Mag 7 No Longer Enough? How Do You Think of MANGOS?

Tiger_comments
06-17
Reward Tiger-CoinsReward 500 Tiger-coins

The moment $SpaceX(SPCX)$ went public, it threw a wrench into one of Wall Street's favorite labels: the Mag Seven.

With its valuation surging above $2 trillion after listing, SpaceX immediately surpassed Tesla and Meta, becoming one of the most valuable technology companies in the world. When a $2 trillion tech giant isn't part of the Mag 7, does the term still represent the leaders of the technology sector?

SpaceX Doesn't Fit the Mag 7 Playbook

For years, the market's tech leaders were simple: $NVIDIA(NVDA)$, $Apple(AAPL)$, $Microsoft(MSFT)$, $Amazon.com(AMZN)$, $Alphabet(GOOGL)$,$Meta Platforms, Inc.(META)$, and $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$.

The group eventually became synonymous with the AI bull market.

Apple sells devices and ecosystems. Meta monetizes attention. Amazon combines e-commerce and cloud. Microsoft dominates software and enterprise AI. NVIDIA sells compute. Tesla is a bet on EVs, robotics, and autonomy.

SpaceX is different. Its story revolves around launch services, satellite internet, orbital infrastructure, low-earth-orbit networks, and potentially the future backbone of global communications. Its assets aren't on the ground—they're in space.

The Market's Belief System Is Changing Again

Over the last two decades, investors have repeatedly shifted what they are willing to pay premium valuations for.

  • First came platform companies: whoever owned users owned the market.

  • Then came compute companies: whoever owned the chips owned the profit pool.

  • Now the market appears to be moving toward infrastructure companies: whoever controls the next generation of networks, energy, compute, satellites, and AI access points gets to tell the next big capital markets story.

SpaceX sits right at the center of that transition.

MANGOS vs. Mag 7

Meta, Anthropic, NVIDIA, Google, OpenAI, and SpaceX.

The acronym sounds awkward, maybe even forced, but the logic behind it is straightforward.

Meta and Google represent platforms. NVIDIA represents compute. OpenAI and Anthropic represent foundation models. SpaceX represents next-generation infrastructure.

Wall Street has always been good at packaging the future into investable themes. FANG packaged internet platforms. FAANG added Apple and mobile computing. Mag 7 packaged cloud, AI, and intelligent devices.

MANGOS attempts to package the world after AI—the infrastructure layer that could support the next decade of technological growth.

Bet on cash flow or bigger story?

The challenge is that most of the Mag 7 already generate enormous profits and cash flow. Apple, Microsoft, Google, and Meta are cash-flow machines. NVIDIA may be cyclical, but its earnings power materializes quickly.

OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX are different.

Their stories are bigger, but their cash flows are further into the future. The key question for investors: Will the market continue paying premium valuations today for profits that may not arrive for many years?

Market is looking for next AI chapter

The first phase of the AI boom belonged to NVIDIA. Apple faces growth challenges. Tesla faces delivery concerns. Meta and Google still need to prove AI can generate meaningful returns. Microsoft must justify massive AI capital expenditures.

SpaceX arrives at exactly this moment and offers the market a new narrative.

  • After AI, there is space infrastructure.

  • After cloud computing, there are low-earth-orbit networks.

  • After internet platforms, there is global satellite connectivity.

It's an exciting story. But exciting stories can also become bubbles.

If SpaceX successfully holds a $2 trillion valuation, investors may become even more willing to fund the next generation of AI and infrastructure IPOs. If the stock struggles after listing and enters a prolonged valuation reset, MANGOS could quickly become a warning sign rather than a new market leadership group.

Discussion

🥭 MANGOS or Mag 7—which concept do you buy into?

🚀 In the next phase of the AI cycle, would you rather own compute or infrastructure?

💰 If you had to choose one long-term winner among NVIDIA, SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and Google, which would it be?

