hotheadz88 personal page - To The Moon

hotheadz88

hotheadz88

adapt or perish

2Follow

2Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2022-06-11

Be careful, don't throw money in. FOMC meeting (raising interest rates) coming week

AAPL, AMZN, GOOG, INTC, MSFT: Why Are Tech Stocks Down Today?

2022-06-14

Long term - Chinese tech is favourable. Short term - Still volatile.

Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon

2022-05-09

Investors are being more selective with their stockpick. They want rapid growth. Palantir needs to crush it. Currently, this looks like a retirement stock @ at a 10-20 year hold.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-05-09

Ooh la la

Palantir Stock Sinks 11.6% Premarket After Q1 Results

2022-06-12

Unfortunately, true

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-06-10

Red days are for shopping, carefully

The Stock Market and Inflation: How the S&P 500 Performs on CPI Report Days

2022-05-22

Risky, indeed

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-06-10

Be careful

Alibaba Looks Like Amazon In 2002

2022-06-07

Tesla is not just a car company. Just like Apple is not just a phone company.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2022-05-28

Twitter has become a monster that is eating itself up.

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4113822145562802","uuid":"4113822145562802","gmtCreate":1650942674815,"gmtModify":1663730060612,"name":"hotheadz88","pinyin":"hotheadz88","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"adapt or perish","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0a2963eb37c60c5d6d4a8dbcd266952","hatId":"ca_profile_frame_DWr5S1","hatName":"","vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":2,"tweetSize":0,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.01.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.12.13","exceedPercentage":"93.61%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.45%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.06.03","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.07","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.06.03","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":9937441595,"gmtCreate":1663490445117,"gmtModify":1676537278741,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Mmm.. .no!","listText":"Mmm.. .no!","text":"Mmm.. .no!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937441595","repostId":"2268672370","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2268672370","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1663460267,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2268672370?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-18 08:17","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Can the Fed Tame Inflation Without Further Crushing the Stock Market? What Investors Need to Know","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2268672370","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Investors should brace for more volatility with policy makers expected to deliver another jumbo rate","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Investors should brace for more volatility with policy makers expected to deliver another jumbo rate hike</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5b4166c0ac7b0bdf7caa1837ef618a67\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"487\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Fed Chair Jerome Powell says bringing down inflation will cause pain for households and businesses.</span></p><p>The Federal Reserve isn’t trying to slam the stock market as it rapidly raises interest rates in its bid to slow inflation still running red hot — but investors need to be prepared for more pain and volatility because policy makers aren’t going to be cowed by a deepening selloff, investors and strategists said.</p><p>“I don’t think they’re necessarily trying to drive inflation down by destroying stock prices or bond prices, but it is having that effect.” said Tim Courtney, chief investment officer at Exencial Wealth Advisors, in an interview.</p><p>U.S. stocks fell sharply in the past week after hopes for a pronounced cooling in inflation were dashed by a hotter-than-expected August inflation reading. The data cemented expectations among fed-funds futures traders for a rate hike of at least 75 basis points when the Fed concludes its policy meeting on Sept. 21, with some traders and analysts looking for an increase of 100 basis points, or a full percentage point.</p><p>The Dow Jones Industrial Average logged a 4.1% weekly fall, while the S&amp;P 500 dropped 4.8% and the Nasdaq Composite suffered a 5.5% decline. The S&amp;P 500 ended Friday below the 3,900 level viewed as an important area of technical support, with some chart watchers eyeing the potential for a test of the large-cap benchmark’s 2022 low at 3,666.77 set on June 16.</p><p>A profit warning from global shipping giant and economic bellwether FedEx Corp. further stoked recession fears, contributing to stock-market losses on Friday.</p><p>Treasurys also fell, with yield on the 2-year Treasury note soaring to a nearly 15-year high above 3.85% on expectations the Fed will continue pushing rates higher in coming months. Yields rise as prices fall.</p><p>Investors are operating in an environment where the central bank’s need to rein in stubborn inflation is widely seen having eliminated the notion of a figurative “Fed put” on the stock market.</p><p>The concept of a Fed put has been around since at least the October 1987 stock-market crash prompted the Alan Greenspan-led central bank to lower interest rates. An actual put option is a financial derivative that gives the holder the right but not the obligation to sell the underlying asset at a set level, known as the strike price, serving as an insurance policy against a market decline.</p><p>Some economists and analysts have even suggested the Fed should welcome or even aim for market losses, which could serve to tighten financial conditions as investors scale back spending.</p><p>William Dudley, the former president of the New York Fed, argued earlier this year that the central bank won’t get a handle on inflation that’s running near a 40-year high unless they make investors suffer. “It’s hard to know how much the Federal Reserve will need to do to get inflation under control,” wrote Dudley in a Bloomberg column in April. “But one thing is certain: to be effective, it’ll have to inflict more losses on stock and bond investors than it has so far.”</p><p>Some market participants aren’t convinced. Aoifinn Devitt, chief investment officer at Moneta,said the Fed likely sees stock-market volatility as a byproduct of its efforts to tighten monetary policy, not an objective.</p><p>“They recognize that stocks can be collateral damage in a tightening cycle,” but that doesn’t mean that stocks “have to collapse,” Devitt said.</p><p>The Fed, however, is prepared to tolerate seeing markets decline and the economy slow and even tip into recession as it focuses on taming inflation, she said.</p><p>The Federal Reserve held the fed funds target rate at a range of 0% to 0.25% between 2008 and 2015, as it dealt with the financial crisis and its aftermath. The Fed also cut rates to near zero again in March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. With a rock-bottom interest rate, the Dow skyrocketed over 40%, while the large-cap index S&amp;P 500 jumped over 60% between March 2020 and December 2021, according to Dow Jones Market Data.</p><p>Investors got used to “the tailwind for over a decade with falling interest rates” while looking for the Fed to step in with its “put” should the going get rocky, said Courtney at Exencial Wealth Advisors.</p><p>“I think (now) the Fed message is ‘you’re not gonna get this tailwind anymore’,” Courtney told MarketWatch on Thursday. “I think markets can grow, but they’re gonna have to grow on their own because the markets are like a greenhouse where the temperatures have to be kept at a certain level all day and all night, and I think that’s the message that markets can and should grow on their own without the greenhouse effect.”</p><p>Meanwhile, the Fed’s aggressive stance means investors should be prepared for what may be a “few more daily stabs downward” that could eventually prove to be a “final big flush,” said Liz Young, head of investment strategy at SoFi, in a Thursday note.</p><p>“This may sound odd, but if that happens swiftly, meaning within the next couple months, that actually becomes the bull case in my view,” she said. “It could be a quick and painful drop, resulting in a renewed move higher later in the year that’s more durable, as inflation falls more notably.”</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Can the Fed Tame Inflation Without Further Crushing the Stock Market? What Investors Need to Know</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCan the Fed Tame Inflation Without Further Crushing the Stock Market? What Investors Need to Know\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-18 08:17 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-fed-isnt-trying-to-wreck-the-stock-market-as-it-wrestles-with-inflation-but-it-isnt-going-to-ride-to-the-rescue-11663366540?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Investors should brace for more volatility with policy makers expected to deliver another jumbo rate hikeFed Chair Jerome Powell says bringing down inflation will cause pain for households and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-fed-isnt-trying-to-wreck-the-stock-market-as-it-wrestles-with-inflation-but-it-isnt-going-to-ride-to-the-rescue-11663366540?mod=home-page\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-fed-isnt-trying-to-wreck-the-stock-market-as-it-wrestles-with-inflation-but-it-isnt-going-to-ride-to-the-rescue-11663366540?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2268672370","content_text":"Investors should brace for more volatility with policy makers expected to deliver another jumbo rate hikeFed Chair Jerome Powell says bringing down inflation will cause pain for households and businesses.The Federal Reserve isn’t trying to slam the stock market as it rapidly raises interest rates in its bid to slow inflation still running red hot — but investors need to be prepared for more pain and volatility because policy makers aren’t going to be cowed by a deepening selloff, investors and strategists said.“I don’t think they’re necessarily trying to drive inflation down by destroying stock prices or bond prices, but it is having that effect.” said Tim Courtney, chief investment officer at Exencial Wealth Advisors, in an interview.U.S. stocks fell sharply in the past week after hopes for a pronounced cooling in inflation were dashed by a hotter-than-expected August inflation reading. The data cemented expectations among fed-funds futures traders for a rate hike of at least 75 basis points when the Fed concludes its policy meeting on Sept. 21, with some traders and analysts looking for an increase of 100 basis points, or a full percentage point.The Dow Jones Industrial Average logged a 4.1% weekly fall, while the S&P 500 dropped 4.8% and the Nasdaq Composite suffered a 5.5% decline. The S&P 500 ended Friday below the 3,900 level viewed as an important area of technical support, with some chart watchers eyeing the potential for a test of the large-cap benchmark’s 2022 low at 3,666.77 set on June 16.A profit warning from global shipping giant and economic bellwether FedEx Corp. further stoked recession fears, contributing to stock-market losses on Friday.Treasurys also fell, with yield on the 2-year Treasury note soaring to a nearly 15-year high above 3.85% on expectations the Fed will continue pushing rates higher in coming months. Yields rise as prices fall.Investors are operating in an environment where the central bank’s need to rein in stubborn inflation is widely seen having eliminated the notion of a figurative “Fed put” on the stock market.The concept of a Fed put has been around since at least the October 1987 stock-market crash prompted the Alan Greenspan-led central bank to lower interest rates. An actual put option is a financial derivative that gives the holder the right but not the obligation to sell the underlying asset at a set level, known as the strike price, serving as an insurance policy against a market decline.Some economists and analysts have even suggested the Fed should welcome or even aim for market losses, which could serve to tighten financial conditions as investors scale back spending.William Dudley, the former president of the New York Fed, argued earlier this year that the central bank won’t get a handle on inflation that’s running near a 40-year high unless they make investors suffer. “It’s hard to know how much the Federal Reserve will need to do to get inflation under control,” wrote Dudley in a Bloomberg column in April. “But one thing is certain: to be effective, it’ll have to inflict more losses on stock and bond investors than it has so far.”Some market participants aren’t convinced. Aoifinn Devitt, chief investment officer at Moneta,said the Fed likely sees stock-market volatility as a byproduct of its efforts to tighten monetary policy, not an objective.“They recognize that stocks can be collateral damage in a tightening cycle,” but that doesn’t mean that stocks “have to collapse,” Devitt said.The Fed, however, is prepared to tolerate seeing markets decline and the economy slow and even tip into recession as it focuses on taming inflation, she said.The Federal Reserve held the fed funds target rate at a range of 0% to 0.25% between 2008 and 2015, as it dealt with the financial crisis and its aftermath. The Fed also cut rates to near zero again in March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. With a rock-bottom interest rate, the Dow skyrocketed over 40%, while the large-cap index S&P 500 jumped over 60% between March 2020 and December 2021, according to Dow Jones Market Data.Investors got used to “the tailwind for over a decade with falling interest rates” while looking for the Fed to step in with its “put” should the going get rocky, said Courtney at Exencial Wealth Advisors.“I think (now) the Fed message is ‘you’re not gonna get this tailwind anymore’,” Courtney told MarketWatch on Thursday. “I think markets can grow, but they’re gonna have to grow on their own because the markets are like a greenhouse where the temperatures have to be kept at a certain level all day and all night, and I think that’s the message that markets can and should grow on their own without the greenhouse effect.”Meanwhile, the Fed’s aggressive stance means investors should be prepared for what may be a “few more daily stabs downward” that could eventually prove to be a “final big flush,” said Liz Young, head of investment strategy at SoFi, in a Thursday note.“This may sound odd, but if that happens swiftly, meaning within the next couple months, that actually becomes the bull case in my view,” she said. “It could be a quick and painful drop, resulting in a renewed move higher later in the year that’s more durable, as inflation falls more notably.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2414,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9937054298,"gmtCreate":1663331373314,"gmtModify":1676537253582,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"‌<a href=\"\">[捂脸]&nbsp;</a>‌","listText":"‌<a href=\"\">[捂脸]&nbsp;</a>‌","text":"‌[捂脸] ‌","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9937054298","repostId":"2267769807","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2267769807","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1663331189,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2267769807?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-16 20:26","market":"us","language":"en","title":"1 Electric Vehicle Stock to Buy Hand Over Fist and 2 With Serious Red Flags","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2267769807","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Not all EV stocks will be winners, but one has a lot of tailwinds at its back.","content":"<div>\n<p>Electric vehicle (EV) stocks have gotten a lot of attention over the last few years as production has increased and multiple companies have come public, but that doesn't mean all EV stocks are good ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/16/1-electric-vehicle-stock-to-buy-hand-over-fist-and/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>1 Electric Vehicle Stock to Buy Hand Over Fist and 2 With Serious Red Flags</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n1 Electric Vehicle Stock to Buy Hand Over Fist and 2 With Serious Red Flags\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-16 20:26 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/16/1-electric-vehicle-stock-to-buy-hand-over-fist-and/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Electric vehicle (EV) stocks have gotten a lot of attention over the last few years as production has increased and multiple companies have come public, but that doesn't mean all EV stocks are good ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/16/1-electric-vehicle-stock-to-buy-hand-over-fist-and/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4574":"无人驾驶","CHPT":"ChargePoint Holdings Inc.","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4566":"资本集团","GM":"通用汽车","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4523":"印度概念","BK4555":"新能源车"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/09/16/1-electric-vehicle-stock-to-buy-hand-over-fist-and/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2267769807","content_text":"Electric vehicle (EV) stocks have gotten a lot of attention over the last few years as production has increased and multiple companies have come public, but that doesn't mean all EV stocks are good investments. Companies still have to make money building and selling vehicles, which has historically been the hardest part of the auto business.Given the current trends, I think General Motors is the one EV stock to buy hand over fist, while ChargePoint and Canoo have some serious red flags.General MotorsGM isn't known as an electric vehicle company today, but its future is electric. Production is low but ramping up on the Chevy Bolt, GMC Hummer EV, and Cadillac Lyriq -- and that's just the start of a plan to be all-electric by 2035. On top of those vehicles, GM owns a majority stake in Cruise, which is launching a fully autonomous ride sharing vehicle that will be manufactured by GM.While the future is electric, GM is a highly profitable business today and trades at a reasonable value for investors. You can see that the trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is under eight, which is less than half of the market's P/E ratio of 20.6.GM Revenue (TTM) data by YChartsWhat really gets me excited about GM's electric future is Cruise. The GM-made Origin (shown below) is launching next year, and Cruise announced recently that it will launch autonomous ride-sharing vehicles for public use in Phoenix and Austin, Texas later this year. The future is autonomous and electric, and GM is leading the way.Image source: Cruise.Red flags for ChargePointWith all of these electric vehicles hitting the road, it would make sense that an EV charging company would be a great place to invest. But even a leader like ChargePoint has some major red flags.Let's start with the financials, where revenue growth is strong, but margins are falling and losses are expanding.CHPT Revenue (TTM) data by YChartsChargePoint may not be the business investors want it to be, either. $84.1 million of ChargePoint's revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2023 was from selling \"networked charging systems,\" which \"consists of the deliveries of EV charging system infrastructure, which include a range of Level 2 AC products for use in residential, commercial and fleet applications, and Level 3 DC, or fast-charge products for use in commercial and fleet applications.\" In other words, ChargePoint is selling EV chargers, which are a commodity piece of hardware.$24.1 million in revenue last quarter was from subscriptions and \"other\" sources of revenue, which are higher-margin, but that's a tiny business for a company worth $6 billion.I don't think there's any moat in EV charging, and with ChargePoint's losses and high market cap, this is a stock with far too many red flags.CanooThe concept behind Canoo is reasonable enough: A platform electric vehicle design that could be turned into a uniquely designed lifestyle vehicle, pickup truck, and delivery vehicle. But creating an interesting concept and delivering vehicles profitably to customers are very different things.You can see below that Canoo is burning cash rapidly and only has $33.8 million in cash on the balance sheet, likely meaning the company will need to raise cash to produce vehicles, since it doesn't currently have revenue.GOEV Revenue (TTM) data by YChartsCanoo is partnering with VDL Groep to build its vehicles, so there isn't a big capital outlay to build a factory, but that doesn't mean this business isn't full of risks. The balance sheet is terrible, the company is losing money at an unsustainable rate, and it's not yet clear if there's enough demand for vehicles to be profitable in a saturating EV market.If you like Canoo's concept, I think a better potential investment would be Rivian. The company has its own manufacturing facility, a similar platform design, and a bigger backlog for both individual customers and commercial customers.EVs are here, but not every stock will winDespite the fact that electric vehicles are quickly gaining market share and continue to improve in cost and performance, that's not a guarantee that every EV stock will be profitable for investors. Given their businesses and financial results, I think GM is the one to bet on right now, and I would avoid ChargePoint and Canoo.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CHPT":0.9,"GM":0.9,"GOEV":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3091,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9904769750,"gmtCreate":1660096628272,"gmtModify":1703477871316,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Based on recent comments and these stock sales sounds like Elon obviously still wants to buy Twitter&nbsp;","listText":"Based on recent comments and these stock sales sounds like Elon obviously still wants to buy Twitter&nbsp;","text":"Based on recent comments and these stock sales sounds like Elon obviously still wants to buy Twitter","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9904769750","repostId":"2258257550","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2103,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9077125262,"gmtCreate":1658473262756,"gmtModify":1676536164982,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Abit late to the party no ? Market already priced in news....","listText":"Abit late to the party no ? Market already priced in news....","text":"Abit late to the party no ? Market already priced in news....","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9077125262","repostId":"2253749498","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2253749498","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1658469162,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2253749498?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-22 13:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The CHIPS Act Could Boost These 3 Semiconductor Stocks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2253749498","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Intel, TSMC, and Texas Instruments would all benefit if it passed.","content":"<div>\n<p>In June 2020, the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors for America (CHIPS) Act was introduced in the House of Representatives by U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas). The act called for...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/21/chips-act-could-boost-these-semiconductor-stocks/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The CHIPS Act Could Boost These 3 Semiconductor Stocks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe CHIPS Act Could Boost These 3 Semiconductor Stocks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-22 13:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/21/chips-act-could-boost-these-semiconductor-stocks/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>In June 2020, the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors for America (CHIPS) Act was introduced in the House of Representatives by U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas). The act called for...