Lanceljx
02-09 17:58

The breakout is undeniably powerful, but whether it fuels an immediate follow-through gap higher depends on who is doing the buying next.


What we are seeing now looks like a classic late-cycle momentum chase. A large portion of the move is driven by sidelined capital capitulating, CTAs and trend followers flipping long, and systematic exposure rebuilding after the recent drawdown. That dynamic can still push indices higher in the near term, especially when positioning rather than fundamentals is the marginal driver.


That said, history suggests that breakouts to psychological milestones often invite short-term consolidation rather than a straight vertical continuation. With a substantial portion of annual returns already front-loaded, upside from here is likely to be more selective and narrower, rather than broad-based index surges.


On the dip-buying question, the recent selloff was more of a positioning reset than a macro breakdown, so buying high-quality leaders or structural winners on weakness made sense. Chasing strength after a near-vertical rebound is a very different risk profile.


In short:


Near-term upside is still possible on momentum and flows.


Risk-reward is no longer symmetric at index level.


Discipline matters more than conviction from here.



The next leg higher, if it comes, will need earnings follow-through rather than just positioning fuel.

Is Market Rebound a Dead-Cat Bounce or Real Turn?
After last week’s AI-led selloff, US equities staged a $1 trillion rebound, with the S&P 500 posting its best single-day gain since May. Yet confidence remains thin. Implied volatility is still elevated, trading volume ran ~13% below average, and Goldman’s short-bias basket jumped ~9%, hinting the rally was driven by short covering rather than fresh conviction. Investors are struggling to price a murky US outlook while reassessing AI’s winner-takes-all impact, especially on software. Is the rebound a dead cat bounce? Would you add stocks now?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment