Mkoh
02-04 21:45

Investment Analysis: Is Anthropic Breaking the Software Business?

Let's get real about this: Anthropic is legitimately shaking the foundations of the traditional software business, and the market's violent reaction over the past few days proves it. No sugarcoating—Claude Cowork's plugins (dropped on January 30) just triggered one of the ugliest sector sell-offs we've seen in years, wiping out an estimated $285 billion in combined market value from software, legal tech, professional services, and related names in a single brutal session, with the pain spilling into a second day.The numbers don't lie: Thomson Reuters plunged 15-18% (its worst single-day drop ever), RELX down 14%, Wolters Kluwer around 13%, LegalZoom getting hammered nearly 20%. Even broader plays like Sage, Pearson, Experian, and Indian IT outsourcers (Infosys, TCS) took sharp hits. 

This wasn't random panic—investors looked at those 11 open-source plugins automating real workflows in legal (contract reviews, NDA triage, compliance), sales pipelines, marketing, finance, data analysis, and more, and decided the old SaaS pricing power is under direct assault.My strong view: This is the moment AI stops being a polite "add-on feature" and starts acting like a full competitor. Legacy software thrives on locking enterprises into expensive, recurring subscriptions for routine, high-margin tasks—exactly the stuff Claude Cowork agents can now handle faster, cheaper, and often autonomously. When the underlying model owner (Anthropic) can iterate in weeks instead of quarters, and open-source the plugins to boot, the moats erode fast. We're seeing the early stages of what could be a structural repricing: from "AI enhances SaaS" to "AI replaces chunks of SaaS."

 Terms like "SaaSpocalypse" or "AI-pocalypse" might sound dramatic, but the ticker tape doesn't argue.Anthropic itself? They're in an enviable spot. Revenue run rate crossed $9 billion by end-2025 (doubled in months), with internal forecasts now lifted to as high as $18 billion for full 2026 (up ~20% from prior guidance), and optimistic paths eyeing $55 billion in 2027. They're pulling in massive funding—latest talks target over $20 billion raised at a $350 billion pre-money valuation, with employee tender offers coming to provide liquidity. That's not hype; it's traction from enterprises shifting spend toward foundational AI that can actually execute work.The bottom line in my opinion: If your portfolio is heavy in pure-play SaaS, legal tech, or IT services reliant on routine white-collar automation, this is a wake-up call to reassess—hard. 

The disruption feels real and accelerating, not incremental. Winners will be the AI infra enablers (Nvidia, cloud partners like Amazon/Microsoft) and the model leaders themselves. Anthropic isn't just participating in the AI wave—they're helping drive the wedge that cracks open legacy models.This isn't the end of software, but it's the end of easy margins for a lot of it. Exciting times if you're positioned right; painful if not. What's your take on where the dust settles—overreaction, or the start of something bigger?

PLTR and APP Plunge! AI Software Trade Faces More Panic Selling?
The AI narrative just flipped. After Anthropic unveiled new automation tools aimed at legal workflows, U.S. software stocks suffered their worst selloff since April. A Goldman-tracked software index plunged 6%, while the Nasdaq 100 slid 1.6%, wiping out roughly $285B in market value across software, fintech, and asset managers. Are you bullish on Anthropic IPO? Will software continue? Buy-the-dip opportunity or not?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment