To The Moon
Home
News
TigerAI
Log In
Sign Up
JTA
We got FIRE baby
+Follow
Posts · 64
Posts · 64
Following · 0
Following · 0
Followers · 0
Followers · 0
JTA
JTA
·
2022-12-12
Ok
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
1.98K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JTA
JTA
·
2022-10-08
$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$
看
2.01K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JTA
JTA
·
2022-06-04
Long term investors... brace and towards we go to mars
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.59K
回复
Comment
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JTA
JTA
·
2022-05-19
$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$
Let's think of it. Has Trump become the POTUS? So... anything is possible
看
1.79K
回复
Comment
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JTA
JTA
·
2022-03-16
2022 16002023 19002024 25002025 3000
Tesla Stock: 2022 Is The Moment Of Truth
Tesla stock performed superbly in the past five years. Is this a good sign in the face of multiple h
Tesla Stock: 2022 Is The Moment Of Truth
看
2.05K
回复
Comment
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JTA
JTA
·
2022-03-02
This war will not last.... and when market recovers, the high potential growth stocks will go first as this is where the money will flow to...
Fear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks
SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural
Fear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks
看
2.15K
回复
Comment
点赞
6
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JTA
JTA
·
2022-03-01
Talk so much so what arrecommendations ations
Buying the Russia Dip? Consider These Stocks
The Russia-Ukraine crisis has knocked U.S. stocks down, but not as much as European stocks. And that
Buying the Russia Dip? Consider These Stocks
看
2.37K
回复
Comment
点赞
8
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JTA
JTA
·
2022-03-01
To the author, when you mentioned the sentence " tsla just makes car", I already stop continue to read further cause you are so misinformed and spreading FUD!
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
1.67K
回复
Comment
点赞
5
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JTA
JTA
·
2022-02-16
Tsla to the moon and Mars in 2022... TP 1600... let's GoGoGo[Great] [Cool] [Miser]
Tech Sell-Off: This Beaten-Down Growth Stock Could Soar 312%, Says Wall Street
C3.ai carries some risk, but the rewards could be remarkable.
Tech Sell-Off: This Beaten-Down Growth Stock Could Soar 312%, Says Wall Street
看
1.81K
回复
Comment
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JTA
JTA
·
2022-02-11
Nice
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
1.96K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Load more
Most Discussed
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3572695424628553","uuid":"3572695424628553","gmtCreate":1609602493407,"gmtModify":1644847524797,"name":"JTA","pinyin":"jta","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"We got FIRE baby","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3a7e41492b5f3bbd2fa7ab2de897cb0","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":11,"headSize":65,"tweetSize":64,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":1,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.02.11","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.29%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9923313389,"gmtCreate":1670800725041,"gmtModify":1676538434163,"author":{"id":"3572695424628553","authorId":"3572695424628553","name":"JTA","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3a7e41492b5f3bbd2fa7ab2de897cb0","crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572695424628553","authorIdStr":"3572695424628553"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923313389","repostId":"2290296478","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1977,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9914304562,"gmtCreate":1665184758457,"gmtModify":1676537568126,"author":{"id":"3572695424628553","authorId":"3572695424628553","name":"JTA","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3a7e41492b5f3bbd2fa7ab2de897cb0","crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572695424628553","authorIdStr":"3572695424628553"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9914304562","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2012,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9059813376,"gmtCreate":1654325628795,"gmtModify":1676535432460,"author":{"id":"3572695424628553","authorId":"3572695424628553","name":"JTA","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3a7e41492b5f3bbd2fa7ab2de897cb0","crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572695424628553","authorIdStr":"3572695424628553"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Long term investors... brace and towards we go to mars","listText":"Long term investors... brace and towards we go to mars","text":"Long term investors... brace and towards we go to mars","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9059813376","repostId":"1175826570","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2589,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3577084956936337","authorId":"3577084956936337","name":"keegs","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577084956936337","authorIdStr":"3577084956936337"},"content":"The moon is just a pitstop","text":"The moon is just a pitstop","html":"The moon is just a pitstop"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9023855633,"gmtCreate":1652912364822,"gmtModify":1676535184290,"author":{"id":"3572695424628553","authorId":"3572695424628553","name":"JTA","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3a7e41492b5f3bbd2fa7ab2de897cb0","crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572695424628553","authorIdStr":"3572695424628553"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>Let's think of it. Has Trump become the POTUS? So... anything is possible","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>Let's think of it. Has Trump become the POTUS? So... anything is possible","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$Let's think of it. Has Trump become the POTUS? So... anything is possible","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9023855633","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1786,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9032283805,"gmtCreate":1647387340728,"gmtModify":1676534222518,"author":{"id":"3572695424628553","authorId":"3572695424628553","name":"JTA","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3a7e41492b5f3bbd2fa7ab2de897cb0","crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572695424628553","authorIdStr":"3572695424628553"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"2022 16002023 19002024 25002025 3000","listText":"2022 16002023 19002024 25002025 3000","text":"2022 16002023 19002024 25002025 3000","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9032283805","repostId":"1193863909","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1193863909","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1647358200,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1193863909?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-15 23:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Stock: 2022 Is The Moment Of Truth","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1193863909","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Tesla stock performed superbly in the past five years. Is this a good sign in the face of multiple h","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Tesla stock performed superbly in the past five years. Is this a good sign in the face of multiple headwinds in 2022, or is TSLA ripe for a sharper correction from here?</p><p>Has Tesla stock (<b>TSLA</b>) been a good investment? It depends on who you ask. So far in 2022, TSLA has been a loser in absolute terms and relative to most equity benchmarks.</p><p>However, looking back a few years, this stock has been one of the best performers among large-cap names. The big question is: will Tesla be able to defend its rich valuations in a year of numerous market headwinds? Or is a sharper decline only a matter of time?</p><p><b>TSLA: impressive performance</b></p><p>Let’s start with the chart below. It shows how, so far in 2022, Tesla stock (blue line) has underperformed the tech-rich Nasdaq 100 and the autonomous/electric vehicle peer group (<b>DRIV</b>). Compared to other high-growth, high-valuation names like those contained in the ARK Innovation ETF (<b>ARKK</b>), however, TSLA has done better.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c356bf8e260123d0cea375b56d4aa04c\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"620\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Figure 2:Tesla stock (blue line) has underperformed the tech-rich Nasdaq 100 and the autonomous/electric vehicle peer group DRIV.</span></p><p>This is not to say, however, that TSLA has been a bad investment in the past several months or couple of years — quite the opposite, in fact.</p><p>This next chart shows how Tesla stock has lavishly outperformed all of the names mentioned above since around the bottom of the COVID-19 bear. The five-year chart (not depicted here) does not look much worse than this.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38e8e05e137bc2bd78a417bc0964ec74\" tg-width=\"1200\" tg-height=\"628\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Figure 3:Tesla stock has lavishly outperformed Nasdaq 100, ARKK and DRIV.</span></p><p><b>Resilience or correction ahead?</b></p><p>There are two ways to interpret recent price action in Tesla stock. The glass-half-full view is that TSLA has been resilient to this year’s selloff. Considering roughly 90% in <i>annualized</i> returns between 2017 and 2021, Tesla’s 28% YTD dip in 2022 has been fairly small by comparison.</p><p>Bulls have business fundamentals reasons to think that Tesla will continue to climb from here, given enough time. The electric vehicle industry is expected to grow aggressively in the next several years: CAGR of 23% through 2027, according to one source.</p><p>The Russia-Ukraine crisis and spike in crude oil prices could also be a positive for Tesla in the end. Tesla’s products are one answer to the global dependence on hydrocarbons that has caused so much turmoil, including inflationary pressures, in the past few months.</p><p>But then, there is the glass-half-empty argument. Tesla stock is still up 77% per year for the past five years, despite all the macroeconomic and geopolitical headwinds. Isn’t it time for shares to de-risk a bit more, as those of so many of Tesla’s peers have since early last year?</p><p>Supporting this idea are rich valuations. According to Seeking Alpha, Tesla stock commands a very high 2022 P/E of 73 times on earnings growth that is expected to decline to a fairly modest 15% through 2025. Is this multiple justifiable in the current market environment?</p><p><b>2022 will be the moment of truth</b></p><p>Clearly, it is impossible to tell for sure whether the optimistic or the pessimistic views on Tesla stock will prove to be correct in the end. The remainder of 2022 will be crucial at determining which way Tesla stock will bifurcate.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Stock: 2022 Is The Moment Of Truth</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Stock: 2022 Is The Moment Of Truth\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-15 23:30 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/reddit-trends/tesla-stock-2022-is-the-moment-of-truth><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla stock performed superbly in the past five years. Is this a good sign in the face of multiple headwinds in 2022, or is TSLA ripe for a sharper correction from here?Has Tesla stock (TSLA) been a ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/reddit-trends/tesla-stock-2022-is-the-moment-of-truth\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/memestocks/reddit-trends/tesla-stock-2022-is-the-moment-of-truth","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1193863909","content_text":"Tesla stock performed superbly in the past five years. Is this a good sign in the face of multiple headwinds in 2022, or is TSLA ripe for a sharper correction from here?Has Tesla stock (TSLA) been a good investment? It depends on who you ask. So far in 2022, TSLA has been a loser in absolute terms and relative to most equity benchmarks.However, looking back a few years, this stock has been one of the best performers among large-cap names. The big question is: will Tesla be able to defend its rich valuations in a year of numerous market headwinds? Or is a sharper decline only a matter of time?TSLA: impressive performanceLet’s start with the chart below. It shows how, so far in 2022, Tesla stock (blue line) has underperformed the tech-rich Nasdaq 100 and the autonomous/electric vehicle peer group (DRIV). Compared to other high-growth, high-valuation names like those contained in the ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK), however, TSLA has done better.Figure 2:Tesla stock (blue line) has underperformed the tech-rich Nasdaq 100 and the autonomous/electric vehicle peer group DRIV.This is not to say, however, that TSLA has been a bad