Lanceljx
11:54

Short answer: yes, the pullback likely creates tactical upside, but only if you separate execution risk (short term) from structural demand risk (long term). Right now, the market is repricing the former, not yet the latter.



---


1. Why the market reacted so sharply


The selloff reflects a shift from perfect-execution expectations to normal semiconductor execution risk:


a) Blackwell rollout delay


Nvidia was priced for flawless transition from Hopper → Blackwell.


Any delay compresses near-term revenue recognition and pushes hyperscaler deployments slightly outward.


Markets discount timing aggressively even if demand remains intact.



b) AI capex sustainability fears


Investors are questioning whether hyperscalers move from “capacity land-grab” to ROI discipline in 2026.


This is a sentiment risk, not yet a demand collapse. Backlogs and commitments remain extremely large.



c) Custom silicon narrative


Meta, Google, Amazon designing in-house chips creates headline fear.


However, most custom ASICs target specific inference workloads, not full-stack training ecosystems where Nvidia still dominates.




---


2. Have the key risks actually been resolved?


Partially addressed, not fully eliminated.


✔ Addressed / improving


Demand visibility: Order pipelines and multi-year AI infrastructure buildouts remain intact.


Software moat: CUDA + networking + system integration still form a high switching cost.


Customer concentration risk: expanding enterprise and sovereign AI demand diversifies beyond hyperscalers.



✖ Still unresolved


Execution timing risk: Blackwell ramp must prove smooth in the next 1–2 quarters.


Gross margin trajectory: New architectures typically pressure margins early.


Capex psychology: Markets need proof AI spend converts into revenue growth for customers.




---


3. Why this pullback may create upside


The key insight: valuation compression occurred without a structural demand break.


Historically, Nvidia corrections during major compute transitions:


reset positioning,


flush momentum leverage,


and allow long-term buyers to re-enter before the next deployment wave.



If Blackwell shipments accelerate into large-scale deployment cycles, earnings power shifts forward again.



---


4. What the market is really waiting for now


Three confirmation signals matter more than headlines:


1. Blackwell shipment scale, not announcements.



2. Hyperscaler capex guidance staying elevated into 2026.



3. Inference growth proving AI monetisation is real, not experimental.





---


Bottom line


The pullback looks less like a thesis break and more like a transition reset. Risks are not fully cleared, but they have shifted from existential to executional. If AI infrastructure spending merely normalises rather than collapses, the recent decline likely opens asymmetric upside over a multi-quarter horizon rather than signalling a peak cycle.

Nvidia Set to Unveil New Chip at GTC: Would You Wait for Lower Entry?
$Nvidia (NVDA.US)$ is set to unveil a new inference chip at next month’s GTC, integrating Groq’s LPU design and potentially based on the next-gen Feynman architecture. With SRAM integration and 3D stacking, the chip aims to tackle latency and bandwidth bottlenecks in large-model inference. $OpenAI has committed to major purchases and investment, while $Meta Platforms has begun large-scale CPU-based inference deployments. As AI shifts from training dominance to inference efficiency, Is GTC the next catalyst — or a sell-the-news moment?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment