A new analysis from research firm SemiAnalysis identifies Anthropic's AI programming tool, Claude Code, as a pivotal turning point for AI "agents." The tool already accounts for 4% of public code commits on GitHub, with projections suggesting this share will exceed 20% by the end of 2026.
The report emphasizes that Claude Code is not only transforming programming but also signaling that AI agents are poised to reshape the global information work market, valued at approximately $15 trillion. Anthropic is experiencing rapid revenue growth driven by this technology, with its quarterly Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) increments now surpassing those of OpenAI. This shift indicates a structural change in the competitive landscape of the AI agent sector.
This trend has triggered a significant response across the industry. Accenture has signed an agreement to train 30,000 professionals in the financial, healthcare, and public sectors to use Claude, marking the largest enterprise-level deployment to date. Concurrently, traditional software and SaaS business models are facing fundamental challenges.
The analysis indicates that numerous sectors will be impacted. With the rise of Claude Code (and the related tool Cowork), the total addressable market for AI agents is significantly larger than that of Large Language Models alone. Applications are expanding from current verticals like customer support and software development into high-value professional services such as financial services, legal compliance, and strategic consulting. This evolution is central to the research firm's ongoing focus: the commercialization path of AI agents is restructuring the value distribution logic of the entire digital economy.
For tech giants, strategic balancing has become more complex. While Microsoft provides computational support via Azure to leading AI firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, it must also defend its core products, such as Office 365, against disruption from AI agent tools. Reports indicate that CEO Satya Nadella is personally involved in adjusting AI product strategy, underscoring the profound impact of this domain on the company's future.
As AI agent tools like Claude Code continue to gain traction, the intelligent transformation of processes—from development workflows to overall business operations—is accelerating comprehensively.
**Claude Code and the Future of Agents**
AI agents are emerging as the primary mode of interaction between humans and artificial intelligence. The advent of Claude Code demonstrates not only how humans can guide AI but also the potential for agents to reciprocally shape workflows.
SemiAnalysis posits that the industry is at a new critical juncture in AI evolution, following the "ChatGPT moment" of 2023. Previous milestones have progressively validated AI's boundaries: GPT-3 established the effectiveness of scale, ChatGPT demonstrated end-market demand, and DeepSeek showed a path to efficient, smaller-scale implementation.
Building on these linear breakthroughs, Claude Code represents a more fundamental paradigm shift. It goes beyond merely improving generation quality; through an agentic architecture, it organizes model capabilities into a digital workforce capable of executing complex tasks with sustained interactive ability. This marks a transition for AI from providing "responses" to systematically delivering "outcomes."
**What is Claude Code?**
Claude Code is a terminal-native AI agent whose design logic surpasses traditional IDE enhancement tools or chat assistant models. As a command-line tool, it achieves a paradigm shift from "code generator" to "system-level operational agent" by directly reading codebases, autonomously planning multi-step tasks, and executing them.
More accurately, Claude Code can be considered a "Claude computer." With user authorization, it can fully perceive the local environment, formulate dynamic plans, and achieve complex goals through iterative execution. Users simply describe a task in natural language, and the system autonomously completes the entire process from context understanding and step decomposition to output verification.
**Redefining Software Development: From Writing Code to Ambient Programming**
Claude Code is redefining the core of a programmer's role, shifting it from code writer to task planner. Its fundamental breakthrough lies in engineering feasibility; via a command-line interface, it can directly understand developer intent, break down complex goals, and autonomously complete the full cycle from environmental perception to execution verification.
The power of Claude Code lies in its practical effectiveness. Many prominent programmers have embraced a new wave of ambient programming, recognizing that programming is essentially becoming a solved problem, better handled by agents than by humans.
Its influence is deep within the top echelons of the tech community. Andrej Karpathy, a former OpenAI scientist who coined the term "ambient programming" a year ago, admits that prolonged use of AI coding has gradually degraded his manual programming skills. Malte Ubl, CTO of Vercel, says his core work has shifted to "correcting AI mistakes." Node.js founder Ryan Dahl has stated that "the era of humans writing code by hand is over." Tool creator Boris Cherny revealed that nearly 100% of his team's code is now completed using Claude Code combined with the Opus 4.5 model, and even Linux founder Linus Torvalds is an active user of such tools.
**Beyond Programming: The Comprehensive Automation of Information Work**
The analysis suggests that the global market for information work, comprising about one billion workers and valued at $15 trillion, is undergoing systemic reshaping due to tools like Claude Code, and this is just the beginning.
The value of Claude Code is extending into non-programming domains. According to SemiAnalysis's own practices, the tool has been systematically applied to scenarios involving the review of hundreds of documents, analysis of thousands of line items in bills of materials, and the construction of real-time predictive models. From regulatory compliance to technical documentation processing, a structural transformation in human-computer interaction paradigms is underway.
Claude Code has validated a widely replicable agent work paradigm: reading unstructured information, applying professional knowledge, generating structured output, and autonomously verifying results. This "perceive-think-output-validate" process aligns closely with the core components of most knowledge work.
Notably, the recent launch of the universal tool "Cowork" further enhances this generalization capability. Developed by just four engineers in ten days, Cowork can automate a series of office tasks, from sorting receipts and categorizing files to drafting reports. This case illustrates that AI agents are evolving from coding-specific tools into programmable, general-purpose work engines.
Currently, task duration remains a key bottleneck for broader adoption. Industry data suggests the doubling period for autonomous task duration has shortened to approximately four months. Each breakthrough in duration—from minutes for code generation to hours for module refactoring, and even days for automating audit processes—unlocks new, scalable application scenarios.