investment in the past several months or couple of years — quite the opposite, in fact.This next chart shows how Tesla stock has lavishly outperformed all of the names mentioned above since around the bottom of the COVID-19 bear. The five-year chart (not depicted here) does not look much worse than this.Figure 3:Tesla stock has lavishly outperformed Nasdaq 100, ARKK and DRIV.Resilience or correction ahead?There are two ways to interpret recent price action in Tesla stock. The glass-half-full view is that TSLA has been resilient to this year’s selloff. Considering roughly 90% in annualized returns between 2017 and 2021, Tesla’s 28% YTD dip in 2022 has been fairly small by comparison.Bulls have business fundamentals reasons to think that Tesla will continue to climb from here, given enough time. The electric vehicle industry is expected to grow aggressively in the next several years: CAGR of 23% through 2027, according to one source.The Russia-Ukraine crisis and spike in crude oil prices could also be a positive for Tesla in the end. Tesla’s products are one answer to the global dependence on hydrocarbons that has caused so much turmoil, including inflationary pressures, in the past few months.But then, there is the glass-half-empty argument. Tesla stock is still up 77% per year for the past five years, despite all the macroeconomic and geopolitical headwinds. Isn’t it time for shares to de-risk a bit more, as those of so many of Tesla’s peers have since early last year?Supporting this idea are rich valuations. According to Seeking Alpha, Tesla stock commands a very high 2022 P/E of 73 times on earnings growth that is expected to decline to a fairly modest 15% through 2025. Is this multiple justifiable in the current market environment?2022 will be the moment of truthClearly, it is impossible to tell for sure whether the optimistic or the pessimistic views on Tesla stock will prove to be correct in the end. The remainder of 2022 will be crucial at determining which way Tesla stock will bifurcate.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2050,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9033357688,"gmtCreate":1646197509603,"gmtModify":1676534103061,"author":{"id":"3572695424628553","authorId":"3572695424628553","name":"JTA","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3a7e41492b5f3bbd2fa7ab2de897cb0","crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572695424628553","authorIdStr":"3572695424628553"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"This war will not last.... and when market recovers, the high potential growth stocks will go first as this is where the money will flow to...","listText":"This war will not last.... and when market recovers, the high potential growth stocks will go first as this is where the money will flow to...","text":"This war will not last.... and when market recovers, the high potential growth stocks will go first as this is where the money will flow to...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9033357688","repostId":"1162614571","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1162614571","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1646193023,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1162614571?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-02 11:50","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162614571","media":"TheStreet","summary":"SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Many people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.</li><li>It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell.</li><li>Generally speaking, stock market declines due to disaster scenarios are very short lived.</li><li>In this article, I will make the case that many stocks (particularly energy stocks) will do just fine in this environment.</li></ul><p>The world is a scary place right now. An armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has created an atmosphere of panic unlike any in recent memory. Various media outlets have described the crisis as the biggest armed conflict in Europe since World War 2. The days-old conflict has already claimed hundreds of lives, and displaced hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians. It is a very frightening, and tragic, situation.</p><p>So, it shouldn't come as any surprise that markets have been jittery since the war began. On February 24, the first day after Russia's invasion, markets opened1.65% lower than they closed the day before. In subsequent trading days, the markets regained what they had lost, and then some. Nevertheless, scary sounding headlines continued to be released for the remainder of the week. Some examples include:</p><ul><li><p>"These 13 Stocks Implode as the World Prepares for War." (Investor's Business Daily).</p></li><li><p>"Stocks tank as War Threat intensifies." (Morningstar).</p></li><li><p>"War Will Give Stocks no Peace." (Forbes).</p></li></ul><p>The subtext of these headlines couldn't be clearer:</p><p><i>War is a scary prospect for stock market investors. Be very afraid!</i></p><p>To be sure, there are legitimate reasons to be afraid of war. The human toll is very real, and wars can bring short term economic disruptions as well. The war in Ukraine has reportedly taken energy pipelines offline, contributing to higher energy costs and inflation. So there are very real reasons to be concerned. The question is,<i>"is the stock market one of these reasons?"</i></p><p>Going by history, no. Although the flash point moments in war do tend to be correlated with brief selloffs, stocks recover from these events quickly. There was only one case in the last 100 years in which a war was correlated with a long-term decline in stock prices but, as you're about to see, the war was not likely what caused stocks to go down that time. Generally speaking, wars can coincide with panic selling, but it doesn't last long. Given this, it would be foolhardy to sell your stocks right now because of the situation in Eastern Europe.</p><p><b>Wars and Stocks: the Correlation</b></p><p>If we look at historical market data, we can see that the very early moments of wars do tend to be correlated with stock market selloffs. A recentFortune article reviewed five major conflict situations and how they impacted stocks. It concluded that war-related stock market dips do occur, but tend to be short lived. The examples given are:</p><ul><li><p>World War 1: the Dow fell 30%, then was closed for six months, then surged 88% in 1915.</p></li><li><p>World War 2: 2.9% drawdown on the morning of the Pearl Harbor attack. Losses erased within a month.</p></li><li><p>Cuban Missile Crisis: tiny 1.2% selloff followed by a 10% gain for the remainder of the year.</p></li><li><p>9/11: 15% selloff within days of the attack. The market didn't find a bottom this time until 2002. It then went on to enter a bull market that lasted until 2008.</p></li><li><p>U.S. invading Iraq: stocks jumped 2.3% on the day of the invasion and ended the year up 30%.</p></li></ul><p>I've included a chart below, borrowed from Trading Economics, that shows the approximate dates of the events above (except World War 1). Looking at it visually, you can see that all of these war-related events coincided with near term lows, but were followed by long-term gains. The one exception is 9/11: it took stocks nearly a year to find a bottom after that one. However, in that particular case, the long-term downtrend was not actually caused by the attack, as I'll explain shortly.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76d1ac70f5e16bcef0d0abacea19479d\" tg-width=\"816\" tg-height=\"517\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Trading Economics</span></p><p>As you can see, 9/11 occurred about halfway through a bear market that began in 2000 and ended in 2002. It was the one "war" related event of the five mentioned in Fortune that was followed by prolonged bearishness. However, it was also the one where there was a lot more than conflict contributing to the selloff. The 9/11 crash occurred about halfway through the Dotcom bubble burst. The bear market of the time was caused by the rapid collapse in prices of high flying tech stocks, some of which went bankrupt and were delisted. Notable examples included:</p><ul><li><p>Pets.com (went bankrupt).</p></li><li><p>Priceline (acquired after falling 94%).</p></li><li><p>Garden.com (shut down after falling to 9 cents a share).</p></li></ul><p>All of these stocks went bust long before 9/11 was part of the conversation. Therefore, it's hard to say how much of the losses in the 2000-2002 period were due to the bubble collapsing, and how much were due to 9/11. The 2000 bubble collapsed mainly due to valuation concerns, companies experiencing financial strain, and a series of interest rate hikes in1999 and 2000. At the peak, the NASDAQ had a 175 P/E ratio. These factors probably contributed to the 2000-2002 bear market more than any conflict did.</p><p>If we take the post-9/11 selloff without the historical context, then it took the markets a little under a year to recover from the 15% drawdown. That's not too bad, all things considered. Of course, the markets took much longer to get back to the highs set in 2000. The S&P 500 took six years to get back to the previous top, the NASDAQ a full 15! So the bear market of 2000-2002 was quite long, and the recovery from it was even longer. But again, most of it took place long before 9/11. The losses incurred in the immediate aftermath of that event reversed in less than a year.</p><p><b>Why Isn't War Bad For Stocks?</b></p><p>Having established that war has not historically been bad for the stock market, the next logical question to ask is, "why?" War is certainly among the most destructive mass-scale activities human beings participate in. Lives are lost, infrastructure is destroyed, people are displaced, and the list just goes on and on. It certainly seems like wars destroy a lot of value. Why, then, do stocks generally go up when they are happening?</p><p>First, it helps to understand how broad the stock market really is.</p><p>To begin with just the U.S., the Wilshire 5000 index consists of 3,500 stocks. It is generally taken as equivalent to the total U.S. stock market. It may exclude some OTC stocks, but it is a pretty good proxy for U.S. listed securities.</p><p>Looking abroad, there are even more stocks to choose from. The OECD says that there are41,000 listed equities globally, and the number rises every year.</p><p>What all of this means is that the universe of stocks is very large. It follows logically from this that different stocks will respond to armed conflict in different ways. While you might find some companies out there that lose money because of armed conflict, you'll find others that won't. Some companies will inevitably do just fine. Out of respect for the lives in jeopardy in Eastern Europe right now, I will avoid any talk of arms dealers, defense contractors and other "war beneficiary" stocks. But I will draw your attention to one major industry that serves as a perfect illustration of how companies can thrive during wars:</p><p><b>Energy</b></p><p>As you might be aware, the Russia/Ukraine war has severely disrupted global energy supplies. Russia's Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been suspended, pipelines in Ukraine have been knocked out, and Western energy companies have withdrawn from Russia. Without a doubt, there are Russian energy companies that could lose a lot of money over this.<b>Gazprom</b>(OTCPK:OGZPY), for example, is heavily invested in the now suspended Nord Stream 2. Its stock had fallen 35% for the year before trading was suspended on February 25th. That's noteworthy because energy stocks as a whole rose in the same period.</p><p>So, Russian energy stocks are in a bad place right now.</p><p>But remember:</p><p><i>It's a big world out there.</i></p><p>All of the oil that's not flowing because of the Russia/Ukraine conflict has to be supplied by someone else. And because of the supply shock, that "someone else" is going to collect higher prices on the oil they sell. When supply decreases but demand is unchanged, prices rise. And right now, the global supply of oil is being reduced.</p><p>There are many companies that can thrive in such an environment. If you look at a Canadian energy company like <b>Suncor Energy</b>(SU), for example, it is about as insulated from the Russia/Ukraine situation as you can imagine. It makes money by selling gasoline to Canadians and by exporting crude oil to Americans. None of this is in any way threatened by the situation in Eastern Europe. Yet oil prices are rising worldwide, even in regions that are not being directly impacted by the conflict. Gasoline prices are rising right along side them. All of this means that Suncor gets to charge higher prices for its products than it did before. That results in higher earnings, as we saw the fourth quarter. In Q4, Suncor's funds from operations (FFO)grew 157%year-over-year. Net income and operating income swung from losses to profits. That was all thanks to oil prices rising year-over-year. Today, oil prices are even higher than they were in Q4, having set new 7 year highs. So Suncor should do even better in Q1.</p><p>What this example illustrates is the fact that equities can respond to crises in surprising ways. Sure, some are damaged by pandemonium, but others can do just fine. Overall, the presence of disorder in the world shouldn't affect your outlook. As history shows, it has little effect on the markets.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFear, Panic And War Are Bad Reasons To Sell Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-02 11:50 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/news/how-important-is-russia-to-apples-business","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162614571","content_text":"SummaryMany people are concerned that the war in Ukraine will damage their portfolios.It is natural to be worried during scary situations, but history shows that times like now are poor times to sell.Generally speaking, stock market declines due to disaster scenarios are very short lived.In this article, I will make the case that many stocks (particularly energy stocks) will do just fine in this environment.The world is a scary place right now. An armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has created an atmosphere of panic unlike any in recent memory. Various media outlets have described the crisis as the biggest armed conflict in Europe since World War 2. The days-old conflict has already claimed hundreds of lives, and displaced hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians. It is a very frightening, and tragic, situation.So, it shouldn't come as any surprise that markets have been jittery since the war began. On February 24, the first day after Russia's invasion, markets opened1.65% lower than they closed the day before. In subsequent trading days, the markets regained what they had lost, and then some. Nevertheless, scary sounding headlines continued to be released for the remainder of the week. Some examples include:\"These 13 Stocks Implode as the World Prepares for War.\" (Investor's Business Daily).\"Stocks tank as War Threat intensifies.\" (Morningstar).\"War Will Give Stocks no Peace.\" (Forbes).The subtext of these headlines couldn't be clearer:War is a scary prospect for stock market investors. Be very afraid!To be sure, there are legitimate reasons to be afraid of war. The human toll is very real, and wars can bring short term economic disruptions as well. The war in Ukraine has reportedly taken energy pipelines offline, contributing to higher energy costs and inflation. So there are very real reasons to be concerned. The question is,\"is the stock market one of these reasons?\"Going by history, no. Although the flash point moments in war do tend to be correlated with brief selloffs, stocks recover from these events quickly. There was only one case in the last 100 years in which a war was correlated with a long-term decline in stock prices but, as you're about to see, the war was not likely what caused stocks to go down that time. Generally speaking, wars can coincide with panic selling, but it doesn't last long. Given this, it would be foolhardy to sell your stocks right now because of the situation in Eastern Europe.Wars and Stocks: the CorrelationIf we look at historical market data, we can see that the very early moments of wars do tend to be correlated with stock market selloffs. A recentFortune article reviewed five major conflict situations and how they impacted stocks. It concluded that war-related stock market dips do occur, but tend to be short lived. The examples given are:World War 1: the Dow fell 30%, then was closed for six months, then surged 88% in 1915.World War 2: 2.9% drawdown on the morning of the Pearl Harbor attack. Losses erased within a month.Cuban Missile Crisis: tiny 1.2% selloff followed by a 10% gain for the remainder of the year.9/11: 15% selloff within days of the attack. The market didn't find a bottom this time until 2002. It then went on to enter a bull market that lasted until 2008.U.S. invading Iraq: stocks jumped 2.3% on the day of the invasion and ended the year up 30%.I've included a chart below, borrowed from Trading Economics, that shows the approximate dates of the events above (except World War 1). Looking at it visually, you can see that all of these war-related events coincided with near term lows, but were followed by long-term gains. The one exception is 9/11: it took stocks nearly a year to find a bottom after that one. However, in that particular case, the long-term downtrend was not actually caused by the attack, as I'll explain shortly.Trading EconomicsAs you can see, 9/11 occurred about halfway through a bear market that began in 2000 and ended in 2002. It was the one \"war\" related event of the five mentioned in Fortune that was followed by prolonged bearishness. However, it was also the one where there was a lot more than conflict contributing to the selloff. The 9/11 crash occurred about halfway through the Dotcom bubble burst. The bear market of the time was caused by the rapid collapse in prices of high flying tech stocks, some of which went bankrupt and were delisted. Notable examples included:Pets.com (went bankrupt).Priceline (acquired after falling 94%).Garden.com (shut down after falling to 9 cents a share).All of these stocks went bust long before 9/11 was part of the conversation. Therefore, it's hard to say how much of the losses in the 2000-2002 period were due to the bubble collapsing, and how much were due to 9/11. The 2000 bubble collapsed mainly due to valuation concerns, companies experiencing financial strain, and a series of interest rate hikes in1999 and 2000. At the peak, the NASDAQ had a 175 P/E ratio. These factors probably contributed to the 2000-2002 bear market more than any conflict did.If we take the post-9/11 selloff without the historical context, then it took the markets a little under a year to recover from the 15% drawdown. That's not too bad, all things considered. Of course, the markets took much longer to get back to the highs set in 2000. The S&P 500 took six years to get back to the previous top, the NASDAQ a full 15! So the bear market of 2000-2002 was quite long, and the recovery from it was even longer. But again, most of it took place long before 9/11. The losses incurred in the immediate aftermath of that event reversed in less than a year.Why Isn't War Bad For Stocks?Having established that war has not historically been bad for the stock market, the next logical question to ask is, \"why?\" War is certainly among the most destructive mass-scale activities human beings participate in. Lives are lost, infrastructure is destroyed, people are displaced, and the list just goes on and on. It certainly seems like wars destroy a lot of value. Why, then, do stocks generally go up when they are happening?First, it helps to understand how broad the stock market really is.To begin with just the U.S., the Wilshire 5000 index consists of 3,500 stocks. It is generally taken as equivalent to the total U.S. stock market. It may exclude some OTC stocks, but it is a pretty good proxy for U.S. listed securities.Looking abroad, there are even more stocks to choose from. The OECD says that there are41,000 listed equities globally, and the number rises every year.What all of this means is that the universe of stocks is very large. It follows logically from this that different stocks will respond to armed conflict in different ways. While you might find some companies out there that lose money because of armed conflict, you'll find others that won't. Some companies will inevitably do just fine. Out of respect for the lives in jeopardy in Eastern Europe right now, I will avoid any talk of arms dealers, defense contractors and other \"war beneficiary\" stocks. But I will draw your attention to one major industry that serves as a perfect illustration of how companies can thrive during wars:EnergyAs you might be aware, the Russia/Ukraine war has severely disrupted global energy supplies. Russia's Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been suspended, pipelines in Ukraine have been knocked out, and Western energy companies have withdrawn from Russia. Without a doubt, there are Russian energy companies that could lose a lot of money over this.Gazprom(OTCPK:OGZPY), for example, is heavily invested in the now suspended Nord Stream 2. Its stock had fallen 35% for the year before trading was suspended on February 25th. That's noteworthy because energy stocks as a whole rose in the same period.So, Russian energy stocks are in a bad place right now.But remember:It's a big world out there.All of the oil that's not flowing because of the Russia/Ukraine conflict has to be supplied by someone else. And because of the supply shock, that \"someone else\" is going to collect higher prices on the oil they sell. When supply decreases but demand is unchanged, prices rise. And right now, the global supply of oil is being reduced.There are many companies that can thrive in such an environment. If you look at a Canadian energy company like Suncor Energy(SU), for example, it is about as insulated from the Russia/Ukraine situation as you can imagine. It makes money by selling gasoline to Canadians and by exporting crude oil to Americans. None of this is in any way threatened by the situation in Eastern Europe. Yet oil prices are rising worldwide, even in regions that are not being directly impacted by the conflict. Gasoline prices are rising right along side them. All of this means that Suncor gets to charge higher prices for its products than it did before. That results in higher earnings, as we saw the fourth quarter. In Q4, Suncor's funds from operations (FFO)grew 157%year-over-year. Net income and operating income swung from losses to profits. That was all thanks to oil prices rising year-over-year. Today, oil prices are even higher than they were in Q4, having set new 7 year highs. So Suncor should do even better in Q1.What this example illustrates is the fact that equities can respond to crises in surprising ways. Sure, some are damaged by pandemonium, but others can do just fine. Overall, the presence of disorder in the world shouldn't affect your outlook. As history shows, it has little effect on the markets.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2153,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9039479988,"gmtCreate":1646108558770,"gmtModify":1676534092330,"author":{"id":"3572695424628553","authorId":"3572695424628553","name":"JTA","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3a7e41492b5f3bbd2fa7ab2de897cb0","crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572695424628553","authorIdStr":"3572695424628553"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Talk so much so what arrecommendations ations","listText":"Talk so much so what arrecommendations ations","text":"Talk so much so what arrecommendations ations","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9039479988","repostId":"1105312471","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105312471","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1646106015,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1105312471?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-01 11:40","market":"other","language":"en","title":"Buying the Russia Dip? Consider These Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105312471","media":"Marketwatch","summary":"The Russia-Ukraine crisis has knocked U.S. stocks down, but not as much as European stocks. And that","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Russia-Ukraine crisis has knocked U.S. stocks down, but not as much as European stocks. And that’s why investors who want to buy the dip should look overseas.</p><p>The Euro Stoxx 600, the European counterpart of the S&P 500, is off 4.1% since Feb. 10, the day before Russia ratcheted up its saber-rattling and stocks worldwide went into a free fall. The S&P 500 is down 2.9% since then.</p><p>What has sent markets into a tizzy, especially those in Europe, are fears of what economic sanctions imposed on Russia by the West will do to economic growth over time.</p><p>Energy is the X Factor. Oil sanctions on Russia would slash the supply flowing to the U.S. and its allies, driving up oil prices—and in turn gas prices. The pain at the pump would only add to the high inflation that both Europeans and Americans are already dealing with.</p><p>And Europe is getting hammered by natural-gas prices as well. The Dutch TTF Natural Gas Futures price has shot up 37% since Feb. 10; the price of NYMEX, the North American natural gas futures benchmark, is up14%.</p><p>Banking sanctions, too, could hit Europe far harder than the U.S. Over the weekend, the European Union along with the U.K., the U.S., and Canada removed Russia’s most influential banks from SWIFT, an interbank messaging system. The move puts European bank assets especially at risk since Russian banks might not make good on their obligations. Other European businesses also might suffer if they can’t get paid for certain goods and services.</p><p>“The main reason the European markets are down more than the U.S. is because Russia is a major trading partner with Europe,” said Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research.</p><p>The bigger dip, triggered by the uncertainty triggered by sanctions, makes the upside potential for European stocks greater than for U.S. stocks.</p><p>If the fighting stops, and sanctions are lifted, stocks—it stands to reason—would gain. The Euro Stoxx 600 would gain 4.3% if it reclaimed its Feb. 10 level, better than the 3% for the S&P 500.