SpaceX closed at USD 148.03, slipping 0.22%.
Large options activity leaned clearly bearish, with two standout institutional-sized trades dominating the tape. A $6.81 million deep in-the-money put buy and a $5.15 million synthetic put both signaled strong conviction for further downside. The combined flow suggests that larger players were focused on defensive positioning and soft price expectations, rather than upside participation, even as the broader market showed mixed smaller trades.
>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!
Options Indicators
SpaceX currently has an implied volatility of 52.04%, while its IV percentile stands at 67.30%, indicating that volatility is in a broadly neutral range and option pricing is neither especially cheap nor excessively expensive, though it is leaning toward the upper end of that range. With an IV/HV ratio of 1.18, implied volatility is running above historical volatility, suggesting the options market is assigning a modest premium to future movement expectations. The Call/Put volume ratio is 1.28.
Large Trades
A synthetic put position with a net credit of $5.15 million was the largest displayed trade, built by selling the 170.0 call and buying the 120.0 put for the same 2027-09-17 expiration. With the call leg out of the money and the put leg also out of the money versus the $148.03 reference price, this structure expresses a clearly bearish directional view while collecting premium upfront. The strategic message is that the trader is positioning for downside exposure similar to a short stock stance, while using the options structure to define the payoff profile and monetize a weak outlook over a long-dated horizon.
A put buy worth $6.81 million was the other standout trade, consisting of the purchase of 1,300 contracts of the 200.0 put expiring 2026-10-16. Because the strike sits above the current reference price of $148.03, this put was in the money at execution, making it a strongly defensive-to-bearish position with substantial intrinsic value already embedded. The trade points to a participant willing to pay meaningful premium for downside protection or for a direct bearish bet on further weakness, and the deep in-the-money profile suggests conviction rather than a low-cost tail hedge.
Overall, the large-trade flow leans clearly bearish. The two most important displayed trades were both downside-oriented and carried meaningful size, with one using a synthetic put to express a sustained negative view and the other using an in-the-money long put to secure direct downside exposure. Although the broader tape did include several sold puts that imply willingness to buy on weakness or collect premium, the dominant character of the biggest institutional-sized activity was defensive and negative, indicating that larger players were more focused on downside risk and soft price expectations than on upside participation.
Strategy Reference
For traders preferring limited margin exposure, a bear put spread such as buying the 140.0 put and selling the 110.0 put in the nearest monthly expiration could express a directional view while capping defined risk; sellers seeking low assignment probability may consider out-of-the-money puts below the 120.0 strike, though the heavy bearish flow warrants tighter risk control.
Comments