📊Your pattern trading callout on $S is sharp. Multi-year accumulation structures like that can be explosive if they resolve. Seeing you tie it back to the 2023 breakout from $13 to $21 made it click for me. $ZS showed similar rhythm during its base phases!
@Barcode：$SentinelOne, Inc(S)$ $Rubrik Inc.(RBRK)$ $CoreWeave, Inc.(CRWV)$ 📊🔐🚀 Cybersecurity’s fastest-growing players are rewriting the growth curves of the industry I’m tracking $RBRK (Rubrik) and $S (SentinelOne) closely because they are two of the rare names that combine hyper-growth with secular cybersecurity tailwinds. Both show staggering acceleration, but in very different ways. 🔵 Rubrik vs 🟠 SentinelOne: contrasting strengths Rubrik’s revenues have compounded at 25.6% CAGR since 2019, but the standout is its ability to retain high-value customers. Customers with >$100K ARR expanded more than 710% in five years. SentinelOne, on the other hand, scaled revenues at a jaw-dropping 71.6% CAGR from 2019 to 2025, up nearly 20× in six years, highlighting raw velocity rather than retention. 📈 Cybersecurity growth leaderboard Latest quarterly growth puts Rubrik at the top with +51%, closely followed by CyberArk at +46%. SentinelOne clocks in at +22%, still ahead of CrowdStrike’s +21% and Palo Alto’s +16%. Cisco, Fortinet, and Okta are lagging, stuck in single digits to low teens. This divergence shows how new-gen players are eating legacy share. 📉 Technical structures: SentinelOne setup On the short-term 4H and 30m, SentinelOne is hugging the lower Keltner and Bollinger bands at $17.51–$17.53. Short-term, it’s in a volatility squeeze. Any reclaim of $19 could trigger a move toward $22, while a breakdown risks $16. 🔵 blue = stability / floor → $16–$17 support 🔴 red = stop / danger zone → break below $16 could unravel further 🟠 orange = alert / ignition → $19 break signals momentum shift 🟢 green = profit / go → $22 and potentially $28 targets 📐 Pattern trading setup (weekly chart) SentinelOne’s chart history shows a full boom-to-bust cycle, now coiling into a long-term base: • IPO (Jun 2021) at $38, surged to all-time highs near $76 within months. • Collapse into 2022, 2023 bear market lows around $12.5. • Rebound phase saw a breakout from $13 to $21 in mid-2023 (+60%), confirming the base-trade behaviour. • Currently consolidating at ~$17.5, building nested “cup” formations that align with a long-term breakout trajectory. Your pattern trading chart captures this perfectly: a multi-year accumulation arc that, if resolved, has a technical target back toward $80+. That would retrace the IPO peak and complete the long symmetry of its trading history. ⏳ Historical context Every base breakout in $S has been followed by 50–100% moves in relatively short order. If history repeats, the current structure could be another launchpad, with upside potential measured in multiples, not percentages. 🌍 Secular cybersecurity trend Cybersecurity spend remains one of the most non-discretionary IT line items globally. With AI driving attack sophistication and compliance tightening, platforms like Rubrik and SentinelOne are not optional; they’re systemic. The institutional money flow into next-gen security proves this theme is just starting its secular climb. 👉❓would you rather back the speed of SentinelOne’s revenue curve or Rubrik’s stickiness with enterprise-grade customers? 📢 Don’t miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends, and insights that move markets 🚀📈 I’m obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Let’s outsmart the market and stack those gains together! 🍀 Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC 📈🚀🍀🍀🍀 @Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerPM @TigerObserver Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
Comments