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/21/chips-act-could-boost-these-semiconductor-stocks/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔","TSM":"台积电","TXN":"德州仪器"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/07/21/chips-act-could-boost-these-semiconductor-stocks/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2253749498","content_text":"In June 2020, the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors for America (CHIPS) Act was introduced in the House of Representatives by U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas). The act called for the U.S. to boost its subsidies for domestic chipmakers to address the global chip shortage, reduce the country's dependence on Asian chip foundries, and stay ahead of China in the semiconductor race.The CHIPS Act would provide $52 billion in subsidies and tax breaks for domestic chipmakers. But more than two years later, it still hasn't passed Congress. The Senate recently cleared the way toward a final vote on the bill next week, but some Republicans are still reportedly reluctant to approve those high subsidies. Some chipmakers have also pointed out that the act favors integrated device manufacturers, which produce their own chips, over \"fabless\" chipmakers, which outsource manufacturing to third-party foundries.All that noise can make it difficult to figure out exactly which chipmakers would benefit from the passage of the CHIPS Act. So today, I'll highlight three chip stocks that could rally the most if it's approved.1. IntelIntel is an integrated device manufacturer that still produces most of its chips, but over the past decade, it fell behind Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(also known as TSMC) in the \"process race\" to create smaller and denser chips. Intel lost its crown as it struggled with R&D blunders, manufacturing mishaps, chip shortages, and delays. TSMC also started installing ASML Holding's top-tier extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography systems -- which etch circuit patterns into the world's most advanced chips -- long before Intel did.As a result, Intel is now approximately one to two chip generations behind TSMC. TSMC plans to boost its capital expenditures from 2021's $30 billion to a historic high of $40 billion in 2022 to maintain that lead. Intel can only afford to increase its capital expenditures to $27 billion this year -- yet it claims it can catch up to TSMC in the process race by 2025.That's why Intel has been aggressively lobbying for the approval of the CHIPS Act. As the country's largest chipmaker, it believes it can secure a large portion of those subsidies, allowing it to close its spending gap with TSMC. It also plans to open up its domestic foundries to fabless chipmakers, which could help it challenge TSMC in the third-party contract chipmaking market.2. Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingAt first glance, the CHIPS Act seems aimed at reducing the dependence of fabless chipmakers like Advanced Micro Devices, Nvidia, and Qualcomm on TSMC and other Asian foundries.However, the U.S. has also been courting TSMC with subsidies to convince it to open more stateside foundries. Back in 2020, Washington subsidized the construction of TSMC's $12 billion plant in Arizona for the production of its 5nm chips -- which are less advanced than the chips it makes in Taiwan, but far more advanced than the older-generation chips it manufactures in China.Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger loudly protested that decision, but the CHIPS Act would likely free up more subsidies for TSMC's Arizona plant and other foundries it might open in the future. If TSMC builds additional plants in the U.S., it could conceivably snuff out Intel's plans of becoming a major third-party contract chipmaker.3. Texas InstrumentsTexas Instruments provides a wide range of analog and embedded chips to the automotive, industrial, consumer electronics, and communications industries. It manufactures its analog chips at its own foundries and outsources some of its embedded chips to overseas foundries.Over the past few years, Texas Instruments has been upgrading its own plants from 200mm to 300mm wafers to reduce the costs of its unpackaged parts by roughly 40%. That strategy enabled it to consistently expand its gross margins.But earlier this year, it announced that it would increase its capital expenditures to about $3.5 billion annually -- a mid-teens percentage of its projected revenues -- over the next four years to upgrade its plants. It also plans to keep that spending elevated at about 10% of its revenues from 2025 to 2030.Texas Instruments can easily handle that spending boost, but it could change the public perception of the chipmaker as a shareholder-friendly company that regularly returns all of its free cash flow to investors through buybacks and dividends. The CHIPS Act might help it mitigate that spending pressure.Not all chipmakers will benefit from the CHIPS ActShares of Intel, TSMC, and Texas Instruments will likely rally if the CHIPS Act is finally approved, as will shares of other American integrated device manufacturers like Micron Technology or Skyworks Solutions.However, fabless chipmakers like Nvidia, AMD, and Qualcomm probably won't see much of a boost, since they're still dependent on big Asian foundries like TSMC and Samsung. The CHIPS Act won't be a magic bullet for the U.S. semiconductor industry, but it could convince more chipmakers to build first-party fabrication plants domestically again.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TXN":0.6,"TSM":0.9,"INTC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3128,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9048653363,"gmtCreate":1656206359152,"gmtModify":1676535784104,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"🍿","listText":"🍿","text":"🍿","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9048653363","repostId":"1199426737","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2410,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9043308154,"gmtCreate":1655867178778,"gmtModify":1676535722191,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Interesting&nbsp;","listText":"Interesting&nbsp;","text":"Interesting","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9043308154","repostId":"1115038434","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1115038434","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1655864609,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1115038434?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-22 10:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cathie Wood Loads Up $1M More Of This Self-Driving Trucking Firm As Shares Drop 80% YTD","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1115038434","media":"Benzinga","summary":"ZINGER KEY POINTSCathie Wood loads up about $1.1M shares in TuSimpleStock is trading way below its I","content":"<div>\n<p>ZINGER KEY POINTSCathie Wood loads up about $1.1M shares in TuSimpleStock is trading way below its IPO price last AprilArk Invest raises exposure after the company announced yet another key exit in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/22/06/27805674/cathie-wood-loads-up-1m-worth-shares-in-this-self-driving-trucking-company-on-tuesday\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606299360108","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cathie Wood Loads Up $1M More Of This Self-Driving Trucking Firm As Shares Drop 80% YTD</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCathie Wood Loads Up $1M More Of This Self-Driving Trucking Firm As Shares Drop 80% YTD\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-22 10:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.benzinga.com/news/22/06/27805674/cathie-wood-loads-up-1m-worth-shares-in-this-self-driving-trucking-company-on-tuesday><strong>Benzinga</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>ZINGER KEY POINTSCathie Wood loads up about $1.1M shares in TuSimpleStock is trading way below its IPO price last AprilArk Invest raises exposure after the company announced yet another key exit in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.benzinga.com/news/22/06/27805674/cathie-wood-loads-up-1m-worth-shares-in-this-self-driving-trucking-company-on-tuesday\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.benzinga.com/news/22/06/27805674/cathie-wood-loads-up-1m-worth-shares-in-this-self-driving-trucking-company-on-tuesday","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1115038434","content_text":"ZINGER KEY POINTSCathie Wood loads up about $1.1M shares in TuSimpleStock is trading way below its IPO price last AprilArk Invest raises exposure after the company announced yet another key exit in two monthsCathie Wood-led Ark Investment Management on Tuesday further raised its exposure to self-driving trucking company TuSimple Holdings Inc, its first buy in the San Diego, California-based startup in over two months.The popular stock-picking firm loaded up 146,700 shares, estimated to be worth $1.07 million, based on Tuesday’s closing price in TuSimple.The self-driving truck startup’s stock closed 5.5% higher at $7.3 a share on Tuesday. TuSimple went public in April last year and began trading at an IPO price of $40. The stock is down 80% so far this year.Ark Invest owns shares in TuSimple via two of its six exchange-traded funds — the Ark Innovation ETF and the Ark Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF.The St. Petersburg, Florida-based money managing firm held 12 million shares — worth $83.3 million— in TuSimple, before Tuesday’s trade.The latest purchase lifts Ark's stake in the company, which is developing commercial-ready, Level 4, fully autonomous trucks for customers by 8.9%.TuSimple shares rose on Tuesday after the company announced the departure of chief financial officer Pat Dillon, whose exit follows a key management reshuffle in March when Cheng Lu stepped down as CEO.Wood, a Tesla Inc, has invested heavily in the Elon Musk-led electric vehicle company that aims to attain full-self driving capability sometime next year. Ark Invest has also recently started buying shares in General Motors Co because of its self-driving capabilities with Cruise.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSP":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2017,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9049551888,"gmtCreate":1655819754544,"gmtModify":1676535711131,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"nice","listText":"nice","text":"nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9049551888","repostId":"1146013913","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1146013913","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1655819622,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1146013913?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-21 21:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir Shares Jumped 7.5% in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1146013913","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Palantir shares jumped 7.5% in morning trading after Palantir initiated with a Buy at BofA.BofA anal","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Palantir shares jumped 7.5% in morning trading after Palantir initiated with a Buy at BofA.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae4273543430d9a9f601fa2349f39218\" tg-width=\"874\" tg-height=\"621\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>BofA analyst Mariana Perez Mora initiated coverage of Palantir Technologies with a Buy rating and $13 price target. The analyst sees the company as a beneficiary of &#34;rapidly growing demand&#34; for acritical intelligence platforms in both commercial and government end markets. Palantir&#39;s &#34;dominant&#34; position in the AI-powered software market should support more than 30% annual revenue growth and improving profits, Perez Mora tells investors in a research note.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir Shares Jumped 7.5% in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir Shares Jumped 7.5% in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-06-21 21:53</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Palantir shares jumped 7.5% in morning trading after Palantir initiated with a Buy at BofA.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae4273543430d9a9f601fa2349f39218\" tg-width=\"874\" tg-height=\"621\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>BofA analyst Mariana Perez Mora initiated coverage of Palantir Technologies with a Buy rating and $13 price target. The analyst sees the company as a beneficiary of &#34;rapidly growing demand&#34; for acritical intelligence platforms in both commercial and government end markets. Palantir&#39;s &#34;dominant&#34; position in the AI-powered software market should support more than 30% annual revenue growth and improving profits, Perez Mora tells investors in a research note.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1146013913","content_text":"Palantir shares jumped 7.5% in morning trading after Palantir initiated with a Buy at BofA.BofA analyst Mariana Perez Mora initiated coverage of Palantir Technologies with a Buy rating and $13 price target. The analyst sees the company as a beneficiary of \"rapidly growing demand\" for acritical intelligence platforms in both commercial and government end markets. Palantir's \"dominant\" position in the AI-powered software market should support more than 30% annual revenue growth and improving profits, Perez Mora tells investors in a research note.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3138,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9054685097,"gmtCreate":1655382864319,"gmtModify":1676535626802,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"GM&nbsp; is weighed down by heavy debt&nbsp;","listText":"GM&nbsp; is weighed down by heavy debt&nbsp;","text":"GM is weighed down by heavy debt","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9054685097","repostId":"1127502169","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1127502169","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1655381225,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1127502169?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-16 20:07","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is the Road Ahead Bumpy for GM and Ford?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1127502169","media":"TipRanks","summary":"Story HighlightsGeneral Motors and Ford seem confident enough to navigate the recession but are keep","content":"<div>\n<p>Story HighlightsGeneral Motors and Ford seem confident enough to navigate the recession but are keeping a close eye on every development in the markets.Top management at General Motors (GM) and Ford ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/is-the-road-ahead-bumpy-for-gm-and-ford/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606183248679","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the Road Ahead Bumpy for GM and Ford?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the Road Ahead Bumpy for GM and Ford?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-16 20:07 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/is-the-road-ahead-bumpy-for-gm-and-ford/><strong>TipRanks</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Story HighlightsGeneral Motors and Ford seem confident enough to navigate the recession but are keeping a close eye on every development in the markets.Top management at General Motors (GM) and Ford ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/is-the-road-ahead-bumpy-for-gm-and-ford/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GM":"通用汽车","F":"福特汽车"},"source_url":"https://www.tipranks.com/news/article/is-the-road-ahead-bumpy-for-gm-and-ford/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1127502169","content_text":"Story HighlightsGeneral Motors and Ford seem confident enough to navigate the recession but are keeping a close eye on every development in the markets.Top management at General Motors (GM) and Ford Motor (F) have reaffirmed that demand for their cars and trucks remains strong. Both U.S.-based auto giants expressed their confidence despite the Federal Reserve’s biggest-ever rate hike since 1994 and skyrocketing oil and gas prices.However, at a Deutsche Bank conference held yesterday, both automakers cautioned investors that they are keeping a close watch on any possible signs of a recession in the U.S. in the wake of rising interest rates and inflation, coupled with record-high gas prices.GM shares gained over 3% following positive management commentary at the Deutsche Bank Global Auto Industry Conference, while Ford shares remained almost flat.General Motors’ TakeGM’s management is holding an extremely cautious stance overall and evaluating its capital expenditure decisions.While the company will execute its long-term, revenue-driving investments in electric vehicles, software, and other new technology, it will remain conservative in adding headcount.Positively, GM reaffirmed its previously guided outlook of increasing vehicle production by 25% to 30% year-over-year for 2022.The company stated that they have been able to negate the effects of higher supply chain costs by $5 billion through price increases and cost-cutting measures, and by maintaining a low level of unsold cars and trucks.GM’s CFO commented, “We obviously have long-term investments that we have to make. We have short-term targets that we have to hit. And in order to respond to this rapidly changing environment, we’ve got to be ready to act, and part of that is what are those signs that we’re going to be looking for.”The Wall Street community is cautiously optimistic about the stock, with a Moderate Buy consensus rating based on 12 Buys, two Holds, and one Sell. The average General Motors price target of $56.93 implies 66.56% upside potential to current levels.GM scores a 9 out of 10 on TipRanks’ Smart Score rating system, indicating that the stock has strong potential to outperform market expectations.Ford is Keeping a Close WatchFord CFO, John Lawler, also reiterated that demand remains consistent despite the looming macro uncertainty.However, higher commodity prices, especially for electric-vehicle batteries for its EV Mustang Mach-E, have negatively impacted profitability despite increased pricing.Moreover, Ford’s credit segment is witnessing a rise in loan delinquencies for auto loans, which remained low during the pandemic years. Though not a red flag yet, the company is keeping a close watch.The Street is cautiously optimistic about Ford with a Moderate Buy consensus rating, based on six Buys, 10 Holds, and one Sell. The average Ford price target of $18.63 implies 51.83% upside potential to current levels.ConclusionIt was reassuring to hear positive comments from both GM and Ford regarding the robust demand and overall momentum. However, both automakers are closely monitoring the current situation.They are better equipped to handle any possible downturn to safeguard their interests, including priority on spending on longer-term initiatives and keeping low inventories, thereby avoiding deep discounts to sell old models in case of a severe recession.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GM":0.9,"F":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2852,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9055081947,"gmtCreate":1655218112189,"gmtModify":1676535586909,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Long term - Chinese tech is favourable. Short term - Still volatile.&nbsp;","listText":"Long term - Chinese tech is favourable. Short term - Still volatile.&nbsp;","text":"Long term - Chinese tech is favourable. Short term - Still volatile.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9055081947","repostId":"1121400553","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1121400553","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1655217932,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121400553?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-14 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121400553","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fisca","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Inflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.</li><li>Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.</li><li>Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.</li><li>Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.</li><li>I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.</li></ul><p><b>Summary</b></p><p>In this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies&#39; business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.</p><p>I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).</p><p><b>The Market has turned</b></p><p>The Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.</p><p>The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn&#39;t address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.</p><p>Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/41a942d3225895324a1293c6e8fe5852\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.</p><p><b>The Fed wants a reverse Wealth Effect</b></p><p>The Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn&#39;t break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.</p><p>Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn&#39;t work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.</p><p>Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.</p><p><b>Amazon and Alibaba as Proxy</b></p><p>Both Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.</p><p>More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.</p><p><b>Why short Amazon?</b></p><p>The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon&#39;s business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.</p><p>Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.</p><p>Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don&#39;t believe that is likely to happen.</p><p><b>Why long Alibaba?</b></p><p>The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.</p><p>Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People&#39;s Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.</p><p>In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be &#34;uninvestable&#34;. However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China&#39;s interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.</p><p>Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.</p><p>The Charts speak for themselves <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5cf7f1ea0742a9c2111a779c35014b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.</p><p><b>The Takeaways</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a293d91b08078d7eaba98b982685125\" tg-width=\"618\" tg-height=\"319\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><b>Risks to the Pair Trade</b></p><p>The Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.</p><p>The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don&#39;t expect it in 2022 &amp; early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.</p><p>The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.</p><p><b>Closing Thoughts</b></p><p>Even with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-14 22:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","AMZN":"亚马逊","09988":"阿里巴巴-W"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121400553","content_text":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.SummaryIn this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies' business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).The Market has turnedThe Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn't address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.Data by YChartsThe disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.The Fed wants a reverse Wealth EffectThe Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn't break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn't work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.Amazon and Alibaba as ProxyBoth Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.Why short Amazon?The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon's business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don't believe that is likely to happen.Why long Alibaba?The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People's Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be \"uninvestable\". However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China's interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.The Charts speak for themselves Data by YChartsThe stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.The TakeawaysRisks to the Pair TradeThe Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don't expect it in 2022 & early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.Closing ThoughtsEven with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BABA":0.9,"09988":0.9,"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3824,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9056621263,"gmtCreate":1655005350152,"gmtModify":1676535547402,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"DCA, yay","listText":"DCA, yay","text":"DCA, yay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9056621263","repostId":"1105643239","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105643239","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1654997027,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1105643239?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-12 09:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nvidia Stock: Secular Growth Provides Hope","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105643239","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryNvidia's GPU stronghold provides it with secular growth attributes.CPU market penetration cou","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Nvidia&#39;s GPU stronghold provides it with secular growth attributes.</li><li>CPU market penetration could tap into the data center space, with time-series AI providing a value-add.</li><li>Supply Chains are still a mess, but a few critical aspects are shifting. In addition, Nvidia has market dominance, providing it with bargaining power.</li><li>The stock&#39;s recent downturn has led to it being undervalued on a relative basis.</li><li>A quantitative risk analysis implies that it&#39;s an extremely risky bet. However, the recent sell-off is likely overdone.</li></ul><p>I&#39;m sure the majority of semiconductor investors are relatively discouraged after most related stocks have experienced significant drawdowns since the turn of the year. However, after analyzing the industry and Nvidia&#39;s (NASDAQ:NVDA) role, we&#39;ve concluded that there&#39;s been an overreaction by market participants and that Nvidia, the most prominent GPU producer, is part of a secular growth pattern that&#39;s currently underpriced by the market.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b28f1f4a49946a511a88e8e623ca19bb\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Data byYCharts</p><p><b>Market &amp; Product Analysis</b></p><p>Nvidia&#39;s exposure is still concentrated on gaming and professional visualization, with the two markets combined making up nearly 90% of the firm&#39;s revenue mix. Nvidia&#39;s gaming unit is currently being driven by robust growth in desktop GPUs, with high-end demand for its GeForce RTX 30-Series products continuing.