+Follow
ricky的帐户
No personal profile
75
Follow
2
Followers
0
Topic
0
Badge
Posts
Hot
ricky的帐户
04-06
mark
Sorry, the original content has been removed
Go to Tiger App to see more news
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4113652880316960","uuid":"4113652880316960","gmtCreate":1650551791766,"gmtModify":1652072058532,"name":"ricky的帐户","pinyin":"rickydzhrickydezhanghu","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9c7f4c01fbb82926962006574a04f713","hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","hatId":"ca_profile_frame_Mpy1eK","hatName":"","vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":75,"tweetSize":2,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.05.31","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"3e5a625780d3411098f7e72115f69f0a-2","templateUuid":"3e5a625780d3411098f7e72115f69f0a","name":"Total trades","description":"Cumulative for 500 trades","bigImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/2a7aad6bbb003528533cf7367bf71a7d","smallImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/545c65027673fd17e3ac5c2df0917fc4","grayImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4875da396980e5cdbae95a7cbf265454","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":1691578800000,"redirectLinkValidityTo":1725015600000,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.16","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":5100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.15","exceedPercentage":"93.25%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"23f878ed27704312ae41c7f17e73b319-4","templateUuid":"23f878ed27704312ae41c7f17e73b319","name":"Annualised return","description":"Top 10%","bigImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/15d4b5a89fa218ed3a35da1a05874cf6","smallImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/16e2b28d75d7746886400fad4f4ec3e3","grayImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6f578d36f80e1a3d9c705f395e522048","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":1691578800000,"redirectLinkValidityTo":1725015600000,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.03.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":5300,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.27","exceedPercentage":"93.87%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.11.16","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.11","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":7,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.27","exceedPercentage":"93.50%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":17,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":550640785602288,"gmtCreate":1775454891174,"gmtModify":1775455977548,"author":{"id":"4113652880316960","authorId":"4113652880316960","name":"ricky的帐户","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9c7f4c01fbb82926962006574a04f713","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4113652880316960","idStr":"4113652880316960"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"mark","listText":"mark","text":"mark","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/550640785602288","repostId":"2625819624","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2625819624","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"追踪全球财经热点，精选影响您财富的资讯，投资理财必备神器！","home_visible":1,"media_name":"华尔街见闻","id":"1084101182","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/66809d1f5c2e43e2bdf15820c6d6897e"},"pubTimestamp":1775450467,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2625819624?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-04-06 12:41","market":"other","language":"zh","title":"The most exciting \"survey\"? \"Internet celebrity AI research institution\": Public data underreports 50% of the actual traffic volume in Hormuz.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2625819624","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"霍尔木兹海峡到底开没开？Citrini分析师冒死亲赴一线“数船”揭开真相：公开AIS系统竟漏报了近50%的真实流量！海峡并非简单的“非开即关”，而是处于随时变化的“动态执法”中。全球能源与航运供应链将面临更频繁、难测的剧烈波动，摒弃单一数据源，掌握多源验证的信息优势已成交易制胜关键。","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>The most \"explosive\" piece of material in the financial world today comes from an article about Hormuz.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/002320\">Channel</a>First-line on-site reports.</p><p>Citrini Research, a Research institution that previously caused a storm in the market with its AI \"thought experiment\" report \"The Global Intelligence Crisis in 2028\" and even \"crashed\" the stock prices of a number of related companies, has now released another major geopolitical report. It caused quite a stir in traders, shipping insurance, and energy research circles for a simple reason: when markets were debating whether the strait should be opened or whether it would suddenly close, the report brought the discussion back to the forefront.</p><p>The report's protagonist is Citrini Research's mysterious \"Analyst No. 3\". Unlike common secondhand compilations, he chose to personally go to the vicinity of the strait to \"count ships,\" observe waterways, chat with locals and crew members, and record details of inspections, detentions, and risks encountered along the way. Many readers' first reaction after reading this is: this is more like a field reconnaissance log than a macro-level commentary made in the office—which is precisely the kind of impact that Citrini always has when it comes to \"bringing the market back to reality with details\".</p><p>Analyst No. 3 observed at the scene that the actual number of ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz was significantly higher than the level shown in publicly available AIS data, indicating that the market systematically underestimated the actual flow. The key figures given in the report are glaring: \"Under the current environment, the AIS system misses approximately 50% of actual passing vessels every day.\"</p><p>More importantly, he describes the current state of the Strait as a state of \"dynamic law enforcement\": the Strait is not well suited to be summarized by the binary label of \"open/closed\", because the rules on the ground are changing, and so are the enforcers. The report states that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is dominating the new \"who can pass\" rules on site, and patrol boats and Shahed drones are frequently active, potentially amplifying the risk of volatility in the global oil and gas supply chain at any time.</p><p><div><h2>How to fill in information gaps: On-site \"counting ships\" has become the most direct method.</h2></div>The Strait of Hormuz acts like a \"master valve\" for global energy.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/USEG\">U.S. energy</a>The Environmental Information Agency (EIA) has long estimated that the Strait of Hormuz carries a significant proportion of the world's seaborne crude oil and refined oil traffic (often cited as around 20%), and any news of \"misjudging the opening and closing\" will quickly be reflected in oil prices, freight rates, and insurance rates.</p><p>The problem is that the tools commonly used in the market—public AIS, some satellite images, and scattered anonymous intelligence—each have blind spots. In his report, Citrini made a very straightforward assessment: \"When there is a huge information gap in the market regarding whether the Strait is open or closed, the only direct and effective way is to count ships on site.\" This explains why the report has attracted attention: it provides scarce first-hand observation at the cost of extremely high personal risk.</p><p><div><h2>\"High-risk forensics\" from Dubai to Musandam</h2></div>Citrini's expedition route was detailed: Dubai → Fujairah oil port → Musandam province (Khasab) of Oman → attempting to enter the core waters of the strait by speedboat. The value of this route lies in the fact that it connects the entire chain of \"port - supply - border law enforcement - maritime passage\" for observation, rather than just focusing on the section of water in the middle of the strait.</p><p>He also brought unusual equipment for a business trip: a Leica zoom camera, recording glasses, an EPIRB distress signal, approximately $15,000 in cash, and even mentioned bringing a spare phone (including a...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XIACY\">Xiaomi</a>(Mobile phones) and supplies such as Zyn. The report had a distinctly on-site tone; for example, he described the trip as \"like writing a research report in a waterproof bag,\" ready to deal with seizures and emergencies at any time.</p><p><div><h2>Key Findings 1: AIS is \"half gone,\" with hidden AIS and \"hidden corridors\" making up for it.</h2></div>One of Citrini's most significant conclusions is a direct blow to the reliability of AIS. He wrote, \"In the current environment, the AIS system misses about 50% of actual passing vessels every day, and the publicly available data that the market relies on is no longer reliable.\" If we compare AIS to highway navigation and positioning, it can indeed display most vehicles, but when some vehicles \"turn off their positioning\" or take a path that is not marked on a publicly available map, a large area of the screen will appear empty.</p><p>He observed more ships passing through the site, especially some ships choosing permitted passages close to the Iranian coast, which he called \"hidden corridors\". Some of these vessels employ dark AIS (off signal) or do not fully rely on public tracking systems. For trading and risk control, this poses a real problem: using publicly available AIS to estimate whether \"traffic has dropped sharply\" may underestimate the actual traffic volume, thereby amplifying panic or mismatching the risk premium.</p><p>To support this point, the shipping industry body BIMCO, as well as some insurance and maritime reporting channels (such as the UKMTO's navigation safety reporting system), have long warned that in high-risk waters, whether or not AIS is activated is often subject to safety and avoidance strategies, and publicly available data is naturally biased. Citrini's contribution is that he quantifies this \"deviation\" into a more impactful approximation.</p><p><div><h2>Key finding two: IRGC-led \"dynamic law enforcement\" makes the strait more like \"temporary traffic control.\"</h2></div>At the security and political level, the report emphasizes that the logic of control over the Strait is changing. He wrote that the IRGC was developing and enforcing new passage rules on site, patrol boats and Shahed drones were frequently active, and the strait was in a state of “dynamic law enforcement.” To use a better analogy, it's somewhat like a key arterial road: the road isn't blocked, but traffic police are constantly setting up temporary lanes, conducting random checks, and releasing lists, causing the travel experience and risks to fluctuate on an hourly basis.</p><p>On sensitive issues, the report also leaves room for the market to understand: some regional security professionals believe that strengthening controls has its own border security and deterrence needs; Shipping companies and traders are more concerned about the unpredictability brought about by the temporary nature of the rules, because what the supply chain fears most is not \"high prices,\" but \"who knows when it will get stuck.\"</p><p><div><h2>Inspection, detention, and \"signing commitments\": Why is this material considered costly?</h2></div>The most immersive part of the report took place at the Omani border checkpoint. Citrini described being asked to sign a pledge \"not to take photographs, not to engage in journalism, and not to gather intelligence.\" He then took a GPS-free speedboat piloted by a stranger. The report stated that the speedboat was \"only 18 miles from the Iranian coast,\" and even included details of \"swimming and smoking cigars in the strait\" to illustrate how close he was to the actual waterway and law enforcement.</p><p>The more dramatic part is that he was intercepted and detained by the Omani coast guard, his mobile phone was confiscated, and his notes and photos may have fallen into official hands. For readers, the significance of such plots lies not in curiosity, but in explaining the fact that as data sources become increasingly difficult and publicly available information becomes more fragmented, the cost of first-hand observation is rising sharply, which directly affects the quality of information and pricing efficiency in the market.</p><p><div><h2>How should the market assess \"Strait risks\" in the future?</h2></div>A common question is, since publicly available AIS is unreliable, what else can the market trust?</p><p>A more realistic answer is to change \"single data source\" to \"multi-source puzzle\". The transaction and risk control team can cross-check publicly available AIS, commercial satellites (especially SAR, which is more friendly to nighttime and cloud cover), port loading and unloading and queuing data, changes in insurance quotes, and official maritime notifications. Think of it as using multiple cameras to look at the same intersection, and even if one camera is blocked, the overall traffic flow can still be reconstructed.</p><p>Another question is, how will this affect oil prices and shipping?</p><p>The EIA and the International Energy Agency (IEA) and other organizations have repeatedly emphasized the importance of Hormuz, and the risk premium often comes from the product of the \"probability of disruption × impact of disruption\". Citrini's report has enhanced the market's understanding of the \"impact\" aspect: the Strait is not experiencing a simple shutdown; passage patterns are changing, rules are more temporary, and risks are more like...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/600668\">spike</a>Pulse\". The transmission of such risks to option volatility, shipping costs, and insurance surcharges is typically more sensitive than to spot transactions.</p><p><div><h2>Volatility comes from \"unpredictable temporary rules\"</h2></div>Citrini is cautious about the future: IRGC-led on-site rules will make the Strait more prone to sudden frictions, and fluctuations in the global oil supply chain may more frequently exhibit the characteristics of being \"short-lived, intense, and difficult to verify.\" For markets, this environment rewards participants who are quick to respond and have more three-dimensional sources of information.</p><p>His advice is also clear: don't treat the strait as a switch, and don't treat AIS as the truth. The report's phrase \"going to the site to count ships\" is striking because it reminds the market that when the information gap is large enough, risk control and research need to be closer to ground reality, even if the cost is high and the risk is high.</p><p>In short, the core point of the report is that<strong>The actual traffic volume in the Strait of Hormuz may be significantly higher than the publicly available AIS data. The strait order exhibits dynamic law enforcement characteristics, and any \"misjudgment of opening and closing\" information could amplify fluctuations in the global energy and shipping chain.</strong></p><p>On the one hand, the market may need to recalibrate the \"traffic-risk premium\" mapping; On the other hand, data methodologies will be forced to upgrade from relying on a single publicly available metric to more expensive but robust multi-source verification. For trading, shipping, and industry, these changes will push \"information advantage\" to a more central position.</p><p></body></html></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The most exciting \"survey\"? \"Internet celebrity AI research institution\": Public data underreports 50% of the actual traffic volume in Hormuz.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe most exciting \"survey\"? \"Internet celebrity AI research institution\": Public data underreports 50% of the actual traffic volume in Hormuz.\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1084101182\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/66809d1f5c2e43e2bdf15820c6d6897e);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">华尔街见闻 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2026-04-06 12:41</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>The most \"explosive\" piece of material in the financial world today comes from an article about Hormuz.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/002320\">Channel</a>First-line on-site reports.</p><p>Citrini Research, a Research institution that previously caused a storm in the market with its AI \"thought experiment\" report \"The Global Intelligence Crisis in 2028\" and even \"crashed\" the stock prices of a number of related companies, has now released another major geopolitical report. It caused quite a stir in traders, shipping insurance, and energy research circles for a simple reason: when markets were debating whether the strait should be opened or whether it would suddenly close, the report brought the discussion back to the forefront.</p><p>The report's protagonist is Citrini Research's mysterious \"Analyst No. 3\". Unlike common secondhand compilations, he chose to personally go to the vicinity of the strait to \"count ships,\" observe waterways, chat with locals and crew members, and record details of inspections, detentions, and risks encountered along the way. Many readers' first reaction after reading this is: this is more like a field reconnaissance log than a macro-level commentary made in the office—which is precisely the kind of impact that Citrini always has when it comes to \"bringing the market back to reality with details\".</p><p>Analyst No. 3 observed at the scene that the actual number of ships passing through the Strait of Hormuz was significantly higher than the level shown in publicly available AIS data, indicating that the market systematically underestimated the actual flow. The key figures given in the report are glaring: \"Under the current environment, the AIS system misses approximately 50% of actual passing vessels every day.\"</p><p>More importantly, he describes the current state of the Strait as a state of \"dynamic law enforcement\": the Strait is not well suited to be summarized by the binary label of \"open/closed\", because the rules on the ground are changing, and so are the enforcers. The report states that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is dominating the new \"who can pass\" rules on site, and patrol boats and Shahed drones are frequently active, potentially amplifying the risk of volatility in the global oil and gas supply chain at any time.</p><p><div><h2>How to fill in information gaps: On-site \"counting ships\" has become the most direct method.</h2></div>The Strait of Hormuz acts like a \"master valve\" for global energy.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/USEG\">U.S. energy</a>The Environmental Information Agency (EIA) has long estimated that the Strait of Hormuz carries a significant proportion of the world's seaborne crude oil and refined oil traffic (often cited as around 20%), and any news of \"misjudging the opening and closing\" will quickly be reflected in oil prices, freight rates, and insurance rates.</p><p>The problem is that the tools commonly used in the market—public AIS, some satellite images, and scattered anonymous intelligence—each have blind spots. In his report, Citrini made a very straightforward assessment: \"When there is a huge information gap in the market regarding whether the Strait is open or closed, the only direct and effective way is to count ships on site.\" This explains why the report has attracted attention: it provides scarce first-hand observation at the cost of extremely high personal risk.</p><p><div><h2>\"High-risk forensics\" from Dubai to Musandam</h2></div>Citrini's expedition route was detailed: Dubai → Fujairah oil port → Musandam province (Khasab) of Oman → attempting to enter the core waters of the strait by speedboat. The value of this route lies in the fact that it connects the entire chain of \"port - supply - border law enforcement - maritime passage\" for observation, rather than just focusing on the section of water in the middle of the strait.</p><p>He also brought unusual equipment for a business trip: a Leica zoom camera, recording glasses, an EPIRB distress signal, approximately $15,000 in cash, and even mentioned bringing a spare phone (including a...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/XIACY\">Xiaomi</a>(Mobile phones) and supplies such as Zyn. The report had a distinctly on-site tone; for example, he described the trip as \"like writing a research report in a waterproof bag,\" ready to deal with seizures and emergencies at any time.</p><p><div><h2>Key Findings 1: AIS is \"half gone,\" with hidden AIS and \"hidden corridors\" making up for it.</h2></div>One of Citrini's most significant conclusions is a direct blow to the reliability of AIS. He wrote, \"In the current environment, the AIS system misses about 50% of actual passing vessels every day, and the publicly available data that the market relies on is no longer reliable.\" If we compare AIS to highway navigation and positioning, it can indeed display most vehicles, but when some vehicles \"turn off their positioning\" or take a path that is not marked on a publicly available map, a large area of the screen will appear empty.</p><p>He observed more ships passing through the site, especially some ships choosing permitted passages close to the Iranian coast, which he called \"hidden corridors\". Some of these vessels employ dark AIS (off signal) or do not fully rely on public tracking systems. For trading and risk control, this poses a real problem: using publicly available AIS to estimate whether \"traffic has dropped sharply\" may underestimate the actual traffic volume, thereby amplifying panic or mismatching the risk premium.</p><p>To support this point, the shipping industry body BIMCO, as well as some insurance and maritime reporting channels (such as the UKMTO's navigation safety reporting system), have long warned that in high-risk waters, whether or not AIS is activated is often subject to safety and avoidance strategies, and publicly available data is naturally biased. Citrini's contribution is that he quantifies this \"deviation\" into a more impactful approximation.</p><p><div><h2>Key finding two: IRGC-led \"dynamic law enforcement\" makes the strait more like \"temporary traffic control.\"</h2></div>At the security and political level, the report emphasizes that the logic of control over the Strait is changing. He wrote that the IRGC was developing and enforcing new passage rules on site, patrol boats and Shahed drones were frequently active, and the strait was in a state of “dynamic law enforcement.” To use a better analogy, it's somewhat like a key arterial road: the road isn't blocked, but traffic police are constantly setting up temporary lanes, conducting random checks, and releasing lists, causing the travel experience and risks to fluctuate on an hourly basis.