</p><p>Historically, European stocks have fared well after a geopolitical crisis. The Euro Stoxx 600 averages a 20% gain for the 12 months following a crisis, according to Citigroup, which studied market returns after the 1991 Gulf War, the 2003 Iraq War, and the 2014 Crimean Crisis.</p><p>What investors should remind themselves of, though, is that past performance doesn’t necessarily predict future returns.</p><p>To be sure, more fallout could be coming from Russia’s attack on Ukraine—maybe oil sanctions or maybe a gut punch to European banks over the SWIFT ban. Or the war could rage on, dragging down European stocks even more, making the dipper even bigger—and a better buy.</p><p>Clearly, there’s a lot for investors to chew on.</p></body></html>","source":"market_watch","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Buying the Russia Dip? Consider These Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBuying the Russia Dip? Consider These Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-01 11:40 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/stock-market-dip-russia-european-stocks-51646083768?mod=search_headline><strong>Marketwatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Russia-Ukraine crisis has knocked U.S. stocks down, but not as much as European stocks. And that’s why investors who want to buy the dip should look overseas.The Euro Stoxx 600, the European ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/stock-market-dip-russia-european-stocks-51646083768?mod=search_headline\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ERUS":"iShares MSCI Russia ETF","RSX":"俄罗斯ETF-Market Vectors"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/articles/stock-market-dip-russia-european-stocks-51646083768?mod=search_headline","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/599a65733b8245fcf7868668ef9ad712","article_id":"1105312471","content_text":"The Russia-Ukraine crisis has knocked U.S. stocks down, but not as much as European stocks. And that’s why investors who want to buy the dip should look overseas.The Euro Stoxx 600, the European counterpart of the S&P 500, is off 4.1% since Feb. 10, the day before Russia ratcheted up its saber-rattling and stocks worldwide went into a free fall. The S&P 500 is down 2.9% since then.What has sent markets into a tizzy, especially those in Europe, are fears of what economic sanctions imposed on Russia by the West will do to economic growth over time.Energy is the X Factor. Oil sanctions on Russia would slash the supply flowing to the U.S. and its allies, driving up oil prices—and in turn gas prices. The pain at the pump would only add to the high inflation that both Europeans and Americans are already dealing with.And Europe is getting hammered by natural-gas prices as well. The Dutch TTF Natural Gas Futures price has shot up 37% since Feb. 10; the price of NYMEX, the North American natural gas futures benchmark, is up14%.Banking sanctions, too, could hit Europe far harder than the U.S. Over the weekend, the European Union along with the U.K., the U.S., and Canada removed Russia’s most influential banks from SWIFT, an interbank messaging system. The move puts European bank assets especially at risk since Russian banks might not make good on their obligations. Other European businesses also might suffer if they can’t get paid for certain goods and services.“The main reason the European markets are down more than the U.S. is because Russia is a major trading partner with Europe,” said Tom Essaye, founder of Sevens Report Research.The bigger dip, triggered by the uncertainty triggered by sanctions, makes the upside potential for European stocks greater than for U.S. stocks.If the fighting stops, and sanctions are lifted, stocks—it stands to reason—would gain. The Euro Stoxx 600 would gain 4.3% if it reclaimed its Feb. 10 level, better than the 3% for the S&P 500.Historically, European stocks have fared well after a geopolitical crisis. The Euro Stoxx 600 averages a 20% gain for the 12 months following a crisis, according to Citigroup, which studied market returns after the 1991 Gulf War, the 2003 Iraq War, and the 2014 Crimean Crisis.What investors should remind themselves of, though, is that past performance doesn’t necessarily predict future returns.To be sure, more fallout could be coming from Russia’s attack on Ukraine—maybe oil sanctions or maybe a gut punch to European banks over the SWIFT ban. Or the war could rage on, dragging down European stocks even more, making the dipper even bigger—and a better buy.Clearly, there’s a lot for investors to chew on.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"ERUS":0.9,"RSX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2370,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9039470992,"gmtCreate":1646108395512,"gmtModify":1676534092302,"author":{"id":"3572695424628553","authorId":"3572695424628553","name":"JTA","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3a7e41492b5f3bbd2fa7ab2de897cb0","crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572695424628553","authorIdStr":"3572695424628553"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"To the author, when you mentioned the sentence \" tsla just makes car\", I already stop continue to read further cause you are so misinformed and spreading FUD!","listText":"To the author, when you mentioned the sentence \" tsla just makes car\", I already stop continue to read further cause you are so misinformed and spreading FUD!","text":"To the author, when you mentioned the sentence \" tsla just makes car\", I already stop continue to read further cause you are so misinformed and spreading FUD!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9039470992","repostId":"1106936697","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1672,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9095522534,"gmtCreate":1644965750522,"gmtModify":1676533979712,"author":{"id":"3572695424628553","authorId":"3572695424628553","name":"JTA","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3a7e41492b5f3bbd2fa7ab2de897cb0","crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572695424628553","authorIdStr":"3572695424628553"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tsla to the moon and Mars in 2022... TP 1600... let's GoGoGo[Great] [Cool] [Miser] ","listText":"Tsla to the moon and Mars in 2022... TP 1600... let's GoGoGo[Great] [Cool] [Miser] ","text":"Tsla to the moon and Mars in 2022... TP 1600... let's GoGoGo[Great] [Cool] [Miser]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9095522534","repostId":"2211505186","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2211505186","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1644939108,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2211505186?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-02-15 23:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tech Sell-Off: This Beaten-Down Growth Stock Could Soar 312%, Says Wall Street","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2211505186","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"C3.ai carries some risk, but the rewards could be remarkable.","content":"<div>\n<p>It's only February, but investors are already having a tough year. The technology sector is suffering the most with the Nasdaq 100 index down over 12% year to date. But history suggests ignoring short...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/14/tech-sell-off-this-beaten-down-stock-could-soar/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tech Sell-Off: This Beaten-Down Growth Stock Could Soar 312%, Says Wall Street</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTech Sell-Off: This Beaten-Down Growth Stock Could Soar 312%, Says Wall Street\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-02-15 23:31 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/14/tech-sell-off-this-beaten-down-stock-could-soar/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It's only February, but investors are already having a tough year. The technology sector is suffering the most with the Nasdaq 100 index down over 12% year to date. But history suggests ignoring short...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/14/tech-sell-off-this-beaten-down-stock-could-soar/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4525":"远程办公概念","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4023":"应用软件","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4543":"AI","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","AI":"C3.ai, Inc.","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4514":"搜索引擎","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4538":"云计算"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/14/tech-sell-off-this-beaten-down-stock-could-soar/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2211505186","content_text":"It's only February, but investors are already having a tough year. The technology sector is suffering the most with the Nasdaq 100 index down over 12% year to date. But history suggests ignoring short-term noise and taking a long-term view will yield the most positive results. So investors could use the recent dip as a chance to buy innovative companies at a discount.First-of-its-kind artificial intelligence company, C3.ai (NYSE:AI), might be one candidate. There is a caveat, however: While its shares down 20% so far in 2022, they have lost 85% of their value since hitting their all-time high in Dec. 2020, so it's a volatile stock.But one Wall Street firm stands behind the company's potential, indicating C3.ai stock could quadruple from today's price. Here's why.It's a trailblazerArtificial intelligence (AI) brings boundless possibilities to the business world through its ability to complete highly complex tasks in a fraction of the time humans would need. For some technology companies, building AI models is part-and-parcel of doing business. Think about behemoths like Meta Platforms, Alphabet's Google, or even Upstart, which uses AI to originate loans for banks.But that's not the case for most regular businesses. They don't have the financial resources, nor can they attract the specialized talent, to create technologies like AI in-house. That's the gap C3.ai fills by offering a suite of turnkey AI applications that can be customized to work within almost any industry in the world.At 35%, the oil and gas sector is C3.ai's largest source of revenue. The sector is benefiting from AI models that help to reduce carbon emissions and predict costly equipment failures.But the company is also recognized by some of the largest tech organizations in the world, including Microsoft, which is collaborating with C3.ai to accelerate the development of AI applications on its Azure cloud-services platform. So far, this partnership has led to over $200 million of new deals for the two companies.Strong revenue growth but explosive customer growthC3.ai isn't a profitable company yet, which is a key reason its stock has struggled, but it's doing all the right things to grow its business. Over time, it will likely achieve scale and deliver positive earnings per share. But for now, investors should be extremely excited about the company's performance based on other metrics.It generated $92 million in revenue during fiscal 2019, and management expects the top line to reach $250 million in fiscal 2022. That change represents a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 39%, but the company's customer growth actually trounces that mark.MetricFiscal 2019Fiscal 2022*CAGRTotal customers2110489%Data source: C3.ai. CAGR = Compound Annual Growth Rate.In addition, over the last 12 months, C3.ai has doubled the number of industries it serves to 14. And it has also significantly expanded existing agreements, Its deal with oil and gas giant Baker Hughes, for example, increased $45 million to a whopping $495 million. That one deal alone guarantees C3.ai $357 million in revenue over the next three and a half years.Wall Street is on boardIn Dec. 2021, Wall Street firm Needham maintained its buy rating on C3.ai stock and attached a price target of $103 per share. That represents 312% growth from its current price of $25.But while Needham is the most bullish firm, it's certainly not alone. The consensus price target on Wall Street sits at $56.29, which is still more than double where the stock trades as of this writing.Those price targets might actually be conservative over the long term with the artificial intelligence industry set to top $360 billion by 2028. So when investors look back a few years from now, the recent tech sell-off might prove to have been a great opportunity to pick up C3.ai stock.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AI":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1809,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9092806771,"gmtCreate":1644572927809,"gmtModify":1676533942409,"author":{"id":"3572695424628553","authorId":"3572695424628553","name":"JTA","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3a7e41492b5f3bbd2fa7ab2de897cb0","crmLevel":13,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3572695424628553","authorIdStr":"3572695424628553"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9092806771","repostId":"2210596520","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1956,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}