</p><p>Due to the growing demand for enterprise AI, I see much scope emerging for Nvidia&#39;s data centre operations. Existing GPUs provide image recognition abilities. However, the company&#39;s newly launched Grace CPU chip provides time-series attributes that could end up being a big breadwinner for the firm.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d3d3466d7c19047f6def94742f88a44b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"136\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p><b>BusinessQuant</b></p><p>As mentioned, Nvidia&#39;s primary focus is on GPUs, where it owns approximately 78% of the market, which provides it with significant pricing power. The firm&#39;s pricing power is conveyed by its ROIC (Return on Invested Capital) ratio of57.48%(explanation here) and its gross margin of65.26%. Gross margins are a valuable indicator of economies of scale. Nvidia&#39;s economies of scale status allows it to take advantage of matters such as bargaining power over its suppliers and pricing power over its customers.</p><p>As Nvidia expands into the CPU market and as competitors enter the hotly contested semiconductor industry, we&#39;ll likely see a slight dilution of its GPU market share. Nonetheless, the firm&#39;s massive exposure to a market (GPUs) with a projected 2020-2025 CAGR (Constant Annual Growth Rate) of32.7%means that Nvidia is a secular growth stock, and transitory economic downturns don&#39;t provide much of a headwind.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/446f2b9c26609e31583fa6f60d678b1b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"240\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>WCCF TECH</p><p><b>AI Could Really Spark Nvidia&#39;s Growth Trajectory</b></p><p>I mentioned before that Nvidia could tap into the AI market. I&#39;d like to expand on this, as many aren&#39;t quite familiar with the growth areas in the market.</p><p>Nvidia recently launched a library called cuDNN. The library is a database for artificial neural network (ANN) related concepts. ANNs are state-of-the-art AI networks that mimic the human brain to replicate time-series and image recognition patterns.</p><p>Time-series patterns can be applied to various enterprise solutions and automotive applications. In contrast, image recognition can be applied to artificial art, fashion, and advertising.</p><p>In essence, Nvidia has the scope to pivot with its existing technology into a neural network market that&#39;s growing at21.5%per year.</p><p><b>Supply-Chain Aspects</b></p><p>Let&#39;s start by looking at the main congestion points in the supply chain. First of all, we need to look at Polysilicon production, which has increased by7.24%since April in China. This is a tremendous positive for the semiconductor domain and related industries. A broader look at production conveys that China&#39;s PMI is gathering steam again, providing optimism to supply chain prospects.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/330777c9878f9c29ae8d3949b09abf8f\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"417\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>Furthermore, Nvidia itself is stocked with inventory, as it&#39;s experienced a year-over-year increase in finished goods and raw materials. Processed goods are an issue. However, with the PMI in China picking up, processed goods will likely come good soon.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/359bb9dfe4f57983afe011cf2fc9ebbb\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"509\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>Although I&#39;m generally bullish about Nvidia&#39;s supply-chain issues, I&#39;m concerned about the Russia-Ukraine war. Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine are massive exporters of ferrous metals. If we&#39;re in an ex-Black Sea trade globe, we&#39;ll likely see input costs continue to rise in the semiconductor space, as primary sector procurement restructuring will take considerable time. Lastly, China&#39;s Covid-19 lockdown policies are uncertain and inconsistent. Thus, supply-chain consolidation could be at risk.</p><p><b>Relative Valuation</b></p><p>It&#39;s clear that Nvidia&#39;s potential to expand is there. Yet, from a stock investing vantage point, we must discover whether the possibilities have been priced in or not. Before its more than 40% year-to-date downturn, I&#39;d say we&#39;d be having a different conversation right now. However, relative valuation metrics imply that Nvidia stock is undervalued at its current price.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a2d187f038705a13f7c3b4e676e8c07f\" tg-width=\"628\" tg-height=\"153\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha</p><p>Nvidia&#39;s price-earnings is at a 21.77% normalized discount, which means that it&#39;s trading lower than its 5-year cyclical average. In addition, the stock&#39;s PE is accommodated by a PEG, which is below its 1.00x valuation threshold. A PEG ratio of below1.00xconveys that the firm&#39;s earnings-per-share growth is outpacing its P/E growth. Thus, considering both metrics cohesively, we can conclude that Nvidia stock is undervalued on an earnings-per-share basis.</p><p>Furthermore, the stock&#39;s EV/EBITDA suggests that the market undervalues Nvidia&#39;s operating earnings before depreciation and amortization, as the metric is at a22.50%discount to its 5-year average.</p><p><b>Quantitative Risk Analysis</b></p><p>Quantitative risk measures contextualize the risk/reward we&#39;re getting whenever we invest in a stock. Additionally, it helps us stay away from the panic button as we&#39;re aware of what kind of stock price deviations to expect.</p><p>Nvidia&#39;s stock doesn&#39;t provide an ideal Sharpe Ratio (below 1.00x), which can be explained by its Value at Risk. The VaR indicates that Nvidia&#39;s stock could lose 23.07% of its value in a month, 5% of the times.</p><p>These deviations are quite substantial. However, consider that Nvidia&#39;s already lost nearly half of its value since the turn of the year and that these statistical downward deviations usually occur whenever the stock&#39;s topped out.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/553c22a2c1b3c6c9c3a7fbaafb8183ba\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"454\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>YCharts on Seeking Alpha</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nvidia Stock: Secular Growth Provides Hope</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNvidia Stock: Secular Growth Provides Hope\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-12 09:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517873-nvidia-stock-secular-growth-provides-hope><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryNvidia's GPU stronghold provides it with secular growth attributes.CPU market penetration could tap into the data center space, with time-series AI providing a value-add.Supply Chains are still...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517873-nvidia-stock-secular-growth-provides-hope\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NVDA":"英伟达"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517873-nvidia-stock-secular-growth-provides-hope","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105643239","content_text":"SummaryNvidia's GPU stronghold provides it with secular growth attributes.CPU market penetration could tap into the data center space, with time-series AI providing a value-add.Supply Chains are still a mess, but a few critical aspects are shifting. In addition, Nvidia has market dominance, providing it with bargaining power.The stock's recent downturn has led to it being undervalued on a relative basis.A quantitative risk analysis implies that it's an extremely risky bet. However, the recent sell-off is likely overdone.I'm sure the majority of semiconductor investors are relatively discouraged after most related stocks have experienced significant drawdowns since the turn of the year. However, after analyzing the industry and Nvidia's (NASDAQ:NVDA) role, we've concluded that there's been an overreaction by market participants and that Nvidia, the most prominent GPU producer, is part of a secular growth pattern that's currently underpriced by the market.Data byYChartsMarket & Product AnalysisNvidia's exposure is still concentrated on gaming and professional visualization, with the two markets combined making up nearly 90% of the firm's revenue mix. Nvidia's gaming unit is currently being driven by robust growth in desktop GPUs, with high-end demand for its GeForce RTX 30-Series products continuing.Due to the growing demand for enterprise AI, I see much scope emerging for Nvidia's data centre operations. Existing GPUs provide image recognition abilities. However, the company's newly launched Grace CPU chip provides time-series attributes that could end up being a big breadwinner for the firm.BusinessQuantAs mentioned, Nvidia's primary focus is on GPUs, where it owns approximately 78% of the market, which provides it with significant pricing power. The firm's pricing power is conveyed by its ROIC (Return on Invested Capital) ratio of57.48%(explanation here) and its gross margin of65.26%. Gross margins are a valuable indicator of economies of scale. Nvidia's economies of scale status allows it to take advantage of matters such as bargaining power over its suppliers and pricing power over its customers.As Nvidia expands into the CPU market and as competitors enter the hotly contested semiconductor industry, we'll likely see a slight dilution of its GPU market share. Nonetheless, the firm's massive exposure to a market (GPUs) with a projected 2020-2025 CAGR (Constant Annual Growth Rate) of32.7%means that Nvidia is a secular growth stock, and transitory economic downturns don't provide much of a headwind.WCCF TECHAI Could Really Spark Nvidia's Growth TrajectoryI mentioned before that Nvidia could tap into the AI market. I'd like to expand on this, as many aren't quite familiar with the growth areas in the market.Nvidia recently launched a library called cuDNN. The library is a database for artificial neural network (ANN) related concepts. ANNs are state-of-the-art AI networks that mimic the human brain to replicate time-series and image recognition patterns.Time-series patterns can be applied to various enterprise solutions and automotive applications. In contrast, image recognition can be applied to artificial art, fashion, and advertising.In essence, Nvidia has the scope to pivot with its existing technology into a neural network market that's growing at21.5%per year.Supply-Chain AspectsLet's start by looking at the main congestion points in the supply chain. First of all, we need to look at Polysilicon production, which has increased by7.24%since April in China. This is a tremendous positive for the semiconductor domain and related industries. A broader look at production conveys that China's PMI is gathering steam again, providing optimism to supply chain prospects.Data by YChartsFurthermore, Nvidia itself is stocked with inventory, as it's experienced a year-over-year increase in finished goods and raw materials. Processed goods are an issue. However, with the PMI in China picking up, processed goods will likely come good soon.Data by YChartsAlthough I'm generally bullish about Nvidia's supply-chain issues, I'm concerned about the Russia-Ukraine war. Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine are massive exporters of ferrous metals. If we're in an ex-Black Sea trade globe, we'll likely see input costs continue to rise in the semiconductor space, as primary sector procurement restructuring will take considerable time. Lastly, China's Covid-19 lockdown policies are uncertain and inconsistent. Thus, supply-chain consolidation could be at risk.Relative ValuationIt's clear that Nvidia's potential to expand is there. Yet, from a stock investing vantage point, we must discover whether the possibilities have been priced in or not. Before its more than 40% year-to-date downturn, I'd say we'd be having a different conversation right now. However, relative valuation metrics imply that Nvidia stock is undervalued at its current price.Source: Seeking AlphaNvidia's price-earnings is at a 21.77% normalized discount, which means that it's trading lower than its 5-year cyclical average. In addition, the stock's PE is accommodated by a PEG, which is below its 1.00x valuation threshold. A PEG ratio of below1.00xconveys that the firm's earnings-per-share growth is outpacing its P/E growth. Thus, considering both metrics cohesively, we can conclude that Nvidia stock is undervalued on an earnings-per-share basis.Furthermore, the stock's EV/EBITDA suggests that the market undervalues Nvidia's operating earnings before depreciation and amortization, as the metric is at a22.50%discount to its 5-year average.Quantitative Risk AnalysisQuantitative risk measures contextualize the risk/reward we're getting whenever we invest in a stock. Additionally, it helps us stay away from the panic button as we're aware of what kind of stock price deviations to expect.Nvidia's stock doesn't provide an ideal Sharpe Ratio (below 1.00x), which can be explained by its Value at Risk. The VaR indicates that Nvidia's stock could lose 23.07% of its value in a month, 5% of the times.These deviations are quite substantial. However, consider that Nvidia's already lost nearly half of its value since the turn of the year and that these statistical downward deviations usually occur whenever the stock's topped out.YCharts on Seeking Alpha","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1533,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9056889433,"gmtCreate":1654995828423,"gmtModify":1676535543560,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Unfortunately, true&nbsp;","listText":"Unfortunately, true&nbsp;","text":"Unfortunately, true","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9056889433","repostId":"1193591642","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1193591642","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1654995722,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1193591642?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-12 09:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMC Stock Hasn’t Changed and One Blockbuster Doesn’t Fix It","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1193591642","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"AMC(AMC) scored another temporary \"win\" on the strong performance ofTop Gun: Maverick.The company's CEO is taking liberty with what this means for AMC.While short interest remains high, AMC remains li","content":"<div>\n<p>AMC(AMC) scored another temporary \"win\" on the strong performance of Top Gun: Maverick.The company's CEO is taking liberty with what this means for AMC.While short interest remains high, AMC remains ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/amc-stock-hasnt-changed-and-one-blockbuster-doesnt-fix-it/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMC Stock Hasn’t Changed and One Blockbuster Doesn’t Fix It</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMC Stock Hasn’t Changed and One Blockbuster Doesn’t Fix It\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-12 09:02 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/amc-stock-hasnt-changed-and-one-blockbuster-doesnt-fix-it/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>AMC(AMC) scored another temporary \"win\" on the strong performance of Top Gun: Maverick.The company's CEO is taking liberty with what this means for AMC.While short interest remains high, AMC remains ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/amc-stock-hasnt-changed-and-one-blockbuster-doesnt-fix-it/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/amc-stock-hasnt-changed-and-one-blockbuster-doesnt-fix-it/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1193591642","content_text":"AMC(AMC) scored another temporary \"win\" on the strong performance of Top Gun: Maverick.The company's CEO is taking liberty with what this means for AMC.While short interest remains high, AMC remains little more than a gamble.Potential investors in AMC Entertainment(NYSE:AMC) stock looking for opinions that support buying aren’t going to get that from me. That’s because the stock is simply a bet that a short-term catalyst can ignite a short squeeze, triggering quick gains. Predicting that is exceptionally difficult.Therefore, investing in AMC is more likely to result in losses, despite the success of Top Gun: Maverick.Top GunAMC Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Adam Aron was quick to jump on the success of Tom Cruise’s newest movie, Top Gun: Maverick.But let’s look at the numbers behind its strong release and understand what they mean to AMC in the grander scheme of things. Top Gun garnered$151 million in sales over the Memorial Day weekend, beating expectations that it would bring in $142 million.From the perspective of money in the door and gross margin, it’s undeniably positive. One estimate suggests that AMC likely pulled in $50 million of that total $151 million in sales, roughly a third of everything. That makes sense given its market share and likely resulted in $29 million in gross proceeds.Its box office stands at $274 million as of Jun. 3. That means it might have brought roughly $54 million in proceeds to AMC by now.But investors have to remember, AMC lost $337 million in its latest quarter. So, while Top Gun proceeds help it move toward positive, it’s highly unlikely to move the needle materially.Wishful ThinkingCEO Adam Aron is taking liberty in extrapolating Top Gun’s success to mean more than it does.He wants investors to believe a turnaround is underway, stating, “the domestic box office posted a 122% year over year increase compared to Memorial Day 2021, which then featured A QUIET PLACE PART II and the live-action CRUELLA. It’s also been reported that 55% of the total domestic audience this year was 35 years or older, an indication that older Americans are also returning to movie theatres in significant numbers.”Top Gun is a better movie than those other two from last year’s Memorial Day weekend. And I don’t believe older Americans are returning to theatres. Rather, they are going to see Top Gun because it’s very nostalgic for those who saw the original Top Gun.Short Interest PlayAMC remains a short squeeze play. It maintains short interest above 20%, indicating retail investors want to prove the shorts wrong. Over time, AMC will continue to decline, however, as losses continue to mount.That’s why investors should ignore the temporary bump the new Top Gun movie is producing. It isn’t nearly enough to right AMC’s ship.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":616,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9056348888,"gmtCreate":1654955867444,"gmtModify":1676535539108,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Be careful, don't throw money in.&nbsp;FOMC meeting (raising interest rates)&nbsp;coming week","listText":"Be careful, don't throw money in.&nbsp;FOMC meeting (raising interest rates)&nbsp;coming week","text":"Be careful, don't throw money in. FOMC meeting (raising interest rates) coming week","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9056348888","repostId":"1137297379","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137297379","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1654912141,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1137297379?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-11 09:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AAPL, AMZN, GOOG, INTC, MSFT: Why Are Tech Stocks Down Today?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137297379","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Tech stocks such as Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN), Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), In","content":"<div>\n<p>Tech stocks such as Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN), Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), Intel(NASDAQ:INTC) and Microsoft(NASDAQ:MSFT) are all down big today.The downside moves in these ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/aapl-amzn-goog-intc-msft-why-are-tech-stocks-down-today/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AAPL, AMZN, GOOG, INTC, MSFT: Why Are Tech Stocks Down Today?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAAPL, AMZN, GOOG, INTC, MSFT: Why Are Tech Stocks Down Today?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-11 09:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/aapl-amzn-goog-intc-msft-why-are-tech-stocks-down-today/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tech stocks such as Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN), Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), Intel(NASDAQ:INTC) and Microsoft(NASDAQ:MSFT) are all down big today.The downside moves in these ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/aapl-amzn-goog-intc-msft-why-are-tech-stocks-down-today/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","GOOGL":"谷歌A","INTC":"英特尔","AAPL":"苹果","MSFT":"微软","GOOG":"谷歌"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/aapl-amzn-goog-intc-msft-why-are-tech-stocks-down-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1137297379","content_text":"Tech stocks such as Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN), Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), Intel(NASDAQ:INTC) and Microsoft(NASDAQ:MSFT) are all down big today.The downside moves in these companies appear to be directly tied to today's CPI print.Additionally, slower rates of hiring could indicate demand destruction on the horizon, impacting all tech stocks.Today, tech stocks are in focus for most investors. A basket of mega-cap companies, including Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN), Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), Intel(NASDAQ:INTC) and Microsoft(NASDAQ:MSFT), are all down considerably. These one-day moves are the continuation of an overall downtrend we’ve seen throughout this year. On a year-to-date basis, most of the names on this list are down more than 25% at the time of writing.Now, for more than a month, the Nasdaq has been in a bear market. The rapid decline in valuations we’ve seen across the board has typically hit more unprofitable and speculative names the hardest. However, the fact that investors are now seeing similar sorts of results from mega-cap tech stocks is worrisome. Indeed, many may be wondering when the carnage will end.Let’s dive into some of the factors that are contributing to this bear market in tech right now.Why Are Tech Stocks Down Today?The most notable factor driving tech stocks lower today was a rather dismal inflation print. The most recent consumer price index (CPI) data for May is in, and we have a fresh new multi-decade high. May’s reading of 8.6% is the highest since 1981. More importantly, this is much higher than predictions of  8.3%. Additionally, this number is more than the previous 8.5% reading we got in March.What does this have to do with tech stocks?Well, these picks tend to trade at higher valuations than the rest of the market due to these companies’ growth profiles. Investors will pay more for growth in good times. However, if they think a downturn is on the horizon, multiples contract to “historical” levels. That’s what we’re seeing now — a broad-based reevaluation of the market.Additionally, recent reports indicating several tech companies are slowing hiring isn’t helping the view that growth will proliferate from here. Reduced hiring could indicate less demand on the horizon. Indeed, corporate America tends to know a thing or two about how to size its businesses.Overall, these macro factors are likely to be hard to overcome. Given how fast inflation is rising, perhaps the worst of the selling pressure isn’t over. At least, that’s what the market is pricing in today.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"MSFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":652,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9056343569,"gmtCreate":1654955561651,"gmtModify":1676535539070,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Battery swapping. Haha&nbsp;","listText":"Battery swapping. Haha&nbsp;","text":"Battery swapping. Haha","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9056343569","repostId":"1141069674","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1141069674","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1654915574,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1141069674?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-11 10:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"NIO Stock Alert: Nio Looks to Rival Tesla With Battery Pack Production in 2024","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1141069674","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Nio(NIO) plans on producing battery packs during the second half of 2024.The batteries will carry a ","content":"<div>\n<p>Nio(NIO) plans on producing battery packs during the second half of 2024.The batteries will carry a voltage of 800-volts.Shares of NIO stock are down over 45% year-to-date.Nio(NYSE:NIO) stock is ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/nio-stock-alert-nio-looks-to-rival-tesla-with-battery-pack-production-in-2024/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>NIO Stock Alert: Nio Looks to Rival Tesla With Battery Pack Production in 2024</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNIO Stock Alert: Nio Looks to Rival Tesla With Battery Pack Production in 2024\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-11 10:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/nio-stock-alert-nio-looks-to-rival-tesla-with-battery-pack-production-in-2024/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Nio(NIO) plans on producing battery packs during the second half of 2024.The batteries will carry a voltage of 800-volts.Shares of NIO stock are down over 45% year-to-date.Nio(NYSE:NIO) stock is ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/nio-stock-alert-nio-looks-to-rival-tesla-with-battery-pack-production-in-2024/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/nio-stock-alert-nio-looks-to-rival-tesla-with-battery-pack-production-in-2024/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1141069674","content_text":"Nio(NIO) plans on producing battery packs during the second half of 2024.The batteries will carry a voltage of 800-volts.Shares of NIO stock are down over 45% year-to-date.Nio(NYSE:NIO) stock is trading down 4% today despite an interesting announcement from Chairman William Li. Li stated that Nio has plans to produce an 800-volt battery packin-house during the second half of 2024. Battery costs have risen for Nio during the second quarter after its agreement with battery supplier CATL was renewed.During May, Nio announced that it had delivered 7,024 vehicles. Year-to-date, the Chinese electric vehicle (EV) company has delivered 37,866 vehicles, up 11.8% year-over-year. Nio is slowly recovering from mass lockdowns in China due to the coronavirus. It has plans to “further ramp up the production capacity” by working with supply chain partners. This month, the company plans on accelerating “delivery recovery,” so delivery numbers for June will be highly anticipated.With that in mind, let’s get into the details of the new battery packs.NIO Stock: Nio Plans on Producing Battery Pack In 2024Today, most electric vehicles carry 400-volt batteries. With Nio’s plans to produce 800-volt batteries, charging will be improved for its customers. This is because higher-voltage batteries allows a lower current to be used during the charging process. In addition, a higher-voltage battery “reduces overheating and allows better power retention in the system.”Li also mentioned that Nio will plan to use a combination of in-house batteries and externally source batteries in the long run. This is similar to what Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) does with its batteries.The new in-house batteries will be used for Nio’s new mass-market models, which are expected to be ready for sale during the second half of 2024. Li mentioned that these models are expected to be priced between $30,000 and $45,000.Nio already operates battery-as-a-service(BaaS) swap stations in China. At these stations, customers can drive up and swap their batteries for a fully charged battery. Now, the company has plans to license out its BaaS technology to other automakers. The company seeks to take advantage of Tesla’s shortcomings, as Tesla released its own battery swapping technology in 2014 but ended the program. By 2025, Nio has a goal of operating over 1,000 battery swapping stations outside of China. By the end of 2030, it plans on operating 5,000 battery swapping stations globally.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":822,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058670124,"gmtCreate":1654835507468,"gmtModify":1676535520262,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Amazing","listText":"Amazing","text":"Amazing","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058670124","repostId":"1162814344","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1162814344","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1654831337,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1162814344?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-10 11:22","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Master Plan Part 3: Elon Musk Finally Reveals Long-Awaited Details","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1162814344","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"What It Means for TSLA StockThe first two Tesla Master Plan phases have been instrumental to the company’s growth. And while it hasn’t been a quick or easy road to get here, Tesla has done a good job meeting the goals outlined by Musk in the plan’s first two parts.He wanted to create an affordable EV, and years later, Teslas have become gradually more affordable. But even as competition has flooded into the EV space, Tesla sales have remained steady. Eveninflationary price hikesdidn’t stop Tesla","content":"<div>\n<p>Elon Musk has revealed the next stage of the Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) Master Plan.The first two parts of the plan have been instrumental in Tesla's success.The third phase will center on growth through ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/tesla-master-plan-part-3-elon-musk-finally-reveals-long-awaited-details/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Master Plan Part 3: Elon Musk Finally Reveals Long-Awaited Details</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Master Plan Part 3: Elon Musk Finally Reveals Long-Awaited Details\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-10 11:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/tesla-master-plan-part-3-elon-musk-finally-reveals-long-awaited-details/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Elon Musk has revealed the next stage of the Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) Master Plan.The first two parts of the plan have been instrumental in Tesla's success.The third phase will center on growth through ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/tesla-master-plan-part-3-elon-musk-finally-reveals-long-awaited-details/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/tesla-master-plan-part-3-elon-musk-finally-reveals-long-awaited-details/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1162814344","content_text":"Elon Musk has revealed the next stage of the Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) Master Plan.The first two parts of the plan have been instrumental in Tesla's success.The third phase will center on growth through scaling operations.Tesla(NASDAQ:TSLA) could use a growth catalyst after last month’s turbulence. While TSLA stock is back in the green today, it has not shaken its May volatility as a new month takes shape. The Tesla stock split is coming, but now investors have something else to be watching. Elon Musk has provided new details on what the third part of the Tesla Master Plan will include.After the success of its first two stages, both fans and investors are expecting big things.What Is the Tesla Master Plan?“My day job is running a space transportation company called SpaceX, but on the side I am the chairman of Tesla Motors,” Musk stated in a Tesla blog post on Aug. 2, 2006. The post, titled “The Secret Tesla Motors Master Plan (just between you and me)” outlined his vision for the company. It focused on turning Tesla into an industry powerhouse, providing drivers with a wide range of electric vehicle(EV) models.Ten years later in July 2016, Musk released the second phase of the Tesla Master Plan. With auto production moving along, his focus now included areas such as solar roofs, integrated battery storage and full self-driving (FSD) technology.It hasn’t been another ten years, but Musk discussed the Tesla Master Plan Part 3at a company meeting. Electrek reports that when a staff member asked about the master plan’s next phase, Musk laid out the following:“Master Plan Part 3 is all about achieving very large scale. In order to shift the entire energy infrastructure and transport infrastructure of earth, there has to be a very high scale. We have to ask what is the actual tonnage? If we work backward from let’s say about 300 TWh of installed capacity in vehicles and stationary [battery packs] then how do you achieve that tonnage from a mining and refining standpoint, but also do so in a sustainable way.”He later added that the plan’s next phase came down to an important question: “How do you get to enough scale to actually shift the entire energy infrastructure of earth?”What It Means for TSLA StockThe first two Tesla Master Plan phases have been instrumental to the company’s growth. And while it hasn’t been a quick or easy road to get here, Tesla has done a good job meeting the goals outlined by Musk in the plan’s first two parts.He wanted to create an affordable EV, and years later, Teslas have become gradually more affordable. But even as competition has flooded into the EV space, Tesla sales have remained steady. Eveninflationary price hikes didn’t stop Tesla from reporting record sales for the first quarter of 2022. The company’s solar energy and battery storage segments have also grown, as has demand for them.That said, Tesla has seen significant turbulence during the current quarter. Market selloffs have generated bearish energy and Musk’s“super bad”feelings about the economy haven’t been reassuring to investors. But this preview of the Tesla Master Plan Part 3 shows the company is focused on growth, and that is will keep moving forward. We don’t know for sure when the full plan will be released, but it will likely happen before 2026.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":779,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058681805,"gmtCreate":1654829566907,"gmtModify":1676535519009,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Red days are for shopping, carefully&nbsp;","listText":"Red days are for shopping, carefully&nbsp;","text":"Red days are for shopping, carefully","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058681805","repostId":"2242514365","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2242514365","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1654818218,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2242514365?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-10 07:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Stock Market and Inflation: How the S&P 500 Performs on CPI Report Days","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2242514365","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Stock-market investors crowded the exits on Thursday, sending major stock indexes sharply lower a da","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Stock-market investors crowded the exits on Thursday, sending major stock indexes sharply lower a day ahead of another eagerly anticipated consumer-price index reading. Recent history may offer a clue.</p><p>&#34;While median returns for the S&amp;P 500 have been right around the flatline over the last two years on CPI days, more recent returns have been much weaker,&#34; wrote analysts at Bespoke Investment Group, in a Thursday note. Since Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell stopped using the term &#34;transitory&#34; in late November to describe inflation, the S&amp;P 500 has declined on the day of the CPI report four out of six times, including the past four reports.</p><p>Over the past six months, the S&amp;P 500&#39;s median performance on CPI days has been a decline of 0.18%, the analysts said.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500  dropped 2.4% on Thursday, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average  slumped nearly 640 points, or 1.9%, and the Nasdaq Composite  shed 2.7%.</p><p>The consumer-price index is expected to show a large, 0.7% increase when the report is released Friday morning -- more than double the gain in the prior month. The increase in inflation over the past year, meanwhile, is forecast to stay near a 40-year high of 8.4%.</p><p>The Bespoke analysts looked at sector performance over the past six reports and found that energy, unsurprisingly, has been the best performer on CPI days, with a median gain of 1.1%, while technology was the worst. Of course, 2022&#39;s stock-market fall has been led by tech-related stocks, while energy has soared in response to surging oil prices.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4a249d567c99dd8c9477bdce90f9089a\" tg-width=\"699\" tg-height=\"382\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Bespoke noted that for a market concerned about inflation, recent reports haven&#39;t offered investors much comfort. Over the past 24 months, there were just three months where headline CPI came in weaker than expected (6/10/20, 11/12/20, and 9/14/21), they said.</p><p>&#34;Ironically enough, on each of those three days, the S&amp;P 500 actually traded lower, although to be fair, all three of these reports were before Powell ditched the term &#39;transitory,&#39;&#34; the analysts wrote.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Stock Market and Inflation: How the S&P 500 Performs on CPI Report Days</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Stock Market and Inflation: How the S&P 500 Performs on CPI Report Days\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-06-10 07:43</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Stock-market investors crowded the exits on Thursday, sending major stock indexes sharply lower a day ahead of another eagerly anticipated consumer-price index reading. Recent history may offer a clue.</p><p>&#34;While median returns for the S&amp;P 500 have been right around the flatline over the last two years on CPI days, more recent returns have been much weaker,&#34; wrote analysts at Bespoke Investment Group, in a Thursday note. Since Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell stopped using the term &#34;transitory&#34; in late November to describe inflation, the S&amp;P 500 has declined on the day of the CPI report four out of six times, including the past four reports.</p><p>Over the past six months, the S&amp;P 500&#39;s median performance on CPI days has been a decline of 0.18%, the analysts said.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500  dropped 2.4% on Thursday, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average  slumped nearly 640 points, or 1.9%, and the Nasdaq Composite  shed 2.7%.</p><p>The consumer-price index is expected to show a large, 0.7% increase when the report is released Friday morning -- more than double the gain in the prior month. The increase in inflation over the past year, meanwhile, is forecast to stay near a 40-year high of 8.4%.</p><p>The Bespoke analysts looked at sector performance over the past six reports and found that energy, unsurprisingly, has been the best performer on CPI days, with a median gain of 1.1%, while technology was the worst. Of course, 2022&#39;s stock-market fall has been led by tech-related stocks, while energy has soared in response to surging oil prices.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4a249d567c99dd8c9477bdce90f9089a\" tg-width=\"699\" tg-height=\"382\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Bespoke noted that for a market concerned about inflation, recent reports haven&#39;t offered investors much comfort. Over the past 24 months, there were just three months where headline CPI came in weaker than expected (6/10/20, 11/12/20, and 9/14/21), they said.</p><p>&#34;Ironically enough, on each of those three days, the S&amp;P 500 actually traded lower, although to be fair, all three of these reports were before Powell ditched the term &#39;transitory,&#39;&#34; the analysts wrote.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF博时","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares","OEX":"标普100","BK4504":"桥水持仓","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4581":"高盛持仓","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2242514365","content_text":"Stock-market investors crowded the exits on Thursday, sending major stock indexes sharply lower a day ahead of another eagerly anticipated consumer-price index reading. Recent history may offer a clue.\"While median returns for the S&P 500 have been right around the flatline over the last two years on CPI days, more recent returns have been much weaker,\" wrote analysts at Bespoke Investment Group, in a Thursday note. Since Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell stopped using the term \"transitory\" in late November to describe inflation, the S&P 500 has declined on the day of the CPI report four out of six times, including the past four reports.Over the past six months, the S&P 500's median performance on CPI days has been a decline of 0.18%, the analysts said.The S&P 500  dropped 2.4% on Thursday, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average  slumped nearly 640 points, or 1.9%, and the Nasdaq Composite  shed 2.7%.The consumer-price index is expected to show a large, 0.7% increase when the report is released Friday morning -- more than double the gain in the prior month. The increase in inflation over the past year, meanwhile, is forecast to stay near a 40-year high of 8.4%.The Bespoke analysts looked at sector performance over the past six reports and found that energy, unsurprisingly, has been the best performer on CPI days, with a median gain of 1.1%, while technology was the worst. Of course, 2022's stock-market fall has been led by tech-related stocks, while energy has soared in response to surging oil prices.Bespoke noted that for a market concerned about inflation, recent reports haven't offered investors much comfort. Over the past 24 months, there were just three months where headline CPI came in weaker than expected (6/10/20, 11/12/20, and 9/14/21), they said.\"Ironically enough, on each of those three days, the S&P 500 actually traded lower, although to be fair, all three of these reports were before Powell ditched the term 'transitory,'\" the analysts wrote.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"161125":0.6,"513500":0.6,"UPRO":0.6,"OEF":0.6,"ESmain":0.6,"IVV":0.6,"OEX":0.6,"SPY":1,"SSO":0.6,"SH":0.6,".SPX":0.6,"SPXU":0.6,"SDS":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1078,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058681390,"gmtCreate":1654829511410,"gmtModify":1676535519001,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Be careful","listText":"Be careful","text":"Be careful","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058681390","repostId":"2242872207","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2242872207","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1654826194,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2242872207?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-10 09:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba Looks Like Amazon In 2002","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2242872207","media":"Seekingalpha","summary":"Alibaba Group Holding (NYSE:BABA) stock has seen its fair share of challenges. Between China’s tech ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Alibaba Group Holding</b> (NYSE:BABA) stock has seen its fair share of challenges. Between China’s tech crackdown, a COVID-19 outbreak, and declining retail spending, there have been many curve balls thrown BABA’s way. However, the company is doing better than many people think it is. Although earnings are declining, revenue is still growing – albeit at a slower pace than in the past – and the company is working on many new projects like chips and cloud computing. Chips and cloud services were big winners for companies like <b>Apple</b> (AAPL) and <b>Amazon</b> (AMZN), so there is reason for optimism toward Alibaba’s future trajectory.</p><p>Speaking of Amazon, that stock is a useful case study when it comes to understanding Alibaba. The two businesses have a lot in common, including:</p><ul><li>Core eCommerce operations.</li><li>Cloud computing operations.</li><li>High market share in the countries that are their “home bases.”</li></ul><p>These qualities make Amazon comparable to Alibaba. The two companies aren’t identical – Alibaba relies on third party vendors much more than Amazon does, and China is a very different market than America. But there are enough similarities that we could describe the two companies as being in the same sector.</p><p>There’s another trait that Amazon and Alibaba have in common:</p><p>Their stock market performance. BABA’s price trend in 2021/2022 is very similar to Amazon’s trend in 2000-2002. In both cases, the shares fell by high double digit percentages while revenue grew. When you’ve got a company whose stock price is declining while sales grow, you’re looking at an investment with the potential for future appreciation. Indeed, that happened with Amazon starting in 2002. That year, the company’s stock fell while its losses got smaller, paving the way for future growth. In BABA’s case, the higher revenue growth is not translating to earnings growth – a declining stock portfolio, investments in subsidiaries, and higher taxes are taking a bite out of fundamentals. On the flipside, BABA (unlike 2002 Amazon) has positive earnings already, so it can support its stock price through future buybacks. Taken as a whole, these factors suggest that BABA is set for a rally much like the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> Amazon experienced after its 2002 crash.</p><h2>Competitive Landscape</h2><p>One thing that Alibaba has in common with Amazon, especially 2002-era Amazon, is its competitive position. Alibaba has one very large competitor, <b>JD.com </b>(JD), and a host of smaller ones. This is similar to the situation Amazon faced in 2002, when <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EBAY\">eBay</a></b> (EBAY) was king of the eCommerce castle. In the long run, Amazon prevailed over eBay, and there are reasons to think that Alibaba will prevail over JD, too.</p><p>One of those reasons relates to profitability. JD is a retailer that holds and sells inventory directly, Alibaba is mainly a platform for third party retailers. Amazon is a mix of both.</p><p>Alibaba’s “third party seller” model results in high margins because it does not require holding inventory. BABA has fulfillment centers, which cost significant sums of money, but not on the level of holding inventory. Alibaba’s model incurs minimal host, mainly marketing and maintaining web infrastructure. JD’s, by contrast, incurs high costs. So BABA will likely earn more profit than JD if the two companies’ revenue levels are comparable. Indeed, their revenue is pretty comparable: JD actually had about $20 billion more of it than BABA did in the trailing 12 month period. However, BABA had far more profit. That’s largely because of Alibaba’s low cost business model.</p><p>Of course, JD’s growing sales are a threat to Alibaba. Just because JD earns less profit doesn’t mean it won’t cut in on Alibaba’s action. However, Alibaba’s higher margins give it more opportunities to invest in its business. Over the last decade, Alibaba has built a cloud business, bought several companies, and launched a partially-owned payments platform. These kinds of things would be hard to pull off with JD’s margins. So, between JD and BABA, the latter is better positioned to grow into an Amazon-style conglomerate.</p><h2>Alibaba’s Financials: the Amazon Comparison is Clear</h2><p>Alibaba’s recent stock performance has been similar to Amazon’s in 2000-2002. Its financials are also similar to Amazon’s at that time period, only far better. In the most recent 12 month period, BABA delivered:</p><ul><li><p>$134.5 billion in revenue.</p></li><li><p>$49 billion in gross profit.</p></li><li><p>$14.9 billion in operating income (“EBIT”).</p></li><li><p>$9.8 billion in net income.</p></li><li><p>$9 billion in levered free cash flow.</p></li></ul><p>These figures give us a 7.2% net margin and a 36.5% gross margin. The net margin might not look that impressive but this is going off of GAAP earnings, which are affected by the performance of BABA’s stock portfolio. Substituting cash from operations for net income and we get a 16.3% CFO margin. Alibaba’s margins have fallen somewhat since the company’s record breaking 2020/2021 fiscal year, but they should start to climb again. A lot of the decline in BABA’s margins has been due to its stock portfolio declining in value. Chinese stocks are in a bullish trend this quarter; if they end the quarter in the green, then we could see BABA’s margins improve.</p><p>This is similar to where Amazon was in 2002. Its stock price was declining, its revenue was rising, and its equity investments were going down. It was not profitable in 2002, so Alibaba compares favourably on that front. However, AMZN’s net loss was shrinking that year whereas BABA’s earnings are declining, so “2002 Amazon” wins on growth.</p><h2>Valuation</h2><p>Having explored Alibaba’s financial performance, we can turn to its valuation. I’ll leave the Amazon comparison alone for this section because Amazon is nothing like Alibaba when it comes to valuation.</p><p>One of the most appealing things about Alibaba stock today is its price. The company is very cheap relative to its underlying assets, earnings and cash flows, and will look even cheaper if earnings growth resumes later this year.</p><p>According to Seeking Alpha Quant, BABA trades at the following multiples:</p><ul><li><p>Adjusted P/E: 12.</p></li><li><p>GAAP P/E: 28.</p></li><li><p>EV/EBITDA: 11.3.</p></li><li><p>Price/sales: 1.98.</p></li><li><p>Price/operating cash flow: 11.7.</p></li></ul><p>These multiples suggest that BABA is cheap. Certainly, they’re much lower than the multiples you’ll find on U.S. tech stocks of similar size. Doing a discounted cash flow analysis on BABA yields a similar result: even with conservative growth assumptions, the stock ends up being worth more than its current stock price implies.</p><p>In the trailing 12 month period, Alibaba grew revenue at 18%. In the two recent quarters, it grew closer to 10%. For the sake of conservatism, we’ll use the lower end of BABA’s recent quarterly growth as our revenue assumption.</p><p>Now let’s look at costs. In 2021, BABA’s COGS was $64 billion and operating expenses were $28 billion, for a total of $93 billion in cash costs. These combined costs grew by 28% to $119 billion in 2022. That would suggest that Alibaba’s costs are growing much faster than revenue. However, if we zero in on the most recent quarter, we see the cost growth slowing down compared to earlier in the year. COGS for Q4 came in at $21.9 billion and operating cost at $7.6 billion–down from $7.8 billion in the prior year quarter. Overall, COGS + operating costs combined grew at 10% for the quarter. We know that Alibaba is actively working at reducing costs right now, so I will again forecast based on the quarter rather than the year. The result of these assumptions is 10% growth in both revenue and costs. I will ignore interest expense in my model because BABA’s “interest income” includes stock market fluctuations, which are impossible to predict. I will use 25% as the tax rate because BABA recently lost its tax credits and, as a result, now pays China’s standard 25% tax. These assumptions yield the following model:</p><table><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td><p>2022 (BASE YEAR)</p></td><td><p>2023</p></td><td><p>2024</p></td><td><p>2025</p></td><td><p>2026</p></td><td><p>2027</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Revenue per share</p></td><td><p>$50</p></td><td><p>$55</p></td><td><p>$60.5</p></td><td><p>$66.55</p></td><td><p>$73.2</p></td><td><p>$80.52</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Costs per share</p></td><td><p>$44.35</p></td><td><p>$48.78</p></td><td><p>$53.66</p></td><td><p>$59</p></td><td><p>$64.93</p></td><td><p>$71.42</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EBIT per share</p></td><td><p>$5.65</p></td><td><p>$6.22</p></td><td><p>$6.84</p></td><td><p>$7.55</p></td><td><p>$8.27</p></td><td><p>$9.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tax</p></td><td><p>$0.62</p></td><td><p>$1.55</p></td><td><p>$1.71</p></td><td><p>$1.89</p></td><td><p>$2.07</p></td><td><p>$2.28</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EPS</p></td><td><p>$5.03</p></td><td><p>$4.665</p></td><td><p>$5.13</p></td><td><p>$5.66</p></td><td><p>$6.2</p></td><td><p>$6.82</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>As you can see, earnings dip briefly in 2023, mainly due to the fact that 2022 hadn’t yet seen four full quarters with higher tax rates. In 2024, earnings resume a modest upward trajectory.</p><p>The end result is a pretty underwhelming 6.2% CAGR growth rate in earnings, which stems from our conservative assumptions. Actual growth could be stronger, but we’ll use what we’ve got. If we discount the cash flows above at the 3% 10 year treasury yield, we get:</p><table><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td><p>2023</p></td><td><p>2024</p></td><td><p>2025</p></td><td><p>2026</p></td><td><p>2027</p></td><td><p>TOTAL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EPS</p></td><td><p>$4.665</p></td><td><p>$5.13</p></td><td><p>$5.66</p></td><td><p>$6.2</p></td><td><p>$6.82</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(1 + r)^N</p></td><td><p>1.03</p></td><td><p>1.0609</p></td><td><p>1.093</p></td><td><p>1.125</p></td><td><p>1.159</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Discounted EPS</p></td><td><p>$4.52</p></td><td><p>$4.83</p></td><td><p>$5.17</p></td><td><p>$5.51</p></td><td><p>$5.88</p></td><td><p>$25.91</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>So we’ve got $25.91 worth of discounted cash flows in five years. If we assume that BABA produces no growth after that, then the terminal value is $227. So, we have a total present value of $253 – even when we assume extremely slow growth!</p><h2>Risks and Challenges</h2><p>As we’ve seen, Alibaba stock is undervalued based on both multiples and discounted cash flows. If the company just grows modestly in the next five years, its stock will come to be worth more than it is today. However, there are many risks and challenges for investors to watch out for, including:</p><ul><li><p><b>Political risk.</b> Alibaba is subject to two forms of political risk: domestic political risk (e.g. a renewed tech crackdown), and international political risk (e.g. tensions between China and the U.S.). Right now, China is easing up on the tech crackdown, which is part of why Chinese stocks are rallying, but you can never discount the possibility that the government will go back into crackdown mode later. Likewise, there is always the possibility that tensions between the U.S. and China.</p></li><li><p><b>Revenue deceleration.</b> Alibaba’s revenue growth decelerated significantly in the past year. Its five year CAGR revenue growth rate is 40%, the TTM growth rate is only 18%. So BABA’s growth is definitely slowing. If it slows down more, then perhaps BABA won’t hit the 10% revenue growth my model assumed, and it will be worth less than what my model estimated.</p></li><li><p><b>COVID outbreaks.</b> China is still committed to a “COVID zero” model, meaning that it is willing to bring in pretty strict lockdowns for only modest numbers of COVID cases. This fact contributed to China’s recent 11% decline in retail spending. If we see more lockdowns, then BABA’s sales growth could slow down considerably, contributing to revenue deceleration.</p></li></ul><p>The risks above are very real. Nevertheless, Alibaba stock is cheap enough to make the risk worth assuming. Even assuming very little growth, the stock’s future earnings have a present value of about $250. That’s considerable upside to today’s prices. If growth accelerates, then we could see a true Amazon-style multi-decade rally taking us to dizzying highs.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba Looks Like Amazon In 2002</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba Looks Like Amazon In 2002\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-10 09:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517331-alibaba-looks-like-amazon-2002><strong>Seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Alibaba Group Holding (NYSE:BABA) stock has seen its fair share of challenges. Between China’s tech crackdown, a COVID-19 outbreak, and declining retail spending, there have been many curve balls ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517331-alibaba-looks-like-amazon-2002\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517331-alibaba-looks-like-amazon-2002","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2242872207","content_text":"Alibaba Group Holding (NYSE:BABA) stock has seen its fair share of challenges. Between China’s tech crackdown, a COVID-19 outbreak, and declining retail spending, there have been many curve balls thrown BABA’s way. However, the company is doing better than many people think it is. Although earnings are declining, revenue is still growing – albeit at a slower pace than in the past – and the company is working on many new projects like chips and cloud computing. Chips and cloud services were big winners for companies like Apple (AAPL) and Amazon (AMZN), so there is reason for optimism toward Alibaba’s future trajectory.Speaking of Amazon, that stock is a useful case study when it comes to understanding Alibaba. The two businesses have a lot in common, including:Core eCommerce operations.Cloud computing operations.High market share in the countries that are their “home bases.”These qualities make Amazon comparable to Alibaba. The two companies aren’t identical – Alibaba relies on third party vendors much more than Amazon does, and China is a very different market than America. But there are enough similarities that we could describe the two companies as being in the same sector.There’s another trait that Amazon and Alibaba have in common:Their stock market performance. BABA’s price trend in 2021/2022 is very similar to Amazon’s trend in 2000-2002. In both cases, the shares fell by high double digit percentages while revenue grew. When you’ve got a company whose stock price is declining while sales grow, you’re looking at an investment with the potential for future appreciation. Indeed, that happened with Amazon starting in 2002. That year, the company’s stock fell while its losses got smaller, paving the way for future growth. In BABA’s case, the higher revenue growth is not translating to earnings growth – a declining stock portfolio, investments in subsidiaries, and higher taxes are taking a bite out of fundamentals. On the flipside, BABA (unlike 2002 Amazon) has positive earnings already, so it can support its stock price through future buybacks. Taken as a whole, these factors suggest that BABA is set for a rally much like the one Amazon experienced after its 2002 crash.Competitive LandscapeOne thing that Alibaba has in common with Amazon, especially 2002-era Amazon, is its competitive position. Alibaba has one very large competitor, JD.com (JD), and a host of smaller ones. This is similar to the situation Amazon faced in 2002, when eBay (EBAY) was king of the eCommerce castle. In the long run, Amazon prevailed over eBay, and there are reasons to think that Alibaba will prevail over JD, too.One of those reasons relates to profitability. JD is a retailer that holds and sells inventory directly, Alibaba is mainly a platform for third party retailers. Amazon is a mix of both.Alibaba’s “third party seller” model results in high margins because it does not require holding inventory. BABA has fulfillment centers, which cost significant sums of money, but not on the level of holding inventory. Alibaba’s model incurs minimal host, mainly marketing and maintaining web infrastructure. JD’s, by contrast, incurs high costs. So BABA will likely earn more profit than JD if the two companies’ revenue levels are comparable. Indeed, their revenue is pretty comparable: JD actually had about $20 billion more of it than BABA did in the trailing 12 month period. However, BABA had far more profit. That’s largely because of Alibaba’s low cost business model.Of course, JD’s growing sales are a threat to Alibaba. Just because JD earns less profit doesn’t mean it won’t cut in on Alibaba’s action. However, Alibaba’s higher margins give it more opportunities to invest in its business. Over the last decade, Alibaba has built a cloud business, bought several companies, and launched a partially-owned payments platform. These kinds of things would be hard to pull off with JD’s margins. So, between JD and BABA, the latter is better positioned to grow into an Amazon-style conglomerate.Alibaba’s Financials: the Amazon Comparison is ClearAlibaba’s recent stock performance has been similar to Amazon’s in 2000-2002. Its financials are also similar to Amazon’s at that time period, only far better. In the most recent 12 month period, BABA delivered:$134.5 billion in revenue.$49 billion in gross profit.$14.9 billion in operating income (“EBIT”).$9.8 billion in net income.$9 billion in levered free cash flow.These figures give us a 7.2% net margin and a 36.5% gross margin. The net margin might not look that impressive but this is going off of GAAP earnings, which are affected by the performance of BABA’s stock portfolio. Substituting cash from operations for net income and we get a 16.3% CFO margin. Alibaba’s margins have fallen somewhat since the company’s record breaking 2020/2021 fiscal year, but they should start to climb again. A lot of the decline in BABA’s margins has been due to its stock portfolio declining in value. Chinese stocks are in a bullish trend this quarter; if they end the quarter in the green, then we could see BABA’s margins improve.This is similar to where Amazon was in 2002. Its stock price was declining, its revenue was rising, and its equity investments were going down. It was not profitable in 2002, so Alibaba compares favourably on that front. However, AMZN’s net loss was shrinking that year whereas BABA’s earnings are declining, so “2002 Amazon” wins on growth.ValuationHaving explored Alibaba’s financial performance, we can turn to its valuation. I’ll leave the Amazon comparison alone for this section because Amazon is nothing like Alibaba when it comes to valuation.One of the most appealing things about Alibaba stock today is its price. The company is very cheap relative to its underlying assets, earnings and cash flows, and will look even cheaper if earnings growth resumes later this year.According to Seeking Alpha Quant, BABA trades at the following multiples:Adjusted P/E: 12.GAAP P/E: 28.EV/EBITDA: 11.3.Price/sales: 1.98.Price/operating cash flow: 11.7.These multiples suggest that BABA is cheap. Certainly, they’re much lower than the multiples you’ll find on U.S. tech stocks of similar size. Doing a discounted cash flow analysis on BABA yields a similar result: even with conservative growth assumptions, the stock ends up being worth more than its current stock price implies.In the trailing 12 month period, Alibaba grew revenue at 18%. In the two recent quarters, it grew closer to 10%. For the sake of conservatism, we’ll use the lower end of BABA’s recent quarterly growth as our revenue assumption.Now let’s look at costs. In 2021, BABA’s COGS was $64 billion and operating expenses were $28 billion, for a total of $93 billion in cash costs. These combined costs grew by 28% to $119 billion in 2022. That would suggest that Alibaba’s costs are growing much faster than revenue. However, if we zero in on the most recent quarter, we see the cost growth slowing down compared to earlier in the year. COGS for Q4 came in at $21.9 billion and operating cost at $7.6 billion–down from $7.8 billion in the prior year quarter. Overall, COGS + operating costs combined grew at 10% for the quarter. We know that Alibaba is actively working at reducing costs right now, so I will again forecast based on the quarter rather than the year. The result of these assumptions is 10% growth in both revenue and costs. I will ignore interest expense in my model because BABA’s “interest income” includes stock market fluctuations, which are impossible to predict. I will use 25% as the tax rate because BABA recently lost its tax credits and, as a result, now pays China’s standard 25% tax. These assumptions yield the following model:2022 (BASE YEAR)20232024202520262027Revenue per share$50$55$60.5$66.55$73.2$80.52Costs per share$44.35$48.78$53.66$59$64.93$71.42EBIT per share$5.65$6.22$6.84$7.55$8.27$9.1Tax$0.62$1.55$1.71$1.89$2.07$2.28EPS$5.03$4.665$5.13$5.66$6.2$6.82As you can see, earnings dip briefly in 2023, mainly due to the fact that 2022 hadn’t yet seen four full quarters with higher tax rates. In 2024, earnings resume a modest upward trajectory.The end result is a pretty underwhelming 6.2% CAGR growth rate in earnings, which stems from our conservative assumptions. Actual growth could be stronger, but we’ll use what we’ve got. If we discount the cash flows above at the 3% 10 year treasury yield, we get:20232024202520262027TOTALEPS$4.665$5.13$5.66$6.2$6.82N/A(1 + r)^N1.031.06091.0931.1251.159N/ADiscounted EPS$4.52$4.83$5.17$5.51$5.88$25.91So we’ve got $25.91 worth of discounted cash flows in five years. If we assume that BABA produces no growth after that, then the terminal value is $227. So, we have a total present value of $253 – even when we assume extremely slow growth!Risks and ChallengesAs we’ve seen, Alibaba stock is undervalued based on both multiples and discounted cash flows. If the company just grows modestly in the next five years, its stock will come to be worth more than it is today. However, there are many risks and challenges for investors to watch out for, including:Political risk. Alibaba is subject to two forms of political risk: domestic political risk (e.g. a renewed tech crackdown), and international political risk (e.g. tensions between China and the U.S.). Right now, China is easing up on the tech crackdown, which is part of why Chinese stocks are rallying, but you can never discount the possibility that the government will go back into crackdown mode later. Likewise, there is always the possibility that tensions between the U.S. and China.Revenue deceleration. Alibaba’s revenue growth decelerated significantly in the past year. Its five year CAGR revenue growth rate is 40%, the TTM growth rate is only 18%. So BABA’s growth is definitely slowing. If it slows down more, then perhaps BABA won’t hit the 10% revenue growth my model assumed, and it will be worth less than what my model estimated.COVID outbreaks. China is still committed to a “COVID zero” model, meaning that it is willing to bring in pretty strict lockdowns for only modest numbers of COVID cases. This fact contributed to China’s recent 11% decline in retail spending. If we see more lockdowns, then BABA’s sales growth could slow down considerably, contributing to revenue deceleration.The risks above are very real. Nevertheless, Alibaba stock is cheap enough to make the risk worth assuming. Even assuming very little growth, the stock’s future earnings have a present value of about $250. That’s considerable upside to today’s prices. If growth accelerates, then we could see a true Amazon-style multi-decade rally taking us to dizzying highs.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BABA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1035,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058855395,"gmtCreate":1654823653717,"gmtModify":1676535517414,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Recession","listText":"Recession","text":"Recession","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058855395","repostId":"1119734148","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1119734148","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1654819387,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1119734148?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-10 08:03","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"More Pain Predicted For Singapore Stock Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1119734148","media":"rtt news","summary":"The Singapore stock market has finished lower in two straight sessions, sinking more than 20 points ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The Singapore stock market has finished lower in two straight sessions, sinking more than 20 points or 0.6 percent along the way. The Straits Times Index now rests just beneath the 3,210-point plateau and it&#39;s tipped to open under pressure again on Friday.</p><p>The global forecast for the Asian markets is soft on concerns for inflation and economic growth. The European and U.S. markets were firmly lower and the Asian bourses are tipped to open in similar fashion.</p><p>The STI finished modestly lower on Thursday following losses from the financial shares and the property stocks.</p><p>For the day, the index slipped 16.18 points or 0.50 percent to finish at 3,209.62 after trading between 3,198.38 and 3,225.26. Volume was 1.9 billion shares worth 1.3 billion Singapore dollars. There were 254 decliners and 210 gainers.</p><p>Among the actives, Ascendas REIT gained 0.35 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust shed 0.44 percent, CapitaLand Investment rose 0.26 percent, DBS Group slumped 0.49 percent, Hongkong Land plummeted 5.47 percent, Keppel Corp added 0.58 percent, Mapletree Logistics Trust advanced 0.59 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation declined 1.09 percent, SembCorp Industries jumped 1.44 percent, Singapore Exchange eased 0.10 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering lost 0.24 percent, SingTel fell 0.39 percent, Thai Beverage and Fraser Logistics both retreated 0.74 percent, United Overseas Bank tumbled 1.23 percent, Wilmar International perked 0.24 percent, Yangzijiang Financial plunged 2.86 percent and Yangzijiang Shipbuilding, Genting Singapore, City Developments, Comfort DelGro, Mapletree Commercial Trust, Mapletree Industrial Trust and SATS were unchanged.</p><p>The lead from Wall Street broadly negative as the major averages opened slightly lower on Thursday but the losses accelerated sharply in the final hour of trade, sending them deep into the red at the finish.</p><p>The Dow plunged 638.11 points or 1.94 percent to finish at 32,272.79, while the NASDAQ plummeted 332.04 points or 2.75 percent to end at 11,754.23 and the S&amp;P 500 sank 97.95 points or 2.38 percent to close at 4,017.82.</p><p>The sell-off on Wall Street came as traders looked ahead to the release of a Labor Department report on consumer price inflation later today. The report is expected to show that consumer prices increased by 0.7 percent in May after rising by 0.3 percent in April.</p><p>The inflation data could have an impact on the outlook for monetary policy ahead of the Federal Reserve&#39;s decision on interest rates next Wednesday.</p><p>On the economic front, a report released by the Labor Department showed first-time claims for U.S. unemployment benefits rose by more than expected in the week ended June 4th.</p><p>Crude oil prices drifted lower on Thursday as demand concerns resurfaced following authorities in Shanghai imposing new Covid-related restrictions. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for July ended down by $0.60 or 0.5 percent at $121.51 a barrel.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1637539882596","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>More Pain Predicted For Singapore Stock Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMore Pain Predicted For Singapore Stock Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-10 08:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.rttnews.com/3289793/more-pain-predicted-for-singapore-stock-market.aspx?type=acom><strong>rtt news</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The Singapore stock market has finished lower in two straight sessions, sinking more than 20 points or 0.6 percent along the way. The Straits Times Index now rests just beneath the 3,210-point plateau...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.rttnews.com/3289793/more-pain-predicted-for-singapore-stock-market.aspx?type=acom\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"STI.SI":"富时新加坡海峡指数"},"source_url":"https://www.rttnews.com/3289793/more-pain-predicted-for-singapore-stock-market.aspx?type=acom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1119734148","content_text":"The Singapore stock market has finished lower in two straight sessions, sinking more than 20 points or 0.6 percent along the way. The Straits Times Index now rests just beneath the 3,210-point plateau and it's tipped to open under pressure again on Friday.The global forecast for the Asian markets is soft on concerns for inflation and economic growth. The European and U.S. markets were firmly lower and the Asian bourses are tipped to open in similar fashion.The STI finished modestly lower on Thursday following losses from the financial shares and the property stocks.For the day, the index slipped 16.18 points or 0.50 percent to finish at 3,209.62 after trading between 3,198.38 and 3,225.26. Volume was 1.9 billion shares worth 1.3 billion Singapore dollars. There were 254 decliners and 210 gainers.Among the actives, Ascendas REIT gained 0.35 percent, while CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust shed 0.44 percent, CapitaLand Investment rose 0.26 percent, DBS Group slumped 0.49 percent, Hongkong Land plummeted 5.47 percent, Keppel Corp added 0.58 percent, Mapletree Logistics Trust advanced 0.59 percent, Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation declined 1.09 percent, SembCorp Industries jumped 1.44 percent, Singapore Exchange eased 0.10 percent, Singapore Technologies Engineering lost 0.24 percent, SingTel fell 0.39 percent, Thai Beverage and Fraser Logistics both retreated 0.74 percent, United Overseas Bank tumbled 1.23 percent, Wilmar International perked 0.24 percent, Yangzijiang Financial plunged 2.86 percent and Yangzijiang Shipbuilding, Genting Singapore, City Developments, Comfort DelGro, Mapletree Commercial Trust, Mapletree Industrial Trust and SATS were unchanged.The lead from Wall Street broadly negative as the major averages opened slightly lower on Thursday but the losses accelerated sharply in the final hour of trade, sending them deep into the red at the finish.The Dow plunged 638.11 points or 1.94 percent to finish at 32,272.79, while the NASDAQ plummeted 332.04 points or 2.75 percent to end at 11,754.23 and the S&P 500 sank 97.95 points or 2.38 percent to close at 4,017.82.The sell-off on Wall Street came as traders looked ahead to the release of a Labor Department report on consumer price inflation later today. The report is expected to show that consumer prices increased by 0.7 percent in May after rising by 0.3 percent in April.The inflation data could have an impact on the outlook for monetary policy ahead of the Federal Reserve's decision on interest rates next Wednesday.On the economic front, a report released by the Labor Department showed first-time claims for U.S. unemployment benefits rose by more than expected in the week ended June 4th.Crude oil prices drifted lower on Thursday as demand concerns resurfaced following authorities in Shanghai imposing new Covid-related restrictions. West Texas Intermediate Crude oil futures for July ended down by $0.60 or 0.5 percent at $121.51 a barrel.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"STI.SI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":259,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058044229,"gmtCreate":1654761937761,"gmtModify":1676535506620,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058044229","repostId":"1106879063","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":641,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058005687,"gmtCreate":1654747690649,"gmtModify":1676535504252,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Buy","listText":"Buy","text":"Buy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058005687","repostId":"2242581260","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2242581260","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1654746052,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2242581260?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-09 11:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"4 Reasons to Buy Alphabet Before Its Stock Split","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2242581260","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The tech giant is still a promising long-term investment.","content":"<div>\n<p>Alphabet (GOOG 0.75%) (GOOGL 0.73%), the parent company of Google, will execute a 20-for-1 stock split on July 15. That split will lower Alphabet's trading price from about $2,300 to $115, but it won'...