</p><p>On sensitive issues, the report also leaves room for the market to understand: some regional security professionals believe that strengthening controls has its own border security and deterrence needs; Shipping companies and traders are more concerned about the unpredictability brought about by the temporary nature of the rules, because what the supply chain fears most is not \"high prices,\" but \"who knows when it will get stuck.\"</p><p><div><h2>Inspection, detention, and \"signing commitments\": Why is this material considered costly?</h2></div>The most immersive part of the report took place at the Omani border checkpoint. Citrini described being asked to sign a pledge \"not to take photographs, not to engage in journalism, and not to gather intelligence.\" He then took a GPS-free speedboat piloted by a stranger. The report stated that the speedboat was \"only 18 miles from the Iranian coast,\" and even included details of \"swimming and smoking cigars in the strait\" to illustrate how close he was to the actual waterway and law enforcement.</p><p>The more dramatic part is that he was intercepted and detained by the Omani coast guard, his mobile phone was confiscated, and his notes and photos may have fallen into official hands. For readers, the significance of such plots lies not in curiosity, but in explaining the fact that as data sources become increasingly difficult and publicly available information becomes more fragmented, the cost of first-hand observation is rising sharply, which directly affects the quality of information and pricing efficiency in the market.</p><p><div><h2>How should the market assess \"Strait risks\" in the future?</h2></div>A common question is, since publicly available AIS is unreliable, what else can the market trust?</p><p>A more realistic answer is to change \"single data source\" to \"multi-source puzzle\". The transaction and risk control team can cross-check publicly available AIS, commercial satellites (especially SAR, which is more friendly to nighttime and cloud cover), port loading and unloading and queuing data, changes in insurance quotes, and official maritime notifications. Think of it as using multiple cameras to look at the same intersection, and even if one camera is blocked, the overall traffic flow can still be reconstructed.</p><p>Another question is, how will this affect oil prices and shipping?</p><p>The EIA and the International Energy Agency (IEA) and other organizations have repeatedly emphasized the importance of Hormuz, and the risk premium often comes from the product of the \"probability of disruption × impact of disruption\". Citrini's report has enhanced the market's understanding of the \"impact\" aspect: the Strait is not experiencing a simple shutdown; passage patterns are changing, rules are more temporary, and risks are more like...<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/600668\">spike</a>Pulse\". The transmission of such risks to option volatility, shipping costs, and insurance surcharges is typically more sensitive than to spot transactions.</p><p><div><h2>Volatility comes from \"unpredictable temporary rules\"</h2></div>Citrini is cautious about the future: IRGC-led on-site rules will make the Strait more prone to sudden frictions, and fluctuations in the global oil supply chain may more frequently exhibit the characteristics of being \"short-lived, intense, and difficult to verify.\" For markets, this environment rewards participants who are quick to respond and have more three-dimensional sources of information.</p><p>His advice is also clear: don't treat the strait as a switch, and don't treat AIS as the truth. The report's phrase \"going to the site to count ships\" is striking because it reminds the market that when the information gap is large enough, risk control and research need to be closer to ground reality, even if the cost is high and the risk is high.</p><p>In short, the core point of the report is that<strong>The actual traffic volume in the Strait of Hormuz may be significantly higher than the publicly available AIS data. The strait order exhibits dynamic law enforcement characteristics, and any \"misjudgment of opening and closing\" information could amplify fluctuations in the global energy and shipping chain.</strong></p><p>On the one hand, the market may need to recalibrate the \"traffic-risk premium\" mapping; On the other hand, data methodologies will be forced to upgrade from relying on a single publicly available metric to more expensive but robust multi-source verification. For trading, shipping, and industry, these changes will push \"information advantage\" to a more central position.</p><p></body></html></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/720622f3a00b611476f1d69c1f2cbf0d","relate_stocks":{"AIPO":"Defiance AI and Power Infrastructure ETF","CHAT":"ROUNDHILL GENERATIVE AI & TECHNOLOGY ETF","ARTY":"ISHARES FUTURE AI & TECH ETF","AGIX":"通用人工智能 ETF-AGIX"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3769308","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2625819624","content_text":"今日金融圈最“炸”的一份材料，来自一篇关于霍尔木兹海峡的一线实地报告。\n之前曾用一篇 AI “思想实验”报告《2028 年全球智能危机》在市场上掀起风暴、甚至把一批相关公司股价“打崩”的研究机构 Citrini Research，这次又抛出了一份重磅地缘材料。它在交易员、航运保险和能源研究圈里引发了不小的震动，原因很简单：当市场争论海峡“到底开没开、会不会突然关”时，这份报告直接把讨论拉回了现场。\n报告主角是 Citrini Research 的神秘的“3号分析师”。与常见的二手汇编不同，他选择亲自去海峡附近“数船”、看航道、和当地人及船员聊天，并记录下沿途遇到的检查、扣留与风险细节。很多读者看完的第一反应是：这更像战地侦察日志，不像办公室里做出来的宏观评论——也正是 Citrini 一贯“用细节把市场拉回现实”的那种冲击感。\n“3号分析师”在现场观察到，实际通过霍尔木兹海峡的船只数量明显高于公开 AIS 数据所呈现的水平，市场对真实流量存在系统性低估。报告给出的关键数字很刺眼——“AIS 系统在当前环境下每天大约漏报 50% 的实际过往船舶”。\n更重要的是，他把海峡现状描述为一种“动态执法”的状态：海峡不太适合用“开放/封闭”二元标签概括，因为现场规则在变，执行者也在变。报告写道，伊朗革命卫队（IRGC）在现场主导“谁能通过”的新规矩，巡逻艇与 Shahed 无人机活动频繁，给全球油气供应链带来的波动风险随时可能放大。\n\n信息空白怎么填：现场“数船”成了最直接的办法\n\n霍尔木兹海峡对全球能源像一段“总阀门”。美国能源信息署（EIA）长期估算，霍尔木兹海峡承载全球相当比例的海运原油与成品油流量（常被引用在约两成上下的量级），任何“误判开合”的消息都会迅速体现在油价、运价与保险费率上。\n问题在于，市场常用的工具——公开 AIS、部分卫星图、零散的匿名情报——各有盲区。Citrini 在报告里给了句很直白的判断：“当市场对海峡‘到底是开放还是封闭’存在巨大信息空白时，只有去现场数船才是最直接有效的途径。”这也解释了这份报告为什么会引发关注：它提供了稀缺的第一手观测，而代价是极高的个人风险。\n\n从迪拜到穆桑代姆的“高风险取证”\n\nCitrini 的考察路线被写得很细：迪拜 → 富查伊拉油港 → 阿曼穆桑代姆省（Khasab）→ 试图乘快艇进入海峡核心水域。这条路径的价值在于，它把“港口—补给—边境执法—海上通行”这一整套链条串起来观察，而不仅盯着海峡中线那一段水域。\n他携带的装备也不像普通出差：徕卡变焦相机、录音眼镜、EPIRB 求救信标、约 1.5 万美元现金，还提到带了备用手机（包括一部小米手机）以及 Zyn 等补给。报告里带有明显的现场口吻，比如他形容这趟行程“像把研究报告写进了防水袋里”，随时准备应对扣押与突发状况。\n\n关键发现一：AIS“少了一半”，暗 AIS 与“隐藏走廊”在补位\n\nCitrini 最重磅的结论之一，是对 AIS 可靠性的直接打击。他写道：“AIS 系统在当前环境下每天大约漏报 50% 的实际过往船舶，市场依赖的公开数据已不可靠。”如果把 AIS 类比成高速公路的导航定位，它确实能显示大多数车辆，但当一部分车“关定位”或走了不被公开地图标注的小路，屏幕上看起来就会空一大片。\n他在现场观察到更多船舶通行，尤其是一些船选择靠近伊朗海岸的许可通道，被他称作“隐藏走廊”。其中一部分船舶采用暗 AIS（关闭信号）或不完全依赖公开跟踪系统。对于交易与风控来说，这意味着一个现实问题：用公开 AIS 估算“流量是否锐减”，很可能把真实通行量低估，从而放大恐慌或错配风险溢价。\n为佐证这一点，航运行业机构 BIMCO、以及部分保险与海事通报渠道（例如 UKMTO 的航行安全通报体系）长期都提醒过：在高风险海域，AIS 的开启与否常常服从安全与规避策略，公开数据天然存在偏差。Citrini 的贡献在于，他把这种“偏差”量化成了一个更具冲击力的近似比例。\n\n关键发现二：IRGC 主导的“动态执法”，让海峡更像“临时交通管制”\n\n在安全与政治层面，报告强调海峡的控制逻辑正在变化。他写道，IRGC 在现场制定并执行新的通行规则，巡逻艇与 Shahed 无人机频繁活动，海峡处于“动态执法”状态。用更好理解的比喻来说，这有点像一条关键干道：路没有封死，但交警随时设置临时车道、抽检、放行名单，通行体验与风险会在小时级别波动。\n在敏感议题上，报告也给市场留出了理解空间：一部分地区安全人士会认为加强管制有其边境安全与威慑需求；航运公司与贸易商更关心的是规则临时性带来的不可预测性，因为供应链最怕的不是“贵”，而是“说不准什么时候卡住”。\n\n检查、扣留与“签承诺”：为什么说这份材料代价高\n\n报告里最具现场感的一段，发生在阿曼边境检查站。Citrini 描述自己被要求签署“不摄影、不从事新闻、不收集情报”的承诺。随后，他又搭乘陌生人驾驶的无 GPS 快艇，报告写道快艇“距离伊朗海岸仅 18 英里”，甚至出现“在海峡里游泳、抽雪茄”的细节，用来说明他离真实航道与执法力量有多近。\n更戏剧性的部分是：他被阿曼海岸警卫队拦截、扣留，手机被没收，笔记和照片可能已落入官方之手。对读者来说，这类情节的意义不在猎奇，而在解释一个事实：当数据源越来越难、公开信息越来越碎，第一手观察的成本正在急剧上升，这会直接影响市场的信息质量与定价效率。\n\n市场今后该怎么判断“海峡风险”？\n\n一个常见问题是，既然公开 AIS 不可靠，市场还能信什么？\n较现实的答案是：把“单一数据源”改成“多源拼图”。交易与风控团队可以把公开 AIS、商业卫星（尤其是 SAR 对夜间与云层更友好）、港口装卸与排队数据、保险报价变化、以及官方海事通报交叉验证。把它想成用多台摄像头看同一个路口，某一台被遮挡时，整体仍能还原车流大势。\n另一个问题是，这会怎样影响油价与航运？\nEIA 与国际能源署（IEA）等机构反复强调过霍尔木兹的重要性，风险溢价往往来自“中断概率×中断影响”的乘积。Citrini 的报告提升了市场对“影响”部分的理解：海峡并未呈现简单停摆，通行方式在变化，规则更临时，风险更像“尖峰脉冲”。这类风险对期权波动率、运费与保险附加费的传导，通常比对现货成交更敏感。\n\n波动来自“不可预测的临时规则”\n\nCitrini 对未来的判断偏谨慎：IRGC 主导的现场规则将使海峡更容易出现突发摩擦，全球石油供应链的波动可能更频繁地呈现“短促、剧烈、难验证”的特征。对市场而言，这类环境会奖励反应快与信息源更立体的参与者。\n他的建议也很明确：别把海峡当成开关，别把 AIS 当成真相。报告里那句“去现场数船”之所以震撼，是因为它提醒市场：当信息缺口足够大时，风控与研究需要更接近地面现实，哪怕代价高、风险大。\n总之报告的核心观点就是，霍尔木兹海峡的真实通行量可能显著高于公开 AIS 所示，海峡秩序呈现动态执法特征，任何“误判开合”的信息都可能放大全球能源与航运链条的波动。\n一方面，市场可能需要重新校准“流量—风险溢价”的映射；另一方面，数据方法论会被迫升级，从依赖单一公开指标，转向更昂贵但更稳健的多源验证。对交易、航运与产业端来说，这类变化会把“信息优势”推到更核心的位置。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AIPO":1.5,"ARTY":1.5,"AGIX":1.5,"CHAT":1.5}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1640,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":550640785602288,"gmtCreate":1775454891174,"gmtModify":1775455977548,"author":{"id":"4113652880316960","authorId":"4113652880316960","name":"ricky的帐户","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9c7f4c01fbb82926962006574a04f713","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4113652880316960","authorIdStr":"4113652880316960"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"mark","listText":"mark","text":"mark","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/550640785602288","repostId":"2625819624","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1640,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}