Leave your comments to win tiger coins~

SpaceX Crashes 16%! Another 50% Downside, Exit or Add?
SpaceX plunged 16.43% today, breaching $155 and shattering the post-IPO euphoria in a single session. Bears are piling on, calling the valuation "astronomical" and flagging 50% further downside even under optimistic assumptions. Space proxy Rocket Lab (RKLB) fell 6.48% in sympathy — the retail frenzy lasted less than two weeks. With the "best IPO ever" now giving back gains, will you buy this dip or cut your losses?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
Reward 500 Tiger-coinsDeadline to 06/29 22:22
The originator will select the best recovery and allocate Tiger coins before the reward ends
Reward-post

Comments

  • MHh
    06-21
    MHh
    Definitely mag7 for now because SpaceX has not proven profit. The concept is promising but I prefer to look at the balance sheets and want to see profit first. In any case, history has demonstrated that prices fall after IPO and there is no rush into mangos until the next year before we re-evaluate them.


    In the next phase of AI, I rather own both compute and infrastructure because we can’t do without the other. It is always good to diversify.


    I think the long term winner could be SpaceX if it is successful with data centres in space. Infrastructure on earth is quickly saturating. SpaceX has been successful with its rockets and satellites so far but real success to support its vision is still a stretch goal for now. If it could pull off into a financially sustainable and truly feasible model it would be the biggest winner. The only major and critical unknown is ‘if’. Otherwise, anthropic is a possible winner with its current superior models.
  • Ragz
    06-17
    Ragz
    MANGOS will probably dominate the scene in the future. At the moment I would rather own Compute rather than Infrastructure. But once the environmental problems are tackled, like recycling water used for cooling or having centres in space, infrastructure will become more important. Among these companies, I'd choose Google as the long-term winner since it has strong fundamentals.
    @BillionaireN @Subramanyan @MKTrader @Reynor @Spiders @逆天邪神云澈 @Justin bala @gnustiy @TigerPM @Tiger Trade Feed @pretiming @Shernice軒嬣 2000 @啵啵盖奶 @Jia92 @ahhock @surewin @astrophore @koolgal @Barcode
  • Shyon
    06-17
    Shyon
    I think Mag 7 still matters because it represents companies with proven earnings and cash flow. However, $SpaceX(SPCX)$ shows the market is increasingly willing to pay for strategic infrastructure, making MANGOS an interesting theme for the next stage of technology growth.

    Between compute and infrastructure, I would lean toward infrastructure over the next decade. The first AI boom belonged to compute, but future growth will also depend on networks, energy, satellites, and connectivity, where SpaceX has a unique position. That said, infrastructure projects usually require more patience and carry higher execution risk.

    If I had to choose one long-term winner, I would still pick $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ . It remains the backbone of AI spending today, generates strong profits, and benefits from almost every major AI trend. SpaceX may become the bigger story, but NVIDIA remains my highest-conviction investment.

    @Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerClub

  • Lanceljx
    06-17
    Lanceljx
    I lean toward MANGOS over Magnificent 7 because it better reflects the AI stack: models, compute, cloud, distribution, and infrastructure.

    If forced to choose between compute and infrastructure, I'd pick compute for this decade. AI demand is exploding faster than chip supply, and every major model still needs massive compute.

    If I could own only one for 10+ years:

    🥇 NVIDIA - best combination of dominance, profitability, and execution. It is the "picks and shovels" provider to the entire AI industry.

    🥈 SpaceX - highest upside. If Starlink and Starship achieve their ambitions, today's valuation could look cheap.

    🥉 Meta Platforms - underrated due to unmatched user distribution and AI monetisation potential.

    My ranking:

    1. NVIDIA (highest conviction)

    2. SpaceX (highest ceiling)

    3. Meta

    4. Google

    5. OpenAI

    6. Anthropic

    For risk-adjusted returns, NVIDIA. For maximum upside, SpaceX.

  • Mrzorro
    06-17
    Mrzorro
    For sure Mangos 🥭 sound sweet than Mag7, so I think mangos concept is better for me [LOL] If I had to choose one long term winner for me will be $NVIDIA(NVDA)$
  • Alihuat
    06-22
    Alihuat
    Im into Mangos for sure.. 🥭 Elon Musk had been setting records after records with his acquisitions of Twitter, management of Tesla etc.. it will eventually be successful.. he is the man who has the resources and the strings and connections to make things work. it will not be a surprise..  but it will be a surprise if it fails..
Leave a comment
36
11