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/08/4-reasons-to-buy-alphabet-before-its-stock-split/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>4 Reasons to Buy Alphabet Before Its Stock Split</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n4 Reasons to Buy Alphabet Before Its Stock Split\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-09 11:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/08/4-reasons-to-buy-alphabet-before-its-stock-split/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Alphabet (GOOG 0.75%) (GOOGL 0.73%), the parent company of Google, will execute a 20-for-1 stock split on July 15. That split will lower Alphabet's trading price from about $2,300 to $115, but it won'...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/08/4-reasons-to-buy-alphabet-before-its-stock-split/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","BK4577":"网络游戏","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4538":"云计算","PEG":"公务集团","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4208":"复合型公用事业","GOOG":"谷歌","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4525":"远程办公概念","GOOGL":"谷歌A","BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4097":"系统软件","BK4524":"宅经济概念","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","AMZN":"亚马逊","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4077":"互动媒体与服务","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4567":"ESG概念","BK4514":"搜索引擎","BK4576":"AR","MSFT":"微软","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4503":"景林资产持仓","BK4122":"互联网与直销零售","BK4566":"资本集团","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4516":"特朗普概念"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/08/4-reasons-to-buy-alphabet-before-its-stock-split/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2242581260","content_text":"Alphabet (GOOG 0.75%) (GOOGL 0.73%), the parent company of Google, will execute a 20-for-1 stock split on July 15. That split will lower Alphabet's trading price from about $2,300 to $115, but it won't actually change its market capitalization or valuations.Nonetheless, Alphabet might attract some extra attention from retail investors due to its lower price tag. It could also generate more liquidity through options trading, since a single options contract represents 100 shares. And its lower share price could eventually lead to its inclusion in the price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average.Alphabet might seem like a wobbly investment after its first-quarter revenue and earnings miss, but I believe it's still a great stock to buy ahead of its split for four simple reasons.Image source: Getty Images.1. An unbeatable advertising businessIn the first quarter, Alphabet generated 80% of its revenue from Google's advertising business (including YouTube). Its ad business certainly isn't immune to macro headwinds -- it suffered temporary slowdowns during both the Great Recession and the COVID-19 pandemic -- but it has always bounced back from such downturns.Between 2011 and 2021, Google's annual advertising revenue rose from $36.5 billion to $209.5 billion, a compound annual growth rate of 19.1%. This year, eMarketer estimates Google will control 27.7% of the digital ad market in the U.S. -- putting it in first place ahead of Meta Platforms (FB 2.20%) (24.2%) and Amazon (AMZN -0.32%) (13.3%) -- and remain the market leader in most markets outside of China.Therefore, if you expect Google to ride out the current macroeconomic headwinds, then this is still a great time to invest in its market-leading digital advertising business.2. An expanding and inescapable ecosystemGoogle's core business has grown so rapidly because its ecosystem is practically inescapable. It owns the world's largest online search engine, the most widely used mobile operating system (Android), the most popular web browser (Chrome), the top webmail service (Gmail), the leading online mapping service (Google Maps), and the largest free streaming video platform (YouTube). It also operates a growing list of adjacent services like YouTube Music, Google Workspace, Google Pay, and Google Photos.Those digital tentacles consistently gather personal data from its users, which it uses to better target ads across its ecosystem. That approach is controversial, especially among privacy advocates and antitrust regulators, but it's remarkably effective for advertisers.3. A rapidly growing cloud businessGoogle operates the third-largest cloud infrastructure platform in the world after Amazon (AMZN -0.32%) Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft's (MSFT -0.12%) Azure. Google Cloud held an 8% share of the global market in the first quarter, according to Canalys, compared to a 33% share for AWS and a 21% share for Azure.Google Cloud won't catch up to AWS or Azure anytime soon, but its revenue rose 53% to $8.9 billion in 2019, 46% to $13.1 billion in 2020, and 47% to $19.2 billion (amounting to 7% of Alphabet's total revenue) in 2021. That means it's growing faster than AWS and at a comparable pace to Azure.Google Cloud should continue to grow over the long term as it attracts retailers that don't want to work with Amazon or tether themselves to Microsoft's sprawling ecosystem of enterprise software. That expansion should gradually reduce Google's dependence on its advertising business.4. High growth rates and a low valuationAlphabet's scale and diversification have enabled it to generate robust growth over the past decade. Looking ahead, analysts expect its revenue to rise both 15% in 2022 and 2023. They expect its earnings to dip 1% this year as it ramps up its spending, but to increase 19% in 2023.Over the next five years, they expect Alphabet's annual earnings to grow at an average rate of about 17%. Investors should take those long-term estimates with a grain of salt, but they give it a low 5-year price-to-earnings-growth (PEG) ratio of 0.8. Stocks with a PEG ratio below 1.0 are considered undervalued, so Alphabet looks dirt cheap relative to its growth potential. By comparison, Meta and Amazon have 5-year PEG ratios of 1.2 and 3.0, respectively.It's still a great long-term investmentAlphabet's share price might struggle over the next few quarters due to investors' concerns about macroeconomic headwinds for advertising and the recent slowdown in YouTube's ad sales.But as a long-term Alphabet investor, I'm not too worried about these near-term speed bumps. I'm confident Google's platforms will continue to grow over the next decade, and I believe Alphabet's upcoming stock split will generate fresh interest from retail investors and options traders. Simply put, this tech titan remains a rock-solid investment in a tumultuous market.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"MSFT":0.9,"PEG":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":221,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9051164437,"gmtCreate":1654652943329,"gmtModify":1676535486116,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Don't bet against the PayPal mafia","listText":"Don't bet against the PayPal mafia","text":"Don't bet against the PayPal mafia","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051164437","repostId":"2241838512","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2241838512","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1654652421,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2241838512?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 09:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Affirm CEO Says He’s Not Worried About Apple’s Pay Later Rival","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2241838512","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"(Bloomberg) -- Affirm Holdings Inc. Chief Executive Officer Max Levchin said he’s not worried about ","content":"<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Affirm Holdings Inc. Chief Executive Officer Max Levchin said he’s not worried about Apple Inc.’s upcoming buy now, pay later service, because his company offers more extensive and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/affirm-ceo-says-not-worried-223520242.html\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Affirm CEO Says He’s Not Worried About Apple’s Pay Later Rival</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAffirm CEO Says He’s Not Worried About Apple’s Pay Later Rival\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 09:40 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/affirm-ceo-says-not-worried-223520242.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- Affirm Holdings Inc. Chief Executive Officer Max Levchin said he’s not worried about Apple Inc.’s upcoming buy now, pay later service, because his company offers more extensive and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/affirm-ceo-says-not-worried-223520242.html\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4573":"虚拟现实","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4512":"苹果概念","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4501":"段永平概念","BK4553":"喜马拉雅资本持仓","BK4571":"数字音乐概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4576":"AR","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4575":"芯片概念","BK4566":"资本集团","AAPL":"苹果","BK4505":"高瓴资本持仓","BK4515":"5G概念","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4579":"人工智能","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","AFRM":"Affirm Holdings, Inc.","BK4507":"流媒体概念","BK4170":"电脑硬件、储存设备及电脑周边","BK4574":"无人驾驶"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/affirm-ceo-says-not-worried-223520242.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2241838512","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- Affirm Holdings Inc. Chief Executive Officer Max Levchin said he’s not worried about Apple Inc.’s upcoming buy now, pay later service, because his company offers more extensive and longer-term plans.“I don’t think there’s much concern,” Levchin said Tuesday in an interview on Bloomberg Television. “There’s a lot of room for growth for all involved.” Buy now, pay later is used for fewer than 5% of US transactions, he said.Affirm offers lending plans from six weeks to 60 months, compared with Apple’s plan to split up Apple Pay purchases over four payments across six weeks, Levchin said. The Apple service “creates a really nice tailwind for us” by informing more people about buy now, pay later services, he said.Apple Pay Later was unveiled Monday at the company’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference. Unlike other buy now, pay later platforms, the service is integrated directly into the iPhone’s Wallet app, which comes installed on every new iPhone.Another Affirm competitor, Klarna, recently announced plans to eliminate 10% of its staff. By contrast, Levchin says Affirm is continuing to hire engineers. “We’re gearing up for time to shine for growth,” he said.Apple’s plans could present a challenge for competitors focused on short-term lending, Levchin said.While Apple has announced only the short-term plan, it is also working on additional financial products, including long-term plans called Apple Pay Monthly Installments that could eventually rival Affirm.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":1,"AFRM":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":599,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":9056348888,"gmtCreate":1654955867444,"gmtModify":1676535539108,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Be careful, don't throw money in.&nbsp;FOMC meeting (raising interest rates)&nbsp;coming week","listText":"Be careful, don't throw money in.&nbsp;FOMC meeting (raising interest rates)&nbsp;coming week","text":"Be careful, don't throw money in. FOMC meeting (raising interest rates) coming week","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9056348888","repostId":"1137297379","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137297379","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1654912141,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1137297379?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-11 09:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AAPL, AMZN, GOOG, INTC, MSFT: Why Are Tech Stocks Down Today?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137297379","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Tech stocks such as Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN), Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), In","content":"<div>\n<p>Tech stocks such as Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN), Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), Intel(NASDAQ:INTC) and Microsoft(NASDAQ:MSFT) are all down big today.The downside moves in these ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/aapl-amzn-goog-intc-msft-why-are-tech-stocks-down-today/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AAPL, AMZN, GOOG, INTC, MSFT: Why Are Tech Stocks Down Today?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAAPL, AMZN, GOOG, INTC, MSFT: Why Are Tech Stocks Down Today?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-11 09:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/aapl-amzn-goog-intc-msft-why-are-tech-stocks-down-today/><strong>InvestorPlace</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tech stocks such as Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN), Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), Intel(NASDAQ:INTC) and Microsoft(NASDAQ:MSFT) are all down big today.The downside moves in these ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/aapl-amzn-goog-intc-msft-why-are-tech-stocks-down-today/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","GOOGL":"谷歌A","INTC":"英特尔","AAPL":"苹果","MSFT":"微软","GOOG":"谷歌"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/aapl-amzn-goog-intc-msft-why-are-tech-stocks-down-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1137297379","content_text":"Tech stocks such as Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN), Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), Intel(NASDAQ:INTC) and Microsoft(NASDAQ:MSFT) are all down big today.The downside moves in these companies appear to be directly tied to today's CPI print.Additionally, slower rates of hiring could indicate demand destruction on the horizon, impacting all tech stocks.Today, tech stocks are in focus for most investors. A basket of mega-cap companies, including Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon(NASDAQ:AMZN), Alphabet(NASDAQ:GOOG, NASDAQ:GOOGL), Intel(NASDAQ:INTC) and Microsoft(NASDAQ:MSFT), are all down considerably. These one-day moves are the continuation of an overall downtrend we’ve seen throughout this year. On a year-to-date basis, most of the names on this list are down more than 25% at the time of writing.Now, for more than a month, the Nasdaq has been in a bear market. The rapid decline in valuations we’ve seen across the board has typically hit more unprofitable and speculative names the hardest. However, the fact that investors are now seeing similar sorts of results from mega-cap tech stocks is worrisome. Indeed, many may be wondering when the carnage will end.Let’s dive into some of the factors that are contributing to this bear market in tech right now.Why Are Tech Stocks Down Today?The most notable factor driving tech stocks lower today was a rather dismal inflation print. The most recent consumer price index (CPI) data for May is in, and we have a fresh new multi-decade high. May’s reading of 8.6% is the highest since 1981. More importantly, this is much higher than predictions of  8.3%. Additionally, this number is more than the previous 8.5% reading we got in March.What does this have to do with tech stocks?Well, these picks tend to trade at higher valuations than the rest of the market due to these companies’ growth profiles. Investors will pay more for growth in good times. However, if they think a downturn is on the horizon, multiples contract to “historical” levels. That’s what we’re seeing now — a broad-based reevaluation of the market.Additionally, recent reports indicating several tech companies are slowing hiring isn’t helping the view that growth will proliferate from here. Reduced hiring could indicate less demand on the horizon. Indeed, corporate America tends to know a thing or two about how to size its businesses.Overall, these macro factors are likely to be hard to overcome. Given how fast inflation is rising, perhaps the worst of the selling pressure isn’t over. At least, that’s what the market is pricing in today.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"AMZN":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"MSFT":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":652,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9055081947,"gmtCreate":1655218112189,"gmtModify":1676535586909,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Long term - Chinese tech is favourable. Short term - Still volatile.&nbsp;","listText":"Long term - Chinese tech is favourable. Short term - Still volatile.&nbsp;","text":"Long term - Chinese tech is favourable. Short term - Still volatile.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9055081947","repostId":"1121400553","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1121400553","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1655217932,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121400553?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-14 22:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121400553","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fisca","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Inflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.</li><li>Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.</li><li>Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.</li><li>Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.</li><li>I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.</li></ul><p><b>Summary</b></p><p>In this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies&#39; business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.</p><p>I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).</p><p><b>The Market has turned</b></p><p>The Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.</p><p>The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn&#39;t address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.</p><p>Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/41a942d3225895324a1293c6e8fe5852\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.</p><p><b>The Fed wants a reverse Wealth Effect</b></p><p>The Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn&#39;t break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.</p><p>Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn&#39;t work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.</p><p>Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.</p><p><b>Amazon and Alibaba as Proxy</b></p><p>Both Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.</p><p>More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.</p><p><b>Why short Amazon?</b></p><p>The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon&#39;s business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.</p><p>Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.</p><p>Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don&#39;t believe that is likely to happen.</p><p><b>Why long Alibaba?</b></p><p>The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.</p><p>Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People&#39;s Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.</p><p>In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be &#34;uninvestable&#34;. However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China&#39;s interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.</p><p>Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.</p><p>The Charts speak for themselves <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5cf7f1ea0742a9c2111a779c35014b\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Data by YCharts</p><p>The stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.</p><p><b>The Takeaways</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2a293d91b08078d7eaba98b982685125\" tg-width=\"618\" tg-height=\"319\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><b>Risks to the Pair Trade</b></p><p>The Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.</p><p>The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don&#39;t expect it in 2022 &amp; early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.</p><p>The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.</p><p><b>Closing Thoughts</b></p><p>Even with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy Alibaba Will Outperform Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-14 22:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","AMZN":"亚马逊","09988":"阿里巴巴-W"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4518217-alibaba-outperform-amazon","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121400553","content_text":"SummaryInflation pressures are rising in the US and are squeezing consumer demand.Monetary and fiscal policy in the West will tighten, while China will likely ease.Alibaba went through the worst of the tech-crackdown, and Amazon has more pain to come.Growth expectations for Amazon are unreasonable, but expectations for Alibaba are realistic.I expect Alibaba to outperform relative to Amazon.SummaryIn this article, I suggest a pair trade of going long Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) and short Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN). Much of my reasoning stems not from the respective companies' business models but from macroeconomic head- and tailwinds and fiscal and monetary policy differences between China and the USA. The business models of Alibaba and Amazon are relatively comparable and therefore, a good proxy for my macro pair trade idea.I suggest this trade for the coming 6-12 months. If readers believe that the similarities between both companies are not sufficient for a pair trade, I suggest expressing the same idea via going long Chinese Internet Equities via the KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and short American Internet Equities via the Nasdaq (NDX).The Market has turnedThe Fed tightening is the single most important factor in equity markets today. After the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, the continuous provision of easy money from the Fed via Quantitative Easing resulted in US equities surging. Actively managed ETFs and funds underperformed because everybody could be sure that at some point, the Fed will step in to save the day.The fundamental reasoning of the Fed policies was that lower interest rates would spur credit demand of businesses and consumers because of cheaper debt costs. However, after the financial crisis, there were fewer investment opportunities for companies worthwhile pursuing. Additionally, many consumers and businesses saw their collateral collapse and thus were unwilling to borrow until their balance sheets were repaired. This process takes time to unwind. Thus, the economy had a shortage of borrowers for 14 years, and the Fed couldn't address the problem by lowering the debt costs. QE did almost nothing to the real economy. But it propped up the collateral.Fundamentally, the last 40 years have been disinflationary. Central Banks around the world expanded the money supply because there was no downside to printing money, as inflation was low and stable. The resulting wealth effects of these policies were massive, and the gap between poor and rich widened.Data by YChartsThe disinflationary environment vanished during the last 1.5 years because of two reasons. Firstly, the interconnection of the expansive fiscal and monetary policy provided a possibility to print money and inject it into the real economy. Secondly, ongoing supply shortages of commodities due to lack of investment during the last decade increased the cost pressures of businesses and consumers, resulting in cost-push inflation. The cost-push inflation now threatens to translate into a price/wage spiral. The Fed was too expansive during the last 14 years without major effects on the real economy. In March 2020, liquidity provision got to absurd levels. No, as the previously printed money arrives in the real economy, the Fed is caught with its pants down. Inflation was always the downside to money printing. But its effects were delayed due to the fundamental shortage of borrowers and absent transmission systems to the real economy.The Fed wants a reverse Wealth EffectThe Fed cannot control the supply shortages which emerged due to missing investments - especially in the energy sector. So, the Fed will try to crack down on the demand side to retake control of the inflation rate. It can achieve the goal of reducing demand most effectively by Quantitative Tightening, which will have the reverse effect of Quantitative Easing: It will devalue the collateral. The Fed hopes for a reverse wealth effect. It wants stock prices to depreciate and hopes it doesn't break the credit market or crush the labor market in the medium term.Due to significant government debt, I believe the Fed will pivot in the future as the credit market gets distressed and inflation eases due to lower demand. But the turning point is still far away at this point. Long-only doesn't work anymore. I believe further downside is coming for global equities, especially the ones at the top of the food chain of all globally diversified ETFs - i.e., the companies with the biggest market capitalizations in the world: American Internet Companies. These are the companies that profited most from Quantitative Easing, and they will be the ones hurt most by Quantitative Tightening.Going long and short in this environment is key if investors want to retain their purchasing power. Gaining purchasing power will be difficult due to inflation, but pair trades offer lower risk because of reduced directional market exposure.Amazon and Alibaba as ProxyBoth Amazon and Alibaba operate mainly in the consumer discretionary segment. Admittedly, the net earnings of Amazon consist of huge contributions from the AWS segment, which is a completely different business with much stronger margins. In that regard, there is a substantial difference in the business models. The Cloud computing segment of Alibaba has just turned towards profitability, and Amazon is much further ahead. However, the revenues of both companies largely stem from E-commerce.More importantly, 60% of all net sales of Amazon are in North America, and 26% constitute international sales. The remaining 14% consists of the cloud segment. Conversely, 74% of the net sales of Alibaba are in China, while 7% constitute international sales. The remaining 19% are cloud and other sales.Why short Amazon?The ongoing Fed tightening cycle is designed to hurt consumer demand in America via the reverse wealth effect. The average consumer in America will spend their income first on consumer staples and then on consumer discretionary items. Because prices of consumer staples items have increased due to cost-push inflation and wages are not responding in a similar manner (yet), the portion left for consumer discretionary spending is reduced. Furthermore, the cost side of Amazon's business increases due to higher energy and shipping costs. Because consumers are unable to spend the same portion of their income on consumer discretionary items, Amazon does not have much pricing power. Therefore the margins of its main business will most likely compress.Currently, Amazon is still one of the biggest companies by market capitalization. The stock profited massively from Quantitative Easing and will be hurt by Quantitative Tightening to a similar degree, as explained above.Because of growth forecasts and ETF inflows, the stock is trading at a high valuation. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 114x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 16x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 17x. If the revenue growth of Amazon decreases further, the stocks could be revalued at a much lower multiple. Currently, Amazon is still expected to grow revenues in 2022 by ~$55 billion (or ~12%). Current EPS estimates point towards a rapid recovery in 2022. I don't believe that is likely to happen.Why long Alibaba?The Chinese macroeconomic environment is currently ahead of the American macroeconomic environment. The Chinese economy suffered a big drawdown due to the mandated lockdowns and COVID restrictions. The China Caixin Manufacturing PMIdroppedto a low of 46 in April and started to reverse in May. Both output and new orders in China fell at a softer rate amid further declines in both export orders and employment. It is likely that the Chinese economy is already through the worst of this economic downturn. From now onwards, consumer spending growth is poised to return to positive territory.Chinese policymakers still have room for accommodative fiscal and monetary policy as the inflation rates remain low. In May 2022, China cut the borrowing rate of the five-year loan prime rate (LPR) by 15 basis points to 4.45% to stimulate the housing market. The People's Bank of China kept the rate on its one-year medium-term lending facility (MLF) at 2.85%. The Chinese policymakers seem hesitant to stimulate the economy in an aggressive way because the Fed is tightening financial conditions at the same time. However, the monetary policy remains neutral in China.In 2021, Alibaba got hit by the Chinese regulatory tech crackdown. Alibaba had to pay a $2.8 billion fine for anti-monopoly violations. The company lost ~50% of its market cap during that time. Financial media and investment banks deemed Chinese Equities to be \"uninvestable\". However, recentlyJPMorganupgraded some Chinese stocks from neutral to overweight in 2022, and many others from underweight to neutral. Other investment banks followed. The Chinese regulators have signaled an easing of the tech crackdown. They have been aware of the VIE loophole for years and have not acted. It is not in China's interest to destroy offshore Chinese companies by challenging the existing VIEs. The VIE risk is now sufficiently priced in, as analysts had talked about it extensively and continue to do so. The worst for Alibaba seems to be over.Because of the selloff, Alibaba trades at significantly lower multiples. The P/E (FWD) is currently at 15x. EV/EBITDA (FWD) stands at 11x, and the P/FCF (FWD) is at 10x. Alibaba is expected to grow revenues in 2022 by only ~$4 billion (or 3%). Current EPS estimates expect stagnant earnings growth for the next four quarters. I believe Alibaba can surprise to the upside.The Charts speak for themselves Data by YChartsThe stock prices of Alibaba and Amazon have correlated strongly during the last few years. However, in late 2020 the stock of Alibaba erased all of its gains since its IPO and fell ~70%. I believe the gap will not widen but begin to close during the next 6-12 months.The TakeawaysRisks to the Pair TradeThe Chinese Crackdown on Internet companies could restart, and complications with Jack Ma and the Chinese Regulators could provide downside to the stock of Alibaba. I believe this risk has a low probability to materialize. If the crackdown continues, why would the Chinese regulators have an interest in signaling easing.The Fed could restart Quantitative Easing and therefore positively affect the market prices. I believe this is very unlikely to happen due to the inflationary pressures that the US is facing. I think at some point in the future a pivot is guaranteed. But I don't expect it in 2022 & early 2023. If the Fed starts to ease the monetary conditions, this pair trade will probably underperform massively.The Chinese recovery could take longer than expected, and Alibaba could have worse quarters ahead. I believe this is the greatest risk in this pair trade since Chinese regulators have taken the Zero-COVID strategy very seriously as opposed to most countries in the west. Recently, there have been partial lockdowns in Shanghai again due to fresh breakouts of the virus. However, sometime in the future, China will have to reopen, Amazon is affected by Chinese lockdowns too, and I believe much of the restrictive COVID policies are priced in.Closing ThoughtsEven with these risks in mind, I believe the downside of Amazon is much larger than the downside of Alibaba. The market expectations for revenue and earnings growth of Amazon in 2022 are not plausible with the current headwinds in mind. I believe Alibaba has a good chance of beating the forecasts, although this pair trade focuses more on the downside potential of both companies than the upside.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BABA":0.9,"09988":0.9,"AMZN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3824,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9062412503,"gmtCreate":1652098115002,"gmtModify":1676535028248,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Investors are being more selective with their stockpick. They want rapid growth. Palantir needs to crush it. Currently, this looks like a retirement stock @ at a 10-20 year hold.&nbsp;","listText":"Investors are being more selective with their stockpick. They want rapid growth. Palantir needs to crush it. Currently, this looks like a retirement stock @ at a 10-20 year hold.&nbsp;","text":"Investors are being more selective with their stockpick. They want rapid growth. Palantir needs to crush it. Currently, this looks like a retirement stock @ at a 10-20 year hold.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9062412503","repostId":"1187917201","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":693,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"4099263395755910","authorId":"4099263395755910","name":"AhBart","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/5c8a0140b30f2d6c3be37b2ad1a1efe8","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4099263395755910","idStr":"4099263395755910"},"content":"Perhaps there can be a danger company may not exist before 10 yrs later 😮😮","text":"Perhaps there can be a danger company may not exist before 10 yrs later 😮😮","html":"Perhaps there can be a danger company may not exist before 10 yrs later 😮😮"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9062495168,"gmtCreate":1652095245454,"gmtModify":1676535027809,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ooh la la&nbsp;","listText":"Ooh la la&nbsp;","text":"Ooh la la","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9062495168","repostId":"1187917201","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1187917201","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1652094524,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1187917201?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-09 19:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir Stock Sinks 11.6% Premarket After Q1 Results","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1187917201","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Palantir Stock Sinks 11.6% Premarket After Q1 Results. Palantir Technologies posted soft first-quart","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">Palantir</a> Stock Sinks 11.6% Premarket After Q1 Results. Palantir Technologies posted soft first-quarter results, along with June quarter guidance that fell shy of previous Wall Street forecasts.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4c0856edc469b61d83a364331926e31d\" tg-width=\"862\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Global economic and geopolitical forces appeared to be weighing on the company’s near-term outlook, although Palantir’s long-established ties to U.S. government defense and intelligence agencies could be an advantage in a world rife with geopolitical conflict.</p><p>For the March quarter, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">Palantir </a> posted revenue of $446.4 million, up 31% from a year ago,a smidge shy of the company’s guidance of $447 million, but above the Wall Street consensus at $443 million.</p><p>On an adjusted basis, the data analytics company earned 2 cents a share in the quarter, 2 cents short of the Wall Street consensus. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the company lost 5 cents a share. Adjusted Ebitda, or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, was $121.7 million, up 27%. Adjusted operating margin was 26%, three points better than the company had forecast.</p><p>The company said commercial revenue was $205 million, up 54% in the quarter, including 136% growth from U.S. customers, ahead of the Wall Street consensus forecast of $193 million. Government revenue grew 16% to $242 million, missing analysts’ forecasts of $251 million. Customer count rose 86% from a year ago, the company said.</p><p>For the second quarter ending in June, Palantir guided to a “base case” of $470 million in revenue, while noting that there was “a wide range of potential upside to our guidance, including those driven by our role in responding to developing geopolitical events.” Previous consensus called for $484 million in second-quarter revenue.</p><p>Palantir repeated a previous forecast for 27% adjusted operating margins for the full year, and likewise reiterated its long-term forecast for annual revenue growth of 30% or better through 2025.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir Stock Sinks 11.6% Premarket After Q1 Results</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir Stock Sinks 11.6% Premarket After Q1 Results\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-09 19:08</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">Palantir</a> Stock Sinks 11.6% Premarket After Q1 Results. Palantir Technologies posted soft first-quarter results, along with June quarter guidance that fell shy of previous Wall Street forecasts.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4c0856edc469b61d83a364331926e31d\" tg-width=\"862\" tg-height=\"675\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>Global economic and geopolitical forces appeared to be weighing on the company’s near-term outlook, although Palantir’s long-established ties to U.S. government defense and intelligence agencies could be an advantage in a world rife with geopolitical conflict.</p><p>For the March quarter, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLTR\">Palantir </a> posted revenue of $446.4 million, up 31% from a year ago,a smidge shy of the company’s guidance of $447 million, but above the Wall Street consensus at $443 million.</p><p>On an adjusted basis, the data analytics company earned 2 cents a share in the quarter, 2 cents short of the Wall Street consensus. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the company lost 5 cents a share. Adjusted Ebitda, or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, was $121.7 million, up 27%. Adjusted operating margin was 26%, three points better than the company had forecast.</p><p>The company said commercial revenue was $205 million, up 54% in the quarter, including 136% growth from U.S. customers, ahead of the Wall Street consensus forecast of $193 million. Government revenue grew 16% to $242 million, missing analysts’ forecasts of $251 million. Customer count rose 86% from a year ago, the company said.</p><p>For the second quarter ending in June, Palantir guided to a “base case” of $470 million in revenue, while noting that there was “a wide range of potential upside to our guidance, including those driven by our role in responding to developing geopolitical events.” Previous consensus called for $484 million in second-quarter revenue.</p><p>Palantir repeated a previous forecast for 27% adjusted operating margins for the full year, and likewise reiterated its long-term forecast for annual revenue growth of 30% or better through 2025.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1187917201","content_text":"Palantir Stock Sinks 11.6% Premarket After Q1 Results. Palantir Technologies posted soft first-quarter results, along with June quarter guidance that fell shy of previous Wall Street forecasts.Global economic and geopolitical forces appeared to be weighing on the company’s near-term outlook, although Palantir’s long-established ties to U.S. government defense and intelligence agencies could be an advantage in a world rife with geopolitical conflict.For the March quarter, Palantir  posted revenue of $446.4 million, up 31% from a year ago,a smidge shy of the company’s guidance of $447 million, but above the Wall Street consensus at $443 million.On an adjusted basis, the data analytics company earned 2 cents a share in the quarter, 2 cents short of the Wall Street consensus. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the company lost 5 cents a share. Adjusted Ebitda, or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, was $121.7 million, up 27%. Adjusted operating margin was 26%, three points better than the company had forecast.The company said commercial revenue was $205 million, up 54% in the quarter, including 136% growth from U.S. customers, ahead of the Wall Street consensus forecast of $193 million. Government revenue grew 16% to $242 million, missing analysts’ forecasts of $251 million. Customer count rose 86% from a year ago, the company said.For the second quarter ending in June, Palantir guided to a “base case” of $470 million in revenue, while noting that there was “a wide range of potential upside to our guidance, including those driven by our role in responding to developing geopolitical events.” Previous consensus called for $484 million in second-quarter revenue.Palantir repeated a previous forecast for 27% adjusted operating margins for the full year, and likewise reiterated its long-term forecast for annual revenue growth of 30% or better through 2025.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"PLTR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":739,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9056889433,"gmtCreate":1654995828423,"gmtModify":1676535543560,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Unfortunately, true&nbsp;","listText":"Unfortunately, true&nbsp;","text":"Unfortunately, true","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9056889433","repostId":"1193591642","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":616,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058681805,"gmtCreate":1654829566907,"gmtModify":1676535519009,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Red days are for shopping, carefully&nbsp;","listText":"Red days are for shopping, carefully&nbsp;","text":"Red days are for shopping, carefully","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058681805","repostId":"2242514365","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2242514365","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1654818218,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2242514365?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-10 07:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Stock Market and Inflation: How the S&P 500 Performs on CPI Report Days","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2242514365","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Stock-market investors crowded the exits on Thursday, sending major stock indexes sharply lower a da","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Stock-market investors crowded the exits on Thursday, sending major stock indexes sharply lower a day ahead of another eagerly anticipated consumer-price index reading. Recent history may offer a clue.</p><p>&#34;While median returns for the S&amp;P 500 have been right around the flatline over the last two years on CPI days, more recent returns have been much weaker,&#34; wrote analysts at Bespoke Investment Group, in a Thursday note. Since Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell stopped using the term &#34;transitory&#34; in late November to describe inflation, the S&amp;P 500 has declined on the day of the CPI report four out of six times, including the past four reports.</p><p>Over the past six months, the S&amp;P 500&#39;s median performance on CPI days has been a decline of 0.18%, the analysts said.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500  dropped 2.4% on Thursday, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average  slumped nearly 640 points, or 1.9%, and the Nasdaq Composite  shed 2.7%.</p><p>The consumer-price index is expected to show a large, 0.7% increase when the report is released Friday morning -- more than double the gain in the prior month. The increase in inflation over the past year, meanwhile, is forecast to stay near a 40-year high of 8.4%.</p><p>The Bespoke analysts looked at sector performance over the past six reports and found that energy, unsurprisingly, has been the best performer on CPI days, with a median gain of 1.1%, while technology was the worst. Of course, 2022&#39;s stock-market fall has been led by tech-related stocks, while energy has soared in response to surging oil prices.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4a249d567c99dd8c9477bdce90f9089a\" tg-width=\"699\" tg-height=\"382\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Bespoke noted that for a market concerned about inflation, recent reports haven&#39;t offered investors much comfort. Over the past 24 months, there were just three months where headline CPI came in weaker than expected (6/10/20, 11/12/20, and 9/14/21), they said.</p><p>&#34;Ironically enough, on each of those three days, the S&amp;P 500 actually traded lower, although to be fair, all three of these reports were before Powell ditched the term &#39;transitory,&#39;&#34; the analysts wrote.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Stock Market and Inflation: How the S&P 500 Performs on CPI Report Days</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Stock Market and Inflation: How the S&P 500 Performs on CPI Report Days\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-06-10 07:43</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Stock-market investors crowded the exits on Thursday, sending major stock indexes sharply lower a day ahead of another eagerly anticipated consumer-price index reading. Recent history may offer a clue.</p><p>&#34;While median returns for the S&amp;P 500 have been right around the flatline over the last two years on CPI days, more recent returns have been much weaker,&#34; wrote analysts at Bespoke Investment Group, in a Thursday note. Since Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell stopped using the term &#34;transitory&#34; in late November to describe inflation, the S&amp;P 500 has declined on the day of the CPI report four out of six times, including the past four reports.</p><p>Over the past six months, the S&amp;P 500&#39;s median performance on CPI days has been a decline of 0.18%, the analysts said.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500  dropped 2.4% on Thursday, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average  slumped nearly 640 points, or 1.9%, and the Nasdaq Composite  shed 2.7%.</p><p>The consumer-price index is expected to show a large, 0.7% increase when the report is released Friday morning -- more than double the gain in the prior month. The increase in inflation over the past year, meanwhile, is forecast to stay near a 40-year high of 8.4%.</p><p>The Bespoke analysts looked at sector performance over the past six reports and found that energy, unsurprisingly, has been the best performer on CPI days, with a median gain of 1.1%, while technology was the worst. Of course, 2022&#39;s stock-market fall has been led by tech-related stocks, while energy has soared in response to surging oil prices.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4a249d567c99dd8c9477bdce90f9089a\" tg-width=\"699\" tg-height=\"382\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Bespoke noted that for a market concerned about inflation, recent reports haven&#39;t offered investors much comfort. Over the past 24 months, there were just three months where headline CPI came in weaker than expected (6/10/20, 11/12/20, and 9/14/21), they said.</p><p>&#34;Ironically enough, on each of those three days, the S&amp;P 500 actually traded lower, although to be fair, all three of these reports were before Powell ditched the term &#39;transitory,&#39;&#34; the analysts wrote.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF博时","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares","OEX":"标普100","BK4504":"桥水持仓","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4581":"高盛持仓","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2242514365","content_text":"Stock-market investors crowded the exits on Thursday, sending major stock indexes sharply lower a day ahead of another eagerly anticipated consumer-price index reading. Recent history may offer a clue.\"While median returns for the S&P 500 have been right around the flatline over the last two years on CPI days, more recent returns have been much weaker,\" wrote analysts at Bespoke Investment Group, in a Thursday note. Since Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell stopped using the term \"transitory\" in late November to describe inflation, the S&P 500 has declined on the day of the CPI report four out of six times, including the past four reports.Over the past six months, the S&P 500's median performance on CPI days has been a decline of 0.18%, the analysts said.The S&P 500  dropped 2.4% on Thursday, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average  slumped nearly 640 points, or 1.9%, and the Nasdaq Composite  shed 2.7%.The consumer-price index is expected to show a large, 0.7% increase when the report is released Friday morning -- more than double the gain in the prior month. The increase in inflation over the past year, meanwhile, is forecast to stay near a 40-year high of 8.4%.The Bespoke analysts looked at sector performance over the past six reports and found that energy, unsurprisingly, has been the best performer on CPI days, with a median gain of 1.1%, while technology was the worst. Of course, 2022's stock-market fall has been led by tech-related stocks, while energy has soared in response to surging oil prices.Bespoke noted that for a market concerned about inflation, recent reports haven't offered investors much comfort. Over the past 24 months, there were just three months where headline CPI came in weaker than expected (6/10/20, 11/12/20, and 9/14/21), they said.\"Ironically enough, on each of those three days, the S&P 500 actually traded lower, although to be fair, all three of these reports were before Powell ditched the term 'transitory,'\" the analysts wrote.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"161125":0.6,"513500":0.6,"UPRO":0.6,"OEF":0.6,"ESmain":0.6,"IVV":0.6,"OEX":0.6,"SPY":1,"SSO":0.6,"SH":0.6,".SPX":0.6,"SPXU":0.6,"SDS":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1078,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9028687961,"gmtCreate":1653215910553,"gmtModify":1676535241436,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Risky, indeed&nbsp;","listText":"Risky, indeed&nbsp;","text":"Risky, indeed","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9028687961","repostId":"2237804740","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":365,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9058681390,"gmtCreate":1654829511410,"gmtModify":1676535519001,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Be careful","listText":"Be careful","text":"Be careful","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058681390","repostId":"2242872207","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2242872207","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1654826194,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2242872207?