**Plummeting Intelligent Costs Reshape Business Models**
Software engineering, as a benchmark sector for information work, is experiencing a structural flip in productivity relationships. As AI code generation quality crosses a critical threshold, programmers are evolving from direct writers into managers who define objectives and oversee black-box tools. This shift is underpinned not only by technological capability but also by a fundamental change in economic models.
The monthly fee for advanced AI tools like Claude Pro is currently around $20. Compared to the fully-loaded daily cost of a US knowledge worker ($350-$500), the cost advantage is stark. Even if an AI agent completes only a fraction of daily tasks, an approximate daily cost of $6-$7 can yield a 10x to 30x return on investment, creating a powerful economic incentive for large-scale deployment.
Although a Stack Overflow 2025 survey indicated that 84% of programmers use AI tools, only 31% employ programming agents, suggesting that technological penetration remains in its early stages with significant growth potential ahead.
The sharp decline in the cost of intelligence is systematically reshaping the profit structures of the information industry. The enterprise software sector is particularly vulnerable. The moats built by traditional SaaS vendors—based on data migration costs, workflow lock-in, and integration complexity—are being gradually eroded by AI agents. These agents can migrate data across systems, operate independently of human-friendly workflows, and reduce integration difficulty through standardized protocols. In this context, the SaaS industry's high gross margins, often around 75%, may ironically serve as a clear signal attracting AI-driven replacement.
**Enterprises Are Taking Action**
The analysis indicates that the massive cost reduction enabled by agents is already prompting action from enterprises. Accenture's plan to train 30,000 professionals to deploy Claude Code signifies that the automation of information work in critical sectors like financial services and life sciences is entering a phase of规模化 deployment. This trend is further corroborated by OpenAI's concurrent launch of its Frontier enterprise plan.
Enterprise software is the primary target of this wave of change. The defensive moats of traditional SaaS models are being dismantled by agent technology, which enables cheaper cross-system data migration, workflow independence from human-centric interfaces, and lower integration barriers via protocols like MCP. When an agent can autonomously complete an entire workflow—from database querying and chart generation to report distribution—the high gross margins of traditional software become a point of vulnerability.
From business intelligence analysis to back-office reconciliation, and from data entry to basic IT operations, any repeatable workflow involving information collection, format conversion, and distribution falls within the scope of AI automation. This interaction paradigm, oriented around natural language interfaces and task completion, threatens not only specific software vendors but also the entire software ecosystem built on traditional human-computer interaction models, exemplified by companies like Microsoft. The efficiency revolution is escalating from technical optimization to a fundamental restructuring of industry value.
**Microsoft's Strategic Dilemma**
The fundamental change in cost structures is undermining software business models centered on per-user licensing. Based on SemiAnalysis's own large-scale deployment of Claude Code, Microsoft's Office 365 suite is among the most significantly affected.
Microsoft faces a strategic dilemma. The rapid growth of its Azure cloud platform must meet market expectations, while investing in its Copilot series is a necessary defense to protect Office 365, a core profit driver. These two objectives are in inherent conflict; a breakthrough in one area may come at the expense of the other. As the primary cloud provider for leading AI firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, Microsoft is effectively renting out the computational power that fuels disruptive technologies capable of eroding the moat around its core productivity software.
Recent earnings calls vividly illustrate the tension in this strategic balancing act. Microsoft acknowledged that if all new GPU resources acquired in the first two fiscal quarters had been allocated to Azure, its key growth metrics would have exceeded 40%. However, the company ultimately prioritized ensuring capacity and growth for its first-party AI products, specifically M365 Copilot and GitHub Copilot.
Interestingly, a "Claude for Excel" tool developed externally within the Microsoft ecosystem now exhibits functionality that Microsoft's own Copilot for Excel was expected to deliver. This highlights a deep-seated矛盾: the company's current cash flow heavily depends on Office, while its long-term valuation relies more on Azure's growth prospects. To accelerate the latter, Microsoft may have to tacitly allow external innovation to continue chipping away at its traditional defenses.
Despite GitHub Copilot and Office Copilot enjoying nearly a year's head start, their pace of product evolution has not created a significant barrier. In this context, CEO Satya Nadella's rare move to personally and deeply involve himself in AI product management, temporarily stepping back from daily CEO duties, clearly signals that the competitive dynamics of AI products are critical to Microsoft's future trajectory.
**Anthropic's Growth Momentum**
Based on detailed economic modeling of Anthropic, SemiAnalysis quantified its expansion's contribution to revenue for cloud providers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure, as well as its pull on capital expenditure in the Trainium, TPU, and GPU supply chains. The analysis suggests Anthropic will deploy computational power on a scale comparable to OpenAI over the next three years, with its growth directly constrained by the availability of computing resources.
Anthropic's quarterly ARR increments have now surpassed those of OpenAI, marking a critical milestone in its commercialization journey. This trend indicates that in the next phase of the AI race, a strong coupling has formed between computational scale and revenue conversion.
The success of Claude Code essentially reflects the engineering capability of the Opus 4.5 model in handling complex tasks. The industry's previous over-reliance on traditional linear benchmarks is becoming less relevant. In long-horizon, multi-step agent tasks, the quality of a single response is not the decisive factor. The competitive focus has shifted from "generating the best answer" to "achieving a deliverable outcome."
Future core metrics for evaluating model efficacy will increasingly revolve around task completion rates, system stability, and the boundaries of automation. Value will be measured by end-to-end output achieved through tool use, memory management, sub-agent coordination, and verification loops, rather than the quality of isolated data packets. The AI competition is moving from the laboratory track of benchmark tests to the efficiency battlefield of real-world workflows.
Comments