>It is worth mentioning that Wells Fargo Securities also issued a warning recently, saying that the day of liquidation of technology stocks is expected to come soon, and U.S. stocks are expected to plummet by 12%, urging investors to take profits.</p>","source":"highlight_zhitongcaijin","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. stocks may fall, will gold rise? The \"pain index\" has already explained it all</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. stocks may fall, will gold rise? The \"pain index\" has already explained it all\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">智通财经 </strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-07-06 10:56</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>The \"Economic Pain Index\" was first proposed by American economist Okun. The index adds the unemployment rate and inflation level to assess the actual economic pressure of the people. It is also an indicator to measure the degree of economic stagflation, and the index has always been highly correlated with the U.S. stock market and gold price.</p><p>At present, with the inflation rate and unemployment rate soaring, the S&P 500 index is still at a multi-year high relative to gold, which is more beneficial to gold. The table below shows the correlation between the Pain Index and the S&P 500/Gold ratio, dating back to the 1950s.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3ff22e419bd5b69016be3e16762e43f9\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"412\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>At present, the ratio is quite high, far higher than the reasonable level of the pain index. The previous times when such a huge difference occurred were 1971, 1975 and 2000. In the following years, the S&P performed very poorly and gold strengthened.</p><p>The chart below shows the overestimation or underestimation of the S&P 500/Gold ratio relative to the Pain Index, and the subsequent 10-year return.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/40ddfffc958e0830c0084d07c49253c1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"442\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>It is clear that the relationship between stocks and gold ratios is an interesting phenomenon and not sufficient as an investment decision, but more evidence suggests that U.S. stocks face prolonged weakness relative to precious metals, particularly as the pain index continues to rise.</p><p>One assumption underpinning current monetary policy decisions is that there is an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. That is, if the unemployment rate is high, it reflects the weakness of the economy, and loose monetary policy can reduce this weakness, but at the cost of enduring the rising inflation rate.</p><p>Indeed, loose monetary policy at the moment is a key factor in rising inflation and unemployment-politicians have done little to stop increasing spending because of the Fed's willingness to continue funding large fiscal deficits, which is why we are seeing welfare spending skyrocket, hindering labor market recovery while pushing inflation higher.</p><p>With government spending increasingly being funded by printing money rather than taxes, many voters now see any political party's reluctance to increase social spending as immoral. Therefore, as long as both parties in the United States are unwilling to cut spending, the loose fiscal policy is likely to continue, and it is foreseeable that the price of gold will significantly outperform the US stock market.</p><p>It is worth mentioning that Wells Fargo Securities also issued a warning recently, saying that the day of liquidation of technology stocks is expected to come soon, and U.S. stocks are expected to plummet by 12%, urging investors to take profits.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/508013.html\">智通财经 </a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37d43f47ff4637f33c2675f14c1cc937","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.zhitongcaijing.com/content/detail/508013.html","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/6ca2dcdccfa2217fb20a0351f4efe814","article_id":"1187560969","content_text":"“经济痛苦指数”最早由美国经济学家欧肯提出,该指数通过将失业率和通货膨胀水平相加,以评估民众的实际经济压力，也是衡量经济滞胀程度的一个指标，并且该指数历来与美国股市、黄金价格呈高度相关性。\n目前，伴随通胀率、失业率一路飙升，标普500指数相对于黄金仍处于多年高位，这对黄金较为有利。下表显示了痛苦指数与标准普尔500指数/黄金比率之间的相关性，可以追溯到20世纪50年代。\n\n目前该比率相当高，远远高于痛苦指数的合理水平，此前出现过如此巨大差异的时间分别是1971年、1975年和2000年，此后几年时间里，标普表现都非常糟糕，黄金走强。\n下图显示了标普500指数/黄金比率相对于痛苦指数的高估或低估，以及随后的10年期回报率。\n\n很明显，股票与黄金比率之间的关系是一个有趣的现象，并不足以作为投资决策，但更多的证据表明，相对于贵金属而言，美国股市将面临长期疲软，特别是在痛苦指数继续上升的情况下。\n支撑当前货币政策决策的一个假设是，通胀率和失业率之间存在反向关系。即如果失业率很高，反映了经济的疲软，而宽松的货币政策可以降低这种疲软，但代价是得忍受持续上升的通胀率。\n事实上，目前宽松的货币政策是通胀和失业率上升的一个关键因素——由于美联储愿意继续为巨额财政赤字提供资金，政客们几乎没有阻止增加支出，这就是为什么我们看到福利支出飙升，阻碍劳动力市场的复苏，同时推高通货膨胀。\n随着政府支出越来越多地由印钞而不是税收来提供资金，许多选民现在认为任何政党不愿增加社会支出的行为都是不道德的。因此，只要美国两党都不愿意削减开支，宽松的财政政策很有可能继续下去，可以预见的是金价将大幅跑赢美股。\n值得一提的时，富国证券近日也发出警告，称科技股清算的日子预计很快将到来，预计美股将大跌12%,敦促投资者获利了结。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2234,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":154845828,"gmtCreate":1625503383164,"gmtModify":1703742790966,"author":{"id":"4087300083147710","authorId":"4087300083147710","name":"bkloh1981","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb66730db127d226356e0dcabc7aa977","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4087300083147710","idStr":"4087300083147710"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"oo","listText":"oo","text":"oo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/154845828","repostId":"1158392841","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1545,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":154845095,"gmtCreate":1625503337417,"gmtModify":1703742789803,"author":{"id":"4087300083147710","authorId":"4087300083147710","name":"bkloh1981","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb66730db127d226356e0dcabc7aa977","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4087300083147710","idStr":"4087300083147710"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"oo","listText":"oo","text":"oo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/154845095","repostId":"2149080331","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2083,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}