Internal divisions within the Federal Reserve over the next steps for monetary policy are becoming more public. Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin on Thursday laid out the case for keeping interest rates unchanged, while also warning of persistent inflation risks. Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack reiterated her stance in favor of rate hikes, continuing her dissent from the July policy meeting.
On the 13th, speaking in Greenville, South Carolina, Barkin stated that current inflation is largely driven by tariffs and oil price shocks from the Iran conflict, which he described as "shocks that should fade," forming the core logic for his support of holding rates steady. However, he also noted that if supply chain challenges and the AI investment boom persist, they could create more sticky price pressures, potentially requiring further tightening.
Hammack, speaking separately in Dayton, Ohio, was more direct: "I think we need to act now."
The public statements from these two officials have made it even more difficult for markets to anticipate the Fed's September meeting. The central bank has held rates steady for the fifth consecutive time, but the camp advocating for tighter policy is growing.
Barkin: Inflation May Fade, but Risks Remain
Barkin's assessment of the current economic outlook is generally optimistic but cautious. He emphasized that the unemployment rate has been below 4.5% for 58 consecutive months, a record, and that the U.S. economy remains consumer-driven and resilient. Even low-income households are continuing to spend.
He also noted that investment booms beyond AI data centers are noteworthy. "Bank project pipelines are healthy, M&A activity is active, leases are being signed, factories are being built, and the defense sector is booming," Barkin said. "Many business leaders believe that high uncertainty is the new baseline, and they can't wait any longer."
He also mentioned that AI investment appears "immune" to interest rate levels, with related capital expenditure not significantly contracting due to current higher financing costs.
However, Barkin did not take a specific stance on the September meeting. He is not a voting member of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) this year.
Hammack: Clearly Supports Rate Hikes, Focuses on Financial Stability Risks
In contrast to Barkin's cautious tone, Hammack's position is more pronounced. At the July FOMC meeting, she joined two other colleagues in dissenting, supporting a 25-basis-point hike in the federal funds rate, and her latest speech reaffirmed this stance.
On financial stability, Hammack expressed more specific concerns. She pointed out that a significant amount of leveraged funds is being used to purchase U.S. Treasury bonds, which is one of the key areas she is monitoring. Additionally, the expansion of private credit and whether there is a bubble in the AI sector are also within her purview.
Regarding the labor market, Hammack said conditions are "quite good" and that the unemployment rate is currently stable, making it the best indicator of employment health.
Mixed Economic Data Complicates Policy Divergence
The Fed's recent policy dilemma is partly due to mixed signals from economic data. July consumer price increases were moderate and largely in line with expectations. Meanwhile, despite weaker-than-expected job creation, the unemployment rate fell to 4.1%. This data set has not effectively resolved the path divergence within the FOMC.
The Fed has now held rates steady for five straight meetings, but hawkish voices are growing louder. Barkin's description of "reasons both for and against raising rates" precisely reflects the current dilemma facing policymakers: how to balance the need for further tightening against the risk of an economic downturn, with inflation not yet back to the 2% target.
Comments