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-10 09:56","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Alibaba Looks Like Amazon In 2002","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2242872207","media":"Seekingalpha","summary":"Alibaba Group Holding (NYSE:BABA) stock has seen its fair share of challenges. Between China’s tech ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Alibaba Group Holding</b> (NYSE:BABA) stock has seen its fair share of challenges. Between China’s tech crackdown, a COVID-19 outbreak, and declining retail spending, there have been many curve balls thrown BABA’s way. However, the company is doing better than many people think it is. Although earnings are declining, revenue is still growing – albeit at a slower pace than in the past – and the company is working on many new projects like chips and cloud computing. Chips and cloud services were big winners for companies like <b>Apple</b> (AAPL) and <b>Amazon</b> (AMZN), so there is reason for optimism toward Alibaba’s future trajectory.</p><p>Speaking of Amazon, that stock is a useful case study when it comes to understanding Alibaba. The two businesses have a lot in common, including:</p><ul><li>Core eCommerce operations.</li><li>Cloud computing operations.</li><li>High market share in the countries that are their “home bases.”</li></ul><p>These qualities make Amazon comparable to Alibaba. The two companies aren’t identical – Alibaba relies on third party vendors much more than Amazon does, and China is a very different market than America. But there are enough similarities that we could describe the two companies as being in the same sector.</p><p>There’s another trait that Amazon and Alibaba have in common:</p><p>Their stock market performance. BABA’s price trend in 2021/2022 is very similar to Amazon’s trend in 2000-2002. In both cases, the shares fell by high double digit percentages while revenue grew. When you’ve got a company whose stock price is declining while sales grow, you’re looking at an investment with the potential for future appreciation. Indeed, that happened with Amazon starting in 2002. That year, the company’s stock fell while its losses got smaller, paving the way for future growth. In BABA’s case, the higher revenue growth is not translating to earnings growth – a declining stock portfolio, investments in subsidiaries, and higher taxes are taking a bite out of fundamentals. On the flipside, BABA (unlike 2002 Amazon) has positive earnings already, so it can support its stock price through future buybacks. Taken as a whole, these factors suggest that BABA is set for a rally much like the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> Amazon experienced after its 2002 crash.</p><h2>Competitive Landscape</h2><p>One thing that Alibaba has in common with Amazon, especially 2002-era Amazon, is its competitive position. Alibaba has one very large competitor, <b>JD.com </b>(JD), and a host of smaller ones. This is similar to the situation Amazon faced in 2002, when <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EBAY\">eBay</a></b> (EBAY) was king of the eCommerce castle. In the long run, Amazon prevailed over eBay, and there are reasons to think that Alibaba will prevail over JD, too.</p><p>One of those reasons relates to profitability. JD is a retailer that holds and sells inventory directly, Alibaba is mainly a platform for third party retailers. Amazon is a mix of both.</p><p>Alibaba’s “third party seller” model results in high margins because it does not require holding inventory. BABA has fulfillment centers, which cost significant sums of money, but not on the level of holding inventory. Alibaba’s model incurs minimal host, mainly marketing and maintaining web infrastructure. JD’s, by contrast, incurs high costs. So BABA will likely earn more profit than JD if the two companies’ revenue levels are comparable. Indeed, their revenue is pretty comparable: JD actually had about $20 billion more of it than BABA did in the trailing 12 month period. However, BABA had far more profit. That’s largely because of Alibaba’s low cost business model.</p><p>Of course, JD’s growing sales are a threat to Alibaba. Just because JD earns less profit doesn’t mean it won’t cut in on Alibaba’s action. However, Alibaba’s higher margins give it more opportunities to invest in its business. Over the last decade, Alibaba has built a cloud business, bought several companies, and launched a partially-owned payments platform. These kinds of things would be hard to pull off with JD’s margins. So, between JD and BABA, the latter is better positioned to grow into an Amazon-style conglomerate.</p><h2>Alibaba’s Financials: the Amazon Comparison is Clear</h2><p>Alibaba’s recent stock performance has been similar to Amazon’s in 2000-2002. Its financials are also similar to Amazon’s at that time period, only far better. In the most recent 12 month period, BABA delivered:</p><ul><li><p>$134.5 billion in revenue.</p></li><li><p>$49 billion in gross profit.</p></li><li><p>$14.9 billion in operating income (“EBIT”).</p></li><li><p>$9.8 billion in net income.</p></li><li><p>$9 billion in levered free cash flow.</p></li></ul><p>These figures give us a 7.2% net margin and a 36.5% gross margin. The net margin might not look that impressive but this is going off of GAAP earnings, which are affected by the performance of BABA’s stock portfolio. Substituting cash from operations for net income and we get a 16.3% CFO margin. Alibaba’s margins have fallen somewhat since the company’s record breaking 2020/2021 fiscal year, but they should start to climb again. A lot of the decline in BABA’s margins has been due to its stock portfolio declining in value. Chinese stocks are in a bullish trend this quarter; if they end the quarter in the green, then we could see BABA’s margins improve.</p><p>This is similar to where Amazon was in 2002. Its stock price was declining, its revenue was rising, and its equity investments were going down. It was not profitable in 2002, so Alibaba compares favourably on that front. However, AMZN’s net loss was shrinking that year whereas BABA’s earnings are declining, so “2002 Amazon” wins on growth.</p><h2>Valuation</h2><p>Having explored Alibaba’s financial performance, we can turn to its valuation. I’ll leave the Amazon comparison alone for this section because Amazon is nothing like Alibaba when it comes to valuation.</p><p>One of the most appealing things about Alibaba stock today is its price. The company is very cheap relative to its underlying assets, earnings and cash flows, and will look even cheaper if earnings growth resumes later this year.</p><p>According to Seeking Alpha Quant, BABA trades at the following multiples:</p><ul><li><p>Adjusted P/E: 12.</p></li><li><p>GAAP P/E: 28.</p></li><li><p>EV/EBITDA: 11.3.</p></li><li><p>Price/sales: 1.98.</p></li><li><p>Price/operating cash flow: 11.7.</p></li></ul><p>These multiples suggest that BABA is cheap. Certainly, they’re much lower than the multiples you’ll find on U.S. tech stocks of similar size. Doing a discounted cash flow analysis on BABA yields a similar result: even with conservative growth assumptions, the stock ends up being worth more than its current stock price implies.</p><p>In the trailing 12 month period, Alibaba grew revenue at 18%. In the two recent quarters, it grew closer to 10%. For the sake of conservatism, we’ll use the lower end of BABA’s recent quarterly growth as our revenue assumption.</p><p>Now let’s look at costs. In 2021, BABA’s COGS was $64 billion and operating expenses were $28 billion, for a total of $93 billion in cash costs. These combined costs grew by 28% to $119 billion in 2022. That would suggest that Alibaba’s costs are growing much faster than revenue. However, if we zero in on the most recent quarter, we see the cost growth slowing down compared to earlier in the year. COGS for Q4 came in at $21.9 billion and operating cost at $7.6 billion–down from $7.8 billion in the prior year quarter. Overall, COGS + operating costs combined grew at 10% for the quarter. We know that Alibaba is actively working at reducing costs right now, so I will again forecast based on the quarter rather than the year. The result of these assumptions is 10% growth in both revenue and costs. I will ignore interest expense in my model because BABA’s “interest income” includes stock market fluctuations, which are impossible to predict. I will use 25% as the tax rate because BABA recently lost its tax credits and, as a result, now pays China’s standard 25% tax. These assumptions yield the following model:</p><table><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td><p>2022 (BASE YEAR)</p></td><td><p>2023</p></td><td><p>2024</p></td><td><p>2025</p></td><td><p>2026</p></td><td><p>2027</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Revenue per share</p></td><td><p>$50</p></td><td><p>$55</p></td><td><p>$60.5</p></td><td><p>$66.55</p></td><td><p>$73.2</p></td><td><p>$80.52</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Costs per share</p></td><td><p>$44.35</p></td><td><p>$48.78</p></td><td><p>$53.66</p></td><td><p>$59</p></td><td><p>$64.93</p></td><td><p>$71.42</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EBIT per share</p></td><td><p>$5.65</p></td><td><p>$6.22</p></td><td><p>$6.84</p></td><td><p>$7.55</p></td><td><p>$8.27</p></td><td><p>$9.1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tax</p></td><td><p>$0.62</p></td><td><p>$1.55</p></td><td><p>$1.71</p></td><td><p>$1.89</p></td><td><p>$2.07</p></td><td><p>$2.28</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EPS</p></td><td><p>$5.03</p></td><td><p>$4.665</p></td><td><p>$5.13</p></td><td><p>$5.66</p></td><td><p>$6.2</p></td><td><p>$6.82</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>As you can see, earnings dip briefly in 2023, mainly due to the fact that 2022 hadn’t yet seen four full quarters with higher tax rates. In 2024, earnings resume a modest upward trajectory.</p><p>The end result is a pretty underwhelming 6.2% CAGR growth rate in earnings, which stems from our conservative assumptions. Actual growth could be stronger, but we’ll use what we’ve got. If we discount the cash flows above at the 3% 10 year treasury yield, we get:</p><table><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr><td></td><td><p>2023</p></td><td><p>2024</p></td><td><p>2025</p></td><td><p>2026</p></td><td><p>2027</p></td><td><p>TOTAL</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>EPS</p></td><td><p>$4.665</p></td><td><p>$5.13</p></td><td><p>$5.66</p></td><td><p>$6.2</p></td><td><p>$6.82</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>(1 + r)^N</p></td><td><p>1.03</p></td><td><p>1.0609</p></td><td><p>1.093</p></td><td><p>1.125</p></td><td><p>1.159</p></td><td><p>N/A</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Discounted EPS</p></td><td><p>$4.52</p></td><td><p>$4.83</p></td><td><p>$5.17</p></td><td><p>$5.51</p></td><td><p>$5.88</p></td><td><p>$25.91</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>So we’ve got $25.91 worth of discounted cash flows in five years. If we assume that BABA produces no growth after that, then the terminal value is $227. So, we have a total present value of $253 – even when we assume extremely slow growth!</p><h2>Risks and Challenges</h2><p>As we’ve seen, Alibaba stock is undervalued based on both multiples and discounted cash flows. If the company just grows modestly in the next five years, its stock will come to be worth more than it is today. However, there are many risks and challenges for investors to watch out for, including:</p><ul><li><p><b>Political risk.</b> Alibaba is subject to two forms of political risk: domestic political risk (e.g. a renewed tech crackdown), and international political risk (e.g. tensions between China and the U.S.). Right now, China is easing up on the tech crackdown, which is part of why Chinese stocks are rallying, but you can never discount the possibility that the government will go back into crackdown mode later. Likewise, there is always the possibility that tensions between the U.S. and China.</p></li><li><p><b>Revenue deceleration.</b> Alibaba’s revenue growth decelerated significantly in the past year. Its five year CAGR revenue growth rate is 40%, the TTM growth rate is only 18%. So BABA’s growth is definitely slowing. If it slows down more, then perhaps BABA won’t hit the 10% revenue growth my model assumed, and it will be worth less than what my model estimated.</p></li><li><p><b>COVID outbreaks.</b> China is still committed to a “COVID zero” model, meaning that it is willing to bring in pretty strict lockdowns for only modest numbers of COVID cases. This fact contributed to China’s recent 11% decline in retail spending. If we see more lockdowns, then BABA’s sales growth could slow down considerably, contributing to revenue deceleration.</p></li></ul><p>The risks above are very real. Nevertheless, Alibaba stock is cheap enough to make the risk worth assuming. Even assuming very little growth, the stock’s future earnings have a present value of about $250. That’s considerable upside to today’s prices. If growth accelerates, then we could see a true Amazon-style multi-decade rally taking us to dizzying highs.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba Looks Like Amazon In 2002</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba Looks Like Amazon In 2002\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-10 09:56 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517331-alibaba-looks-like-amazon-2002><strong>Seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Alibaba Group Holding (NYSE:BABA) stock has seen its fair share of challenges. Between China’s tech crackdown, a COVID-19 outbreak, and declining retail spending, there have been many curve balls ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517331-alibaba-looks-like-amazon-2002\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517331-alibaba-looks-like-amazon-2002","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2242872207","content_text":"Alibaba Group Holding (NYSE:BABA) stock has seen its fair share of challenges. Between China’s tech crackdown, a COVID-19 outbreak, and declining retail spending, there have been many curve balls thrown BABA’s way. However, the company is doing better than many people think it is. Although earnings are declining, revenue is still growing – albeit at a slower pace than in the past – and the company is working on many new projects like chips and cloud computing. Chips and cloud services were big winners for companies like Apple (AAPL) and Amazon (AMZN), so there is reason for optimism toward Alibaba’s future trajectory.Speaking of Amazon, that stock is a useful case study when it comes to understanding Alibaba. The two businesses have a lot in common, including:Core eCommerce operations.Cloud computing operations.High market share in the countries that are their “home bases.”These qualities make Amazon comparable to Alibaba. The two companies aren’t identical – Alibaba relies on third party vendors much more than Amazon does, and China is a very different market than America. But there are enough similarities that we could describe the two companies as being in the same sector.There’s another trait that Amazon and Alibaba have in common:Their stock market performance. BABA’s price trend in 2021/2022 is very similar to Amazon’s trend in 2000-2002. In both cases, the shares fell by high double digit percentages while revenue grew. When you’ve got a company whose stock price is declining while sales grow, you’re looking at an investment with the potential for future appreciation. Indeed, that happened with Amazon starting in 2002. That year, the company’s stock fell while its losses got smaller, paving the way for future growth. In BABA’s case, the higher revenue growth is not translating to earnings growth – a declining stock portfolio, investments in subsidiaries, and higher taxes are taking a bite out of fundamentals. On the flipside, BABA (unlike 2002 Amazon) has positive earnings already, so it can support its stock price through future buybacks. Taken as a whole, these factors suggest that BABA is set for a rally much like the one Amazon experienced after its 2002 crash.Competitive LandscapeOne thing that Alibaba has in common with Amazon, especially 2002-era Amazon, is its competitive position. Alibaba has one very large competitor, JD.com (JD), and a host of smaller ones. This is similar to the situation Amazon faced in 2002, when eBay (EBAY) was king of the eCommerce castle. In the long run, Amazon prevailed over eBay, and there are reasons to think that Alibaba will prevail over JD, too.One of those reasons relates to profitability. JD is a retailer that holds and sells inventory directly, Alibaba is mainly a platform for third party retailers. Amazon is a mix of both.Alibaba’s “third party seller” model results in high margins because it does not require holding inventory. BABA has fulfillment centers, which cost significant sums of money, but not on the level of holding inventory. Alibaba’s model incurs minimal host, mainly marketing and maintaining web infrastructure. JD’s, by contrast, incurs high costs. So BABA will likely earn more profit than JD if the two companies’ revenue levels are comparable. Indeed, their revenue is pretty comparable: JD actually had about $20 billion more of it than BABA did in the trailing 12 month period. However, BABA had far more profit. That’s largely because of Alibaba’s low cost business model.Of course, JD’s growing sales are a threat to Alibaba. Just because JD earns less profit doesn’t mean it won’t cut in on Alibaba’s action. However, Alibaba’s higher margins give it more opportunities to invest in its business. Over the last decade, Alibaba has built a cloud business, bought several companies, and launched a partially-owned payments platform. These kinds of things would be hard to pull off with JD’s margins. So, between JD and BABA, the latter is better positioned to grow into an Amazon-style conglomerate.Alibaba’s Financials: the Amazon Comparison is ClearAlibaba’s recent stock performance has been similar to Amazon’s in 2000-2002. Its financials are also similar to Amazon’s at that time period, only far better. In the most recent 12 month period, BABA delivered:$134.5 billion in revenue.$49 billion in gross profit.$14.9 billion in operating income (“EBIT”).$9.8 billion in net income.$9 billion in levered free cash flow.These figures give us a 7.2% net margin and a 36.5% gross margin. The net margin might not look that impressive but this is going off of GAAP earnings, which are affected by the performance of BABA’s stock portfolio. Substituting cash from operations for net income and we get a 16.3% CFO margin. Alibaba’s margins have fallen somewhat since the company’s record breaking 2020/2021 fiscal year, but they should start to climb again. A lot of the decline in BABA’s margins has been due to its stock portfolio declining in value. Chinese stocks are in a bullish trend this quarter; if they end the quarter in the green, then we could see BABA’s margins improve.This is similar to where Amazon was in 2002. Its stock price was declining, its revenue was rising, and its equity investments were going down. It was not profitable in 2002, so Alibaba compares favourably on that front. However, AMZN’s net loss was shrinking that year whereas BABA’s earnings are declining, so “2002 Amazon” wins on growth.ValuationHaving explored Alibaba’s financial performance, we can turn to its valuation. I’ll leave the Amazon comparison alone for this section because Amazon is nothing like Alibaba when it comes to valuation.One of the most appealing things about Alibaba stock today is its price. The company is very cheap relative to its underlying assets, earnings and cash flows, and will look even cheaper if earnings growth resumes later this year.According to Seeking Alpha Quant, BABA trades at the following multiples:Adjusted P/E: 12.GAAP P/E: 28.EV/EBITDA: 11.3.Price/sales: 1.98.Price/operating cash flow: 11.7.These multiples suggest that BABA is cheap. Certainly, they’re much lower than the multiples you’ll find on U.S. tech stocks of similar size. Doing a discounted cash flow analysis on BABA yields a similar result: even with conservative growth assumptions, the stock ends up being worth more than its current stock price implies.In the trailing 12 month period, Alibaba grew revenue at 18%. In the two recent quarters, it grew closer to 10%. For the sake of conservatism, we’ll use the lower end of BABA’s recent quarterly growth as our revenue assumption.Now let’s look at costs. In 2021, BABA’s COGS was $64 billion and operating expenses were $28 billion, for a total of $93 billion in cash costs. These combined costs grew by 28% to $119 billion in 2022. That would suggest that Alibaba’s costs are growing much faster than revenue. However, if we zero in on the most recent quarter, we see the cost growth slowing down compared to earlier in the year. COGS for Q4 came in at $21.9 billion and operating cost at $7.6 billion–down from $7.8 billion in the prior year quarter. Overall, COGS + operating costs combined grew at 10% for the quarter. We know that Alibaba is actively working at reducing costs right now, so I will again forecast based on the quarter rather than the year. The result of these assumptions is 10% growth in both revenue and costs. I will ignore interest expense in my model because BABA’s “interest income” includes stock market fluctuations, which are impossible to predict. I will use 25% as the tax rate because BABA recently lost its tax credits and, as a result, now pays China’s standard 25% tax. These assumptions yield the following model:2022 (BASE YEAR)20232024202520262027Revenue per share$50$55$60.5$66.55$73.2$80.52Costs per share$44.35$48.78$53.66$59$64.93$71.42EBIT per share$5.65$6.22$6.84$7.55$8.27$9.1Tax$0.62$1.55$1.71$1.89$2.07$2.28EPS$5.03$4.665$5.13$5.66$6.2$6.82As you can see, earnings dip briefly in 2023, mainly due to the fact that 2022 hadn’t yet seen four full quarters with higher tax rates. In 2024, earnings resume a modest upward trajectory.The end result is a pretty underwhelming 6.2% CAGR growth rate in earnings, which stems from our conservative assumptions. Actual growth could be stronger, but we’ll use what we’ve got. If we discount the cash flows above at the 3% 10 year treasury yield, we get:20232024202520262027TOTALEPS$4.665$5.13$5.66$6.2$6.82N/A(1 + r)^N1.031.06091.0931.1251.159N/ADiscounted EPS$4.52$4.83$5.17$5.51$5.88$25.91So we’ve got $25.91 worth of discounted cash flows in five years. If we assume that BABA produces no growth after that, then the terminal value is $227. So, we have a total present value of $253 – even when we assume extremely slow growth!Risks and ChallengesAs we’ve seen, Alibaba stock is undervalued based on both multiples and discounted cash flows. If the company just grows modestly in the next five years, its stock will come to be worth more than it is today. However, there are many risks and challenges for investors to watch out for, including:Political risk. Alibaba is subject to two forms of political risk: domestic political risk (e.g. a renewed tech crackdown), and international political risk (e.g. tensions between China and the U.S.). Right now, China is easing up on the tech crackdown, which is part of why Chinese stocks are rallying, but you can never discount the possibility that the government will go back into crackdown mode later. Likewise, there is always the possibility that tensions between the U.S. and China.Revenue deceleration. Alibaba’s revenue growth decelerated significantly in the past year. Its five year CAGR revenue growth rate is 40%, the TTM growth rate is only 18%. So BABA’s growth is definitely slowing. If it slows down more, then perhaps BABA won’t hit the 10% revenue growth my model assumed, and it will be worth less than what my model estimated.COVID outbreaks. China is still committed to a “COVID zero” model, meaning that it is willing to bring in pretty strict lockdowns for only modest numbers of COVID cases. This fact contributed to China’s recent 11% decline in retail spending. If we see more lockdowns, then BABA’s sales growth could slow down considerably, contributing to revenue deceleration.The risks above are very real. Nevertheless, Alibaba stock is cheap enough to make the risk worth assuming. Even assuming very little growth, the stock’s future earnings have a present value of about $250. That’s considerable upside to today’s prices. If growth accelerates, then we could see a true Amazon-style multi-decade rally taking us to dizzying highs.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BABA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1035,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9053565357,"gmtCreate":1654562709879,"gmtModify":1676535469209,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tesla is not just a car company. Just like Apple is not just a phone company.&nbsp;","listText":"Tesla is not just a car company. Just like Apple is not just a phone company.&nbsp;","text":"Tesla is not just a car company. Just like Apple is not just a phone company.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9053565357","repostId":"2241998880","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":595,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9025737783,"gmtCreate":1653742957742,"gmtModify":1676535335460,"author":{"id":"4113822145562802","authorId":"4113822145562802","name":"hotheadz88","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/accdd6bf5a9ba8c6c1d7a0737af4bc16","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113822145562802","idStr":"4113822145562802"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Twitter has become a monster that is eating itself up.&nbsp;","listText":"Twitter has become a monster that is eating itself up.&nbsp;","text":"Twitter has become a monster that is eating itself up.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9025737783","repostId":"1165399678","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":541,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}