NVIDIA Entered CPU War: ARM the Winner, Intel or AMD the Losers?

Tiger_comments
06-02 23:42
Reward Tiger-CoinsReward 500 Tiger-coins

At Computex, Huang announced Vera CPU entering mass production and RTX Spark crashing into the PC market — NVIDIA is now officially in the CPU business. The market voted with its feet: $ARM Holdings(ARM)$ surged +15.7% to $409, the biggest free-rider winner; $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ +6.3% to $224; while the x86 duo took it on the chin — $Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$ -1.2% to $510, $Intel(INTC)$ -4.7% to $109. A Barclays report just ranked the winners and losers of this $100B+ CPU war.

For years the semiconductor spotlight was on GPUs. But over the past six months, AI workloads have shifted from training to inference and agents (Agentic AI) — GPUs "compute," CPUs "manage": calling tools, routing sub-agents, tracking task completion. That's CPU work.

The CPU-to-GPU ratio has shifted from ~1:2 to near 1:1 — a completely different standing. Market-size forecasts have doubled in six months: NVIDIA sees a $200B TAM by 2030; AMD pegs the server CPU market at $120B with its own share above 50%.

NVIDIA: the most dangerous new variable

Vera is NVIDIA's first standalone data-center CPU, taking direct aim at Intel Xeon and AMD Epyc. Huang's numbers: 3x faster than x86 on SQL, 6x on data processing, ~1.8x overall on common agent tooling, with Anthropic and OpenAI as early customers. ~$20B of CPU revenue visibility this year.

But there's an opaque variable: nearly all of NVIDIA's CPUs ship bundled inside NVL rack systems — no standalone ASP, and the revenue is "embedded" in rack estimates, not broken out. Which means the market may not have fully priced its CPU footprint yet.

Intel: the most cornered

The target was raised from $65 to $100, but Barclays was blunt: that's ASP-driven valuation repair, not share improvement. The verdict — "ongoing core share loss, structurally pressured profitability, no evidence of a manufacturing-leadership comeback."

The starkest number is the 2030 CPU EPS contribution: AMD ~$19, ARM ~$7, Intel just ~$1.5. x86's efficiency disadvantage on agentic workloads + a lagging process node + getting squeezed by both AMD and NVIDIA = a structural bind no single product cycle fixes.

ARM: does nothing, collects royalties

ARM's logic is the simplest: whoever builds the CPU, if it's on Arm, they pay the royalty. NVIDIA's Vera is Arm; AMD is migrating parts of its line to Arm. Barclays lifted the target from $250 to $360, with ~$7 of 2030 CPU EPS contribution. It never steps onto the battlefield to fight for share — the most stable way to benefit, and why it spiked 15% in a single day.

Whose side are you on in the CPU war?

Is the market simply rewarding the certainty of "royalty collection"?

Can Huang's Vera really take share from x86, or is it just an add-on bundled into NVL racks?

Intel's target was lifted to $100, but it's only valuation repair — do you think it has a comeback left in this cycle?

Leave your comments to win tiger coins~

Nvidia Surrenders Computex Gains: Where's the Entry Point?
Nvidia fell 3.62% Wednesday, pressured by Broadcom's post-earnings selloff and Middle East-driven risk-off sentiment, dragging the AI chip sector into a broad pullback. TSMC's CEO reiterated AI demand shows "no signs of cooling," while BofA recalibrated its NVDA outlook — leaving the long-term compute narrative intact. Would you buy this dip, or wait for geopolitical and earnings sentiment to clear first?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
Reward 500 Tiger-coinsDeadline to 06/15 11:42
The originator will select the best recovery and allocate Tiger coins before the reward ends
Reward-post

Comments

  • 這是甚麼東西
    06-03 11:48
    這是甚麼東西
    Intel Target Lift: Valuation Repair Without a Cyclical ComebackThe upward revision to a $100 price target reflects pure balance-sheet valuation repair and does not signal a major cyclical comeback. The reassessment is driven by structural cost-cutting, asset optimization, and government-subsidized foundry infrastructure rollouts. Intel's core data center and client processor businesses still face market share erosion against rival x86 and Arm architectures. The operational turnaround is a long-term capital expenditure story that will not yield a dominant cyclical product comeback in the near term.
  • TimothyX
    06-03 10:52
    TimothyX
    The CPU-to-GPU ratio has shifted from ~1:2 to near 1:1 — a completely different standing. Market-size forecasts have doubled in six months: NVIDIA sees a $200B TAM by 2030; AMD pegs the server CPU market at $120B with its own share above 50%.
  • Chrishust
    06-03 04:41
    Chrishust
    1. In this cpu war $ARM Holdings(ARM)$ has the better position, however $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ is also a strong contender
    2. Yes $ARM Holdings(ARM)$ has a high valuation due to the value of royalties of the arm chipset instruction set
    3. Yes, $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ new cpu has higher performance that legacy x86 cpu chipsets
    4. $Intel(INTC)$ is highly valued for its current position in the market which is second to amd and nvda
  • Shyon
    06-03 00:02
    Shyon
    I’m leaning toward $ARM Holdings(ARM)$ in this CPU war. Its business model is the most attractive because it benefits no matter who wins. Whether it’s $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ , $Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$ , or hyperscalers building Arm-based CPUs, ARM collects royalties without having to fight for market share directly. That certainty helps explain the stock’s strong reaction.

    NVIDIA is still the biggest wildcard. Vera may not replace x86 overnight, but within NVIDIA’s AI ecosystem it doesn’t need to. If customers are already buying NVL racks, adopting Vera becomes a natural extension. The market may also be underestimating how much CPU revenue is embedded inside those systems.

    For Intel, I’m not convinced a comeback is near. A higher target driven by valuation repair is different from improving competitiveness. Intel still faces pressure from AMD and NVIDIA, and until I see clear market-share gains and product leadership, I remain cautious.

    @Tiger_comments @TigerClub @TigerStars

  • AliceSam
    08:01
    AliceSam
    由英伟达和联发科联合开发,台积电在3N上独家制造:20核CPU+6144核Blackwell GPU,两者通过NVLink共享内存,运行微软Windows for Arm。
  • koolgal
    06:06
    koolgal
    🌟🌟🌟 $ARM Holdings(ARM)$ is the undisputed winner of the CPU war.  Why?  ARM designs the underlying architectural blueprint, licenses the instruction set and collects its licensing fees upfront.

    The consumer computing world is aggressively migrating to ARM architecture because the processing requirements for on-device local AI have pushed legacy x86 standards to their physical limits.

    ARM utilises Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC) architecture which breaks down software processing tasks into lean, hyper efficient instructions.

    ARM chips can deliver identical computing and Neural Processing Unit (NPU) speeds while consuming a fraction of the battery power.

    This makes ARM the mandatory choice for tech giants like Qualcomm, Apple and NVIDIA as they race to engineer ultra thin, high performance AI PCs.

    That is why ARM's share price is sizzling hot as it has skyrocketed 32% in the past 5 days & 258% YTD.

    @Tiger_comments @TigerStars @Tiger_SG

Leave a comment
24
64